Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: inhalation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: inhalation
Type of information:
other: Published data
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Reliability score 2 on the basis of the weight of evidence found during review of public documents existing relating to toxicological data
Justification for type of information:
Pure talc has the formula Mg3Si4O10(OH)2 and a chemical composition of 31.88% by weight (wt) magnesium oxide (MgO), therefore the health effects of Magnesium hydroxide also should be taken into account

Data source

Referenceopen allclose all

Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2010
Reference Type:
review article or handbook
Title:
MSDS for Magnesium hydroxide
Author:
Albemarle Corporation Ltd
Year:
2010
Bibliographic source:
Albemarle Corporation Health & Environment Department

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 403 (Acute Inhalation Toxicity)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method B.2 (Acute Toxicity (Inhalation))
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EPA OPPTS 870.1300 (Acute inhalation toxicity)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Test type:
acute toxic class method
Limit test:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
Magnesium hydroxide
EC Number:
215-170-3
EC Name:
Magnesium hydroxide
Cas Number:
1309-42-8
IUPAC Name:
magnesium dihydroxide
Test material form:
aerosol dispenser: not specified

Test animals

Species:
rat
Strain:
Wistar
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
Species
Rat: Crl:WI(Han) (outbred, SPF-Quality)
Recognised by international guidelines as the recommended test system (e.g. OECD, EC).
Source: Charles River Deutschland, Sulzfeld, Germany.
Number of animals
5 males and 5 females (females were nulliparous and non-pregnant) per exposure level.
Age and body weight
Young adult animals were selected (approximately \ weeks old).
Animals used within the study were of approximately the same age and body weight variation did not exceed +/- 20% of the sex mean.
Identification
Earmark
Health inspection
A health inspection was performed prior to commencement of treatment, to ensure that the animals were in a good state of health.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
inhalation: aerosol
Type of inhalation exposure:
whole body
Vehicle:
air
Details on inhalation exposure:
Test atmosphere generation
Administering the test substance to a stream of dry pressurized air using a combination of a spiral feeder and air mover generated an aerosol. The aerosol was passed through a cyclone, allowing larger particles to settle, before it entered the exposure chamber (Appendix 1, Figure 1). The mean total airflow was 47 L/min. From the exposure chamber the test atmosphere was passed through a filter before it was released to the exhaust of the fume hood.

Nominal concentration
The nominal concentration was calculated by dividing the amount of test substance used by the volume of pressurized air (average air flow times exposure time) entering the exposure chamber used for exposure of the animals.

Actual concentration
The actual concentration was determined twelve times during the exposure period. Samples were drawn from the test atmosphere through a tube mounted in one of the free animal ports of the middle section of the exposure chamber. Samples were drawn through a glass fiber filter (type APFC04700, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The collected amount of the test substance in the air sample was measured gravimetrically. Sample volumes were measured by means of a dry gas meter (type G 1.6, Actaris Meterfabriek B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands).

Subsequently the mean concentration with the standard deviation was calculated.

The particle size distribution was characterized twice during the exposure period. The samples were drawn (2 L/min) from the test atmosphere through a tube mounted in one of the free animal ports of the middle section of the exposure chamber (Appendix 1, Figures 1 and 2). The samples were collected with an 8 stage Marple personal cascade impactor containing fiber glass filters (SKC 225-713, fiber glass, SKC Omega Specialty Division, Chelmsford, MA, USA) and a fiber glass back-up filter (SEC-290-GFS, Westech, Upper Stondon, Bedfordshire, England). Amounts of test substance collected were measured gravimetrically. Subsequently the Mass Median Aerodynamic Diameter (MMAD) and the Geometric Standard Deviation (GSD) were determined.
Analytical verification of test atmosphere concentrations:
yes
Remarks:
The collected amount of the test substance in the air sample was measured gravimetrically. Sample volumes were measured by means of a dry gas meter (type G 1.6, Actaris Meterfabriek B.V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands).
Duration of exposure:
4 h
Concentrations:
The mean actual concentration was 2.1 ± 0.47 mg/L. The nominal concentration was 21.7 mg/L resulting in a generation efficiency (ratio of actual and nominal concentration) of 10%. The concentration measurements distributed over time showed that the substance was sufficiently stable
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5 males and 5 females
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 15 days
- Frequency of observations and weighing: Days 1 (pre-administration), 2, 4, 8 and 15.
- Necropsy of survivors performed: yes
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs, body weight,organ weights, histopathology, other: On Day 1, one and three hours after exposure and once daily thereafter until Day 15.
Statistics:
No statistical analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Effect levelsopen allclose all
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 2.1 mg/L air
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LC50
Effect level:
> 2 100 mg/m³ air
Based on:
test mat.
Exp. duration:
4 h
Remarks on result:
other: To convert mg/l into mg/m³ 1 mg/m³ = mg/l x 1000 (2.1 x 1000=2100 mg/m³)
Mortality:
No mortality occurred.
Clinical signs:
other: No clinical signs were noted during exposure. After exposure, ptosis and/or piloerection were noted in two males and one female on Day 1 only.
Body weight:
Overall body weight gain in males and females was within the range expected for rats of this strain and age used in this type of study.

Any other information on results incl. tables

To convert mg/l into mg/m³     

1=1000L

        

1 mg/m³=mg/l x 1000, 2.1mg/l x1000=2100 mg/m³

 

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
other: practically nontoxic
Conclusions:
The inhalatory LC50, 4h value of Magnesium hydroxide in Wistar rats was established to exceed 2.1 mg/L.
Executive summary:

Groups of 5 male and female Wistar rats were treated with Magnesium hydroxide as aerosol during 4 hours. No mortality or other relevant adverse effects were observed. An inhalatory LC50 (4h)value for magnesium hydroxide exceeding 2.1 mg/L was determined, being this value the maximum feasible concentration that could be tested.