Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-851-8 | CAS number: 6786-83-0
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Acute oral toxicity:
The acute oral toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the given test chemical. The studies concluded that the LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
The acute inhalation toxicity study need not be conducted because exposure to humans via inhalation route is not likely taking into account due to the low vapour pressure of the test chemical, which is reported to be 2.01E-17 mm Hg. Thus, exposure to inhalable dust, mist and vapour of the chemical is highly unlikely. Therefore this study is considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal toxicity:
The acute dermal toxicity dose (LD50) was considered based on different studies conducted on rats for the test chemical. The studies concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Acute toxicity: via oral route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: oral
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from experimental report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 423 (Acute Oral toxicity - Acute Toxic Class Method)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The aim of this study was to assess the toxicity potential of the given test chemical after single oral administration in rats and an observation period of 14 days.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- acute toxic class method
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation:8- 10 weeks at the time of dosing.
- Health Status:Healthy young adult animals were used for the study. Females were nulliparous and non pregnant.
- Weight at study initiation:Minimum: 131 g Maximum: 160 g (Individual body weights were within ± 7% prior to treatment after overnight fasting)
- Fasting period:were fasted for 16 to 18 hours, prior to dosing .
- Housing:The animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages.
- Bedding:All cages were provided with corn cobs (Sparconn Life Sciences Bangalore) Batch No.: SPAR – 25/2014.
- Room Sanitation:The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
- Cages and water bottle:All the cages and water bottles were changed at least twice every week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):All animals were provided conventional laboratory rodent diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum. Batch No 400004..
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum via drinking bottles
- Acclimation period:Animal nos. 1-3 were acclimatized for 5 days and 4-6 for 11 days prior to administration of the test item..
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
-Temperature: Minimum: 19.80°C Maximum: 23.20°C
-Relative humidity:Minimum: 48.70 % Maximum: 69.20 %
-Light-dark-rhythm:12:12
-Air Changes: More than 12 changes per hour - Route of administration:
- oral: unspecified
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on oral exposure:
- VEHICLE
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage):10 ml - Doses:
- G1 = 2000 mg/kg bw
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6 female rats
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
AAt the end of 14 day observation period, all surviving rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 for external and internal observations.
- Other examinations performed: Clinical Observation - After test item administration, individual animals were frequently observed at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dosing on day 0 (day of dosing). Subsequently, all the six animals were observed once a day during the 14 day observation period.
Mortality - All the animals were observed twice daily (morning and evening) for morbidity and mortality, throughout the acclimatization and study period.
Body weight - All the rats were weighed on days 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14. Animals were weighed immediately after found dead.
Pathology - At the end of 14 day observation period, all surviving rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 for external and internal observations - Statistics:
- not specified
- Preliminary study:
- not specified
- Sex:
- female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed througout the experimentation period
- Clinical signs:
- other: At 2000 mg/kg, animal no. 1 and 4 were observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours and on day 1 post dosing while additionally, animal no. 1 was observed with mild lethargy on day 2 and animal no. 4 was observed with mild diarrhea at 1 and
- Gross pathology:
- No external and internal gross pathological examination were seen in all the six animals treated with 2000 mg/kg body weight during terminal sacrifice
- Other findings:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- other: Not classified
- Conclusions:
- Under the condition of the study, the acute oral LD50 value of the given test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibits acute oral toxicity in as per CLP criteria of classification
- Executive summary:
Acute oral toxicity study was performed as per OECD No. 423 by using the given test chemical in Rats. Six female Wistar rats were selected for acute oral toxicity study. The animals were fasted for minimum 16-18 hours prior to dosing and for 4 hours post dosing, with food withheld but drinking water provided ad libitum. The time intervals between dosing were determined by the onset, duration and severity of toxic signs.
Three rats of group G1 were dosed with starting dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight and the animals showed no mortality post dosing, so another three rats of the same group were dosed with 2000 mg/kg weight and no mortality was observed. Hence, further dosing was stopped.
Body weights were recorded on day 0 (prior to dosing) 7 and 14. Mean body weight of all six animals was observed with gain on day 7 and 14, as compared to day 0. At 2000 mg/kg, animal no. 1 and 4 were observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours and on day 1 post dosing while additionally, animal no. 1 was observed with mild lethargy on day 2 and animal no. 4 was observed with mild diarrhea at 1 and 2 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 2 was observed with normal clinical signs at 30 minutes, mild lethargy at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild diarrhoea at 1 and 2 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 3 was observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours, day 1, 2 and 3 and mild diarrhoea at 2 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 5 was observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild diarrhoea at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 6 was observed normal clinical signs at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild lethargy on day 1 and 2, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14.
No external and internal gross pathological examination were seen in all the six animals treated with 2000 mg/kg body weight during terminal sacrifce.
Under the condition of the study, the acute oral LD50 value of the given test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibits acute oral toxicity in as per CLP criteria of classification
Reference
Table 1: Individual Animal Body Weight (g) andBody Weight Changes(%)
Sex:Female
Animal No. |
Group/ Dose (mg/kg) |
Body Weight (gram) |
Body Weight Change (%) |
|||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0-7 |
Day 0-14 |
||
1 |
G1/ 2000 |
135 |
160 |
177 |
18.52 |
31.11 |
2 |
146 |
180 |
199 |
23.29 |
36.30 |
|
3 |
137 |
143 |
172 |
4.38 |
25.55 |
|
4 |
147 |
166 |
182 |
12.93 |
23.81 |
|
5 |
160 |
190 |
206 |
18.75 |
28.75 |
|
6 |
131 |
161 |
183 |
22.90 |
39.69 |
Key:- = Not Applicable
Table 2: Summary of Animal Body Weight (g) and Body Weight Changes (%)
Sex:Female
Group/ Dose (mg/kg) |
Rats Body Weight (g) |
Body Weight Changes (%) |
||||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
0-7 |
0-14 |
||
G1/ 2000 |
Mean |
142.67 |
166.67 |
186.50 |
16.79 |
30.87 |
SD |
10.56 |
16.49 |
13.19 |
7.15 |
6.17 |
|
n |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
Keys:SD = Standard Deviation, n = Number of Animals
Keys:- = Not applicable, 1 = Normal, 2 = Found dead, 4 = Abdominal breathing, 145 = Salivation, 155 = Sternal recumbency, 166 = Tremors, + = Mild, ++ = Moderate
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 1 and from study report.
Acute toxicity: via inhalation route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: inhalation
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Quality of whole database:
- Waiver
Acute toxicity: via dermal route
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- acute toxicity: dermal
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Justification for type of information:
- Data is from study report.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 402 (Acute Dermal Toxicity)
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The objective of the study was to assess the dermal toxicity of the given test chemical after single dose application by dermal route in rats and an observation period of 14 days.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Test type:
- standard acute method
- Limit test:
- yes
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source:In-House Bred at Sa-Ford, Animal Facility.
- Health Status:Healthy young adult animals were used for the study. Females were nulliparous and non pregnant.
- Weight (Prior to Treatment)::Male:Minimum: 242 g and Maximum: 262 g (Prior to Treatment)Female:Minimum: 221 g and Maximum: 249 g
- Housing:The animals were housed individually in polycarbonate cages.
- Bedding : All cages were provided with corn cobs.
- Room Sanitation : The experimental room floor and work tops were swept and mopped with disinfectant solution every day.
- Cages and water bottle : All the cages and water bottles were changed at least twice every week.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum):All animals were provided conventional laboratory rodent diet (Nutrivet Life Sciences, Pune) ad libitum.
- Water (e.g. ad libitum):Aqua guard filtered tap water was provided ad libitum via drinking bottles.
- Acclimation period:All animals were acclimatized to the test conditions for 5 days prior to administration of the test item.
- Randomization : Animals were selected manually. No computer generated randomization program was used
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
-Temperature:Minimum: 19.80 °C Maximum: 23.20 °C
-Relative humidity:Minimum: 50.60% Maximum: 61.10%
-Light-dark-rhythm:12:12
-Air Changes:More than 12 changes per hour - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Vehicle:
- other: distilled water
- Details on dermal exposure:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure:The test item was applied uniformly over clipped dorsal area of rat skin.
- % coverage:Approximately 10% body surface area of rat.
- Type of wrap if used:The test item was held in the contact with the skin with a porous gauze dressing and non-irritating tape.
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done):The residual test item was removed by using distilled water.
- Time after start of exposure:24-hour.
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item was applied.
- Constant volume or concentration used: yes
- For solids, paste formed: yes
VEHICLE
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit):0.2 ml distilled water - Duration of exposure:
- 24 hrs
- Doses:
- 2000 mg/kg body weight.
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10 (Five per sex)
- Control animals:
- not specified
- Details on study design:
- - Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing:Daily
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
At the end of 14 day observation period, all the surviving rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 and subjected to gross pathology examination, for external and internal observations.
- Other examinations performed:
- Clinical signs : After test item administration, individual animals were frequently observed at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours post dosing on day 0 (day of dosing). Subsequently, all animals were observed once a day during the 14 day observation period.
-Mortality - Animals were observed twice daily for any mortality during the experimental period
- Body weight: All rats were weighed on days 0 (prior to dosing), 7 and 14..
other: -Pathology
At the end of 14 day observation period, all the surviving rats were euthanised by overdose of CO2 and subjected to gross pathology examination, for external and internal observations. - Statistics:
- No statistical analysis was performed since the study was terminated with limit test.
- Preliminary study:
- not specified
- Sex:
- male/female
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Effect level:
- > 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks on result:
- other: Non toxic to animals
- Mortality:
- No mortality was observed at limit dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight of test item during the 14 day observation period.
- Clinical signs:
- other: All animals were observed with normal clinical signs throughout the experimental period.
- Gross pathology:
- The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality
- Other findings:
- not specified
- Interpretation of results:
- other: not classified
- Conclusions:
- Under the condition of the study, the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
- Executive summary:
Acute dermal toxicity study was performed as per OECD No. 402 by using the given test chemical in Wistar Rats. Five male and five female healthy young adult rats were randomly selected and used for conducting acute dermal toxicity study. Rats free from injury and irritation of skin were selected for the study. Twenty four hours prior to dermal application of test item, approximately 10% of body surface area of each rat was clipped. A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied by single dermal application and observed for 14 days after treatment. On test day 0, anamount oftestitem moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied directly on the intact skin of clipped area of rats; the porous gauze dressing was put on to the intact skin of clipped area.
All the animals were observed with normal clinical signs throughout the experimental period. No mortality was observed at limit dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight of test item during the 14 day observation period.
In males, mean body weight was observed with increase on day 7 and 14, as compared to day 0. In females, mean body weight was observed with decrease on day 7 and increase on day 14, as compared to day 0.The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality.
Under the condition of the study, the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
Reference
Table 1: Individual Animal Body Weight (g) andBody Weight Changes(%)
Dose: 2000 mg/ kg bodyweight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Body Weight (gram) |
Body Weight Change (%) |
|||
Day 0 |
Day 7 |
Day 14 |
Day 0-7 |
Day 0-14 |
||
1 |
Male |
262 |
260 |
289 |
-0.76 |
10.31 |
2 |
242 |
258 |
281 |
6.61 |
16.12 |
|
3 |
251 |
269 |
300 |
7.17 |
19.52 |
|
4 |
260 |
271 |
302 |
4.23 |
16.15 |
|
5 |
258 |
274 |
310 |
6.20 |
20.16 |
|
6 |
Female |
228 |
231 |
240 |
1.32 |
5.26 |
7 |
221 |
219 |
225 |
-0.90 |
1.81 |
|
8 |
249 |
241 |
246 |
-3.21 |
-1.20 |
|
9 |
224 |
216 |
218 |
-3.57 |
-2.68 |
|
10 |
230 |
231 |
240 |
0.43 |
4.35 |
Table 2: Individual Animal Clinical Signs and Symptoms
Dose: 2000 mg/kg body weight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Hour(s) - Day 0 |
Day |
|||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
||
1 |
Male |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
6 |
Female |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Animal No. |
Sex |
Day |
||||||
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
||
1 |
Male |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
4 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
5 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
6 |
Female |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
8 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
9 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
10 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
Keys: 1 = Normal
Table 3: Individual Animal Mortality Record
Dose: 2000 mg/kg body weight
Animal No. |
Sex |
Days of Observation (0 to 14) |
|
Morning Observations |
Evening Observations |
||
1 |
Male |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
2 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
3 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
4 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
5 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
6 |
Female |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
7 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
8 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
9 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
|
10 |
No mortality and morbidity |
No mortality and morbidity |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- LD50
- Value:
- 2 000 mg/kg bw
- Quality of whole database:
- Data is Klimisch 1 and from study report.
Additional information
Acute oral toxicity:
In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute oral toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for the given test chemical. The studies are summarized as below –
The reported study was mentioned in study report and conducted to assess the toxicological profile of the test chemical as per OECD No. 423 in Rats. Six female Wistar rats were selected for acute oral toxicity study.
The animals were fasted for minimum 16-18 hours prior to dosing and for 4 hours post dosing, with food withheld but drinking water provided ad libitum. The time intervals between dosing were determined by the onset, duration and severity of toxic signs. Three rats of group G1 were dosed with starting dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight and the animals showed no mortality post dosing, so another three rats of the same group were dosed with 2000 mg/kg weight and no mortality was observed. Hence, further dosing was stopped.
Body weights were recorded on day 0 (prior to dosing) 7 and 14. Mean body weight of all six animals was observed with gain on day 7 and 14, as compared to day 0. At 2000 mg/kg, animal no. 1 and 4 were observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours and on day 1 post dosing while additionally, animal no. 1 was observed with mild lethargy on day 2 and animal no. 4 was observed with mild diarrhoea at 1 and 2 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 2 was observed with normal clinical signs at 30 minutes, mild lethargy at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild diarrhoea at 1 and 2 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 3 was observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4 hours, day 1, 2 and 3 and mild diarrhoea at 2 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 5 was observed with mild lethargy at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild diarrhoea at 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14. Animal no. 6 was observed normal clinical signs at 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3 and 4 hours and mild lethargy on day 1 and 2, followed by normal clinical signs till day 14.
No external and internal gross pathological examination was seen in all the six animals treated with 2000 mg/kg body weight during terminal sacrifice.
Under the condition of the study, the acute oral LD50 value of the given test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibits acute oral toxicity in as per CLP criteria of classification
The above study report is supported with the data available in another study report and the study was conducted by using the given test chemical with the compliance of OECD Guideline-423 for testing of chemicals. The healthy wistar albino rats of body weight 200±20 gm were selected for study after acclimatization to standard laboratory condition and divided into test compound and vehicle control group each having three animals.
The study was conducted stepwise as follow: Starting dose 2000 mg/kg body weight: Step-I - The test compound was mixed with distilled water and administered orally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg body weight (dose volume 10 ml/kg) to three female rats. However; vehicle control group treated with the distilled water at the dose level of 10 ml/kg b.wt. The treated animals were closely observed for clinical signs of intoxication during first four hours of test compound administration. Thereafter, all the animals were observed periodically at one hour interval for 24 hrs and once daily for a period of 14 days. The necropsy was performed on all animals at the termination of the study.
All the Wistar albino rats which were treated with the test compound observed normal without any mortality and clinical signs of toxicity. Furthermore, No clinical signs and mortality were observed in vehicle control group. The necropsy finding did not reveal any gross pathological changes. Furthermore, no gross pathological change was observed in vehicle control group.
In Step -II: After 72 hrs, the result of step-I was confirmed by administration of same dose level (2000 mg/kg. b.wt) of test compound in additional three animals of same sex (OECD-423 guidelines). The test compound administered at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt did not produce any mortality and clinical sign of intoxication throughout the observation period of 14 days in treated Wistar albino rats. The test compound did not elicit any gross pathological changes in animals sacrificed at the end of experimentation. Based on the results obtained from present investigation, it can be concluded that the test compound is non- toxic to Wistar albino rats at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt.
Thus, based on the above summarised studies on test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral toxicity.
Acute Inhalation Toxicity:
The acute inhalation toxicity study need not be conducted because exposure to humans via inhalation route is not likely taking into account due to the low vapour pressure of the test chemical, which is reported to be 2.01E-17 mm Hg. Thus, exposure to inhalable dust, mist and vapour of the chemical is highly unlikely. Therefore this study is considered for waiver.
Acute Dermal Toxicity:
In different studies, the given test chemical has been investigated for acute dermal toxicity to a greater or lesser extent. Often are the studies based on in-vivo experiments in rodents, i.e. most commonly in rats for test chemical. The studies are summarized as below -
The reported study was mentioned in study report and was performed to determine acute dermal toxicity dose as per OECD No. 402 by using the given test chemical in Wistar Rats. Five male and five female healthy young adult rats were randomly selected and used for conducting acute dermal toxicity study. Rats free from injury and irritation of skin were selected for the study. Twenty four hours prior to dermal application of test item, approximately 10% of body surface area of each rat was clipped. A limit dose of 2000 mg/ kg body weight of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied by single dermal application and observed for 14 days after treatment. On test day 0, an amount of test item moistened with 0.2 ml distilled water was applied directly on the intact skin of clipped area of rats; the porous gauze dressing was put on to the intact skin of clipped area.
All the animals were observed with normal clinical signs throughout the experimental period. No mortality was observed at limit dose of 2000 mg/kg body weight of test item during the 14 day observation period.
In males, mean body weight was observed with increase on day 7 and 14, as compared to day 0. In females, mean body weight was observed with decrease on day 7 and increase on day 14, as compared to day 0.The external and internal gross pathological observation of all terminally sacrificed animals did not show any pathological abnormality.
Under the condition of the study, the acute dermal median lethal dose (LD50) of the given test chemical was considered to be >2000 mg/kg body weight. Thus by considering the CLP criteria for acute toxicity rating for the chemicals, it infers that the given test chemical does not exhibit acute dermal toxicity i.e it is acutely non toxic to animals.
Another study mentioned in study report was carried out to determine the acute dermal toxicity dose by using the given test chemical according to OECD guideline 402 for testing of chemicals on Wistar albino rats.
The summary of the study was as follows- LIMIT TEST (2000 mg/kg b.wt): Ten healthy wistar albino rats of both sex (ranging b.wt 200±20 gm) selected for study after acclimatization. Approximate 10 percent back skin of total body surface area was prepared 24 hrs prior to application of test compound. The test compound was applied dermally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt to each animal. The treated animals were observed for clinical signs of intoxication and mortality at different time interval for a period of 14 days. The body weight of each rat was observed on day 0 (pre treatment), 7th and 14th (post treatment). The necropsy was performed on all animals at the termination of the study.
The test compound applied at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt in Wistar albino rats did not show any mortality as well as clinical signs of toxicity throughout the observation period of 14 days. The necropsy was conducted on all the animals at the end of observation period did not show any gross pathological changes.
CONFIRMATORY TEST: After 72 hrs, confirmatory test was conducted in same species of animals to confirm result obtained from the limit test (OECD-402 guidelines for testing of chemicals). Ten healthy Wistar albino rats of both sex (ranging b.wt 200±20 gm) selected for study after acclimatization. Approximate 10 percent back skin of total body surface area was prepared 24 hrs prior to application of test compound. The test drug was applied dermally at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt for each animal. The treated animals were observed for clinical signs of intoxication and mortality at different time interval for a period of 14 days. The body weight of each rat was observed on day 0 (pre treatment), 7th and 14th (post treatment). The necropsy was performed on all animals at termination of the study.
No mortality was recorded after administration of test compound at the dose level of 2000 mg/kg b.wt. The test compound did not elicit any clinical signs of toxicity during the entire observation period. No skin reaction was observed after 24th hrs. of patch removal. The body weight of each animal recorded on day 0, 7th and 14th showed normal increase in weight.
Based on the results obtained from present investigation, it can be concluded that the acute dermal LD50 was considered to be >2000 mg/kg b.wt. when Wistar albino rats was treated with the given test compound applied by dermal route.
Thus, based on the above summarised studies for test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute dermal toxicity.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the above studies for the test chemical, it can be concluded that LD50 value is >2000 mg/kg bw, for acute oral toxicity and acute dermal toxicity. Thus, comparing this value with the criteria of CLP regulation, the given test chemical cannot be classified for acute oral and acute dermal toxicity. For acute inhalation toxicity wavier was added so, not possible to classify.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.