3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Link to relevant study record(s)

Reference

Endpoint:

toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

key study

Study period:

2007-02-06 to 2007-02-09

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

other: Guideline study

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)

GLP compliance:

yes

Analytical monitoring:

yes

Details on sampling:

- Sampling method: At test initiation, 24, 48 and 72 hours, a single sample was removed from each test solution (i.e., 7.5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 mg a.i./L) and the control and analyzed for 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile.  Three quality control (QC) samples were prepared at test initiation and analyzed at each interval for 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile.  The QC samples were prepared at test concentrations similar to the treatment level range.  Results of these analyses indicated the accuracy of the analytical method for measuring the test substance concentration in the stock solution.

Vehicle:

no

Details on test solutions:

PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION

- Method: : A 120 mg a.i./L stock solution was prepared prior to test initiation by placing 0.2437 g of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile (0.2400 g as active ingredient) in a 2000-mL volumetric flask and bringing it to volume with AAP medium.  The results stock solution was observed to be clear and colorless with a small amount of visible undissolved test substance.  The solution was mixed for approximately 40 minutes and was observed to be clear and colorless with no visible undissolved test substance after mixing.  Three of the test solutions (i.e., 15, 30 and 60 mg a.i./L) were prepared by bringing the appropriate amount of the 120 mg a.i./L stock solution (125, 250 and 500 mL) to a final volume of 1000 mL with AAP medium.  The 7.5 mg a.i./L test solution was prepared by bringing 125 mL of the 60 mg a.i./L solution to a final volume of 1000 mL with AAP medium.

Test organisms (species):

Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)

Details on test organisms:

TEST ORGANISM

- Strain: strain 1648

- Source: The alga was obtained from the University of Texas, Austin, Texas, and was maintained in stock culture at Springborn Smithers.  The stock cultures were maintained within the following conditions:  a shaking rate of 100 ± 10 rpm, a temperature of 23 ± 2  C and continuous illumination at the surface of the medium with an intensity of 4440 to 5900 lux (420 to 550 footcandles).  Lighting was supplied by fluorescent bulbs.  Culture flasks were agitated continuously on orbital shakers.

- Growth medium:  The culture medium used was Algal Assay Procedure (AAP) medium prepared with sterile, deionized water.  

Test type:

static

Water media type:

freshwater

Limit test:

no

Total exposure duration:

72 h

Hardness:

Not reported

Test temperature:

24ºC

pH:

7.3 at test initiation.  At 72 hours of exposure, the pH of the test and control solutions ranged from 7.2 to 8.2.  

Dissolved oxygen:

No data

Salinity:

Not applicable

Nominal and measured concentrations:

Nominal concentrations: 0 (Control), 7.5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 mg/L.

Geometric mean measured concentrations:  0 (Control), 0.30, 0.52, 0.89, 1.8 and 3.6 mg/L.

The test results are presented and reported with reference to geometric mean measured concentrations.

Details on test conditions:

TEST SYSTEM

- Exposure vessel type: The test was conducted in sterile 250-mL Erlenmeyer flasks fitted with stainless steel caps.

- Test Design:  One hundred milliliters of the appropriate exposure solution was placed in each replicate vessel.  A 0.686-mL inoculum of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata cells, at a density of approximately 145.7 x 104 cells/mL, was aseptically introduced into each vial.  This inoculum provided an initial (0 hour) cell density of approximately 1.0 x 104 cells/mL.  Three replicate test vessels were established for the treatment levels and six replicates were established for the control.  

- Growth/test medium:  AAP medium used to prepare the exposure solutions was formulated in the same manner as the culture medium. TOC concentration of the AAP sample collected in February 2007 was 0.53 mg/L. 

- Light levels and quality during exposure:  4500 to 5500 lux (420 to 510 footcandles).  The photosynthetically-active radiation (PAR) of the test area measured at test initiation ranged from 68 to 84 µE/m2/s.

Reference substance (positive control):

no

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

NOEC

Effect conc.:

1.8 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Conc. based on:

test mat.

Remarks:

and hydrolysis products

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC10

Effect conc.:

> 3.6 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Conc. based on:

test mat.

Remarks:

and hydrolysis products

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC50

Effect conc.:

> 3.6 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

meas. (geom. mean)

Conc. based on:

test mat.

Remarks:

and hydrolysis products

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

EC50

Effect conc.:

> 120 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

nominal

Conc. based on:

test mat.

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Duration:

72 h

Dose descriptor:

NOEC

Effect conc.:

60 mg/L

Nominal / measured:

nominal

Conc. based on:

test mat.

Basis for effect:

growth rate

Details on results:

- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes

Reported statistics and error estimates:

Based on the results of Shapiro-Wilks' and Bartlett's Tests, this data set passed the requirements for normality and homogeneity of variance, therefore, Williams' Test was used to determine treatment-related effects.  Since no concentration tested resulted in >=50% reduction of yield, the 72 hour ErC50 and EyC50 values were empirically estimated to be >the highest geometric mean measured concentration tested.

Table 1. Test results

Geometric mean measured concentration (mg/L)	Mean cell density after 24 hours (cells/ml)	Mean cell density after 48 hours (cells/ml)	Mean cell density after 72 hours (cells/ml)
0 (Control)	56300	185000	1240000
0.30	56700	196000	1250000
0.52	50800	199000	1250000
0.89	43300	218000	1170000
1.8	36700	181000	1090000
3.6	35800	140000	940000

Yield
The 0- to 72-hour yield in the control averaged 122.93 x 104
cells/mL.  The 0- to 72-hour yield in the 0.30, 0.52, 0.89,
1.8 and 3.6 mg/L treatment levels averaged 124.00, 124.33,
116.25, 107.75 and 93.42 x 104 cells/mL, respectively. 
Based on the results of Shapiro-Wilks' and Bartlett's Tests,
this data set passed the requirements for normality and
homogeneity of variance, therefore, Williams' Test was used
to determine treatment-related effects.  Williams' Test
determined a significant reduction in yield occurred in the
3.6 mg/L treatment level compared to the control data. 
Therefore, the 72 hour NOEC for yield was determined to be
1.8 mg/L.  The 72 hour EyC10 was determined to be 1.4 mg/L,
with 95% confidence intervals of 0.49 and 2.7 mg/L.  The
72-hour EyC20 was determined to be 2.5 mg/L, with 95%
confidence intervals of 0.88 and 3.5 mg/L.  Since no
concentration tested resulted in >=50% reduction of yield,
the 72 hour EyC50 value was empirically estimated to be >
3.6 mg/L, the highest geometric mean measured concentration
tested.

Growth Rate
The 0- to 72-hour growth rate in the control averaged 1.65
days-1.  The 0- to 72 hour growth rate in the 0.30, 0.52,
0.89, 1.8 and 3.6 mg a.i./L treatment levels averaged 1.65,
1.66, 1.63, 1.61 and 1.56 days 1, respectively.  Based on
the results of Shapiro-Wilks' and Bartlett's Tests, this
data set passed the requirements for normality and
homogeneity of variance, therefore, Williams' Test was used
to determine treatment-related effects.  Williams' Test
determined a significant reduction in average growth rate
occurred in the 3.6 mg a.i./L treatment level compared to
the control data.  Based on these results, the 72 hour NOEC
was determined to be 1.8 mg a.i./L.  Since no concentration
tested resulted in >= 10% reduction in growth rate, the 72
hour ErC10, ErC20 and ErC50 values were empirically
estimated to be > 3.6 mg a.i./L, the highest geometric mean
measured concentration tested.

Element value (e.g. ErC50 and EyC50): 
72-hour EyC10:  1.4 mg/L
72-hour EyC20:  2.5 mg/L
72-hour EyC50:  > 3.6 mg/L
72-hour ErC10:  > 3.6 mg/L
72-hour ErC20:  > 3.6 mg/L
72-hour ErC50:  > 3.6 mg/L

NOEC: 1.8 mg/L (for growth rate (r) and biomass expressed as yield(y))

Validity criteria fulfilled:

yes

Conclusions:

A 72-hour EC50 value of >3.6 mg/L and NOEC of 1.8 mg/L have been determined for the effects of the test substance on growth rate of Pseudokirchnerella subcapitata. The test results are expressed relative to the concentration of the test substance however it is likely that the test organisms were exposed to a mixture of the test substance and its hydrolysis products. The EC50 and NOEC values expressed relative to nominal test concentration are >120 and 60 mg/L respectively.

Description of key information

72-hour ErC₅₀ >120 mg/l and NOEC 60 mg/l, growth rate of Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata.

Additional information

A 72-hour ErC₅₀ value of >120 mg/l and NOEC value of 60 mg/l (nominal concentration) have been determined for the effects of 3-(triethoxysilyl)propiononitrile (CAS 919-31-3) on growth rate of the freshwater algae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 201 and in compliance with GLP (Springborn Smithers, 2007).

A 72-hour ErC₅₀ value of >3.6 mg/l and NOEC of 1.8 mg/l have also been determined based on the measured concentration of parent substance. However, due to the rapid hydrolysis half-life of the substance (6.5 hours at pH 7), it is likely that the test organisms were exposed to a mixture of the test substance and its hydrolysis products, 3-(trihydroxysilyl)propiononitrile (CAS 182156-21-4) and ethanol, because the test is performed under static conditions. The low measured concentrations of parent substance support this. Therefore, it is more appropriate to use the EC₅₀ and NOEC values expressed relative to nominal test concentration.