4-(5-Ethyl-tetrahydropyran-2-yl)-phenol

Skin sensitisation

Administrative data

Endpoint:

skin sensitisation: in chemico

Type of information:

experimental study

Adequacy of study:

weight of evidence

Study period:

2017-08-11 to 2017-09-09

Reliability:

1 (reliable without restriction)

Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:

guideline study

Data source

Reference

Reference Type:

study report

Title:

Unnamed

Year:

2017

Report date:

2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline

Test guideline 1

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

OECD Guideline 442C (In Chemico Skin Sensitisation: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA))

Test guideline 2

Qualifier:

according to guideline

Guideline:

other: Direct Peptide Reactivity Assay (DPRA) for Skin Sensitization Testing, DB-ALM Protocol n°154, January 12, 2013

GLP compliance:

yes (incl. QA statement)

Remarks:

Bayerisches Landesamt für Gesundheit und Lebensmittelsicherheit, München, Germany

Type of study:

direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA)

Test material

Test material information

Constituent 1

Reference substance name:

4-(5-ethyloxan-2-yl)phenol

EC Number:

921-114-5

Cas Number:

1173761-32-4

Molecular formula:

C13 H18 O2

IUPAC Name:

4-(5-ethyloxan-2-yl)phenol

Test material form:

solid

In chemico test system

Details on the study design:

The in chemico direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA) enables detection of the sensitising potential of a test item by quantifying the reactivity of test chemicals towards synthetic peptides containing either lysine or cysteine.

Results and discussion

Positive control results:

The 100 mM stock solution of the positive control (cinnamic aldehyde) showed high reactivity towards the synthetic peptides. The mean depletion of both peptides was 65.19%.

In vitro / in chemico

Results

Results 1

Key result

Run / experiment:

other: cysteine run

Parameter:

other: mean peptide depletion [%]

Value:

0.06

Vehicle controls validity:

valid

Negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Results 2

Key result

Run / experiment:

other: lysine run

Parameter:

other: mean peptide depletion [%]

Value:

0.26

Vehicle controls validity:

valid

Negative controls validity:

valid

Positive controls validity:

valid

Other effects / acceptance of results:

Acceptance Criteria

The run meets the acceptance criteria if:
- the standard calibration curve has a r² > 0.99,
- the mean percent peptide depletion (PPD) value of the three replicates for the positive control is
between 60.8% and 100% for the cysteine peptide and the maximum standard deviation (SD) for the
positive control replicates is < 14.9%,
- the mean percent peptide depletion (PPD) value of the three replicates for the positive control is
between 40.2% and 69.0% for the lysine peptide and the maximum SD for the positive control
replicates is < 11.6%,
- the mean peptide concentration of the three reference controls A replicates is 0.50 ± 0.05 mM,
- the coefficient of variation (CV) of peptide peak areas for the six reference control B replicates and three reference control C replicates in acetonitrile is < 15.0%.

The results of the test item meet the acceptance criteria if:
- the maximum standard deviation (SD) for the test chemical replicates is < 14.9% for the cysteine
percent depletion (PPD),
- the maximum standard deviation (SD) for the test chemical replicates is < 11.6% for the lysine
percent depletion (PPD),
- the mean peptide concentration of the three reference controls C replicates in the appropriate solvent is 0.50 ± 0.05 mM.

Both peptide runs and the test item results met the acceptance criteria of the test.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Cysteine and Lysine Values of the Calibration Curve

Sample	Cysteine Peptide		Lysine Peptide
	Peak Area at 220 nm	Peptide Concentration [mM]	Peak Area at 220 nm	Peptide Concentration [mM]
STD1	4835.2368	0.5340	4196.2754	0.5340
STD2	2314.6648	0.2670	2135.2583	0.2670
STD3	782.4597	0.1335	1032.7322	0.1335
STD4	525.4504	0.0667	516.1820	0.0667
STD5	266.4071	0.0334	257.2941	0.0334
STD6	135.9798	0.0167	130.6166	0.0167
STD7	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000	0.0000

Depletion of the Cysteine Peptide

Cysteine Peptide
Sample	Peak Area at 220 nm	Peptide Conc. [mM]	Peptide Depletion [%]	Mean Peptide Depletion [%]	SD of Peptide Depletion [%]	CV of Peptide Depletion [%]
Positive Control	1381.2087	0.1629	71.03	71.19	0.17	0.24
	1364.7275	0.1611	71.37
	1374.1948	0.1621	71.18
Test Item	4794.6045	0.5384	0.00	0.06	0.09	154.04
	4759.6314	0.5345	0.17
	4766.8809	0.5353	0.01

Depletion of the Lysine Peptide

Lysine Peptide
Sample	Peak Area at 220 nm	Peptide Conc. [mM]	Peptide Depletion [%]	Mean Peptide Depletion [%]	SD of Peptide Depletion [%]	CV of Peptide Depletion [%]
Positive Control	1633.4226	0.2075	58.76	59.19	0.48	0.81
	1595.8407	0.2028	59.71
	1619.8287	0.2058	59.10
Test Item	3953.4578	0.5018	0.18	0.26	0.15	58.26
	3953.9629	0.5018	0.17
	3943.2253	0.5005	0.44

Prediction Model 1

Cysteine 1:10/ Lysine 1:50 Prediction Model ¹

Mean Cysteine andLysine PPD	Reactivity Class	DPRA Prediction²
0.00% ≤ PPD ≤ 6.38%	No or Minimal Reactivity	Negative
6.38% < PPD ≤ 22.62%	Low Reactivity	Positive
22.62% < PPD ≤ 42.47%	Moderate Reactivity
42.47% < PPD ≤ 100%	High Reactivity

1 The numbers refer to statistically generated threshold values and are not related to the precision of the measurement.

2 DPRA predictions should be considered in the framework of an IATA.

Prediction Model 2

Cysteine 1:10 Prediction Model

Cysteine PPD	ReactivityClass	DPRA Prediction²
0.00% ≤ PPD ≤ 13.89%	No or Minimal Reactivity	Negative
13.89% < PPD ≤ 23.09%	Low Reactivity	Positive
23.09% < PPD ≤ 98.24%	Moderate Reactivity
98.24% < PPD ≤ 100%	High Reactivity

Categorization of the Test Item

Prediction Model	Prediction Model 1 (Cysteine Peptide and Lysine Peptide / Ratio: 1:10 and 1:50)			Prediction Model 2 (Cysteine Peptide / Test Item Ratio: 1:10)
Test Substance	Mean Peptide Depletion [%]	Reactivity Category	Prediction	Mean Peptide Depletion [%]	Reactivity Category	Prediction
Test Item	0.16	Minimal Reactivity	no sensitizer	0.06	Minimal Reactivity	no sensitizer
Positive Control	65.19	High Reactivity	sensitizer	71.19	Moderate Reactivity	sensitizer

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:

other: The result should be considered in the context of integrated approach such as IATA.

Conclusions:

In this study under the given conditions the test item showed minimal reactivity towards the cysteine peptide. The test item might be considered as “non-sensitiser”.
The data generated with this method may be not sufficient to conclude on the absence of skin sensitisation potential of chemicals and should be considered in the context of integrated approach such as IATA.

Executive summary:

In the present study the test material was dissolved in acetonitrile based on the results of the pre-experiments. Based on a molecular weight of 206.29 g/mol a 100 mM stock solution was prepared. The test item solutions were tested by incubating the samples with the peptides containing either cysteine or lysine for 24 ± 2 h at 25 ± 2.5 °C. Subsequently samples were analysed by HPLC.

For the 100 mM stock solution of the test item no turbidity or precipitation was observed when diluted with the cysteine peptide solution. After the 24 h±2 h incubation period but prior to the HPLC analysis samples were inspected for precipitation, turbidity or phase separation. Precipitation was observed for the samples of the positive control (excluding the co-elution control of the positive control). Samples were not centrifuged prior to the HPLC analysis.

For the 100 mM stock solution of the test item a turbidity was observed when diluted with the lysine peptide solution. After the 24 h ± 2 h incubation period but prior to the HPLC analysis samples were inspected for precipitation, turbidity or phase separation. Phase separation (small droplets) was observed for the samples of the positive control (including co-elution of the positive control) and for the samples of the test item (including co-elution control of the test item). Samples were not centrifuged prior to the HPLC analysis.

Since the acceptance criteria for the depletion range of the positive control were fulfilled, the observed precipitation and phase separation were regarded as insignificant.

No co-elution of test item with the peptide peaks was observed. However, due to the phase separation observed in the lysine peptide samples and possible underestimation of the reactivity, the sensitising potential of the test item was predicted only from the peptide depletion of the cysteine peptide by comparing the peptide concentration of the test item treated samples to the corresponding reference control C (RC C_acetonitrile).

The 100 mM stock solution of the test item showed minimal reactivity towards the synthetic peptide. The mean depletion of the cysteine peptide was ≤ 6.38% (0.06%). Based on the prediction model 2 the test item can be considered as non-sensitiser.

The 100 mM stock solution of the positive control (cinnamic aldehyde) showed high reactivity towards the synthetic peptides. The mean depletion of both peptides was 65.19%.