Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1976
Report date:
1977

Materials and methods

Principles of method if other than guideline:
Before OECD Guideline 405 was established, eye irritation was tested using an internal method (BASF test). White Vienna rabbits were used. Approximately 50 mg of the test substance were applied to the conjunctival sac of one eye in 2 animals. The talcum-treated adjacent eye served as control. The animals were observed several times on the day of treatment and up to 8 days afterwards. Findings were recorded on working days. The eyes were not washed out after 24 hours as specified in OECD Guideline 405. The report usually describes findings after 1 and 24 hours and at the end of the observation period. Thus, for final evaluation, the findings after 48 and 72 hours from the raw data have to be taken into account.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Phthalide
EC Number:
201-744-0
EC Name:
Phthalide
Cas Number:
87-41-2
Molecular formula:
C8H6O2
IUPAC Name:
1,3-dihydro-2-benzofuran-1-one
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Phthalid

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
Vienna White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 3.08 and 3.26 kg

Test system

Vehicle:
water
Controls:
other: adjacent eye served as talcum-treated control
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount applied: 50 mg
- Concentration: 80%
Duration of treatment / exposure:
8 days (eyes were not washed out)
Observation period (in vivo):
8 days
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
2

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.5
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Remarks on result:
other: The original readings at 72 h are missing. Therefore, the values from the 48 h reading were used for the 72 h reading.
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Remarks on result:
other: The original readings at 72 h are missing. Therefore, the values from the 48 h reading were used for the 72 h reading.
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
1.3
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 8 days
Remarks on result:
other: The original readings at 72 h are missing. Therefore, the values from the 48 h reading were used for the 72 h reading.
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 48 h
Remarks on result:
other: The original readings at 72 h are missing. Therefore, the values from the 48 h reading were used for the 72 h reading.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Findings: animal 1/animal 2:

 Time  Opacity  Iritis  Erythema  Chemosis
 1 h 0/0  0/0 1/1 2/2
 24 h 1/0  0/0 2/2 1/1
 48 h 1/0  0/0 1/1 0/0
 72 h -/- -/- -/- -/-
 8 d 0/0 0/0 0/0 0/0

The application of the test substance caused slight corneal opacity, slight to moderate erythema and chemosis. All effects were reversible within 8 days.

The original BASF grading was converted into the numerical grading according the OECD Draize system.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met