Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 233-566-4 | CAS number: 10236-47-2
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian cell study: DNA damage and/or repair
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2010.
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- publication
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 011
- Report date:
- 2011
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 489 (In vivo Mammalian Alkaline Comet Assay)
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- mammalian comet assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- 7-(2-O-(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,3-dihydro-4',5,7-trihydroxyflavone
- EC Number:
- 233-566-4
- EC Name:
- 7-(2-O-(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,3-dihydro-4',5,7-trihydroxyflavone
- Cas Number:
- 10236-47-2
- Molecular formula:
- C27H32O14
- IUPAC Name:
- 7-(2-O-(6-deoxy-α-L-mannopyranosyl)-β-D-glucopyranosyloxy)-2,3-dihydro-4',5,7-trihydroxyflavone
- Test material form:
- solid
Constituent 1
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch No.of test material: Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO, USA. Lot and purity not specified.
Test animals
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Wistar
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Experimental Animal Care Center, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University.
- Age at study initiation: 10–12 weeks old
- Weight at study initiation: 250 – 300 g
- Fasting period before study: yes
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): standard rats pellet diet
- Water ad libitum.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 ± 2ºC
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-h light/12-h dark
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: water.
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: the test item is soluble in water.
- Amount of vehicle (if gavage or dermal): 1 mL/kg.
- Purity: distilled water. - Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: naringin was dissolved in distilled water and administered by gavage following preparation.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 weeks.
- Frequency of treatment:
- daily (spaced 24h apart).
- Post exposure period:
- No.
Doses / concentrationsopen allclose all
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- Dose / conc.:
- 50 mg/kg bw/day (nominal)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 5 animals per sex per dose. 6 groups of 5 male rats per group: 2 diabetic rat groups plus 2 non-diabetic rat groups received either 25 or 50 mg/kg test item; one diabetic and one non-diabetic groups were used as negative controls.
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent no treatment
- Positive control(s):
- streptozotocin was used to induce Diabetes mellitus, as the oxidative stress caused by this health problem causes DNA damage.
- Justification for choice of positive control(s): The main objective of the study was to evaluate the protective effects of the test item against DNA damage.
- Route of administration: intraperitoneal injection
- Doses / concentrations: 65 mg/kg in citrate buffer in a volume of 1 mL/kg.
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- bone marrow cells from one femur per rat.
- Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- CRITERIA FOR DOSE SELECTION: The doses of naringin were selected on the basis of its the antihyperglycemic and antioxidant effects in streptozotocin-induced diabetes in male Wistar rats (see attached background material).
TREATMENT AND SAMPLING TIMES (in addition to information in specific fields): The animals were killed by cervical dislocation under light anesthesia at week 4 post treatments, then bone marrow cells, testes, and sperm cells were sampled. Bone marrow cells from one femur were collected in tubes containing ice-cold PBS (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free, pH 7.4), and DNA strand breaks were studied by alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (alkaline comet assay) according to the guidelines of Tice et al. with slight modifications (see attached background material): the bone marrow cells from one femura were collected in tubes containing foetal calf serum then centrifuged and resuspended in ice-cold PBS (Ca2+ and Mg2+ free, pH 7.4). 10 μl of cell suspension (~10,000 cells) were mixed with 85 μl of 0.5% low melting agarose (LMA), distributed onto the end frosted conventional slides precoated with 1.5% normal melting agarose in PBS. After the agarose solidifies, other 85 μl of LMA was layered and kept over ice for 10 min.
DETAILS OF SLIDE PREPARATION: The slides were stained with ethidium bromide (20 μg/mL) and studied using a fluorescent microscope (Nikon, Japan) equipped with appropriate filter.
METHOD OF ANALYSIS: Fifty individual cells were selected for calculations for each analysis; all experiments were carried out at least three times, each with two parallel
slides per animal. Single cells were analyzed with TriTek CometScore version 1.5 software. The parameters studied to access the DNA damage were the tail length (μm), tail DNA (%), tail moment (arbitrary units), and olive tail moment (arbitrary units). - Statistics:
- Data were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the means. The data were analyzed by employing nonparametric tests, Mann-Whitney U test, or Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test. Results were considered significantly different if the P value was less than 0.05.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Key result
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- no effects
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- RESULTS OF DEFINITIVE STUDY
Naringin treatment did not exhibit any significant difference in the level of tail length, tail DNA, tail moment, and olive tail moment compared to the solvent control at either dose tested. Furthermore, when both doses of naringin were given to diabetic animals for 4 weeks, decreased rates of DNA strand breaks were significantly observed and the higher dose of naringin gave the more effective reduction in all measured parameters (P < 0.01).
Any other information on results incl. tables
Table 1. DNA strand breaks in bone marrow of nondiabetic and diabetic rats 24 hours after the last treatment with the indicated doses of naringin (4 weeks exposures, spaced 24 hours apart) (mean ± SD).
Treatment groups (mg/kg) |
Tail length (μm) |
Tail DNA (%) |
Tail moment (arbitrary unit)
|
Olive tail moment (arbitrary units)
|
Nondiabetic control |
14.0 ± 4.8 |
5.98 ± 1.15 |
1.96 ± 0.61 |
4.78 ± 1.23 |
Nondiabetic + naringin (25) |
12.6 ± 4.77 |
5.76 ± 1.52 |
2.12 ± 0.43 |
4.14 ± 0.56 |
Nondiabetic + naringin (50) |
11.8 ± 4.71 |
4.82 ± 1.76 |
1.98 ± 0.23 |
3.20 ± 0.73 |
Diabetes |
27.2 ± 4.91∗ |
14.2±3.39∗ |
4.72±0.54∗∗ |
9.44±2.03∗ |
Diabetes + naringin (25) |
18.6 ± 4.33 ª |
8.08 ± 1.54b |
2.98 ± 0.85a |
5.82 ± 1.27b
|
Diabetes + naringin (50) |
15.8 ± 3.96b |
6.97 ± 1.53b |
2.24 ± 0.7b |
4.32 ± 1.18b |
∗P < 0.05 and∗∗P < 0.01 versus nondiabetic control (Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test).
aP < 0.05 andbP < 0.01 versus diabetes alone (Mann-Whitney U test).
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- The test item did not induce an increase of DNA strand breaks and alkali-labile sites compared to the controls. Therefore, the test item is not mutagenic under test conditions.
- Executive summary:
An in vivo alkaline comet assay was conducted to determine the mutagenic potential of the test item in male Wistar rats, by a method similar to OECD 489, and also its protective effects against DNA damage caused by Diabetes mellitus. 5 diabetic and 5 non-diabetic male rats per group were treated with the test item at concentrations of 25 or 50 mg/kg, daily for 4 weeks. Negative/solvent controls were run in parallel. At the end of the treatment, animals were killed by cervical dislocation under light anesthesia and bone marrow cells from one femur were collected in tubes with ice-cold PBS and DNA strand breaks were studied by alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis. Naringin treatment did not exhibit any significant difference in the level of tail length, tail DNA, tail moment, and olive tail moment compared to the solvent control at either dose tested. Furthermore, when both doses of naringin were given to diabetic animals for 4 weeks, decreased rates of DNA strand breaks were significantly observed and the higher dose of naringin gave the more effective reduction in all measured parameters. The test item demonstrated no genotoxicity or citotoxicity at all tested doses, and is therefore considered to be non-mutagenic.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.