Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 227-369-2 | CAS number: 5809-08-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Developmental toxicity / teratogenicity
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- The study was conducted between 11 January 2017 and 03 May 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 017
- Report date:
- 2017
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 414 (Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Limit test:
- no
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide
- EC Number:
- 227-369-2
- EC Name:
- 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide
- Cas Number:
- 5809-08-5
- Molecular formula:
- C8H18O2
- IUPAC Name:
- 2,4,4-trimethylpentane-2-peroxol
- Test material form:
- other: clear, colourless liquid
- Details on test material:
- Identity: 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide
CAS No.: CAS 5809-08-5
Batch-No.: 1010519063
Molecular Weight: 146.2 g/mol
Purity: 91.1 % (dose calculation adjusted to purity)
Stability in Solvent: Not indicated by the sponsor
Storage Conditions: At +2 to +8 °C
Expiration Date: November 01, 2012
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- Description: Clear colorless liquid
Chemical Name: 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide
CAS Number : 5809-08-5
EC Name: 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide
Purity: 92.5%
Batch Number: 1504510829
Label: Trigonox TMBH-L -5ºC MIN, 25ºC MAX
Date Received: 21 June 2016
Storage Conditions: Approximately 4ºC in the dark
Expiry Date: 06 January 2018
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Animal Information
A total of ninety-six time-mated female Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD (SD) IGS BR strain rats were obtained from Charles River (UK) Limited, Margate, Kent. Animals were delivered in two batches containing females prior to Day 3 of gestation. The day that positive evidence of mating was observed was designated Day 0 of gestation. On arrival the females weighed 189 to 276g.
Animal Care and Husbandry
The animals were housed individually in solid-floor polypropylene cages with stainless steel mesh lids furnished with softwood flakes (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK). The animals were allowed free access to food and water. A pelleted diet (Rodent 2018C Teklad Global Certified Diet, Envigo RMS (UK) Limited, Oxon, UK) was used. Certificates of analysis of the batches of diet used are given in Annex 2. Mains drinking water was supplied from polycarbonate bottles attached to the cage. Environmental enrichment was provided in the form of wooden chew blocks and cardboard fun tunnels (Datesand Ltd., Cheshire, UK). The diet, drinking water, bedding and environmental enrichment was considered not to contain any contaminant at a level that might have affected the purpose or integrity of the study.
The animals were housed in a single air-conditioned room within the Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK Barrier Maintained Rodent Facility. The rate of air exchange was at least fifteen air changes per hour and the low intensity fluorescent lighting was controlled to give twelve hours continuous light and twelve hours darkness. Environmental conditions were continuously monitored by a computerized system, and print-outs of hourly mean temperatures and humidity are included in the study records. The Study Plan target ranges for temperature and relative humidity were 22 ± 3 ºC and 50 ± 20% respectively; there were no deviations from these targets.
The animals were randomly allocated to treatment groups using a randomization procedure based on stratified body weight to ensure similarity between the treatment groups. The animals were uniquely identified within the study by an ear punching system routinely used in these laboratories.
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- arachis oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
For the purpose of the study the test item was prepared at the appropriate concentrations as a solution in Arachis oil BP. Formulations were prepared in two batches each of 14 days and made in advance of the first day of use and stored at approximately 4ºC in the dark. - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- The stability and homogeneity of the test item formulations were determined by Envigo Research Limited, Shardlow, UK Analytical Services (Harlan Study Number: 41104766 and Envigo Study Number: CN35PW). Results showed the formulations to be stable for at least nineteen days.
Samples were taken of each test item formulation and were analyzed for concentration of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide (CAS 5809-08-5) at Envigo Analytical Laboratory, Shardlow. The results indicate that the prepared formulations were within 94-101% of the nominal concentration, confirming accurate formulation.
The homogeneity was detennined with respect to the concentration of 1.1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl bydroperoxide (CAS#5809-08-5) (test item) in Arachis oil formulations at a nominal concentration of 150 mg/mL.
The concentrations of Test Item in Arachis oil formulations analyzed during the study.
The stability and validatioo was determined under Harlan Srudy Nwuber 4 1104766 at concentrations of 3.75 and 250 mg/mL. The test item showed to be stable for up to 19 days when stored at approltimately 4 °C in the dark.
The test item concentration in the test samples was determined by gas chromatography (GC) using an external standard technique. The test item gave a chromatographic profile consisting of a single peak.
The analytical procedure was successfully validated with respect to specificity of chromatographic analysis, linearity of detector response, method accuracy and precision during Harlan study 41104766. The homogeneity was confirmed for Test Item in Arachis oil formulations at a nominal concentration of 150 mg/mL. The mean concentrations of Test Item in test formulations analyzed for the study were within ± 10%, of nominal concentrations confirming accurate formulation. - Details on mating procedure:
- Females were time-mated with sexually proven males of the same strain by the animal supplier. The day of observation of positive evidence of mating will be designated Day 0 of gestation. The animal supplier will identify mated females and provide identification details of their respective mating partners.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- The test item was administered from Day 5 to Day 19 of gestation.
- Frequency of treatment:
- Daily.
- Duration of test:
- 20 days from Day 0 of gestation to Day 20.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 24 females per dose
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- The dose levels were chosen in collaboration with the Sponsor and are based on previous toxicity data including a 28 day oral (gavage) toxicity study in the rat (Harlan Study Number: 41104766) and a 90 day oral (gavage) toxicity study in the rat (Envigo Study Number: CN35PW). The oral route was selected as the most appropriate route of exposure, based on the physical properties of the test item, and the results of the study are believed to be of value in predicting the likely toxicity of the test item to man.
Examinations
- Maternal examinations:
- Clinical Observations
Following arrival, all animals were examined for overt signs of toxicity, ill-health or behavioral changes once daily during the gestation period. Additionally, during the dosing period, observations were recorded immediately before and soon after dosing and one hour post dosing. All observations were recorded.
Body Weight
Individual body weights were recorded on Day 3 (before the start of treatment) and on Days 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 14 and 17 of gestation. Body weights were also recorded for animals at terminal kill (Day 20).
Food Consumption
Food consumption was recorded for each individual animal at Day 3, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17 and 20 of gestation.
Water Consumption
Water intake was observed daily by visual inspection of the water bottles for any overt changes.
Necropsy
All animals were killed by carbon dioxide asphyxiation followed by cervical dislocation on Day 20 of gestation. All animals were subjected to a full external and internal examination, the stomachs were retained and any macroscopic abnormalities were recorded. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uteri of pregnant females were removed, examined and the following data recorded:
i) Number of corpora lutea
ii) Number, position and type of intrauterine implantation
iii) Fetal sex
iv) External fetal appearance
v) Fetal weight
vi) Placental weight
vii) Gravid uterus weight
Implantation types were divided into:
Early Death: No visible distinction between placental/decidual tissue and embryonic tissue
Late Death: Separate embryonic/fetal and placental tissue visible
Dead Fetus: A fetus that had died shortly before necropsy. These were included as late deaths for reporting purposes
All implantations and viable fetuses were numbered according to their intrauterine position as follows (as an example):
Left Horn Cervix Right Horn
L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 L7 L8 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 R7 R8
V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8 V9 V10 V11 V12 V13 V14 V15 V16
V = viable fetus - Fetal examinations:
- The fetuses were killed by subcutaneous injection of a suitable barbiturate agent. Fetuses from each litter were divided into two groups and examined for skeletal alterations and soft tissue alterations. Alternate fetuses were identified using an indelible marker and placed in Bouin’s fixative. Fetuses were subsequently transferred to distilled water and examined for visceral anomalies under a low power binocular microscope and then stored in 10% Buffered Formalin. The remaining fetuses were identified using cardboard tags marked with chinagraph pencil and placed into 70% IMS in distilled water. The fetuses were subsequently eviscerated, processed and the skeletons stained with alizarin red S before being transferred to 50% glycerol for examination of skeletal development and anomalies and storage.
- Statistics:
- The following parameters were analyzed statistically, where appropriate, using the test methods outlined below:
Body weights, body weight change, food consumption and gravid uterus weight: Shapiro Wilk normality test and Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variance and one way analysis of variance, followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test or, if unequal variances were observed, on alternative multiple comparison test.
All caesarean necropsy parameters and fetal parameters: Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance; and a subsequent pairwise analysis of control values against treated values using the Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test, where significance was seen.
Fetal evaluation parameters, including skeletal or visceral findings: Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test.
Probability values (p) are presented as follows:
p<0.001 ***
p<0.01 **
p<0.05 *
p≥0.05 (not significant) - Indices:
- Pre and Post Implantation Loss
Percentage pre-implantation loss was calculated as:
((number of corpora lutea - number of implantations) / mumber of corpora lutea) x 100
Percentage post-implantation loss was calculated as:
((number of implantations - number of live fetuses) / number of implantations) x 100
Sex Ratio
Sex ratio was calculated as:
% male fetuses (sex ratio) = (number of males fetuses / total number of fetuses) x 100
Results and discussion
Results: maternal animals
General toxicity (maternal animals)
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- There were considered to be no clinical signs apparent that were specifically related to systemic toxicity of the test item.
Two animals treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day exhibited sporadic instances of hunched posture during the treatment period which became apparent from Day 6 of gestation.
Increased salivation was noted in all animals treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day from Days 6 to 19, in seventeen animals treated with 200 mg/kg bw/day from Days 8 to 19 and in one animal treated with 50 mg/kg bw/day.
Noisy respiration was noted in three animals treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day on three separate occasions (persisting for one day only) Days 10, 14 and 18.
Generalized fur loss was noted in one animal treated with 50 mg/kg bw/day from Days 13 to 20. - Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- no mortality observed
- Description (incidence):
- There were no unscheduled deaths during the study.
- Body weight and weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction
(p<0.001 - p<0.01) in body weight gain between Days 5 and 6 of gestation, with actual body weight losses being evident in the majority of females. Signs of recovery were noted from Days 7 to 14 and even a statistically significant increase (p<0.01) in body weight was noted in these animals from Days 7 to 8, however, reductions in body weight gain were again apparent between Days 14 and 20 (which may be a reflection of lower litter weights/ contribution of the gravid uterus) which achieved statistical significance (p<0.01-p<0.001). Body weight and body weight gain when adjusted for gravid uterus weight was also statistically significantly reduced (p<0.001) (-11 and -55% respectively) in these females.
Females treated with 200 mg/kg bw/day exhibited slight reductions in body weight gains between Days 5 and 8 (which did not achieve statistical significance), however, this did result in a statistically significant reduction in cumulative body weight gain from Days 5 to 7 and 5 to 8. Recovery was evident thereafter and by Day 20, overall body weight gain was comparable to controls. A statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction in body weight gain
(-17%) after the adjustment for the contribution of the gravid uterus was still noted at the end of the treatment period.
Body weight gain during gestation, including after adjustment for the contribution of the gravid uterus, was considered to be unaffected by treatment at 50 mg/kg bw/day. - Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Statistically significant reductions (p<0.05 - p<0.001) in food consumption were evident in females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day throughout the treatment period.
A slight reduction in food consumption was noted in females treated with 200 mg/kg bw/day from Days 5 to 8 which achieved statistical significance (p<0.01). However, recovery was evident thereafter such that food consumption was comparable to control.
No such effects were evident in females treated with 50 mg/kg bw/day. - Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Daily visual inspection of water bottles did not reveal any overt intergroup differences.
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- All females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day exhibited thickening and/or sloughing of the non-glandular region of the stomach. Isolated occurrences of yellow colored contents in the stomach and raised white patches on the non-glandular region of the stomach were also apparent.
No macroscopic abnormalities considered to be related to treatment with the test item were noted in any other animal.
One female treated with 50 mg/kg bw/day exhibited generalized fur loss. - Neuropathological findings:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- not examined
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Maternal developmental toxicity
- Number of abortions:
- not specified
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Not applicable in rats
- Pre- and post-implantation loss:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 'Group Mean Litter Data Values' in section 'any other information on results'
- Total litter losses by resorption:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 'Group Mean Litter Data Values' in section 'any other information on results'
- Early or late resorptions:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 'Group Mean Litter Data Values' in section 'any other information on results'
- Dead fetuses:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 'Group Mean Litter Data Values' in section 'any other information on results'
- Changes in pregnancy duration:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Females killed on Day 20 of gestation
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Effects on pregnancy duration" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.EffectsOnPregnancyDuration): not examined
Field "Description (incidence and severity)" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsMaternalAnimals.MaternalDevelopmentalToxicity.DescriptionIncidenceAndSeverityEffectsOnPregnancyDuration): Females killed on Day 20 of gestation - Changes in number of pregnant:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- See table 'Group Mean Litter Data Values' in section 'any other information on results'
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- There was no effect of maternal exposure to 50, 200 or 600 mg/kg bw/day of the test item on litter data, as assessed by numbers of implantations, in-utero offspring survival (as assessed by the mean numbers of early or late resorptions), live litter size, sex ratio and post implantation losses.
Effect levels (maternal animals)
- Key result
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- body weight and weight gain
- changes in number of pregnant
- clinical signs
- dead fetuses
- early or late resorptions
- food consumption and compound intake
- gross pathology
- maternal abnormalities
- mortality
- number of abortions
- pre and post implantation loss
- total litter losses by resorption
- water consumption and compound intake
Maternal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- no effects observed
Results (fetuses)
- Fetal body weight changes:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 600 mg/kg bw/day, mean fetal weight for both sexes was statistically significantly lower (p<0.05 - p<0.001) than control (-9.8 % male and -11.4 % female), resulting in statistically significantly lower (p<0.05) mean litter weights (-12.4 %). Placental weights were also statistically significantly reduced (p<0.01) in these females (-10.2 %).
No adverse effects on fetal, litter or placental weights were detected in females treated with 50 or 200 mg/kg bw/day.
At 200 mg/kg bw/day, mean male and female fetal weights were slightly lower than control
(-2.7 % and -5.3 % respectively), however, only females achieved statistical significance (p<0.05), total litter weights and placental weights actually exceeded control.
Migrated Data from removed field(s)
Field "Fetal/pup body weight changes" (Path: ENDPOINT_STUDY_RECORD.DevelopmentalToxicityTeratogenicity.ResultsAndDiscussion.ResultsFetuses.FetalPupBodyWeightChanges): not examined - Reduction in number of live offspring:
- no effects observed
- Changes in sex ratio:
- no effects observed
- Changes in litter size and weights:
- no effects observed
- Changes in postnatal survival:
- not examined
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Animals terminated on Day 20 of gestation.
- External malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- An increased incidence of small fetuses was evident from females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day which resulted in a statistically significant increase in total number of fetuses with external findings at necropsy.
With the exception of one small fetus from a female treated with 200 mg/kg bw/day, no such findings were evident in litters from females treated with 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day. - Skeletal malformations:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Description (incidence and severity):
- At 600 mg/kg bw/day, there was clear effect of treatment on a large number of ossification parameters affecting most regions of the skeleton, with the number of affected fetuses/litters increased compared with control and differences frequently attaining statistical significance (p<0.01).
These parameters included unossified areas of the frontal and incomplete ossification of the occipital (Supra Occipital) bones of the skull, incomplete ossification of the cervical (neural) arch and thoracic centrum, incomplete ossification of the sacral (neural) arch and no ossification of the metacarpals. There was also a lower incidence of fetuses showing ossification of the ventral arch of vertebra 1, ossification of one or more fore paw phalanges and metatarsal 1st ossified.
At 200 mg/kg bw/day, an increased incidence of fetuses/litters showing incomplete ossification of the thoracic centrum was evident.
At 50 mg/kg bw/day, an increased incidence of fetuses/litters showing incomplete ossification of the cervical (neural) arch was evident. - Visceral malformations:
- no effects observed
- Description (incidence and severity):
- Visceral examinations of fetuses on Day 20 of gestation did not indicate any obvious effect of maternal treatment on fetal development at 50, 200 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
- Other effects:
- no effects observed
Effect levels (fetuses)
open allclose all
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Effect level:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- external malformations
- skeletal malformations
- visceral malformations
- other: fetal and placental weights
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEL
- Effect level:
- 200 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: no effects observed
Fetal abnormalities
- Abnormalities:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Localisation:
- other: skeletal: generalised pattern of delays in ossification
Overall developmental toxicity
- Developmental effects observed:
- yes
- Lowest effective dose / conc.:
- 600 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Treatment related:
- yes
- Relation to maternal toxicity:
- not specified
- Dose response relationship:
- not specified
Any other information on results incl. tables
Key
M |
Male |
F |
Female |
sd |
Standard deviation |
n |
Number of animals/litters |
NF |
Number of fetuses |
NL |
Number of litters |
%† |
Group mean percent |
N/A |
Not applicable |
NP |
Not pregnant |
V |
Viable fetuses+ |
FWT |
Fetal weight |
PWT |
Placental weight |
C |
Cervix |
ED |
Early death |
LD |
Late death |
DF |
Dead Fetus |
- |
No data available |
|
|
Statistical Footnotes: |
|
* |
Significantly different from control group p<0.05 |
** |
Significantly different from control group p<0.01 |
*** |
Significantly different from control group p<0.001 |
+= viable fetuses are identified by assigned fetal number
Summary of Female Performance
Category |
Number of Females at Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|
Initial Group Size |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Pregnant |
24 |
24 |
22 |
24 |
Non-Pregnant |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
Summary Incidence of Daily Clinical Observations
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
Number of Animals |
Clinical Observations |
Number Showing Effect |
0 (Control) |
24 |
No abnormalities detected |
|
50 |
24 |
Increased salivation Generalized fur loss |
1 (14) 1 (13-20) |
200 |
24 |
Increased salivation |
17 (8-19) |
600 |
24 |
Increased Salivation Hunched posture Noisy respiration |
24 (6-19) 2 (6-14, 16-19) 3 (10, 14, 18) |
Group Mean Body Weight Values
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Body Weight (g) on Day of Gestation |
||||||||
3 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
17 |
20 |
||
0 (Control) |
mean |
244.6 |
259.6 |
262.5 |
269.2 |
274.0 |
293.5 |
313.7 |
345.9 |
391.6 |
sd |
22.4 |
22.8 |
23.3 |
23.5 |
23.7 |
24.7 |
25.2 |
27.5 |
29.5 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
246.1 |
262.0 |
265.0 |
271.4 |
277.0 |
294.9 |
315.6 |
347.8 |
391.9 |
sd |
19.6 |
21.3 |
21.2 |
19.9 |
20.5 |
21.0 |
21.8 |
23.6 |
27.8 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
200 |
mean |
243.1 |
258.7 |
260.1 |
265.1 |
269.4 |
288.2 |
308.1 |
340.6 |
387.2 |
sd |
16.6 |
18.9 |
18.9 |
18.6 |
18.2 |
21.1 |
24.2 |
27.1 |
33.4 |
|
n |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
600 |
mean |
242.9 |
257.2 |
251.0 |
248.3** |
255.8* |
272.5** |
293.5* |
317.9** |
353.6*** |
sd |
20.1 |
22.3 |
21.9 |
22.2 |
24.0 |
23.8 |
24.1 |
28.9 |
32.6 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Group Mean Body Weight Change Values
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Body Weight Change (g) during Days of Gestation |
|||||||
3 to 5 |
5 to 6 | 6 to 7 |
7 to 8 | 8 to 11 |
11 to 14 | 14 to 17 |
17 to 20 | ||
0 (Control) |
mean |
15.0 |
2.9 |
6.7 |
4.8 |
19.5 |
20.2 |
32.2 |
45.8 |
sd |
3.7 |
2.9 |
4.3 |
3.3 |
5.6 |
3.4 |
5.5 |
5.5 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
15.9 |
3.0 |
6.4 |
5.7 |
17.8 |
20.8 |
32.1 |
44.2 |
sd |
4.8 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.6 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
4.9 |
7.0 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
200 |
mean |
15.6 |
1.4 |
5.0 |
4.3 |
18.9 |
19.9 |
32.5 |
46.6 |
sd |
3.2 |
4.3 |
5.4 |
3.7 |
5.5 |
5.4 |
4.6 |
8.1 |
|
n |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
60 |
mean |
14.3 |
-6.2*** |
-2.8*** |
7.5** |
16.8 |
21.0 |
24.4** |
35.7*** |
sd |
6.4 |
5.3 |
4.9 |
8.0 |
5.1 |
6.0 |
8.8 |
9.9 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Cumulative Body Weight Change (g) from Day 5 of Gestation |
||||||
6 |
7 |
8 |
11 |
14 |
17 |
20 |
||
0 (Control) |
mean |
2.9 |
9.6 |
14.4 |
33.9 |
54.1 |
86.3 |
132.0 |
sd |
2.9 |
4.6 |
4.2 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
10.4 |
13.9 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
3.0 |
9.3 |
15.0 |
32.8 |
53.6 |
85.7 |
129.9 |
sd |
3.7 |
4.0 |
5.5 |
7.3 |
8.9 |
10.1 |
14.8 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
200 |
mean |
1.4 |
6.4* |
10.6** |
29.5 |
49.4 |
81.9 |
128.5 |
sd |
4.3 |
3.8 |
4.1 |
5.0 |
7.7 |
10.7 |
16.8 |
|
n |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
600 |
mean |
-6.2*** |
-8.9*** |
-1.4*** |
15.4*** |
36.4*** |
60.8*** |
96.5*** |
sd |
5.3 |
5.0 |
8.2 |
8.8 |
10.0 |
14.6 |
18.6 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Group Mean Gravid Uterus Weight and Adjusted Body Weight and Body Weight Change Values
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Body Weight (g) on Days of Gestation |
Body Weight Change (g) during Days of Gestation |
Gravid Uterus Weight |
Adjusted |
Adjusted |
|
5 |
20 |
5-20 |
|||||
0 (Control) |
mean |
259.6 |
391.6 |
132.0 |
83.128 |
308.5 |
48.9 |
sd |
22.8 |
29.5 |
13.9 |
13.289 |
25.1 |
11.3 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
262.0 |
391.9 |
129.9 |
84.342 |
307.6 |
45.5 |
sd |
21.3 |
27.8 |
14.8 |
12.882 |
20.3 |
10.7 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
200 |
mean |
258.7 |
387.2 |
128.5 |
88.093 |
299.1 |
40.4* |
sd |
18.9 |
33.4 |
16.8 |
9.669 |
26.5 |
12.8 |
|
n |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
600 |
mean |
257.2 |
353.6 |
96.5 |
73.982* |
279.2*** |
21.9*** |
sd |
22.3 |
32.6 |
18.6 |
13.211 |
24.9 |
13.1 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
23 |
23 |
Group Mean Food Consumption Values
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Food Consumption (g/rat/day) between Days of Gestation |
|||||
3 - 5 |
5 - 8 |
8 - 11 |
11 - 14 |
14 - 17 |
17 - 20 |
||
0 (Control) |
mean |
24.9 |
22.8 |
24.5 |
25.1 |
27.1 |
26.7 |
sd |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.5 |
2.2 |
2.8 |
2.3 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
25.5 |
23.2 |
24.5 |
25.7 |
27.3 |
26.5 |
sd |
2.2 |
1.5 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
200 |
mean |
24.6 |
20.6** |
23.7 |
24.2 |
27.1 |
25.9 |
sd |
2.2 |
1.9 |
2.9 |
2.9 |
3.3 |
3.3 |
|
n |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
600 |
mean |
24.0 |
12.2*** |
20.1*** |
22.8* |
23.3*** |
24.6* |
sd |
3.6 |
2.6 |
2.3 |
3.5 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Summary Incidence of Necropsy Findings
|
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|
INTERIM DEATH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of animals examined |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Generalized fur loss |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
Stomach – non-glandular region – thickened |
0 |
0 |
0 |
23 |
Stomach – non-glandular region – sloughing |
0 |
0 |
0 |
24 |
Stomach – yellow colored contents |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
Stomach – raised white patches |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
No abnormalities detected |
24 |
23 |
24 |
0 |
Group Mean Litter DataValues
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|
Number of Corpora Lutea |
Number of Implants |
Number of Embryonic/Fetal Deaths |
Implantation Loss |
Number of Live Implants |
% |
Mean Male Fetal Weight (g) |
Mean Female Fetal Weight (g) |
Mean Fetal Weight (g) |
MeanPlacentalWeight |
Litter Weight (g) |
TotalPlacentalWeight |
|||||
Early |
Late |
Total |
Pre |
Post |
Male |
Female |
Total |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
mean |
14.5 |
13.4 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
7.1 |
3.2 |
6.3 |
6.7 |
13.0 |
48.8 |
4.264 |
4.069 |
4.161 |
0.588 |
53.742 |
7.585 |
sd |
2.3 |
2.1 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
10.1 |
8.8 |
1.7 |
2.1 |
2.5 |
11.4 |
0.353 |
0.328 |
0.325 |
0.072 |
9.761 |
1.477 |
|
n |
23 |
23 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
23 |
23 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
50 |
mean |
14.4 |
13.5 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
6.5 |
3.1 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
13.0 |
50.5 |
4.290 |
4.081 |
4.185 |
0.567 |
54.483 |
7.392 |
sd |
1.3 |
2.0 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
11.2 |
5.1 |
2.4 |
2.5 |
2.1 |
17.8 |
0.268 |
0.248 |
0.255 |
0.055 |
9.146 |
1.359 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
|
200 |
mean |
15.3 |
14.5 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
4.8 |
2.5 |
7.3 |
6.9 |
14.2 |
51.6 |
4.147 |
3.854* |
4.003 |
0.562 |
56.660 |
7.962 |
sd |
1.6 |
1.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
7.5 |
4.3 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
1.7 |
11.1 |
0.288 |
0.314 |
0.291 |
0.076 |
7.167 |
1.442 |
|
n |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
22 |
|
600 |
mean |
14.8 |
13.4 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.7 |
9.5 |
5.2 |
6.2 |
6.5 |
12.7 |
48.2 |
3.845* |
3.606* |
3.723*** |
0.528** |
47.100* |
6.684 |
sd |
2.0 |
2.2 |
0.4 |
0.8 |
0.9 |
10.8 |
7.1 |
2.0 |
2.1 |
2.3 |
13.9 |
0.305 |
0.294 |
0.299 |
0.070 |
8.476 |
1.410 |
|
n |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
24 |
Summary Incidence of Fetal External Findings
External Findings |
Dose level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|||||||||
Number of fetuses (litters) examined |
||||||||||||
312 (24) |
313 (24) |
312 (22) |
305 (24) |
|||||||||
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
|
Total Number Affected |
1 |
1 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.4 |
19 |
6 |
5.8* |
Small |
1 | 1 |
0.3 | 0 |
0 | 0.0 |
1 | 1 |
0.4 | 18 |
5 | 5.5 |
Hematoma - lower left side of back |
0 | 0 |
0.3 | 0 |
0 | 0.0 |
0 | 0 |
0.0 | 1 |
1 | 0.3 |
Summary Incidence of Fetal Visceral Findings
Visceral Findings |
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|||||||||
Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined |
||||||||||||
162 (24) |
161 (24) |
160 (22) |
158 (24) |
|||||||||
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
|
EXTERNAL/GENERAL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hemorrhage – kidney cortex - R |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
HEAD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tongue - short |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Rugae - non-uniform patterning |
17 |
10 |
10.7 |
7 |
6 |
5.2 |
8 |
8 |
5.5 |
10 |
6 |
6.4 |
ABDOMEN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liver - additional lobe between right and left median |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.1 |
Umbilical artery - left-sided |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
2 |
2 |
1.2 |
Urinary bladder - distended with fluid or gas |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
1 |
1.1 |
2 |
1 |
1.2 |
Testis - partially undescended |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
3 |
2 |
1.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Ureter - kinked |
18 |
14 |
10.9 |
9 |
8 |
5.3 |
20 |
10 |
12.1 |
13 |
10 |
8.5 |
Ureter - dilated - Slight/Severe |
5 |
5 |
3.3 |
5 |
5 |
2.9 |
11 |
8 |
6.8 |
8 |
6 |
5.0 |
Renal pelvic cavitation - increased - Slight/Severe |
10 |
7 |
5.9 |
5 |
4 |
3.0 |
13 |
8 |
7.7 |
4 |
3 |
2.4 |
Renal papilla - absent |
3 |
2 |
2.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.1 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
2 |
2 |
1.5 |
THORAX |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thymus - lobe partially undescended |
2 |
2 |
1.6 |
5 |
5 |
2.9 |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
15 |
8 |
9.9 |
Total |
37 |
20 |
22.6 |
25 |
17 |
15.7 |
36 |
18 |
22.5 |
44 |
19 |
27.9 |
Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings
Skeletal Findings |
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|||||||||
Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined |
||||||||||||
150 (24) |
152 (24) |
152 (22) |
147 (24) |
|||||||||
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
|
SKULL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fontanelle (anterior) - large |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
1 |
1.5 |
3 |
3 |
1.9 |
Nasal - incomplete ossification |
10 |
6 |
6.7 |
16 |
9 |
10.6 |
15 |
7 |
9.6 |
26 |
10 |
17.4 |
Nasal/Frontal - sutural bone |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
4 |
1 |
2.4 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Frontal - incomplete ossification |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
4 |
3 |
2.6 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
6 |
2 |
3.8 |
Frontal - unossified area |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
4 |
3 |
2.5 |
12 |
8 |
7.8** |
Parietal - incomplete ossification |
6 |
4 |
4.1 |
10 |
5 |
7.0 |
8 |
6 |
5.4 |
11 |
8 |
7.1 |
Parietal - unossified area(s) |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Interparietal - incomplete ossification |
18 |
11 |
11.4 |
26 |
11 |
17.1 |
27 |
12 |
17.7 |
42 |
16 |
29.8 |
Interparietal - unossified area(s) |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
Occipital (Supra-occipital) - incomplete ossification |
8 |
4 |
5.3 |
20 |
9 |
13.3 |
11 |
9 |
7.3 |
44 |
14 |
29.2** |
Occipital (Supra-occipital) - unossified area(s) |
6 |
5 |
3.8 |
3 |
3 |
2.0 |
3 |
2 |
2.2 |
10 |
7 |
6.2 |
Exoccipital - fused to 1stcervical (neural) arch |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Squamosal - incomplete ossification |
5 |
4 |
3.4 |
17 |
8 |
11.9 |
16 |
9 |
10.1 |
9 |
5 |
5.7 |
Squamosal - unossified area(s) |
3 |
2 |
1.9 |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
7 |
4 |
4.5 |
2 |
2 |
2.8 |
Jugal - incomplete ossification |
2 |
2 |
1.2 |
4 |
4 |
2.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Jugal - misshapen |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Zygomatic process of maxilla - incomplete ossification |
7 |
4 |
4.6 |
12 |
6 |
8.4 |
17 |
9 |
11.7 |
3 |
3 |
2.0 |
Zygomatic process of squamosal - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
Zygomatic process of squamosal - fused to jugal |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings (continued)
Skeletal Findings |
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|||||||||
Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined |
||||||||||||
150 (24) |
152 (24) |
152 (22) |
147 (24) |
|||||||||
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
|
SKULL (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premaxilla - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
1 |
1.1 |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
Hyoid - incomplete ossification |
6 |
5 |
4.0 |
14 |
11 |
9.3 |
7 |
5 |
4.5 |
7 |
6 |
4.7 |
Hyoid - not ossified |
5 |
4 |
2.8 |
7 |
6 |
4.7 |
11 |
9 |
7.0 |
12 |
9 |
8.1 |
Mandible - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Tympanic annulus - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Presphenoid - incomplete ossification |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Basisphenoid - incomplete ossification |
2 |
2 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
VERTEBRAL COLUMN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odontoid - ossification present |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Ventral arch of vertebra 1 - ossification present |
54 |
20 |
36.0 |
41 |
18 |
27.9 |
60 |
22 |
39.3 |
22 |
13 |
14.4** |
Cervical (neural) arch - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
6 |
4 |
3.9* |
4 |
3 |
2.8 |
12 |
8 |
7.4** |
Thoracic centrum - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
4 |
4 |
2.5* |
9 |
8 |
5.6** |
Thoracic centrum - not ossified |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Thoracic centrum - bipartite ossification |
6 |
5 |
3.7 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
3 |
3 |
1.9 |
5 |
4 |
3.0 |
Thoracic centrum - dumb-bell-shaped |
17 |
13 |
11.8 |
10 |
7 |
7.1 |
23 |
14 |
14.6 |
29 |
14 |
18.8 |
Thoracic centrum - asymmetrically ossified |
6 |
4 |
3.5 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.1 |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
Thoracic (neural) arch - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Lumbar centrum - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Lumbar centrum - bipartite ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Lumbar centrum - dumb-bell-shaped |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings (continued)
Skeletal Findings |
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|||||||||
Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined |
||||||||||||
150 (24) |
152 (24) |
152 (22) |
147 (24) |
|||||||||
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
|
VERTEBRAL COLUMN (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sacral (neural) arch - incomplete ossification |
12 |
5 |
7.9 |
12 |
6 |
8.2 |
8 |
5 |
4.8 |
15 |
8 |
10.6 |
Caudal vertebrae - less than 4 ossified |
19 |
11 |
11.5 |
21 |
10 |
14.3 |
16 |
8 |
10.3 |
35 |
14 |
23.1 |
RIBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ossification centre - associated with 7th cervical vertebra |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Ossification centre - associated with 1st lumbar vertebra |
8 |
5 |
5.3 |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
7 |
6 |
4.4 |
13 |
7 |
7.8 |
One or more ribs - wavy |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
One or more ribs - thickened |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Rib - short |
2 |
2 |
1.1 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Rib - rudimentary |
2 |
1 |
2.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Rib - fused |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Rib - no articulation point |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Costal cartilage - misaligned |
4 |
4 |
2.5 |
5 |
5 |
3.1 |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
5 |
5 |
3.0 |
Costal cartilage - not fused to sternebra |
10 |
5 |
8.6 |
18 |
10 |
12.7 |
15 |
10 |
9.8 |
17 |
12 |
13.1 |
STERNEBRAE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sternebra - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
4 |
4 |
2.6 |
Sternebra - not ossified |
1 |
1 |
0.5 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
Sternebra - bipartite ossification |
2 |
2 |
1.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
Sternebra - misaligned |
8 |
7 |
4.7 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
3 |
3 |
2.1 |
8 |
8 |
5.2 |
Sternebra - fused |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Xiphoid cartilage - partially split |
12 |
9 |
8.0 |
9 |
7 |
5.8 |
11 |
5 |
7.7 |
10 |
7 |
7.1 |
Summary Incidence of Fetal Skeletal Findings (continued)
Skeletal Findings |
Dose Level (mg/kg bw/day) |
|||||||||||
0 (Control) |
50 |
200 |
600 |
|||||||||
Number of Fetuses (litters) Examined |
||||||||||||
150 (24) |
152 (24) |
152 (22) |
147 (24) |
|||||||||
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
NF |
NL |
%† |
|
PECTORAL GIRDLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scapula - misshapen (comment on region) |
5 |
4 |
3.6 |
3 |
3 |
1.9 |
4 |
4 |
2.5 |
7 |
5 |
4.1 |
PELVIC GIRDLE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ischium - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Pubis - not ossified |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
1 |
1.3 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Pubis - incomplete ossification |
3 |
3 |
1.6 |
5 |
3 |
3.1 |
5 |
5 |
3.4 |
3 |
2 |
1.9 |
FORELIMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metacarpal - not ossified |
25 |
12 |
16.2 |
23 |
8 |
16.4 |
26 |
12 |
16.4 |
64 |
21 |
43.2** |
Metacarpal - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
2 |
2 |
1.3 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.7 |
Forepaw phalanges - 1 or more - ossified |
42 |
15 |
30.3 |
45 |
13 |
29.7 |
28 |
14 |
18.8 |
9 |
6 |
5.7** |
Humerus - incomplete ossification |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
2 |
2 |
1.4 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
3 |
2 |
1.9 |
HINDLIMBS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Metatarsal - 1st - ossified |
16 |
7 |
10.4 |
10 |
7 |
6.9 |
7 |
3 |
4.5 |
0 |
0 |
0.0** |
Metatarsal - not ossified |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.8 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
Metatarsal - incomplete ossification |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
0 |
0 |
0.0 |
1 |
1 |
0.6 |
Femur - incomplete ossification |
10 |
7 |
6.4 |
14 |
8 |
9.3 |
11 |
6 |
7.1 |
12 |
9 |
8.4 |
Total |
130 |
24 |
86.8 |
132 |
24 |
87.9 |
132 |
22 |
86.8 |
132 |
24 |
90.0 |
NOTE: a fetus may appear in more than one category
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The oral (gavage) administration of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide (CAS#5809-08-5) to pregnant rats from gestation Days 5 to 19, at dose levels of 50, 200 or 600 mg/kg bw/day was associated with lower maternal body weight gain during gestation and an effect on food consumption at 600 mg/kg bw/day. Slight effects on body weight development were noted at 200 mg/kg bw/day, however, these were considered not to be toxicologically significant. No similar effects were apparent at 50 mg/kg bw/day. Consequently, 200 mg/kg bw/day was considered to represent the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and 50 mg/kg bw/day was considered to represent the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the pregnant female.
In-utero survival of the developing conceptus was unaffected by maternal treatment with 600 mg/kg bw/day, although reduced fetal and placental weights and an increased incidence of skeletal findings indicated an adverse effect on fetal growth. No changes in the measured fetal parameters or embryofetal development were detected at 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day. The ‘No Observed Effect Level’ (NOEL) for developmental toxicity was therefore considered to be 200 mg/kg bw/day. - Executive summary:
Introduction
The study was performed to investigate the effects of the test item on embryonic and fetal development following repeated administration by gavage to the pregnant female during gestation including the period of organogenesis.
The study was designed to comply with the following guidelines:
· US EPA Health Effects Test Guideline OPPTS 870.3700, ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (August 1998)
· Japanese Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Testing guidelines for Toxicology studies, 12 NohSan No 8147, (24 November 2000)
· OECD Guidelines for Testing of Chemicals, No 414, ‘Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study’ (adopted 22 January 2001)
· Commission Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 test methods pursuant to Regulations (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)
Methods
The test item was administered by gavage to three groups each of twenty-four time mated Sprague-Dawley Crl:CD®(SD) IGS BR strain rats, between Days 5 and 19 of gestation inclusive at dose levels 50, 200, and 600 mg/kg bw/day. A further group of twenty-four time mated females was exposed to the vehicle only (Arachis oil BP) to serve as a control.
Clinical signs, body weight change, food and water consumptions were monitored during the study.
All females were terminated on Day 20 of gestation and subjected to gross necropsy including examination of the uterine contents. The number of corpora lutea, number, position and type of implantation, placental weights, fetal weights, sex and external and internal macroscopic appearance were recorded. Half of each litter were examined for detailed skeletal development and the remaining half were subjected to detailed visceral examination.
Results
Mortality
There were no unscheduled deaths during the study.
Clinical Observations
There were considered to be no clinical signs apparent that were specifically related to systemic toxicity of the test item.
Body Weight
Females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day showed a statistically significant reduction in body weight gain between Days 5 and 7 of gestation, with actual body weight losses being evident in the majority of females on these days. Signs of recovery were noted from Days 7 to 14, however, reductions in body weight gain were again apparent between Days 14 and 20 which achieved statistical significance. Body weight and body weight gain when adjusted for gravid uterus weight were also statistically significantly reduced (-11 and -55% respectively) in these females.
No toxicologically significant effects were detected in females treated with 50 and 200 mg/kg bw/day.
Food Consumption
Reductions in food consumption were evident in females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day throughout the treatment period. No adverse effects of treatment were apparent in females treated with 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day.
Water Consumption
No adverse effect on water consumption was detected.
Post Mortem Studies
All females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day exhibited thickening and/or sloughing of the non-glandular region of the stomach. Isolated occurrences of yellow colored contents in the stomach and raised white patches on the non-glandular region of the stomach were also apparent.
No macroscopic abnormalities considered to be related to treatment with the test item were noted in animals treated with 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day.
Litter Data and Litter Placental and Fetal Weights
The number of implantations and subsequent embryofetal survival were unaffected by maternal treatment at 50, 200 or 600 mg/kg bw/day. At 600 mg/kg bw/day, mean fetal weights for both sexes were lower than control, resulting in lower mean litter weights. Placental weights were also reduced at this dose level.
No toxicologically significant effects were detected at 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day.
Fetal Examination
External Findings
An increased incidence of small fetuses was evident from females treated with 600 mg/kg bw/day which resulted in a statistically significant increase in total number of fetuses with external findings. No such findings were evident in litters from females treated with 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day.
Detailed Visceral Examinations
Visceral examinations of fetuses on Day 20 of gestation did not indicate any obvious effect of maternal treatment on fetal development at 50, 200 or 600 mg/kg bw/day.
Detailed Skeletal Examination
At 600 mg/kg bw/day, there was clear effect of treatment on a large number of ossification parameters affecting most regions of the skeleton, with the number of fetuses/litters affected being increased compared with control (areas not ossified or showing incomplete ossification). Decreases were also noted in the number of fetuses/litters showing ossified areas. No treatment-related adverse effects were detected in the type and incidence of skeletal findings in fetuses from females treated with 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day.
Conclusion
The oral (gavage) administration of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl hydroperoxide (CAS#5809-08-5) to pregnant rats from gestation Days 5 to 19, at dose levels of 50, 200 or 600 mg/kg bw/day was associated with lower maternal body weight gain during gestation and an effect on food consumption at 600 mg/kg bw/day. Slight effects on body weight development were noted at 200 mg/kg bw/day, however, these were considered not to be toxicologically significant. No similar effects were apparent at 50 mg/kg bw/day. Consequently, 200 mg/kg bw/day was considered to represent the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for the pregnant female and 50 mg/kg bw/day was considered to represent the No Observed Effect Level (NOEL) for the pregnant female.
In-uterosurvival of the developing conceptus was unaffected by maternal treatment with 600 mg/kg bw/day, although reduced fetal and placental weights and an increased incidence of skeletal findings indicated an adverse effect on fetal growth. No changes in the measured fetal parameters or embryofetal development were detected at 200 or 50 mg/kg bw/day. The ‘No Observed Effect Level’ (NOEL) for developmental toxicity was therefore considered to be 200 mg/kg bw/day.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our websites.