Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Environmental fate & pathways

Hydrolysis

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Referenceopen allclose all

Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Data waiving:
other justification
Justification for data waiving:
other:
Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
(Q)SAR
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Validated QSAR model. Fragment(s) on this compound are not available from the fragment library. Substitute(s) have been used.
Justification for type of information:
QSAR prediction: migrated from IUCLID 5.6
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Calculation based on HYDROWIN v2.00, Estimation Programs Interface Suite™ for Microsoft® Windows v 4.10. US EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
GLP compliance:
no
pH:
8
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
117.42 d
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
other: Kb half-life; The substance is (not) within the applicability domain of the model.
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
DT50:
> 3.22 yr
Type:
(pseudo-)first order (= half-life)
Remarks on result:
other: Kb half-life; The substance is (not) within the applicability domain of the model.
Other kinetic parameters:
Kb at atom#16: 3.416 E-2 L/mol*sec
Total Kb for pH > 8 at 25 °C : 6.832 E-2 L/mol*sec
Executive summary:

QPRF: HYDROWIN v2.00

1.

Substance

See “Test material identity”

2.

General information

 

2.1

Date of QPRF

24 Oct. 2013

2.2

QPRF author and contact details

BASF SE, Dept. for Product Safety, Ludwigshafen, Germany

3.

Prediction

3.1

Endpoint
(OECD Principle 1)

Endpoint

Aqueous hydrolysis rate

Dependent variable

Hydrolytic half-life

3.2

Algorithm
(OECD Principle 2)

Model or submodel name

WSKOWWIN

Model version

v. 2.00

Reference to QMRF

Estimation of Aqueous Hydrolysis Rate Constants using HYDROWIN v2.00 (EPI Suite v4.11) (QMRF)

Predicted value (model result)

See “Results and discussion”

Input for prediction

Chemical structure via CAS number or SMILES

Descriptor values

- SMILES: structure of the compound as SMILES notation

Fragment values:

- Taft constant (sigma*)

- Steric factor (Es)

- Hammett constants (sigma-meta and sigma-para)

3.3

Applicability domain
(OECD principle 3)

Domains:

1) Chemical class

An equation for the estimation of the aqueous hydrolytic rate constant is available for the chemical class of the substance.

2) Fragments (On-Line HYDROWIN User’s Guide, Appendix E)

All fragments were identified.

3.4

The uncertainty of the prediction
(OECD principle 4)

According to REACH Guidance Document R.7a, (Nov. 2012), hydrolysis kinetics are usually determined experimentally. The guidance document also lists HYDROWIN as a means to estimate the hydrolytic half-life. The estimation is limited to only a few chemical classes. The model marks uncertainties of the estimate due to substitute values for missing fragments. As yet, the QSAR equations in HYDROWIN have not been rigorously tested with an external validation dataset. Currently, the number of chemicals with evaluated hydrolysis rates is relatively small in number, and the available data have been used to train the QSAR regressions. The training data set for esters has an acceptable size (n = 124). Equations for the other chemical classes were developed on very small databases (n = 7 to 20); therefore the reliability of estimations for members of other chemical classes than esters is low.

3.5

The chemical mechanisms according to the model underpinning the predicted result
(OECD principle 5)

Hydrolysis is a common degradation route in the environment, where reaction of a substance with water with a net exchange of the X group with an OH at the reaction centre such that RX + H2O →ROH + HX. Hydrolysis is often dependent upon pH as the reaction is commonly catalysed by hydrogen or hydroxide ions.

The model uses the principle of linear free energy relationships (LFER) to estimate the aqueous hydrolysis rate.

References

- US EPA (2012). On-Line HYDROWIN User’s Guide, Appendix E: Fragment Substituent Values Used by HYDROWIN.

- ECHA (2012). REACH Guidance Document R.7a, (Nov. 2012). 381 pp.

Identified fragments for the current substance:

Fragment(s) on this compound are NOT available from the fragment library. Substitute(s) have been used!!! Substitute R1, R2, R3, or R4 fragments are marked with double astericks "**".

 

ESTER: R1-C(=O)-O-R2     ** R1: n-Butyl-

** R2: iso-Butyl-

 

ESTER: R1-C(=O)-O-R2     ** R1: n-Butyl-

** R2: iso-Butyl-

Endpoint:
hydrolysis
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Study period:
14 Oct 1994 - 15 Feb 1995
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions.
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 111 (Hydrolysis as a Function of pH)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
not specified
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
PHYSICO-CHEMICAL PROPERTIES
- Vapour pressure: 2.1 * 10E(-02) Pa at 25 °C
- Water solubility: 35 mg/L (at 25 ± 1 °C)

Radiolabelling:
no
Analytical monitoring:
not specified
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Type, material and volume of test flasks, other equipment used: glass flask with a glass cap
Number of replicates:
2
Positive controls:
no
Negative controls:
no
Preliminary study:
No hydrolysis was observed in pH4 at 50 ± 1 °C after 5 days.
Test performance:
Concentration was 15 mg/L.
Temperature: (pH7) 70 ± 1 °C, 80 ± 1 °C, 90 ± 1 °C
(pH9) 50 ± 1 °C, 60 ± 1 °C, 70 ± 1 °C
Transformation products:
not specified
pH:
7
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0 h-1
DT50:
1 850 d
pH:
9
Temp.:
25 °C
Hydrolysis rate constant:
0.004 h-1
DT50:
7.31 d

Description of key information

Hydrolysis is not expected to be a relevant degradation pathway since the substance is readily biodegradable.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Additional information

In accordance with Annex VIII, column 2 (9.2.2.1) of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, the testing for hydrolysis as a function of pH is not required as the substance is readily biodegradable. Furthermore, in accordance with Annex XI, subitem 2. Testing is technically not possible, of Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006, testing for hydrolysis as a function of pH may be omitted, if the test is technically not possible to conduct. The substance is expected to be very poorly soluble in water (0.0032 mg/L). Thus, the test is technically not possible to conduct since the practical insolubility of the test substance impedes a proper analytics.

Generally, as Bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate does contain carboxylic ester groups, hydrolysis may be possible to some extent. The stability of the test substance at pH 13.5, the low reactions rate at an increased temperature, and the partly saponification under alcoholic and acidic conditions (11% at pH 2), permits the conclusion, that the hydrolytic degradation of the test substance runs slowly under natural conditions (Brown 1983). QSAR calculations (DT50 [pH 7] > 1 yr; HYDROWIN v2.00) and experimental data for a structurally very similar substance (Dibutyl adipate, DT50 [pH 7] > 1850 d) clearly confirms, that hydrolysis represents a negligible pathway for the environmental fate of the substance in the environment. This assumption of lack of relevance of abiotic degradation is in line with the assessment of substances as defined by the US-EPA "Aliphatic Diester Category" (US-EPA, 2010).