Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 271-178-7 | CAS number: 68516-75-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test substance and structural analogues (diszazocondensation red pigments) were found to be non irritating to rabbit skin and eyes. Studies were performed according to or similar to OECD testing guidelines 404 and 405 and regarded as valid with restrictions. Effects were either absent or clearly below the threshold for classification and labelling.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the Draize-Test (1959). In contrast to OECD guideline 404 the Draize-test is done under occlusive conditions, exposure time is 24 hrs, substance is applied to intact and abrated skin, and washing of substance after application is omitted.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Draize-Test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was conducted according to the patch test technique as described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- GLP was not mandatory when the study was done
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Russian
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: no data
- Age at study initiation: no data
- Weight at study initiation: 1.5 - 2.1 kg
- Housing: housing singly in metal cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Nafag (ad libitum)
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 8 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18+/- 1
- Humidity (%): 55+/- 5%
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 10/14 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- water
- Controls:
- other: untreated skin from same rabbit was used as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 g - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hrs
- Observation period:
- 7 days
- Number of animals:
- 3 females, 3 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 2.5 x 2.5 cm
- Type of wrap: gauze patch was maintained in place by using an impermeable foil 5 x 5 cm which was fixed by an adhesive tape
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Time after start of exposure: 24 hrs
SCORING SYSTEM:
- Draize Scoring System - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no animal had erythema over the complete observation period
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no animal had edema over the complete observation period
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- no animal showed signs of irritation
- Other effects:
- Testing was done on intact and scarified skin. Only intact skin was considered for assessment of irritation.
Nevertheless the abraded skin showed no signs of irritation, too. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no animal had erythema over the complete observation period
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no animal had edema over the complete observation period
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- no animal showed signs of irritation
- Other effects:
- Testing was done on intact and scarified skin. Only intact skin was considered for assessment of irritation.
Nevertheless the abraded skin showed no signs of irritation, too. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the Draize-test (1959). In contrast to OECD guideline 405, 6 animals instead of 3 were used. For 3 animals substance was washed out after 30 seconds, whereas for the remaining animals eyes were not washed. Observation period was stopped after 72 hrs since no effects were seen.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Draize-Test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was conducted with slight modification according to the procedure set out in the "Hazardous Substances Regulations" under the U.S.A. Federal Hazardous Substances Labelling Act Sect. 191.12 (February 1965)
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- (GLP was not mandatory when the study was done)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: 9-13 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 2.6 kg (male, average), 2.0 kg (female, average)
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): commercial irradiated (Styles-Oxoid), ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 1 week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 +/- 1
- Humidity (%): 50-70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 14/10 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: right eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 40 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- for 3 animals test substance was washed out after 30 s
for 3 animals no washing out was performed - Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 h
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 (4 males, 2 females)
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
Scoring according to the Draize system ( "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Food Drugs and Cosmetics" page 51, published by the Association of Food and Drug Officials of the U.S.A.) - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no corneal opacity detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no iritis detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no conjunctival redness detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no chemosis detected after 24, 48, and 72 hrs
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A transient conjunctival reaction was seen in 2/3 unwashed and 1/3 washed eyes one hour after application. In one case the effect persisted for 6 hrs.
All eyes were normal at 24 hours. For regulatory purposes only time points of 24, 48, 72 hrs are considered, therefore test substance is defined as non-irritating. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: see 'Remark'
- Remarks:
- The study was conducted according to the Draize-test (1959). In contrast to OECD guideline 405, 6 animals instead of 3 were used. For 3 animals substance was washed out after 60 seconds, whereas for the remaining animals eyes were not washed. Observation period was 8 days.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Draize-Test
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test was conducted as described in the "Appraisal of the Safety of Chemicals in Foods, Drugs and Cosmetics" (1959) of the US Association of Food and Drug Officials (AFDO).
- GLP compliance:
- no
- Remarks:
- (GLP was not mandatory when the study was done)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Russian
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 1.6 -2.0 kg
- Housing: single housing in metal cages, overall dimensions of cage 47x32x34 cm,
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): NAFAG, ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 +/- 1
- Humidity (%): 55 +/- 5
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 10/14 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: right eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 100 mg - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- for 3 animals test substance was washed out after 60 s with physiological saline solution
for 3 animals no washing out was performed - Observation period (in vivo):
- 8 days
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 6 (3 males, 3 females)
- Details on study design:
- SCORING system:
Draize Scoring System
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE ONLY for 3 out of 6 animals
- Washing (if done): Washing with physiological saline solution
- Time after start of exposure: 1 minute
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: hand-slit lamp - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no corneal opacity detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no iritis detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no conjunctival redness detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no chemosis detected after 24, 48, and 72 hrs
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A transient conjunctival reaction was seen in all treated eyes one hour after application (redness grade 1, accompanied by discharge grade 1 in 2 cases). All eyes were normal at 6 hours. For regulatory purposes only time points of 24, 48, 72 hrs are considered, therefore test substance is defined as non-irritating.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no corneal opacity detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no iritis detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no conjunctival redness detected after 24, 48, 72 hrs
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other: no chemosis detected after 24, 48, and 72 hrs
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A transient conjunctival reaction was seen in 2/3 unwashed and 1/3 washed eyes one hour after application. In one case the effect persisted for 6 hrs.
All eyes were normal at 24 hours. For regulatory purposes only time points of 24, 48, 72 hrs are considered, therefore test substance is defined as non-irritating. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to attached read across justification document (Chapter 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- ca. 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- A transient conjunctival reaction was seen in all treated eyes one hour after application (redness grade 1, accompanied by discharge grade 1 in 2 cases). All eyes were normal at 6 hours. For regulatory purposes only time points of 24, 48, 72 hrs are considered, therefore test substance is defined as non-irritating.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
Classification, Labelling, and Packaging Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008
The available experimental test data are reliable and suitable for classification purposes under Regulation 1272/2008. As a result, the substance is not considered to be classified for skin or eye irritation under Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.