Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: 1189173-49-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From December 20, 1993 to February 4, 1994
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Ames test (5 Salmonella strains), GLP. Substance identification: information available from supplier for commercial name Substance analytical certificate available
- Justification for type of information:
- A discussion and report on the read across strategy is given as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across: supporting information
Reference
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From December 20, 1993 to February 4, 1994
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Ames test (5 Salmonella strains), GLP. Substance identification: information available from supplier for commercial name Substance analytical certificate available
- Justification for type of information:
- A discussion and report on the read across strategy is given as an attachment in IUCLID Section 13.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS: no
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The substance was freely soluble in the vehicle Pluronic F68 . A preliminary toxicity assay was conducted in S. typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 at concentrations between 2 and 200 µL/plate in 10% Pluronic F68 solution (1/1) (v/v). A slight cytotoxicity (62.4% to 102.2% of the control survival) at the highest test substance was observed in all strains. Considering the slight toxicity this concentration (200 µL/plate) was used in the main test both in the absence and the presence of S9 activation system.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:no - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results:
negative with and without metabolic activation
Under the test conditions, HDF 200 did not demonstrate any in vitro mutagenic activity in the Salmonella test system. - Executive summary:
This data is being read across from the source study that tested Hydrocarbons, C14-C18, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, <2% aromatics based on analogue read across.
The mutagenic potential of HDF 200 was assessed in the Salmonella typhimurium microsomal assay according to the Ames test, and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice. The histidine-requiring S. typhimurium mutants TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 102, TA 98 and TA 100 were used in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation system from the liver fraction of Aroclor 1254-induced rats (S9-mix). Each strain was exposed to 5 dose levels according to the direct incorporating plate method. After 48 hours of incubation at 37°C, the revertant colonies were scored. A preliminary toxicity assay was performed according to the direct incorporating method to define the 5 dose levels to be used in the main test. The evaluation of toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies. The test substance was tested in the main experiment according to two tests independently performed in the same way as the range-finding test. The test substance was diluted in 10% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution. Dose levels used in the main assay were 0 (solvent), 2, 6, 20, 60 and 200 µL/plate in the main test, with and without S9-mix. All determinations were made in triplicate (3 automatic scoring measurements / plate). Simultaneous negative (solvent, triplicate) and positive controls (triplicate) were used in all experiments. No toxicity was observed in any of the strains in the absence and in the presence of S-9 mix up to the highest dose tested in the main test (62.4% to 102.2% survival). No increase in revertant mean number was observed in any S. typhimurium strain with and without S9-mix in the preliminary test and in the first main test. However, positive results were observed in the second main test conducted with 60-minute S9 pre-incubation before plate incorporation.
Positive controls gave the expected increases in the number of revertants, with and without S-9 mix. Both statistically significant results and biologically significant results (two-fold increase by comparison with solvent) were observed at the highest test substance dose in S. typhimurium TA 98 but without a dose-effect relationship. Reduced but statistically significant positive results were also observed in S. typhimurium TA 100 with a dose-effect relationship. However, no biological significance was observed at any dose. A third test was performed in S. typhimurium TA 98 and TA 100 under the same conditions as the second main test. In this case the positive results obtained in the previous main test were not observed in either S. typhimurium TA 98 or TA 100. In the absence of reproducible results, the test substance was not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium according to the decision criteria of Brusick (1980).
Under the conditions of this study, HDF 200 did not demonstrate any in vitro mutagenic activity in this bacterial test system.
Table 7.6.1/5: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the absence of metabolic activation (First test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
28 |
6.8 |
4 |
2.6 |
17 |
4.1 |
113 |
7.1 |
265 |
35 |
2** |
21 |
4 |
5 |
0.6 |
13 |
3.2 |
119 |
10.3 |
263 |
46.8 |
6** |
29 |
5.5 |
5 |
1.7 |
16 |
1.7 |
99 |
4.7 |
259 |
27 |
20** |
24 |
5.5 |
4 |
1.7 |
16 |
5.1 |
110 |
6.9 |
251 |
45.4 |
60** |
29 |
9.1 |
3 |
1.5 |
16 |
8.4 |
105 |
12.5 |
253 |
32.5 |
200** |
31 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
16 |
3.5 |
116 |
9.3 |
205 |
16.5 |
Positive control*** |
461 |
37.2 |
543 |
159 |
340 |
19.7 |
701 |
88.9 |
1360 |
206.1 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Table 7.6.1/6: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the presence of metabolic activation (First test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
12 |
3.2 |
6 |
1.9 |
26 |
5 |
114 |
6 |
347 |
19.9 |
2** |
11 |
2.5 |
7 |
2.9 |
21 |
3 |
127 |
5.7 |
355 |
35.1 |
6** |
8 |
1.2 |
5 |
1.2 |
28 |
3.6 |
136 |
11.7 |
332 |
47.3 |
20** |
12 |
3 |
5 |
2.3 |
24 |
5.6 |
141 |
1.5 |
331 |
4.6 |
60** |
12 |
3.6 |
4 |
1 |
24 |
5.6 |
124 |
5.2 |
375 |
99.7 |
200** |
9 |
0.6 |
7 |
3.2 |
29 |
5.6 |
137 |
8 |
375 |
19.2 |
Positive control*** |
892 |
104.6 |
94 |
10.5 |
1324 |
117.2 |
2653 |
361.7 |
1380 |
87 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Red results: p 0.01
Table 7.6.1/7: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the absence of metabolic activation (Second test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
24 |
3.7 |
4 |
2.5 |
15 |
3.6 |
106 |
11.4 |
235 |
15.9 |
2** |
28 |
5.3 |
4 |
2.9 |
15 |
4 |
113 |
10.6 |
273 |
33.1 |
6** |
25 |
12.1 |
7 |
2.3 |
15 |
3 |
108 |
13.1 |
240 |
54.1 |
20** |
25 |
4.7 |
4 |
1.2 |
15 |
6.4 |
108 |
11.7 |
225 |
28.3 |
60** |
19 |
6 |
7 |
2.1 |
18 |
1.7 |
92 |
5 |
243 |
32.5 |
200** |
21 |
4 |
5 |
1.2 |
18 |
4.6 |
105 |
3.2 |
225 |
31.9 |
Positive control*** |
825 |
67.1 |
133 |
21.4 |
318 |
29.4 |
1151 |
235.3 |
1213 |
41.6 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Table 7.6.1/8: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the presence of metabolic activation with pre-incubation (Second test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
9 |
5.1 |
4 |
1.7 |
18 |
6.3 |
138 |
12.6 |
395 |
45.1 |
2** |
9 |
0.6 |
7 |
4.2 |
26 |
3.6 |
170 |
23 |
403 |
47.7 |
6** |
10 |
2.6 |
7 |
0.6 |
29 |
10.7 |
183 |
19.2 |
373 |
25.7 |
20** |
10 |
1.7 |
7 |
1.5 |
34 |
2.5 |
195 |
7 |
379 |
12.2 |
60** |
9 |
1.7 |
7 |
0 |
33 |
11.6 |
213 |
9.3 |
384 |
41.8 |
200** |
11 |
1 |
7 |
0.6 |
37 |
3.5 |
232 |
12.2 |
385 |
47.4 |
Positive control*** |
127 |
18.6 |
91 |
6 |
1457 |
193.5 |
1093 |
142.3 |
953 |
97.9 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Red results: p 0.01
Table 7.6.1/9: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the presence of metabolic activation with pre-incubation (Third test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
19 |
5.2 |
107 |
14.6 |
2** |
26 |
2.6 |
100 |
8.5 |
6** |
25 |
10.3 |
118 |
7.6 |
20** |
31 |
0 |
153 |
5.7 |
60** |
32 |
5.5 |
124 |
14.4 |
200** |
30 |
1.5 |
135 |
17.6 |
Positive control*** |
1457 |
193.5 |
1305 |
51.4 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Red results: p 0.01
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 1 994
- Report date:
- 1994
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- Ames test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Guideline principles
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Hydrocarbons, C14-C18, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, <2% aromatics
- EC Number:
- 927-632-8
- Molecular formula:
- Combination of mainly CnH2n+2 and CnH2n structures, comprised mainly within a carbon number range from C14 to C18.
- IUPAC Name:
- Hydrocarbons, C14-C18, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, <2% aromatics
- Reference substance name:
- HDF 200
- IUPAC Name:
- HDF 200
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): HDF 200
- Substance type: insoluble oil, petroleum product, UVCB
- Physical state: clear liquid
- Analytical purity: 100% Commercial product
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: Hydrocarbons, C14-C18, n-alkanes, isoalkanes, cyclics, <2% aromatics
- Lot/batch No.: 7/9/93
- Stability under test conditions: expected to be stable during the study
- Storage condition of test material: dry storage at 4°C in the absence of light
Constituent 1
Constituent 2
Method
- Target gene:
- Reverse gene mutation assay
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- other: Stock of S. typhimurium tester strains were obtained from B. N. Ames (University of California Berkeley, USA). Master stocks are held in liquid nitrogen and were aliquots of nutrient broth cultures then stored at -80°C. See below Table 7.6.1/1.
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- The S9 mix was prepared in laboratory from liver of a Sprague-Dawley male rat (IFFA CREDO, France) induced by Aroclor 1254 and stored at -80 °C as aliquots. See below Table 7.6.1/2
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- HDF 200 was tested as an emulsion in 10% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution (1/1)( v/v) in preliminary test and both main tests.
Doses: 0 (5% Pluronic F68 solution as solvent), 2, 6, 20, 60, 200 µL/plate in Pluronic F68 aqueous solution for all S. typhimurium strains (see below Table 7.6.1/3) - Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: 10% Pluronic aqueous solution
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: the test substance (oil) was insoluble in water and other vehicles (DMSO, acetone)
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Sterile test: plates without the addition of bacteria are prepared in order to assess the sterility of HDF 200, the S9 mix and the medium.
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Aqueous Pluronic F68 solution at 5%
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: See below Table 7.6.1/4
- Remarks:
- 6 plates for negative control (solvent). 3 plates for positive controls. 3 plates for controls of sterility (S9, solvent, medium).
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
After range-finding test, two independent experiments were conducted in the main test by agar plate incorporation with and without S9 mix. The different controls (negative and positive controls, controls for sterility) were tested in the same conditions.
DURATION
- Preincubation period: yes- S9 activation system preincubation at 37°C for 60 min before agar plate incorporation (when negative results in the main first test in the presence of S9 activation)
- Exposure duration: 48h at 37°C
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): histidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: three scoring (3 measurements/plate). The mean number and standard deviation of revertants are calculated for all groups. The means for all treatment groups are compared with those obtained for the solvent control groups.
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: a preliminary toxicity assay was conducted in S. typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 at concentrations between 2 and 200 µL/plate (test substance dilutions in Pluronic F68 solution at 10% (1/1)( v/v)).
OTHER: scoring (3 measurements/plate). The mean number and standard deviation of revertants are calculated for all groups. The means for all treatment groups are compared with those obtained for the solvent control groups: the ratio between test substance revertants and solvent negative control revertants was performed at each dose-concentration - Evaluation criteria:
- CRITERIA OF DECISION:
-Biological significance:
a reproducible 2-fold increase in the number of revertants (3 times in the case of TA 1535 and TA 1537 strains) compared with the vehicle controls, in any strain at any dose-level with some evidence of a dose-relationship (3 dose-concentrations) will be considered as a positive result. Reference to historical data may be taken into account in the evaluation of the data obtained.
-Statistical significance:
the test data were subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any increase in revertants according to the Dunnett method.
-Reproductibility:
Positive results should be observed in two independently tests. Positive results observed in one test without reproducibility in two tests independently conducted should not be considered as significant (Brusick ,1980). Complementary test could be performed.
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA:- The mean of the solvent control revertants for each strain should lie within or close to the 99% confidence limits of the current historical control range of the laboratory unless otherwise justified by the study director. The positive control compounds must induce an increase in mean revertants of at least twice (3 times in the case of strains TA 1535 and 1537) the concurrent solvent controls.The test substance must be sterile at the highest concentration after agar plate incubation 48h at 37°C. - Statistics:
- The test data were subjected to analysis to determine the statistical significance of any increase in revertants according to the Dunnett method.
Results and discussion
Test resultsopen allclose all
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not examined
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS: no
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: The substance was freely soluble in the vehicle Pluronic F68 . A preliminary toxicity assay was conducted in S. typhimurium TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535 and TA 1537 at concentrations between 2 and 200 µL/plate in 10% Pluronic F68 solution (1/1) (v/v). A slight cytotoxicity (62.4% to 102.2% of the control survival) at the highest test substance was observed in all strains. Considering the slight toxicity this concentration (200 µL/plate) was used in the main test both in the absence and the presence of S9 activation system.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: yes
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY:no - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 7.6.1/5: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the absence of metabolic activation (First test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
28 |
6.8 |
4 |
2.6 |
17 |
4.1 |
113 |
7.1 |
265 |
35 |
2** |
21 |
4 |
5 |
0.6 |
13 |
3.2 |
119 |
10.3 |
263 |
46.8 |
6** |
29 |
5.5 |
5 |
1.7 |
16 |
1.7 |
99 |
4.7 |
259 |
27 |
20** |
24 |
5.5 |
4 |
1.7 |
16 |
5.1 |
110 |
6.9 |
251 |
45.4 |
60** |
29 |
9.1 |
3 |
1.5 |
16 |
8.4 |
105 |
12.5 |
253 |
32.5 |
200** |
31 |
5 |
3 |
0 |
16 |
3.5 |
116 |
9.3 |
205 |
16.5 |
Positive control*** |
461 |
37.2 |
543 |
159 |
340 |
19.7 |
701 |
88.9 |
1360 |
206.1 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Table 7.6.1/6: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the presence of metabolic activation (First test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
12 |
3.2 |
6 |
1.9 |
26 |
5 |
114 |
6 |
347 |
19.9 |
2** |
11 |
2.5 |
7 |
2.9 |
21 |
3 |
127 |
5.7 |
355 |
35.1 |
6** |
8 |
1.2 |
5 |
1.2 |
28 |
3.6 |
136 |
11.7 |
332 |
47.3 |
20** |
12 |
3 |
5 |
2.3 |
24 |
5.6 |
141 |
1.5 |
331 |
4.6 |
60** |
12 |
3.6 |
4 |
1 |
24 |
5.6 |
124 |
5.2 |
375 |
99.7 |
200** |
9 |
0.6 |
7 |
3.2 |
29 |
5.6 |
137 |
8 |
375 |
19.2 |
Positive control*** |
892 |
104.6 |
94 |
10.5 |
1324 |
117.2 |
2653 |
361.7 |
1380 |
87 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Red results: p 0.01
Table 7.6.1/7: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the absence of metabolic activation (Second test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
24 |
3.7 |
4 |
2.5 |
15 |
3.6 |
106 |
11.4 |
235 |
15.9 |
2** |
28 |
5.3 |
4 |
2.9 |
15 |
4 |
113 |
10.6 |
273 |
33.1 |
6** |
25 |
12.1 |
7 |
2.3 |
15 |
3 |
108 |
13.1 |
240 |
54.1 |
20** |
25 |
4.7 |
4 |
1.2 |
15 |
6.4 |
108 |
11.7 |
225 |
28.3 |
60** |
19 |
6 |
7 |
2.1 |
18 |
1.7 |
92 |
5 |
243 |
32.5 |
200** |
21 |
4 |
5 |
1.2 |
18 |
4.6 |
105 |
3.2 |
225 |
31.9 |
Positive control*** |
825 |
67.1 |
133 |
21.4 |
318 |
29.4 |
1151 |
235.3 |
1213 |
41.6 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Table 7.6.1/8: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the presence of metabolic activation with pre-incubation (Second test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 1535 |
TA 1537 |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
TA 102 |
|||||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
9 |
5.1 |
4 |
1.7 |
18 |
6.3 |
138 |
12.6 |
395 |
45.1 |
2** |
9 |
0.6 |
7 |
4.2 |
26 |
3.6 |
170 |
23 |
403 |
47.7 |
6** |
10 |
2.6 |
7 |
0.6 |
29 |
10.7 |
183 |
19.2 |
373 |
25.7 |
20** |
10 |
1.7 |
7 |
1.5 |
34 |
2.5 |
195 |
7 |
379 |
12.2 |
60** |
9 |
1.7 |
7 |
0 |
33 |
11.6 |
213 |
9.3 |
384 |
41.8 |
200** |
11 |
1 |
7 |
0.6 |
37 |
3.5 |
232 |
12.2 |
385 |
47.4 |
Positive control*** |
127 |
18.6 |
91 |
6 |
1457 |
193.5 |
1093 |
142.3 |
953 |
97.9 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Red results: p 0.01
Table 7.6.1/9: Number of revertants per plate (mean of triplicates) in the presence of metabolic activation with pre-incubation (Third test)
Test substance concentration |
TA 98 |
TA 100 |
||
Mean |
Standard deviation |
Mean |
Standard deviation |
|
0* |
19 |
5.2 |
107 |
14.6 |
2** |
26 |
2.6 |
100 |
8.5 |
6** |
25 |
10.3 |
118 |
7.6 |
20** |
31 |
0 |
153 |
5.7 |
60** |
32 |
5.5 |
124 |
14.4 |
200** |
30 |
1.5 |
135 |
17.6 |
Positive control*** |
1457 |
193.5 |
1305 |
51.4 |
* Solvent control = negative control: 5% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution
** Test substance diluted in 10% Pluronic aqueous solution (1/1) (v/v)
*** Mutagens positive controls: see Table 7.6.1/4
Red results: p 0.01
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results: negative with and without metabolic activation
Under the test conditions, HDF 200 did not demonstrate any in vitro mutagenic activity in the Salmonella test system. - Executive summary:
The mutagenic potential of HDF 200 was assessed in the Salmonella typhimurium microsomal assay according to the Ames test, and in compliance with Good Laboratory Practice. The histidine-requiring S. typhimurium mutants TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 102, TA 98 and TA 100 were used in the presence and the absence of metabolic activation system from the liver fraction of Aroclor 1254-induced rats (S9-mix). Each strain was exposed to 5 dose levels according to the direct incorporating plate method. After 48 hours of incubation at 37°C, the revertant colonies were scored. A preliminary toxicity assay was performed according to the direct incorporating method to define the 5 dose levels to be used in the main test. The evaluation of toxicity was performed on the basis of the observation of the decrease in the number of revertant colonies. The test substance was tested in the main experiment according to two tests independently performed in the same way as the range-finding test. The test substance was diluted in 10% Pluronic F68 aqueous solution. Dose levels used in the main assay were 0 (solvent), 2, 6, 20, 60 and 200 µL/plate in the main test, with and without S9-mix. All determinations were made in triplicate (3 automatic scoring measurements / plate). Simultaneous negative (solvent, triplicate) and positive controls (triplicate) were used in all experiments. No toxicity was observed in any of the strains in the absence and in the presence of S-9 mix up to the highest dose tested in the main test (62.4% to 102.2% survival). No increase in revertant mean number was observed in any S. typhimurium strain with and without S9-mix in the preliminary test and in the first main test. However, positive results were observed in the second main test conducted with 60-minute S9 pre-incubation before plate incorporation.
Positive controls gave the expected increases in the number of revertants, with and without S-9 mix. Both statistically significant results and biologically significant results (two-fold increase by comparison with solvent) were observed at the highest test substance dose in S. typhimurium TA 98 but without a dose-effect relationship. Reduced but statistically significant positive results were also observed in S. typhimurium TA 100 with a dose-effect relationship. However, no biological significance was observed at any dose. A third test was performed in S. typhimurium TA 98 and TA 100 under the same conditions as the second main test. In this case the positive results obtained in the previous main test were not observed in either S. typhimurium TA 98 or TA 100. In the absence of reproducible results, the test substance was not considered as mutagenic in S. typhimurium according to the decision criteria of Brusick (1980).
Under the conditions of this study, HDF 200 did not demonstrate any in vitro mutagenic activity in this bacterial test system.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.