ECHA decisions on data sharing disputes under REACH

 

Issue date Decision Legal basis Outcome Decision of the Board of Appeal Keywords
10/01/2019 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, affiliates, unjustified delays in providing the SIEF agreement, failure to communicate timely
14/12/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, substance sameness, SIP, unjustified delays in providing the LoA costs, absence of the SIEF agreement and SIP
10/12/2018 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of efforts to establish contact, not all efforts exhausted, dispute filed not as a measure of last resort
28/11/2018 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, opt-out, a token, unjustified concerns regarding the LoA costs, the inconsistent communication, dispute filed not as a measure of last resort
26/11/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the SIP and SIEF agreement, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing mechanism, lack of justification of costs
21/11/2018 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, failure to communicate timely, Third party representative, dispute filed not as a measure of last resort
21/11/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model, discussions regarding the lead role, lack of justification of the LoA costs and surcharge
19/11/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of replies, absence of information regarding the LoA costs
24/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, not all efforts exhausted, third party data owner, lack of transparency regarding the reimbursement mechanism, LoA costs recalculation
18/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the cost itemisation, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the costs
18/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the cost itemisation, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the costs
18/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the cost itemisation, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the costs
18/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the cost itemisation, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the costs
18/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the cost itemisation, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the costs
09/10/2018 [PDF] 27(6) unfavourable for the claimant   LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing the SIEF agreement
01/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of the cost breakdown, lack of proof of costs, unjustified delays, legitimate third party data owner, legitimate possession of data
01/10/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, unjustified delays in providing costs itemisation
21/09/2018 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimant   Inquiry, LoA costs, lack of proof of study costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model and costs itemisation, lack of a reimbursement mechanism, substance sameness
19/09/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of price differentiation between tonnage ranges, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model
18/09/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, affiliates, Only Representative, lack of justification regarding the LoA cost
18/09/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the administrative costs
29/08/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of any information regarding the LoA costs, a non-responsive lead registrant, unjustified delays
13/08/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of any information regarding the LoA costs, a non-responsive lead registrant, unjustified delays
09/08/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the administrative costs
30/07/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of the information regarding the LoA costs, absence of the cost itemisation, unjustified delays
27/07/2018 [PDF] 27(6) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, Intellectual property rights, patent, Substance Identity Profile, substance sameness
24/07/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of the information regarding the LoA costs, absence of the cost itemisation, unjustified delays
20/07/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, lack of transparency regarding the SIEF agreement, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model
16/07/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of the information regarding the LoA costs, absence of the cost itemisation, unjustified delays
12/07/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, lack of justification costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model
11/07/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, absence of the information regarding the LoA costs, absence of the cost itemisation, unjustified delays
29/06/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, SIP, substance sameness, absence of the cost itemisation
01/06/2018 [PDF] 27(6) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, a measure of a last resort, not all efforts exhausted
28/05/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of justification for application of risk surcharge, lack of justification for deposit and administrative costs
25/05/2018 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, annual increase of the LoA costs, lack of reimbursement mechanism, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model
14/05/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, SIP, absence of the information regarding the LoA costs
09/05/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, costs resulting from a substance evaluation
26/04/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, LoA costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model, absence of a reimbursement mechanism
26/04/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, absence of any information regarding the LoA costs, unjustified delays
24/04/2018 [PDF] 27(6) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF, Intellectual property rights, patent, Substance Identity Profile
09/04/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, affiliates, lack of transparency regarding the cost-sharing model, risk surcharge, absence of the cost itemisation, absence of a reimbursement mechanism
09/04/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, delay in provision of a LoA costs, lack of transparency regarding the cost itemisation, lack of justifications of the costs, absence of a reimbursement mechanism
23/03/2018 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, Not tonnage band-specific LoA costs, non-responsive lead registrant, lack of transparency regarding the LoA costs, absence of the cost itemisation
15/02/2018 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimant   SIEF, impurity profile, Joint submission, Substance Identity Profile, absence of information regarding the LoA and data costs, absence of the itemisation
30/01/2018 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF members, LoA cost, the itemisation of administrative costs, a measure of a last resort, on-going negotiations, not all efforts exhausted
24/10/2017 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF members, LoA cost, affiliates, annual surcharge, a measure of a last resort, not all efforts exhausted
22/09/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   Only Representative, delay in sending an invoice, refusal to sell a LoA, delaying the negotiations
31/08/2017 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   Group claim, LoA costs, opt-out, annual surcharge, the cost itemisation, lack of transparency of the counter-offer
29/06/2017 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF,
Individual registration,
IP rights,
legitimate possession of data,
opt-out
29/06/2017 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF,
Individual registration,
IP rights,
legitimate possession of data,
opt-out
16/06/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,
absence of the cost itemisation,
unjustified delay in providing the itemisation,
lack of transparency
16/06/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,
absence of the cost itemisation,
unjustified delay in providing the itemisation,
lack of transparency
18/05/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,
access to a study,
absence of the itemisation of the data costs and administrative costs
31/05/2017 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   Failure to provide cost breakdown,
SIEF,
lack of discount for REACH-only use of data
28/02/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,Token, intermediates
20/02/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,
Intermediates,
Lack of transparency regarding the cost breakdown,
Full opt out
13/02/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,
Intermediates,
Lack of transparency regarding the cost breakdown.
13/02/2017 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimant   SIEF,
Token,
full opt out
20/02/2017 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
Token and opt-out
24/01/2017 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Delays in providing cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
24/11/2016 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF,
The legitimacy of the lead registrant
Opt-out, the purity profile
SIEF members
Studies
13/10/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding administrative cost
Token and opt-out
13/10/2016 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
02/09/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Unjustified increase of LoA price
Lack of reimbursement mechanism
29/06/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Delays in providing SIEF agreement and cost calculation
13/04/2016 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Administrative cost shared equally by all co-registrants regardless of tonnage band
12/04/2016 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
25/11/2015 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant  
SIEF
Delays in providing SIEF agreement and cost calculation,
Responsibility of the Only Representative for data sharing
07/09/2015 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant  
SIEF
Lack of discount for REACH-only use of data
Lack of justification for application of risk premium
22/07/2015 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
30/01/2015 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant  
SIEF
26/08/2014 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimants  
Inquiry
Group claim
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost sharing mechanism
26/08/2014 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimants  
Inquiry
Group claim
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost sharing mechanism
11/04/2014 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
03/04/2014 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimants   SIEF
Group claim
Lack of transparency regarding cost breakdown
Lack of transparency regarding cost sharing mechanism
25/02/2014 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
25/10/2013 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of cost breakdown
25/10/2013 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
04/10/2013 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
16/08/2013 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
16/08/2013 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of cost breakdown
Failure to communicate timely
16/08/2013 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
16/08/2013 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of cost breakdown
Failure to communicate timely
26/07/2013 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Price not dependent on tonnage band
No option of buying LoA without CSR
Price calculation
23/07/2013 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
22/07/2013 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant   SIEF
Lack of cost breakdown
Price not dependent on tonnage band
12/07/2013 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant A-017-2013 SIEF
Unjustified annual increase of LoA price
29/04/2013 [PDF] 30(3) inadmissible   Dispute on data from different substance
05/03/2012 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
14/02/2011 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
24/01/2011 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
24/01/2011 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
22/12/2010 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
30/11/2010 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
22/11/2010 [PDF] 30(3) inadmissible   Dispute after the conclusion of data sharing agreement
19/11/2010 [PDF] 30(3) favourable for the claimant A-003-2011 SIEF
Unilateral approach on data gathering and dossier development
Disagreement on changes of price calculation methodology
05/11/2010 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
20/10/2010 [PDF] 30(3) unfavourable for the claimant   SIEF
11/10/2010 [PDF] 27(6) favourable for the claimant   Inquiry
Lack of explanation of costs
Failure to reply

Categories Display

Oznakowane jako:

(kliknij znak, aby wyszukać właściwą treść)