Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Skin irritation / corrosion

Currently viewing:

Some information in this page has been claimed confidential.

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study without detailed documentation
Remarks:
This study is included in a NONS registration and therefore has been evaluated by a relevant competent authority and is considered to be reliable.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
other: Body responsible for the test
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2005

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Annex V
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
other: Japanese White

Test system

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
not specified
Vehicle:
other: Liquid paraffin
Controls:
not specified
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 500 mg

VEHICLE
- Other: Liquid paraffin
Duration of treatment / exposure:
4 hours
Observation period:
Not reported
Number of animals:
6
Details on study design:
Conducted according to guideline and GLP

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #1
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #2
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #3
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #4
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #5
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
animal #6
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
0
Reversibility:
not specified
Remarks on result:
other: Timepoint not specified, standard timepoint assumed
Irritant / corrosive response data:
None reported
Other effects:
None

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
Edema and erythema scores were 0 for all animals. Therefore, the test item is not classified for skin irritation.
Executive summary:

The skin irritancy potential of the test item was assessed using 500 mg of the test item. The study was conducted according to a standard guideline using Japanese white rabbits. The mean and max edema and erythema scores were 0 for all animals. No other effects were observed. Therefore, the test item is not classified for skin irritation.

The study is a GLP compliant, guideline study and is acceptable with restrictions for evaluation of this endpoint.