Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-479-2 | CAS number: 650-51-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Field studies
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- field studies
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data on sampling and analytical method are provided. No GLP.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Residues in Crops Irrigated with Water Containing Trichloroacetic Acid
- Author:
- Demint RJ, Pringle JC, Hattrup A, Bruns VF, Frank PA
- Year:
- 1 975
- Bibliographic source:
- J. Agr. Food Chem., Vol. 23, No. 1.
- Report date:
- 1974
Materials and methods
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Ten field and vegetable and three fruit crops were irrigated with water that contained about 0.1 and 0.5 ppm of trichloroacetic acid. Grapes were treated at 0.17 and 1.39 ppm. Alfalfa, corn, garden peas, potatoes, field-bean pods and seed, snapbean herbage and watermelon were treated at 0.5 ppm. Apple fields were treated at 0.1 ppm.
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Type of measurement:
- Water samples were acidified and extracted with ether; then they were partitioned into buffer and back to ether and analyzed by electron-capture gas chromatography. Recoveries of TCA from fortified water averaged 87%.
Soil samples were slurried with water and acidified to a pH of 0.9 with hydrochloric acid. The slurries were shaken for 1 hr, and the acid extracts were then analyzed by a procedure similar to the water analysis. Recoveries of TCA from fortified control soils were 86 and 77% at the 0.1- and 0.05-ppm Ievels, respectively. All water and soil analyses were corrected for recovery.
The analytical method used for TCA in crops was based on a procedure developed for TCA in wheat grain (Chiba and Morley, 1966). The method was subsequently modified for the determination of TCA in sugar beets and various by-products of the beet-sugar industry (Hanzas, 1971). - Media:
- Field and vegetable and three fruit crops.
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- TCA
- EC Number:
- 211-479-2
- EC Name:
- TCA
- Cas Number:
- 650-51-1
- Molecular formula:
- C2HCl3O2.Na
- IUPAC Name:
- trichloroacetic acid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): TCA
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Any other information on results incl. tables
Trichloroacetic acid residues were not detected in peaches, sugar beets, wheat, or tomatoes. Minute amounts of test substance (0.01-0.04 ppm) were detected in alfalfa, corn, garden peas, potatoes, and watermelon treated at 0.5 ppm. Slightly higher residues of Trichloroacetic acid, ranging from 0.13 to 0.43 ppm, were detected in field-bean pods and seed, and snapbean herbage treated at 0.5 ppm. Apples treated at 0.1 ppm contained 0.19 ppm of residue, and grapes contained 0.03 and 0.20 ppm when treated at lower and higher rates, respectively. Of the two crops that were sprinkler and furrow irrigated with Trichloroacetic acid -treated water, the only difference was in pods of furrow-irrigated field-beans, which contained maximum Trichloroacetic acid residues of 0.19 ppm, compared to pods of sprinkler-irrigated beans, which contained 0.03 ppm. At harvest, residues had disappeared from most crops, except apples, field-bean pods and seed, garden peas, and grapes, which contained 0.19, 0.19, 0.13, 0.02, and 0.20 ppm of Trichloroacetic acid, respectively.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Trace concentrations (0.01–0.20 ppm [0.01–0.20 mg/kg]) have been detected in vegetables and fruits from fields irrigated with water containing trichloroacetic acid; slightly higher levels (0.13–0.43 mg/kg) were detected in field bean pods and seeds.
- Executive summary:
Ten field and vegetable and three fruit crops were irrigated with water that contained about 0.1 and 0.5 ppm of trichloroacetic acid. Grapes were treated at 0.17 and 1.39 ppm.
Trichloroacetic acid residues were not detected in peaches, sugar beets, wheat, or tomatoes. Minute amounts of test substance (0.01-0.04 ppm) were detected in alfalfa, corn, garden peas, potatoes, and watermelon treated at 0.5 ppm. Slightly higher residues of Trichloroacetic acid, ranging from 0.13 to 0.43 ppm, were detected in field-bean pods and seed, and snapbean herbage treated at 0.5 ppm. Apples treated at 0.1 ppm contained 0.19 ppm of residue, and grapes contained 0.03 and 0.20 ppm when treated at lower and higher rates, respectively. Of the two crops that were sprinkler and furrow irrigated with Trichloroacetic acid -treated water, the only difference was in pods of furrow-irrigated field-beans, which contained maximum Trichloroacetic acid residues of 0.19 ppm, compared to pods of sprinkler-irrigated beans, which contained 0.03 ppm. At harvest, residues had disappeared from most crops, except apples, field-bean pods and seed, garden peas, and grapes, which contained 0.19, 0.19, 0.13, 0.02, and 0.20 ppm of Trichloroacetic acid, respectively.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.