Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
September/October 1992
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1992
Report date:
1992

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 406 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.6 (Skin Sensitisation)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of study:
guinea pig maximisation test

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
5-(benzoylamino)-4-hydroxy-3-[[1-sulpho-6-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]-2-naphthyl]azo]naphthalene-2,7-disulphonic acid, sodium salt
EC Number:
287-842-4
EC Name:
5-(benzoylamino)-4-hydroxy-3-[[1-sulpho-6-[[2-(sulphooxy)ethyl]sulphonyl]-2-naphthyl]azo]naphthalene-2,7-disulphonic acid, sodium salt
Cas Number:
85586-40-9
Molecular formula:
C29H19N3Na4O17S5 C29H23N3O17S5.xNa
IUPAC Name:
5-(Benzoylamino)-4-hydroxy-3-((1-sulpho-6-((2-(sulphooxy)ethyl)sulphonyl)-2-naphthyl)azo)naphthalene-2,7-disulphonic acid, sodium salt
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Remarks:
migrated information: powder
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Remazol-Brillantrot F3B

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Pirbright-Hartley
Sex:
female
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Hoechst AG
- Weight at study initiation: mean 295 g; range: 265 g to 337 g; n = 15
- Housing: group-housing (5/cage)
- Diet: Altromin 3112 for guinea pigs and rabbits ad libitum
- Water: tap water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at 1east 5 days


ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19 to 25°C
- Humidity (%): 35 to 75%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12


IN-LIFE DATES: From: September 22 to October 23, 1992

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
intradermal and epicutaneous
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal: 5%
dermal induction: 25%
dermal challenge: 2.5%
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
physiological saline
Concentration / amount:
Intradermal: 5%
dermal induction: 25%
dermal challenge: 2.5%
No. of animals per dose:
Determination of primary not irritating concentration: 6
Determination of intradermal tolerability: 3
Sentinel group: 5
Control group: 5
Treatment group: 10
Details on study design:
RANGE FINDING TESTS:

Determination of the primary non-irritant concentration:
In a dermal-occlusive test for primary skin irritation, each of the following test concentrations was applied to the left flank of two guinea pigs:
25.0 %Remazol-Brillantrot F3B in isotonic saline
5.0 %Remazol-Brillantrot F3B in isotonic saline
1.0 % Remazol-Brillantrot F3B in isotonic saline
The hair on the left flanks of the animals was removed mechanically. 0.5 mL of the test substance preparation was applied to a 2 x 2 cm cellulose patch, which was then fixed to the left flank and covered occlusively for 24 hours with a bandage and film. 24 hours after removal of the patches, the treated skin areas were examined for erythema and oedema

Determination of the tolerance of intradermal injections:
To determine the tolerance of intradermal injections, each of the following preparations (5.0%, 1.0%, 0.2% in isotonic saline) was administered twice by intradermal injection to 3 guinea pigs. The injection sites (sites 1, 2 and 3) were all within a dorsal area measuring 2 x 4 cm in the vicinity of the shoulder.


MAIN STUDY
A. INTRADERMAL INDUCTION
- No of Injections: 2 x 3 preparations: 50% FCA, 5% TS in 0.9% NaCl, 5% TS in 50% FCA - treatment group
50% FCA, 0.9% NaCl, 50% FCA - control and attending group
- Exposure period: Injection on Day 1, observation Day 1 to Day 7
- Site: shoulder

B. DERMAL INDUCTION EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: one
- Exposure period: 48 hours
- Test groups: 25% TS in 0.9% NaCl
- Control group: 0.9% NaCl
- Site: shoulder
- Frequency of applications: single
- Duration: Day 8 to Day 22
- Concentrations: 25%

C. CHALLENGE EXPOSURE
- No. of exposures: 1
- Day(s) of challenge: 22 (15 for attending group)
- Exposure period: 24 hours
- Test groups: 2.5% TS + 0.9% NaCl
- Control group: 2.5% TS + 0.9% NaCl
- Site: right flank: TS; left flank: 0.9% NaCl
- Concentrations: 2.5%
- Evaluation (hr after challenge): 24 and 48 hours
Challenge controls:
In addition to the control group, 5 further guinea pigs (attending group) were used to confirm that challenge exposure with 2.5% TS would not lead to dermal irritation in animals pre-treated with 50% FCA.
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
bi-annually tested

Results and discussion

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2.5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 2.5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
2.5%
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 2.5%. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Induction treatment

The treated animals showed no clinical signs of intoxication throughout the study.

The intradermal injections with Freund's Adjuvant caused severe erythema and oedema, indurat ions and encrustations (evaluaton of erythema formation was not possible at the sites treated with the test substance due to red discolourations).

The application sites treated with the test substance showed very slight oedema and encrustations, evaluation of erythema formation was not possible. Injections of the vehicle alone did not cause any sign of irritation.

Due to these strong irritation reactions of the skin, 10% sodium dodecylsulfate was not applied at day 7.

After the removal of the patch at day 10, erythema as well as oedema, indurated and encrusted skin and necrosis were observed at the sites previously treated with Freund's Adjuvant. The application sites treated with the test substance in vehicle showed very light oedema, indurations and encrustations (evaluation of erythema formation was not possible at the sites treated with the test substance

due to dark red discolourations). No signs of irritations occurred at the sites treated with the vehicle alone. The app1ication sites of the treatment group were discoloured dark red. The body weight gains of the treated animals were not impaired.

Challenge treatment

No signs of irritation were observed in the control and treatment group 24 and 48 hours after removal of the occlusive bandage. The skin surface of all animals was discoloured light red.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
The test item is not sensitizing in pirbright white guinea pigs.
Executive summary:

Testing for sensitizing properties was performed in female Guinea pigs according to the method of MAGNUSSON & KLIGMAN.

Intradermal induction was performed using 5% test substance in isotonic saline. Dermal induction was carried out with 25% test substance in isotonic saline. Challenge treatment was performed using 2.5% test substance in isotonic saline.

Based on the results of this study Reactive Red 180 showed no evidence for sensitizing properties.