Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 205-587-9 | CAS number: 143-15-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The test material produced a primary irritation index of 4.0 and was classified as a moderate irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme.
The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 6/0 and was classified as a minimal irritant (Class 3 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- The temp. and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 17 to 23 deg. C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least 15 changes per hour and lighting was controlled.
- Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- clipped
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- not required
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material following single, 3-minute, 1 and 4-hour, semi-occluded applications to the intact rabbit skin.
- Observation period:
- 25
- Number of animals:
- 3 rabbits
- Details on study design:
- At each test site a quantity of 0.5ml of the test material was introduced under a 2.5cm x 2.5 cm cotton gauze patch and placed in position on the shorn skin. Each patch was secured in positoin with a strip of surgical adhsesive tape. One patch was removed at each of thre time points: 3 minutes, 1 hour and 4 hours after applicatoin. After consideration of the skin reactions produced in the first animal, two additional animals were treated with 0.5ml of test material. one patch was applied to the back of each rabbit , and was allowed to remain in contact with the skin for a period of four hours.
Approximately one hour following the removal of the patches, and 24, 48 and 72 hours later, the test sites were examined for evidence of primary irritaiton and scored. - Irritation parameter:
- primary dermal irritation index (PDII)
- Time point:
- other: 24,72-hour
- Score:
- ca. 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 14 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- 4-hour Exposure Period:The individual scores for erythema/eshcar and oedema are given in Talbe 1.
Well-defined erythema and slight to moderate oedema were noted at all treated skin sites on hour after patch removal with well-defined erythema and slight oedema at the 24,48 and 72-hour observatoins. Loss of skin elasticity was noted at all treated sites at the 72-hour observation. Severe desquamation, which prevented evaluation of erythema and oedema, was noted at two treated skin sites with moderate desquamation noted at one other treated skin site at the 7-day observation. All treated skin sites appeared notrmal at the 14-day observation.
1-Hour Exposure Period: The individual scores for erythema/escjar amd pede,a are govem om Appendix 1. Well-defined erythema and very slight oedema were npoted at the treated skin site at the 24.48 and 72-hour observations. Loss of skin elasticity was noted at the treated skin site at the 72-hour observation. Slight desquamation was noted at the treated skin site at the 7-day observation. The treated skinsite appeared normal at the 14-day oservation.
3-Minute Exposure Period: The individual scores for erythema/eschar and oedema are given in Appendix 1. No evidence of skin irritation was noted during the study. - Conclusions:
The test material produced a primary irritation index of 4.0 and was classified as a moderate irritant to rabbit skin accordingt to the Draize3 classification scheme. No corrosive effects were noted.- Executive summary:
The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the skin of the New Zealand White rabbit.
A single 4 -hour, semi-occluded application of the test material to the intact skin of three rabbits produced well-defined erythema and slight to moderate oedema. Other skin reactions noted were loss of skin elasticity and moderate or sever desquamation. All treated skin sites appeared normal at the14 -day observation. No corrosive effects were noted.
3 -minute and 1 -hour semi-occluded applications of the test material to the intact skin of one rabbit produced no corrosive effects.
Conclusion: The test material produced a primary irritation index of 4.0 and was classified as a moderate irritant to rabbit skin according to the Draize classification scheme.
The test material was also classiifed as irritant accoridng to the EU labeling regulation.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2003
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.5 (Acute Toxicity: Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- New Zealand White
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- The temp. and relative humidity were set to achieve limits of 17 to 23 deg. C and 30 to 70% respectively. The rate of air exchange was at least 15 changes per hour and lighting was controlled.
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: The left untreated eye was used for control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A volume of 0.1m of the test material was placed into the conjunctival sac of the right eye.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 1 hr, 24 hr, 48hr, 72hr
- Observation period (in vivo):
- Assessment of ocular damage/irritation was made appr. 1 hour and 24, 48 and 72 hours following treatment.
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Initially a single rabbit was treated. After consideration of the ocular responses, two additional animlas were treated.
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1hr, 24hr, 48 hr, 72hr
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no effect
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1hr, 24hr, 48 hr, 72hr
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no effect
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1hr, 24hr, 48 hr, 72hr
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no effect
- Irritation parameter:
- overall irritation score
- Basis:
- mean
- Time point:
- other: 1hr, 24hr, 48 hr, 72hr
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 0
- Reversibility:
- other: no effect
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- No conrneal or iridial effects were noted during hte study.
Minimal conjunctival irritation was noted in all treated eyes one hour after treatment.
All treated eye appeared normal at the 24-hour observation. - Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Remarks:
- Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: OECD GHS
- Conclusions:
- A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced minimal conjuctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 24-hour observation
- Executive summary:
Introduction: The study was performed to assess the irritancy potential of the test material to the eye of the New Zealand White rabbity. The method was designed to meet the requirenmnets of the following:
• OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 “Acute Eye IrritationlCorrosion” (adopted 24 February 1987)
• Commission Directive 92/69/EEC Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation)
Result. A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced minimal conjunctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 24-hour observation.
• OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals No. 405 “Acute Eye IrritationlCorrosion” (adopted 24 February 1987)
• Commission Directive 92/69/EEC Method B5 Acute Toxicity (Eye Irritation)
Result. A single application of the test material to the non-irrigated eye of three rabbits produced minimal conjunctival irritation. All treated eyes appeared normal at the 24-hour observation.
Conclusion. The test material produced a maximum group mean score of 6.0 and was classified as a minimal irritant (Class 3 on a 1 to 8 scale) to the rabbit eye according to a modified Kay and Calandra classification system.
The test material did not meet the criteria for classification as irritant according to EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 93/21/EEC.
The test material did not meet the criteria for classification as irritant according to EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 93/21/EEC.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Additional information
Availability of Kllimish 1 study.
Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Availability of Kllimish 1 study.
Effects on skin irritation/corrosion: moderately irritating
Justification for classification or non-classification
The test material did not meet the criteria for classification as irritant to eye according to the EU labelling regulations Commission Directive 92/21/EEC.
The test material is classifiied as irritant to skin according to EU labeling regulations Commission Directive 92/21/EEC.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.