Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 603-316-2 | CAS number: 129050-27-7
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- From 2016-02-17 to 2016-03-07
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 016
- Report date:
- 2016
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.42 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.2600 (Skin Sensitisation)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- (1S)-2-(benzylamino)-1-[(2R)-6-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-chromen-2-yl]ethanol
- EC Number:
- 603-316-2
- Cas Number:
- 129050-27-7
- Molecular formula:
- C18H20FNO2
- IUPAC Name:
- (1S)-2-(benzylamino)-1-[(2R)-6-fluoro-3,4-dihydro-2H-chromen-2-yl]ethanol
- Test material form:
- solid: particulate/powder
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study reports): JNJ-17298957-AAA (T001592)
- Physical state: solid (powder)
- Appearance: White powder
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: I15HB2929
- Expiration date of the lot/batch: 2017-08-14 (retest date)
STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: Not available
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING:
The test item preparations (w/w) were prepared within 4 hours prior to each dosing. No adjustment was made for specific gravity of the vehicle. Homogeneity was assessed by visual inspection of the solutions.
Correction of the purity/composition of the test item was not applicable, since the test method required a logical concentration range rather than specific dose levels to be dosed.
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- CBA:J
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: female (nulliparous and non-pregnant) mice, CBA/J strain, inbred, SPF-Quality from Janvier, Le Genest-Saint-Isle, France
- Age at study initiation: approx. 10 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation (day 1): 21.4 -23.6 grams
- Housing: group housed in labeled Makrolon cages (MIII type; height 18 cm) containing sterilised sawdust as bedding material . Paper and shelters were supplied as cage-enrichment. On day 6, the animals were group housed in Makrolon MII type cages with a sheet of paper instead of sawdust and cage enrichment.
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, pelleted rodent diet
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum, tap water
- Acclimation period: at least 5 days before the start of treatment, under laboratory conditions
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 to 24°C
- Humidity (%): 40 to 70%
- Air changes (per hr): at least 10 air changes/hour
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- dimethylformamide
- Concentration:
- 0, 2, 25 and 50% (w/w)
- No. of animals per dose:
- 5 females per group; 4 groups
- Details on study design:
- PRE-SCREEN TESTS:
- Two test item concentrations were tested; a 25% and 50% concentration. The highest concentration was the maximum concentration as required in the test guidelines.
- The test system, procedures and techniques were identical as those used in the main study except that the application method may have been different and the assessment of lymph node proliferation and necropsy were not performed. Two young adult animals per concentration were selected. Each animal was treated with one concentration on three consecutive days. Animals were group housed in labeled Makrolon cages (MII type, height 14 cm). Ear thickness measurements were conducted using a digital thickness gauge (Kroeplin C110T-K) prior to dosing on days 1 and 3, and on Day 6.
- Animals were sacrificed after the final observation.
- No irritation and no signs of systemic toxicity were observed in any of the animals examined. White staining of test item remnants on the dorsal surface of the ears of all animals, did not hamper scoring of erythema. Variations in ear thickness during the observation period were less than 25% from Day 1 pre-dose values. Based on these results, the highest test item concentration selected for the main
study was a 50% concentration.
MAIN STUDY
ANIMAL ASSIGNMENT AND TREATMENT - INDUCTION days 1, 2, 3
- Name of test method: Local Lymph Node Assay: Radioactivity measurements on day 7 were performed using a Packard scintillation counter (2800 TR). The scintillation counter was programmed to automatically subtract background and convert Counts Per Minute (CPM) to Disintegrations Per Minute (DPM)
- Criteria used to consider a positive response: A Stimulation Index (SI) is calculated for each group using the individual SI values. The individual SI is the ratio of the DPM/animal compared to DPM/vehicle control group. If the results indicate a SI ≥ 3, the test item may be regarded as a skin sensitizer.
The results were evaluated according to the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) of the United Nations (2011) (including all amendments) and the Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, including all amendments. Consideration was given to the EC3 value (the estimated test item concentration that will give a SI =3).
Classification of results:
SI value < 3: No sensitizer
SI ≥ 3: Cat 1 Skin sensitizer (EC3 value ≤ 2%: sub-category 1A; EC3 value > 2%: sub-category 1B); Hazard statement: H317: May cause an allergic skin reaction
TREATMENT PREPARATION AND ADMINISTRATION:
- The test item preparations (w/w) were prepared within 4 hours prior to each dosing.
- The dorsal surface of both ears was topically treated (25 μL/ear) with the test item, at approximately the same time on each day. The concentrations stirred with a magnetic stirrer immediately prior to dosing.
The control animals were treated in the same way as the experimental animals, except that the vehicle was administered instead of the test item. - Positive control substance(s):
- hexyl cinnamic aldehyde (CAS No 101-86-0)
Results and discussion
- Positive control results:
- The SI values calculated for concentrations 5, 10 and 25% were 1.0, 1.5 and 4.4 respectively. An EC3 value of 17.8% was calculated using linear interpolation.
The calculated EC3 value was found to be in the acceptable range of 4.8 and 19.5%. The results of the 6 monthly HCA reliability checks of the recent years were 14.5, 13.4, 14.1, 17.3, 9.8% and 10%. Based on the results, it was concluded that the Local Lymph Node Assay as performed at WIL Research Europe is an appropriate model for testing for contact hypersensitivity.
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 2% w/w group
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.6
- Test group / Remarks:
- 25% w/w group
- Parameter:
- SI
- Value:
- 1.1
- Test group / Remarks:
- 50% w/w group
- Cellular proliferation data / Observations:
- CELLULAR PROLIFERATION DATA: Mean DPM/animal values for the experimental groups treated with test item concentrations 2, 25 and 50% were 887, 1457 and 1031 DPM, respectively. The mean DPM/animal value for the vehicle control group was 910 DPM. The SI values calculated for the item concentrations 2, 25 and 50% were 1.0, 1.6 and 1.1, respectively.
DETAILS ON STIMULATION INDEX CALCULATION: see above
EC3 CALCULATION :
An EC value was not calculated as the SI values were not >=3 in all test groups.
CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: no clinical signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study
Skin reactions / Irritation: Very slight erythema was noted for three animals treated at a concentration of 50% on Day 3 only. No irritation of the ears was observed in any of the other animals examined. White staining of test item remnants on the dorsal surface of the ears of all animals treated at concentrations of 25% and 50% between Days 1 and 3, did not hamper scoring for erythema.
Systemic toxicity: No mortality occurred and no clinical signs of systemic toxicity were observed in the animals of the main study. Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period.
Macroscopy of the auricular lymph nodes and surrounding area: All auricular lymph nodes of the animals of the experimental and control groups were considered normal in size. No macroscopic abnormalities of the surrounding area were noted for any of the animals.
BODY WEIGHTS: Body weights and body weight gain of experimental animals remained in the same range as controls over the study period.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Interpretation of results:
- GHS criteria not met
- Conclusions:
- Since there was no indication that the test item elicited a SI ≥ 3 when tested up to 50%, T001592 was not considered to be a skin sensitizer. Based on these results, the test item does not have to be classified and has no obligatory labelling requirement for sensitization by skin contact according to the GHS and the CLP regulation.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.