Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Eye irritation

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1997-03-24 to 1997-03-27
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1997
Report date:
1997

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
L-4-hydroxyproline
EC Number:
200-091-9
EC Name:
L-4-hydroxyproline
Cas Number:
51-35-4
Molecular formula:
C5H9NO3
IUPAC Name:
L-4-hydroxyproline
Test material form:
solid: crystalline
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: lot 96003:

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Stability under test conditions: stable
- Solubility and stability of the test substance in the solvent/vehicle: soluble and stable

TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Final dilution of a dissolved solid, stock liquid or gel: test item suspended at 50 % distilled water

FORM AS APPLIED IN THE TEST (if different from that of starting material): est item suspended at 50 % distilled water

Test animals / tissue source

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Age at study initiation: ca. 3 months
- Weight at study initiation: ca. 2 kg
- Housing: Individually in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): Lab Diet Certified Rabbit Diet #5322
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 12 d

ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 18 - 24 °C
- Humidity (%): monitored
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12 / 12

IN-LIFE DATES: From: 1997-02-27 To:1997-03-27

Test system

Vehicle:
water
Controls:
yes, concurrent no treatment
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 ml
- Concentration (if solution): 50 %

VEHICLE
- Purity: distilled water
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
24, 48, 72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
6
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): with distilled water
- Time after start of exposure: 24 h

SCORING SYSTEM: Severity of ocular lesions

Results and discussion

In vivo

Resultsopen allclose all
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
other: All 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
other: Area of cornea involved
Basis:
other: All 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Remarks:
Redness, chemosis, discharge
Basis:
other: All 6 animals
Time point:
24/48/72 h
Score:
0
Remarks on result:
no indication of irritation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
GHS criteria not met
Conclusions:
The substance is not irrittaing to the eye.
Executive summary:

6 New Zealand white rabbits, free from visible ocular defects, each received a single intraocular application of 0.1 mI of the test article in 1 eye. The contralateral eye, remaining untreated, served as a control. The eyes of all animals remained unwashed for 24 hours' Observations of corneal opacity, intis, and conjunctivitis were recorded 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment. The test article was used as a 50 percent suspension in distilled water (test article and distilled water were added together in aratio of 1:1 2 grams of each).

The substance did not show any eye irritating properties under the conditions of the test.