Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Genetic toxicity in vitro

Description of key information

Gene mutation in bacteria (OECD TG 471 - Ames): Not mutagenic.

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
28 March 2000 - 26 May 2000
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
1997
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay
Target gene:
Histidine gene
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Rat liver S9-mix
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
50 to 5000 μg per plate in the presence and absence of S9 mix.
Vehicle / solvent:
- Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: according to guidelines
Untreated negative controls:
yes
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Remarks:
DMSO
True negative controls:
not specified
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
2-nitrofluorene
sodium azide
mitomycin C
other: 2-Aminoanthracene (with metabolic activation)
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
METHOD OF APPLICATION: standard plate incorporation
DURATION: Exposure duration: 48h -72h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: The experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated in full after an interval of at least 3 days.
DETERMINATION OF TOXICITY
- Method: Background lawn measurement and reduction in revertant colonies compared to the controls
Statistics:
Estimation of the statistical significance of the difference between the mean number of revertants in the negative controls and the plates at each dosage level was done, using a X2-test (Mohn and Ellenberger,1977).
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 1500 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102 and TA1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Remarks:
at 5000 µg/plate
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: No precipitation was observed

HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA (with ranges, means and standard deviation and confidence interval (e.g. 95%): A historical overview of the revertant frequencies of the strains used in the Freiburger Labor fur Mutagenitätsprüfung for the years 1998 to 2000.
Mix: -S9 +S9 -S9 +S9
strain: spontaneous /solvent cont./ spontaneous/ solvent cont
TA1535: 31±11 (13/58) 30±11 (10/62) 19±6 (9/27) 18±6 (9/28)
TA1537: 11±4 (5/20) 11±4 (6/21) 16±5 (9/29) 16±5 (9/29)
TA98: 30±8 (18/47) 29±8 (19/50) 40±10 (21/63) 38±9 (23/62)
TA100: 150±35 (89/226) 138±29 (94/205) 139±38 (88/238) 133±38 (79/222)
TA102: 280±37 (218/359) 269±38 (163/337) 306±45 (237/400) 298±46 (207/404)

The historical data of positive controls are given in the form: strain, mutagen (concentration of mutagen in μg/plate), mean of revertants per plate (minimum/maximum). The data of test without S9 are: TA1535, NaN3 ( 0.7), 513±130 (242/688); TA1537, 9-AA (50), 278±97 (131/529); TA98, 2-NF (2.5), 353±113 (190/632); TA100, NaN3 ( 0.7), 427±90 (312/665); TA102, Mitmomycin C (0.15) 820±151 (577/1061). The data of the tests with lot KH3799 of S9 are: TA1535, 2-AA (1.5), 547±205 (310/1118); TA1537, 2-AA (1.5), 299±157 (100/543); TA98, 2-AA (0.7), 919±458 (319/2243); TA100, 2-AA (0.7), 854±336 (402/1955); TA102, 2-AA (1.5), 1116±337 (610/1799). Additional data of the tests with lot KH3799 of S9 are: TA100, B(a)P (5.0), 869±100 (736/976)

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON TOXICITY:
In the presence and absence of S9-mix Resedafol / Corps 302 was toxic towards the strains TA1535 at 1500 µg/plate and towards the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1537 at 5000 μg/plate.

The number of spontaneous revertants observed using each of the five strains was close to those previously established in the laboratory and was within the range obtained by Ames et al. (1975) as well as reported by De Serres and Shelby (1979). The results with the positive control substances confirmed the known reversion properties and specificity of the tester strains as well as the fall activity of the metabolizing system.

Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, Hyacinth body #3 was determined to be not mutagenic.
Executive summary:

The mutagenic activity of Hyacinth body #3 was evaluated in Ames test performed in accordance with OECD 471 guideline and according to GLP principles, therefore a Klimisch 1 rating was assigned. The test was performed as a standard plate incorporation assay, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix up to and including 5000 μg/plate. Toxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and background lawn, was observed. In the presence and absence of S9-mix, Hyacinth body #3 was toxic towards the strains TA1535 at 1500 µg/plate and towards the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1537 at 5000 μg/plate. No precipitation was observed at any of the concentrations. Adequate negative and positive controls were included. The substance did not induce a significant dose-related increase of the number of revertant (His+) colonies in any of the five S. typhimurium tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 TA102), both in the absence and presence of S9 -metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that Hyacinth body #3 is not mutagenic.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (negative)

Additional information

The mutagenic activity of Hyacinth body #3 was evaluated in Ames test performed in accordance with OECD 471 guideline and according to GLP principles, therefore a Klimisch 1 rating was assigned. The test was performed as a standard plate incorporation assay, both in the absence and presence of S9-mix up to and including 5000 μg/plate. Toxicity, as evidenced by a decrease in the number of revertants and background lawn, was observed. In the presence and absence of S9-mix, Hyacinth body #3 was toxic towards the strains TA1535 at 1500 µg/plate and towards the strains TA98, TA100, TA102, and TA1537 at 5000 μg/plate. No precipitation was observed at any of the concentrations. Adequate negative and positive controls were included. The substance did not induce a significant dose-related increase of the number of revertant (His+) colonies in any of the five S. typhimurium tester strains (TA1535, TA1537, TA98, TA100 TA102), both in the absence and presence of S9 -metabolic activation. These results were confirmed in an independently repeated experiment. Based on the results of this study, it is concluded that Hyacinth body #3 is not mutagenic.

Justification for classification or non-classification

Based on the available data, Hyacinth body #3 was determined to be not mutagenic and does not need to be classified for mutagenicity in accordance with the criteria outlined in Annex I of the CLP Regulation (1272/2008/EC) and its updates.