Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Dermal absorption

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
dermal absorption in vitro / ex vivo
Type of information:
read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
weight of evidence
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study follows some principles of the OECD Guideline 428 (skin absorption : in vitro method), but the total recovery did not meet the criteria in the OECD guideline.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Human Skin Absorption and Metabolism of the Contact Allergens, Cinnamic Aldehyde, and Cinnamic Alcohol
Author:
Smith CK, Moore CA, Elahi EN, Smart ATS and Hotchkiss SAM
Year:
2000
Bibliographic source:
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 168, 189-199

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The study follows some principles of the OECD Guideline 428 (skin absorption : in vitro method)
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Heptanal, 2-(phenylmethylene)-, (2E)-
EC Number:
800-696-3
Cas Number:
78605-96-6
Molecular formula:
C14 H18 O
IUPAC Name:
Heptanal, 2-(phenylmethylene)-, (2E)-
Details on test material:
The test material typically contains >94% of the trans (E) isomer and 4-5% of the cis (Z) isomer.
Radiolabelling:
no

Test animals

Species:
human
Sex:
female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
The skin samples were obtained from six female individuals (n = 4 females, two abdomen and two breast skin samples, age range 26 -64 years) who underwent surgery at St. Mary's Hospital, London or were donors to the Stephen Kirby Skin Bank, Roehampton.
Within 1 h following excision, the tissue was washed in ice-cold 0.9% saline solution. Skin (~100 cm2) was cleaned manually of all fat and consecutive tissue using dissection scissors. Circles of skin (1.7 cm diameter) were cut using a circular sharpened steel cutter and placed in a petri dish on ice. The weights (~0.2 -0.3 g per circle) of each full-thickness skin sample were determined.

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
open
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Duration of exposure:
24 or 2 hours
Doses:
10 µL of cinnamaldehyde (up to 78 µM) was used
No. of animals per group:
Not applicable
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
The skin samples were obtained from six female individuals (n = 4 females, two abdomen and two breast skin samples, age range 26 -64 years) who underwent surgery at St. Mary's Hospital, London or were donors to the Stephen Kirby Skin Bank, Roehampton.
Within 1 h following excision, the tissue was washed in ice-cold 0.9% saline solution. Skin (~100 cm2) was cleaned manually of all fat and consecutive tissue using dissection scissors. Circles of skin (1.7 cm diameter) were cut using a circular sharpened steel cutter and placed in a petri dish on ice. The weights (~0.2 -0.3 g per circle) of each full-thickness skin sample were determined.
Details on in vitro test system (if applicable):
SKIN PREPARATION
- Source of skin: reduction mammoplasty (breast) or apronectomy (abdomen) operation
- Ethical approval if human skin: all skin samples were obtained with ethical approval from the Local Research Ethics Committees of St. Mary's Hospital and Stephen Kirby Skin Bank, respectively.
- Type of skin: breast or abdomen
- Preparative technique: operation
- Thickness of skin (in mm): no information
- Membrane integrity check: no information
- Storage conditions:
- Justification of species, anatomical site and preparative technique:

PRINCIPLES OF ASSAY
- Diffusion cell: yes
- Receptor fluid: 0.025 M Hepes, Hank's balanced salts solution (9.8g/l), 4 mM sodium bicarbonate, 50 mg/l gentamycin, pH7.4; degassed; and filtered using a 65-um PEFE filter (Whatman, UK) prior to use
- Solubility of test substance in receptor fluid:
- Static system: no information
- Flow-through system: yes (flowing at 2 mL/h)
- Test temperature: no information
- Humidity: no information
- Occlusion: all samples were occluded throughout the experiment
- Reference substance(s):
- Other: During 24-h experiments, each fraction was collected over 2 h; for 2-h experiments each fraction was collected over 15 min.

Results and discussion

Signs and symptoms of toxicity:
not specified
Dermal irritation:
not specified
Absorption in different matrices:
No data
Total recovery:
The total recovery of cinnamic compounds (adding together the percentage levels found to penetrate, evaporate, remain unabsorbed, or reside free within the skin) following application of 78 micro mol cinnamic aldehyde was 82.9%. The majority of the initial dose was recovered as cinnamaldehyde (62.2%); 2.8% was reduced to cinnamic alcohol and a total of 17.9% had been oxidatively metabolized to cinnamic acid.
Conversion factor human vs. animal skin:
Not applicable - human skin samples used in assay

Any other information on results incl. tables

During 24 h absorption of neat cinnamaldehyde, parent cinnamaldehyde was detected at low levels (80 -150 nmol/cm2skin/h) in receptor fluid in the first three 2 -h fractions and began to penetrate the skin at an increasing rate after an approximate lag time of 6 h. Levels of cinnamaldehyde-derived cinnamic alcohol (321.4 +/- 250.3 nmol/cm2skin/h) and cinnamic acid (238.0 +/- 164.0 nmol/cm2skin/h) metabolites were higher than parent cinnamaldehyde (132.9 +/- 24.6 nmol/cm2skin/h) in the first 2 -h receptor fluid fraction and maximal penetration for the two metabolites occurred between 4 and 8 h. After 8 h, the rates of penetration for cinnamic alcohol and cinnamic acid continually fell and cinnamic alcohol approached undetectable levels (limit of detection < 0.1 nmol) in the 22- to 24 -h fraction. After 12 h, the level of penetrated cinnamaldehyde became greater than the level of cinnamic alcohol metabolite and, after 18 h, parent cinnamaldehyde became the predominant cinnamic compound present in receptor fluid.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The skin penetration of cinnamic aldehyde in this study was 16%.
Executive summary:

The in vitro percutaneous absorption and metabolism of cinnamaldehyde and cinnamic acid (78 micromol dose) has been examined using freshly excised, metabolically viable, full-thickness breast and abdomen skin from six female donors. Penetration rates and total recoveries of cinnamic compounds that were present in receptor fluid, extracted from within the skin, evaporated from the skin surface, or remained unabsorbed on the skin surface after 24 h were quantified by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. At the end of the 24 -h experiment for neat cinnamaldehyde application to human skin, a total of 9.4% of the initial applied dose of cinmamaldehyde had penetrated the skin as cinnamaldehyde, cinnamic alcohol, or cinnamic acid. Only cinnamaldehyde (1.0% of the initial dose) was seen to evaporate onto the occlusion cell cap after 24 h. The majority of parent cinnamaldehyde (~55%) had remained on the skin surface at the end of the experiment; ~10.6% of the initial dose had been converted to cinnamic acid and had remained on the skin surface; no cinnamic alcohol was found to be unabsorbed. Within the skin, a total of 6.6% of the initial cinnamaldehyde dose was found as either cinnamaldehyde (2.9%), cinnamic alcohol (0.4%), or cinnamic acid (3.3%). Therefore, the skin penetration of cinnamaldehyde in this study was 16% (9.4% + 6.6%).