Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-765-0 | CAS number: 6713-03-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
The in vitro skin corrosion of the test substance was determined in accordance with the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 431. The Relative mean tissue viability calculated as a percentage of the negative control was 86.9% after the 60 minutes exposure and 78.5% after the 3 minutes exposure. The test item did not meet the criteria for classification as corrosive to the skin according to the criteria laid down in the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 431.
The in vitro skin irritation of the test substance was determined in accordance with the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 439. The percentage of viability obtained with the test item 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol was 80.735%, therefore it has to be considered as non-irritant to the skin according to the criteria laid down in the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 439. All the acceptance criteria were met and the study is therefore considered as valid.
The in vitro skin irritation of the test substance was determined in accordance with the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 437. An In Vitro Irritation Score (IVIS) of 18.69 was calculated for 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol from corneal opacity and permeability measurements. No prediction can be made if the IVIS is >3 but ≤ 55 and, therefore no conclusion can be made based on the criteria laid down in the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 437. All the acceptance criteria were met and the study is therefore considered as valid.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin corrosion: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 8 May 2017 to 28 June 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 431 (In Vitro Skin Corrosion: Reconstructed Human Epidermis (RHE) Test Method)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Source species:
- other: reconstructed human epidermis
- Details on animal used as source of test system:
- Not applicable
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: MatTek’s EpiDermTM model
- Tissue batch number(s): Lot# 25816
- Date of initiation of testing: 08 May 17
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37°C
DYE BINDING METHOD
- Dye used in the dye-binding assay: MTT
- Spectrophotometer: BMG LabTech FluoStar Optima
- Wavelength: 570 nm
- Filter: None - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 50 μl
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 μl
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 50 μl - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 3 and 60 minutes
- Number of replicates:
- Triplicate
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 3 minutes (mean)
- Value:
- 78.5
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- 60 minutes (mean)
- Value:
- 86.9
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The Relative mean tissue viability calculated as a percentage of the negative control was 86.9% after the 60 minutes exposure and 78.5% after the 3 minutes exposure. The test item did not meet the criteria for classification as corrosive to the skin according to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
- Executive summary:
The in vitro skin corrosion of the test substance was determined in accordance with the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 431. The purpose of this test is to evaluate the corrosivity potential of the test item using the EpiDerm™ Reconstituted Human Epidermis after treatment periods of 3 and 60 minutes. Corrosion is directly related to cytotoxicity in the EpiDerm™ tissue. Cytotoxicity is determined by the reduction of MTT to formazan by viable cells in the test item treated tissues relative to the corresponding negative control. The results are used to make a prediction of the corrosivity potential of the test item.
Prior to the testing, the test substance was checked for interference with water and/or MTT. No interference was identified.
Triplicate tissues were treated with the test item for exposure periods of 3 and 60 minutes. A MTT assay was performed in order to measure the test viability following the exposure to the test substance. The optical density was measured at 570 nm to determine the concentration of formazan produced by the viable cells from the reduction of MTT. Data are presented in the form of percentage viability (MTT reduction in the test item treated tissues relative to negative control tissues).
The Relative mean tissue viability calculated as a percentage of the negative control was 86.9% after the 60 minutes exposure and 78.5% after the 3 minutes exposure. The test item did not meet the criteria for classification as corrosive to the skin according to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 439 (In Vitro Skin Irritation: Reconstructed Human Epidermis Test Method)
- Version / remarks:
- Adopted: 28 July 2015
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Test system:
- human skin model
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Details on test system:
- RECONSTRUCTED HUMAN EPIDERMIS (RHE) TISSUE
- Model used: EpiDermTM (EPI-200) Reconstituted Human Epidermis
- Tissue batch number(s): Lot# 25834
- Date of initiation of testing: 11 JUL 17
TEMPERATURE USED FOR TEST SYSTEM
- Temperature used during treatment / exposure: 37°C
NUMBER OF REPLICATE TISSUES:
Triplicate - Control samples:
- yes, concurrent negative control
- yes, concurrent positive control
- Amount/concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 30 μl of neat test item
NEGATIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 30 μl of neat Sterile Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS)
POSITIVE CONTROL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight): 30 μl of
- Concentration (if solution): SDS 5%
- Solvent: water - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 60 minutes (25 minutes at room temperature and 35 minutes at 37°C, 5% CO2), followed by 42 hours’ post-treatment incubation, prior to the MTT endpoint
- Duration of post-treatment incubation (if applicable):
- 42 hours’ post-treatment incubation
- Number of replicates:
- Triplicate
- Irritation / corrosion parameter:
- % tissue viability
- Run / experiment:
- Mean value
- Value:
- 80.735
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- The test item did not reduce the viability to 50% or below and should be considered as non-irritant to the skin.
- Executive summary:
The in vitro skin irritation of the test substance was determined in accordance with the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 439. This in vitro risk assessment assay predicts the Skin irritation potential of a chemical by measurement of its cytotoxic effect on the EpiDerm™ tissue model.
Prior to the testing, the test substance was checked for interference with water and/or MTT. No interference was identified.
Skin irritation of the test substance and controls was evaluated in triplicate. After 60 minutes’ exposure on the surface of the EpiDerm™ reconstructed human epidermis and a 42h post-exposure incubation time, viability of the tissues was assessed and compared to the negative control.
The percentage of viability obtained with the test item 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol was 80.735%, therefore it has to be considered as non-irritant to the skin according to the criteria laid down in the OECD Guideline for Testing of Chemicals 439. All the acceptance criteria were met and the study is therefore considered as valid.
The test item did not meet the criteria for classification as irritant to the skin according to Regulation (EC) No.1272/2008 on the Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From August 03, 2017 to September 08, 2017
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Remarks:
- Assay was conducted by a GLP accredited laboratory using OECD Guideline 437
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method for Identifying i) Chemicals Inducing Serious Eye Damage and ii) Chemicals Not Requiring Classification for Eye Irritation or Serious Eye Damage)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- The end time for the 2-hour incubation period was not recorded in the raw data
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The end time for the 2-hour incubation period was not recorded in the raw data. However, the subsequent procedure was noted as completed 2 hours and 10 minutes after the start of the incubation period. This deviation from protocol was believed not to have affected the integrity or outcome of the study as the negative and positive controls gave satisfactory results. In addition, the study was considered to be GLP-compliant but the expiry date for the test article stability was not based on known stability data.
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Species:
- cattle
- Strain:
- not specified
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Corneas from bovine eyes were obtained from a local abattoir. The eyes were removed after slaughter, completely immersed in Hanks’ Balanced Salt Solution (containing penicillin at 100 IU/mL and streptomycin at 100 µg/mL) in a suitably sized container and transported on the same day to the testing facility. On arrival at the test facility the eyes were carefully examined for defects including increased opacity, scratches and neovascularisation. Only corneas free from such defects were used
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- yes, concurrent positive control
- yes, concurrent negative control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- A volume of 750 µL of the test article was applied to each of three corneas followed by a ten minute incubation at 32 °C. The test article was administered without dilution. A volume of 750 µL of the negative or positive control was similarly applied to further groups of three corneas
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Ten minute incubation period
- Duration of post- treatment incubation (in vitro):
- Corneas were incubated (horizontally) for approximately 2 hours prior to the measurement of corneal opacity. For the permeability endpoint (optical density), corneas were incubated in the vertical position for 1 hour and 25 minutes. The negative and positive control groups were subject to the same procedures
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- Three corneas (triplicate)
- Details on study design:
- SELECTION AND PREPARATION OF CORNEAS
All eyes were carefully examined for defects on arrival, including increased opacity, scratches and neovascularisation. Only corneas free from such defects were used. The selected corneas were excised from the eyes and loaded onto a holder that contained chambers (posterior and anterior) filled with pre-warmed Minimal Essential Medium (MEM). To avoid bubbles forming, the posterior chamber was filled first. The holders were incubated at 32 ± 1 °C for at least 1 hour. After this point, the media in both chambers was exchanged for fresh MEM in the order of posterior chamber followed by anterior chamber, therein ensuring that the corneas retained their natural curvature
QUALITY CHECK OF THE ISOLATED CORNEAS
Following preparation in the MEM, the opacity of each cornea was measured using an opacitometer. Any corneas found to have scratches or increased neovascularization or an opacity of >7 opacity units when examined prior to treatment were discarded
NUMBER OF REPLICATES
Three (triplicate)
NEGATIVE CONTROL USED
Yes, the negative control substance was 0.9% sodium chloride solution
POSITIVE CONTROL USED
Yes, the positive control substance was dimethylformamide (DMF)
APPLICATION DOSE AND EXPOSURE TIME
The test article was not diluted prior to administration. A volume of 750 µL of the test article was applied to each of three corneas followed by a 10 minute incubation at 32 °C
POST-INCUBATION PERIOD: Yes
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
After the 10 minute incubation period, the corneas were individually washed with media containing phenol red (as a pH indicator) until this indicator showed no pH effect occurring and demonstrating that the test article had been removed successfully. The corneas were then washed once in media without phenol red
POST-EXPOSURE INCUBATION
Yes. After washing, the anterior chamber was filled with fresh MEM and the corneas were incubated (horizontally) for approximately 2 hours. Corneal opacity was subsequently measured and then the anterior chamber emptied. For the permeability endpoint, 1 mL of sodium fluorescein (4 mg/mL solution) was added into the anterior chamber and the corneas were incubated in the vertical position for 1 hour and 25 minutes. Following this period, the media in the posterior chamber was removed and held in a labelled tube for later analysis
METHODS FOR MEASURED ENDPOINTS
- Corneal opacity: Opacitometer
- Corneal permeability: Passage of sodium fluorescein dye measured with the aid of spectrophotometry (OD490)
- Others: It was apparent from visual observation that the corneas treated with the test article appeared cloudy post treatment and the corneas treated with the positive control were cloudy and wrinkled following treatment
SCORING SYSTEM: In Vitro Irritancy Score (IVIS)
DECISION CRITERIA
The test article is concluded as inducing serious eye damage if the IVIS is >55 or as not requiring classification for eye irritation if the IVIS is ≤3. No prediction can be made if the IVIS is >3 but ≤55 - Irritation parameter:
- in vitro irritation score
- Remarks:
- Mean corrected
- Value:
- 18.69
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not applicable
- Negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- OTHER EFFECTS:
- Visible damage on test system: The corneas treated with 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol appeared cloudy post-treatment and the corneas treated with the positive control were noted to be cloudy and wrinkled following treatment
ACCEPTANCE OF RESULTS:
- Acceptance criteria met for negative control: yes, the negative control yielded opacity and permeability values that were less than the established upper limits for the endpoints for bovine corneas as treated at the testing facility
- Acceptance criteria met for positive control: yes, the positive control yielded an IVIS within 2 standard deviations of the historical control mean - Interpretation of results:
- other: inconclusive
- Conclusions:
- The results of this in vitro Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay suggests that a conclusive prediction cannot be made on the eye irritation potential, or for the hazard classification, of 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol as the IVIS was >3 but < 55.1 (IVIS = 18.69).
- Executive summary:
An in vitro Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay was performed in line with OECD Guideline 437 (Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability Test Method).
The undiluted test material was applied to three cattle corneas obtained from an abattoir at a volume of 750 µL, after which each cornea was incubated at 32 ± 1 °C for 10 minutes and then washed with phenol red-containing media followed by a media without phenol red. Corneal opacity was measured after a 2 hour period of horizontal incubation. For permeability, the corneas were incubated in the vertical position for 1 hour and 25 minutes at 32 ± 1°C within a sodium fluorescein solution. Thereafter, three 350 μL aliquots of this media (per cornea) were analysed for optical density at 490 nanometers (OD490). A positive (dimethylformamide) and negative (0.9% sodium chloride solution) control was applied using the same procedure to additional groups of corneas.
The mean corrected opacity reading for the test article, positive control, and negative control was 16.0, 62.7, and 0.0, respectively. The mean group corrected optical density for the test article was 0.180 and the mean group corrected optical density for the positive and negative control was 0.243 and 0.000, respectively. An In Vitro Irritation Score (IVIS) of 18.69 was calculated for 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol from corneal opacity and permeability measurements. No prediction can be made if the IVIS is >3 but ≤ 55 and, therefore, the study is inconclusive.
Reference
Corneal Opacity
Test Substance | Cornea Number | Initial Opacity | Post Incubation Opacity | Change in Opacity | Mean Change in Opacity | Corrected Opacity | Mean Corrected Opacity |
Negative | 23 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -0.67 | -0.3 | 0 |
Negative | 24 | 0 | -1 | -1 | -0.3 | ||
Negative | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.7 | ||
Test article | 18 | 0 | 16 | 16 | N/A | 16.7 | 16 |
Test article | 19 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 15.7 | ||
Test article | 20 | 0 | 15 | 15 | 15.7 | ||
Positive | 14 | -1 | 60 | 61 | N/A | 61.7 | 62.7 |
Positive | 15 | -1 | 69 | 70 | 70.7 | ||
Positive | 16 | -2 | 53 | 55 | 55.7 |
Corneal Permeability (Density)
Test Substance | Cornea Number | Mean Blank OD490 | OD490 | Corrected OD490 | Mean Corrected OD490 | Final Corrected OD490 | Mean Group Corrected OD490 |
Negative | 23 | 0.04 | 0.041 | 0.001 | 0.002 | 0 | 0 |
Negative | 24 | 0.042 | 0.003 | 0.001 | |||
Negative | 25 | 0.04 | 0.001 | -0.001 | |||
Test article | 18 | 0.423 | 0.383 | N/A | 0.381 | 0.18 | |
Test article | 19 | 0.173 | 0.133 | 0.132 | |||
Test article | 20 | 0.067 | 0.027 | 0.026 | |||
Positive | 14 | 0.416 | 0.376 | N/A | 0.375 | 0.243 | |
Positive | 15 | 0.13 | 0.091 | 0.089 | |||
Positive | 16 | 0.307 | 0.276 | 0.266 |
Calculated IVIS
Test Chemical | Mean Opacity | Mean Permeability | IVIS (Mean Opacity + (15 x Mean Permeability)) |
Test article | 16 | 0.18 | 18.69 |
Negative control | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Positive control | 62.7 | 0.243 | 66.31 |
N/A Not applicable.
The data in these tables was computer generated. In this system individual and derived figures are rounded. Thereby recalculation of derived values from the individual data will, in some instances, yield minor variations
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- adverse effect observed (irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Justification for classification or non-classification
GLP-compliant studies were performed in order to investigate the skin corrosion and skin irritation of 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol in accordance with the OECD Testing Guidelines 431 and 439 respectively. All acceptance criteria were met and these studies are therefore considered as valid. The substance did not meet the criteria for classification as corrosive or irritant to the skin according to Regulation (EC) N° 1272/2008.
A GLP-compliant study was performed in order to investigate the eye irritation of 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol in accordance with the OECD Testing Guideline 437 (BCOP). All acceptance criteria were met and this study is therefore considered as valid. The study did not allow to conclude regarding the capacity of the substance to induce eye irritation.
According to ECHA Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance (Version 6.0 - July 2017), the BCOP possesses a good predictivity to identify substances inducing serious eye damage and therefore meeting the criteria for classification as Eye Dam. 1 according to Regulation (EC) N° 1272/2008. Since 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol was not identified during the study as inducing serious eye damage, it can be concluded that the substance does not meet the criteria for classification as Eye Dam. 1 according to Regulation (EC) N° 1272/2008. Therefore it is proposed to classify 1-[(2-hydroxyethyl)thio]propan-2-ol as Eye Irrit 2 without performing additional in vitro eye irritation testing as it represents a worst-case scenario.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.