Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 700-891-2 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vitro
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- migrated information: read-across based on grouping of substances (category approach)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15/04/2010 until 01/12/2010
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: This study was conduced following an accepted OECD guideline and in compliance with the Good Laboratory Practice.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 010
- Report date:
- 2010
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Acetalization products between glucose and C12/18(even numbered)alcohol
- IUPAC Name:
- Acetalization products between glucose and C12/18(even numbered)alcohol
- Details on test material:
- TEST ITEM LCE10031
IPL REGISTRATION NUMBER 100319
BATCH NUMBER T92235
EXPIRY DATE 27/05/2011 (i.e. retest date)
APPEARANCE pearls appearance
PURITY 99.45% (taking into account the water content but considered as
100 % as mentioned in the Study Plan)
SALT / BASE RATIO not applicable
WATER CONTENT 0.55 %
CORRECTION FACTOR none, at the sponsor’s request
QUANTITY SUPPLIED not determined
STORAGE CONDITIONS room temperature, protected from light
STABILITY UNDER
STORAGE CONDITIONS
up to expiry date (i.e. 27/05/2011)
Constituent 1
Method
- Target gene:
- Aroclor1254
Species / strain
- Species / strain / cell type:
- human lymphoblastoid cells (TK6)
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Human lymphocytes were taken from healthy non-smoker subjects receiving no medication and who have
not suffered any recent viral infection. The blood was drawn onto lithium-heparin in a sterile Venoject
tube. The genotoxicity test was carried out using cells taken from two different donors (a man and a
woman)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- S9 fraction
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY:
PRELIMINARY CYTOTOXICITY ASSAY
Carried out both without and with metabolic activation using S9 from rat liver induced by Aroclor.
-Treatment durations:
• Without S9-mix : 4 h + 20 h recovery period (short treatment)
20 and 44 h without recovery period (continuous treatment)
• With S9-mix : 4 h + 20 h recovery period, with 5% or 10 % S9-mix
- Concentrations tested expressed as μg/mL LCE10031
• Without S9-mix : 162.5 – 81.25 – 40.63 – 20.31 – 10.16
(short and continuous treatments)
• With S9-mix : 162.5 – 81.25 – 40.63 – 20.31 – 10.16
(with either 5 or 10% S9-mix)
- Factor limiting the maximum
concentration tested : solubility
MUTAGENICITY ASSAYS:
Carried out both without and with metabolic activation using Aroclor1254-induced S9 from rat livers (S9-
mix)
- Number of assays : 2
- Number of replicate cultures : 2 per concentration
- Factor limiting the maximum
concentration tested : solubility
-Treatment durations:
• Without S9-mix : 4 h + 20 h recovery period (short treatment)
20 and 44 h without recovery period (continuous treatment)
• With S9-mix : 4 h + 20 h recovery period, with 5% or 10 % S9-mix
- Concentrations tested expressed as μg/mL LCE10031:
• Without S9 mix : 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 1: 4-hour treatment)
162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 2: 20-hour treatment)
162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 2: 44-hour treatment)
• With S9 mix : 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 1: with 5% S9-mix)
162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 2: with 10% S9-mix)
Concentrations in bold were actually assessed
- Positive controls
- without S9-mix : mitomycin C 0.25 μg/mL, Sigma, batch 117K1683
(4 and 20-hour treatments)
(No positive controls are used for the 44-h treatment without metabolic activation)
- with S9-mix : cyclophosphamide 10 μg/mL, Sigma, batch 068K1131
In-Life Phase
Initiated - completed : 19/04/2010 – 30/07/2010 - Vehicle / solvent:
- Solvent used ethanol (Merck, Batch K40366283 938)
Stability in solvent unknown (dilutions were prepared extemporaneously)
S9 batch number IPL 09-C
Controls
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
Results and discussion
Test results
- Species / strain:
- human lymphoblastoid cells (TK6)
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: other:
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative
Under these experimental conditions, the test item induced no clastogenic activity in human lymphocytes both in presence and in
absence of metabolic activation, in the in vitro human lymphocyte metaphase analysis test. - Executive summary:
In the assays without metabolic activation (4, 20 or 44-hour treatment), strong to moderate cytotoxicity was noted at the highest concentration tested of 162.5 μg/mL, with 39.3 to 65.4% of mitotic index compared to the control. In the assays with metabolic activation with either 5 or 10% of S9-mix, moderate and no cytotoxicity was noted at the highest concentration tested of 162.5 μg/mL, with 106.7 and 65.6% of mitotic index compared to the control, respectively. Under these conditions, the concentration of 162.5 μg/mL was retained as the maximum concentration to be tested in each assay either with or without metabolic activation.
GENOTOXICITY ASSAY Carried out both without and with metabolic activation using Aroclor1254-induced S9 from rat livers (S9-mix) - Number of assays : 2 - Number of replicate cultures : 2 per concentration - Factor limiting the maximum concentration tested : solubility
-Treatment durations:
• Without S9-mix : 4 h + 20 h recovery period (short treatment) 20 and 44 h without recovery period (continuous treatment)
• With S9-mix : 4 h + 20 h recovery period, with 5% or 10 % S9-mix - Concentrations tested expressed as μg/mL LCE10031:
• Without S9 mix : 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 1: 4-hour treatment) 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 2: 20-hour treatment) 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 2: 44-hour treatment)
• With S9 mix : 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 1: with 5% S9-mix) 162.5 – 108.33 – 72.22 – 48.15 (assay 2: with 10% S9-mix)
The test item induced no statistically significant increase in the number of breaks per cell and in the frequency of aberrant cells excluding or including gaps in the treatments with or without metabolic activation. It is to be noted that during the 1st reading, an exchange was noted during the 2nd assay following a 44-hour treatment without S9-mix. As this event could constitute an alert for clastogenesis, a complementary reading was performed. In this new reading, no other specific event of clastogenesis was noted. Therefore, this effect was not considered as biologically significant. Furthermore, no statistically significant increase in the number of cells with numerical aberrations was noted in any treatment.
The acceptance criteria for the results were fulfilled. The current study was considered as valid. Under these experimental conditions, the test item induced no clastogenic activity in human lymphocytes both in presence and in absence of metabolic activation, in the in vitro human lymphocyte metaphase analysis test.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.