Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 211-263-8 | CAS number: 636-70-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- October 2013 - November 2013
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.13/14 (Mutagenicity - Reverse Mutation Test Using Bacteria)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- None as known.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium (TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 (produced from the livers of male Sprague-Dawley rats which were treated with 500 mg Aroclor 1254/kg body weight intraperitoneally)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Deionised water
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: because the test item was sufficiently soluble, and this solvent doesn’t have any effects on the viability of the bacteria or the number of spontaneous revertants. - Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deionised water
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Deionised water
- True negative controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- benzo(a)pyrene
- other: 4-Nitro-1,2-phenylene diamine; 2-Amino-anthracene
- Species / strain:
- other: Salmonella typhimurium (TA 97a, TA 98, TA 100, TA 102 and TA 1535)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
The test item triethylammonium bromide is considered as “not mutagenic under the conditions of the test”. - Executive summary:
The test item is considered not mutagenic for the reasons given above. The test item did not show any cytotoxicity towards the bacteria.
The confirmation tests of the genotype didn’t show any irregularities. The control of the titre was above the demanded value.
The numbers of revertant colonies of the positive controls were within the range of the historical data (all batch numbers of bacteria) of the laboratory and were definitely increased in comparison with the negative controls, as well as showing mutagenic potential of the diagnostic mutagenes.
Spontaneous revertants were within the normal range in comparison with the historical data (all batch numbers of bacteria) of the LAUS GmbH. For these reasons, the result of the test is considered valid.
Reference
First Experiment
Confirmation of the Criteria and Validity
The treatments for the sterility control and the determination of the titre didn’t show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls (diagnostic mutagenes) showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
Solubility and Toxicity
The test item was dissolved in deionised water. A stock solution containing 50.0±0.5 g/L was prepared.
No signs of toxicity towards the tested strains could be observed. The background lawn was visible and the number of revertant colonies was not reduced.
Main Revertants First Experiment
Strain |
TA97a |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
TA1535 |
||||||
Induction |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
|
H2O |
Mean |
99 |
106 |
15 |
17 |
151 |
135 |
186 |
220 |
21 |
21 |
sd |
13.7 |
16.1 |
2.2 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
21.6 |
9.4 |
9.9 |
3.3 |
5.4 |
|
DMSO |
Mean |
128 |
105 |
17 |
18 |
152 |
122 |
186 |
217 |
19 |
17 |
sd |
22.9 |
10.4 |
2.2 |
2.2 |
7.4 |
10.1 |
9.8 |
17.4 |
4.3 |
7.8 |
|
Positive |
Mean |
590 |
652 |
118 |
95 |
689 |
630 |
540 |
449 |
108 |
125 |
sd |
97 |
39 |
10 |
10 |
31 |
89 |
111 |
20 |
14 |
12 |
|
f(I) |
4.61 |
6.21 |
6.94 |
5.28 |
4.56 |
5.16 |
2.90 |
2.07 |
5.14 |
7.35 |
|
5007 µg/pl. |
Mean |
121 |
119 |
20 |
18 |
135 |
114 |
181 |
203 |
22 |
21 |
sd |
7 |
8 |
2 |
3 |
14 |
24 |
14 |
23 |
3 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
1.22 |
1.12 |
1.33 |
1.06 |
0.89 |
0.84 |
0.97 |
0.92 |
1.05 |
1.00 |
|
1502 µg/pl. |
Mean |
118 |
103 |
17 |
18 |
151 |
132 |
194 |
216 |
22 |
20 |
sd |
21 |
6 |
2 |
6 |
25 |
10 |
37 |
14 |
5 |
4 |
|
f(I) |
1.19 |
0.97 |
1.13 |
1.06 |
1.00 |
0.98 |
1.04 |
0.98 |
1.05 |
0.95 |
|
501 µg/pl. |
Mean |
114 |
111 |
15 |
19 |
126 |
132 |
192 |
198 |
25 |
18 |
sd |
9 |
27 |
3 |
2 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
22 |
6 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
1.15 |
1.05 |
1.00 |
1.12 |
0.83 |
0.98 |
1.03 |
0.90 |
1.19 |
0.86 |
|
150 µg/pl. |
Mean |
105 |
113 |
19 |
17 |
141 |
122 |
194 |
227 |
22 |
20 |
sd |
15 |
19 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
26 |
15 |
19 |
6 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
1.06 |
1.07 |
1.27 |
1.00 |
0.93 |
0.90 |
1.04 |
1.03 |
1.05 |
0.95 |
|
50 µg/pl. |
Mean |
122 |
119 |
18 |
21 |
154 |
133 |
208 |
234 |
24 |
20 |
sd |
9 |
3 |
2 |
4 |
11 |
39 |
14 |
7 |
2 |
3 |
|
f(I) |
1.23 |
1.12 |
1.20 |
1.24 |
1.02 |
0.99 |
1.12 |
1.06 |
1.14 |
0.95 |
f(I) = increase factor
* Different positive controls were used
Mutagenicity
No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation could be observed.No concentration-related increase over the tested range was found.
Therefore, the test item is stated as not mutagenic under the test conditions.
To verify this result, a second experiment was performed using the pre-incubation method.
Second Experiment
Confirmation of the Criteria and Validity
The treatments for the sterility control and the determination of the titre didn’t show any inconsistencies. The determined values for the spontaneous revertants of the negative controls were in the normal range of the test laboratory. All positive controls showed mutagenic effects with and without metabolic activation.
Solubility and Toxicity
The test item was dissolved in deionised water. A stock solution containing 50.0±0.5 g/L was prepared.
No signs of toxicity towards the tested strains could be observed. The background lawn was visible and the number of revertant colonies was not significantly reduced.
Survey of the Findings
The mean revertant values of the four replicates are presented in the following table.
Mean Revertants Second Experiment
Strain |
TA97a |
TA98 |
TA100 |
TA102 |
TA1535 |
||||||
Induction |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
-S9 |
+S9 |
|
H2O |
Mean |
100 |
114 |
14 |
10 |
115 |
121 |
207 |
196 |
19 |
19 |
sd |
6.2 |
16.6 |
3.0 |
0.0 |
9.5 |
16.9 |
17.5 |
24.1 |
2.9 |
1.3 |
|
DMSO |
Mean |
105 |
113 |
15 |
13 |
118 |
117 |
198 |
205 |
20 |
21 |
sd |
3.6 |
11.0 |
1.3 |
0.0 |
13.4 |
12.8 |
20.8 |
28.3 |
4.3 |
3.0 |
|
Positive |
Mean |
581 |
767 |
109 |
146 |
569 |
957 |
676 |
804 |
155 |
140 |
sd |
151 |
165 |
4 |
49 |
116 |
253 |
56 |
161 |
23 |
36 |
|
f(I) |
5.53 |
6.79 |
7.27 |
11.23 |
4.95 |
8.18 |
3.41 |
3.92 |
8.16 |
6.67 |
|
5023 µg/pl. |
Mean |
116 |
131 |
15 |
16 |
123 |
119 |
237 |
198 |
21 |
21 |
sd |
15 |
27 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
22 |
7 |
14 |
3 |
4 |
|
f(I) |
1.16 |
1.15 |
1.07 |
1.60 |
1.07 |
0.98 |
1.14 |
1.01 |
1.11 |
1.11 |
|
2512 µg/pl. |
Mean |
103 |
118 |
14 |
15 |
127 |
107 |
226 |
178 |
19 |
17 |
sd |
7 |
13 |
3 |
2 |
14 |
6 |
31 |
16 |
2 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
1.03 |
1.04 |
1.00 |
1.50 |
1.10 |
0.88 |
1.09 |
0.91 |
1.00 |
0.89 |
|
1256 µg/pl. |
Mean |
105 |
118 |
16 |
12 |
139 |
129 |
211 |
188 |
24 |
21 |
sd |
4 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
13 |
20 |
22 |
29 |
2 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
1.05 |
1.04 |
1.14 |
1.20 |
1.21 |
1.07 |
1.02 |
0.96 |
1.26 |
1.11 |
|
628 µg/pl. |
Mean |
106 |
119 |
17 |
13 |
114 |
119 |
222 |
174 |
19 |
21 |
sd |
11 |
28 |
4 |
1 |
21 |
17 |
25 |
15 |
3 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
1.06 |
1.04 |
1.21 |
1.30 |
0.99 |
0.98 |
1.07 |
0.89 |
1.00 |
1.11 |
|
314 µg/pl. |
Mean |
98 |
107 |
16 |
12 |
129 |
117 |
194 |
207 |
22 |
22 |
sd |
3 |
13 |
3 |
1 |
8 |
8 |
28 |
22 |
2 |
2 |
|
f(I) |
0.98 |
0.94 |
1.14 |
1.20 |
1.12 |
0.97 |
0.94 |
1.06 |
1.16 |
1.16 |
f(I) = increase factor
* Different positive controls were used
Mutagenicity
No significant increase of the number of revertant colonies in the treatments with and without metabolic activation was observed.
No concentration-related increase over the tested range was found.
Therefore, the test item is stated as not mutagenic under the test conditions.
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
The test item did not show any cytotoxicity towards the bacteria. The confirmation tests of the genotype didn’t show any irregularities. The control of the titre was above the demanded value. The numbers of revertant colonies of the positive controls were within the range of the historical data (all batch numbers of bacteria) of the laboratory and were definitely increased in comparison with the negative controls, as well as showing mutagenic potential of the diagnostic mutagenes.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.