Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

- Acute toxicity:
Oral: LD50: >2000 mg/kg in the rat
Dermal: LD50: > 2000 mg/kg in the rat

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Acute toxicity: via oral route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: oral
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2011
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.1 tris (Acute Oral Toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1100 (Acute Oral Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Harlan Netherlands BV
- Age at study initiation: 7 - 8 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 157 - 198 g
- Housing: Group hosed in polycarbonate cages 59x38.5x20 cm
- N° of animal/cage: Up to 5/cage during acclimatisation; 3/cage during study period
- Diet: 4 RF 18 (Mucedola Srl)
- Diet supply: ad libitum except for an overnight fast prior to dosing and 4 hours following dosing.
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°c +/- 2°c
- Humidity (%): 55% +/- 15%
- Air changes: 15 to 25 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod: Artificial (fluorescent tubes) , daily light/dark cycle of 12/12 hours


IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2011-10-26 To: 2011-11-18
Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
CMC (carboxymethyl cellulose)
Remarks:
0.5% aqueous
Details on oral exposure:
VEHICLE
- Concentration in vehicle: 200 mg/mL
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage): 10 mL/kg bodyweight
- Justification for choice of vehicle: Substance soluble/miscible in selected vehicle
MAXIMUM DOSE VOLUME APPLIED: 10 mL/kg body weight

DOSAGE PREPARATION (if unusual): Admixture w/v

CLASS METHOD (if applicable)
- Rationale for the selection of the starting dose: Expected lack of toxicity based on information from structurally analogous substances
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
6
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Examination of clinical signs 0.5, 2 and 4 hours after treatment and daily observations thereafter; bodyweights were determined before treatment and weekly thereafter
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: no
Statistics:
no statistics performed
Sex:
female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Mortality:
0/6 animals
Clinical signs:
other: Soft faces noted in 3 animals following dosing. Recovery within 48 hours of dosing.
Gross pathology:
No abnormal findings
Other findings:
none
Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Acute oral toxicity of the substance has been investigated according to OECD/EU test guidelines. The LD50 was determined to be in excess of 2000 mg/kg body weight.
Executive summary:

Acute oral toxicity of the substance has been investigated according to OECD/EU test guidelines. The LD50 was determined to be in excess of 2000 mg/kg body weight.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Acute toxicity: via inhalation route

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Acute toxicity: via dermal route

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2012
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.3 (Acute Toxicity (Dermal))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1200 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
yes
Species:
rat
Strain:
Sprague-Dawley
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source Charles River Italia S.p.A.
- Age at study initiation: 8 - 10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 208 - 306 g
- Housing: Polysulphone solid bottomed cages measuring 42 .5 x 26.6 x 18 cm
- N° of animal/cage: Group caged (during acclimatisation period); Individually caged (study)
- Diet: 4 RF 18 (Mucedola Srl), available ad libitum
- Water :ad libitum
- Acclimation period:at least 5 days

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°c +/- 2°c
- Humidity (%):55% +/- 15%
- Air changes: 15 to 25 air changes per hour
- Photoperiod: Artificial (fluorescent tubes) , daily light/dark cycle of 12/12 hours

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 2012-09-10 To: 2012-09-25
Type of coverage:
semiocclusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: approximately 10% of body surface
- Type of wrap if used: synthetic film

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing : After exposure , the adhesive bandage and gauze patch were removed. The treatment area was cleaned by gentle swabbing of the skin with cotton wool soaked with lukewarm water.
- Time after start of exposure:24 hours

TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied : Aliquots were weighed accordingly to the body weight of each animal measured prior dosing
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes
- Frequency of treatment: once only , on the day of dosing
- Treatment area preparation: on the day before dosing

Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
2000 mg/kg bw
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 male and 5 female rats
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Observations - 1,2 and 4 hours after first dosing and daily thereafter for 14 days. Weighing - Days -1, 1, 8 and 15
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
> 2 000 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Mortality:
None during 14 day post-exposure observation period
Clinical signs:
other: No signs of systemic toxicity observed. Signs of local irritation at treatment site.
Gross pathology:
No abnormal changes considered to be of significance
Other findings:
None

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The acute toxicity of the substance was investigated following dermal administration of a single dose to the rat at 2000 mg/kg. No mortality occurred following dosing and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed. The lack of mortality demonstrates the LD50 to be greater than 2000 mg/kg.
Executive summary:

The acute toxicity of the substance has been investigated following dermal administration of a single dose to the rat at 2000 mg/kg utilising OECD/EU test methods. No mortality occurred following dosing and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed. The lack of mortality demonstrates the LD50 to be greater than 2000 mg/kg.

 

         

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed
Dose descriptor:
discriminating dose
Value:
2 000 mg/kg bw

Additional information

Data are available from studies investigating effects following exposure via the oral and dermal routes of administration. No significant toxicities were apparent at limit doses of 2000 mg/kg body weight.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Classification with regard to acute oral and dermal toxicity is not justified based on the observed lack of mortality at a dose level of 2000 mg/kg.