Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Nanomaterial dustiness

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
nanomaterial dustiness
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
2021
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with national standard methods with acceptable restrictions

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2021
Report date:
2021

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
EN 17199-4:2019-03
Workplace exposure — Measurement of dustiness of bulk materials that contain or release respirable nano-objects or submicrometer particles — Part 4: Small rotating drum method.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
other: Small Rotating Drum
Details on methods and data evaluation:
3.4 Detection methods
3.4.1 Mass-based dustiness index
The mass-based dustiness index is determined gravimetrically. The filter in the cyclone is measured before and after the rotation of the drum. The results are given as average of the triplicate, and its standard deviation.

3.4.2 Number-based dustiness index
The number-based dustiness index is determined by the Condensatino Particle Counter (CPC). The filter in the cyclone is measured before and after the rotation of the drum. The results are given as average of the triplicate, and its standard deviation.

3.4.3 Size distribution of the aerosol
The size distribution is determined by weighing the impactor stages (MOUDI) before and after the complete set of triplicate rotations, because a single rotation of many materials does not deposit enough dust on each individual impactor stage. The results thus reflect the average of the triplicate.

3.4.4 Morphology of the aerosol
Non-mandatory, the aerosol can be collected on porous Gold filters for analysis of the identity and morphology of the airborne particles by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). This option was not performed in the present case, because the test item is a pure substance with no uncertainty on the identity of aerosols.

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Perylene-3,4:9,10-tetracarboxydiimide
EC Number:
201-344-6
EC Name:
Perylene-3,4:9,10-tetracarboxydiimide
Cas Number:
81-33-4
Molecular formula:
C24H10N2O4
IUPAC Name:
7,18-diazaheptacyclo[14.6.2.2²,⁵.0³,¹².0⁴,⁹.0¹³,²³.0²⁰,²⁴]hexacosa-1(23),2,4,9,11,13,15,20(24),21,25-decaene-6,8,17,19-tetrone
Test material form:
solid: nanoform
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Paliogen Rotviolett K5411
- Analytical purity: >98%
- Lot/batch No.: LDPH0113

Data gathering

Instruments:
Small Rotating Drum (SRD)
The powder is loaded into the drum and is evenly spread on one of the lamellae that lift the powder during rotation. One “conditioning” run coats the inner surface of the drum, and is not used for data acquisition (Schneider and Jensen 2008).
Then, the three replicate measurements are each performed with fresh powder. Particle-free air is flushed through the drum at standstill, and the aerosol concentration is monitored by the CPC until the background (here: 13 particles /mL, indicating a very airtight setup) is reached. Then, the drum is rotated for 60 seconds. This rotation event results in a peak aerosol concentration in the CPC, and deposits dust onto the filter after the cyclone, and onto the MOUDI impactor stages. When the concentration has fallen after stopping the drum, the drum is removed, powder exchanged, and the next replicate taken.
The speed of rotation is 11 rpm as given for the SRD in the revised CEN standard.

Results and discussion

Dustiness index
Key result
Mean:
18 mg/kg
St. dev.:
4 mg/kg
Remarks on result:
other: respirable dustiness mass fraction

Any other information on results incl. tables

The average respirable mass-based dustiness of 18 ± 4 mg kg-1 places the Pigment Violet 29 into the band of low dustiness.
As far as we know, no fixed bands have been established for the number-based dustiness index.
Comparing to academic data on other fillers and pigments, the average number-based dustiness index of 740 ± 60 mg-1 is neither extremely low nor extremely high.
Consistently with the average values, the size distribution of the aerosol is polydisperse with aerodynamic sizes from 0.56 to 5.6 μm, peaking around 2.1 μm.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The average respirable mass-based dustiness of 18 ± 4 mg kg-1 places the Pigment Violet 29 into the band of low dustiness.
The average number-based dustiness index was found at 740 ± 60 mg-1.
The size distribution of the aerosol is polydisperse with a distribution of aerosol aerodynamic sizes from 0.56 to 5.6 μm, peaking around 3.2 μm. The Mass-Mean Aerodynamic Diameter of this distribution is 2.1μm (MMAD).