Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria

Administrative data

Endpoint:
toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
from 2017-03-27 to 2017-03-31, with the definitive exposure phase from 2017-03-28 to 2017-03-31 at the test facility
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guidelineopen allclose all
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
Deviations:
no
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
EU Method C.3 (Algal Inhibition test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
2-(3-methoxypropyl)-9(or 10)-methylbenzimidazo[2,1-b]benzo[lmn][3,8]phenanthroline-1,3,6(2H)-trione
EC Number:
258-094-6
EC Name:
2-(3-methoxypropyl)-9(or 10)-methylbenzimidazo[2,1-b]benzo[lmn][3,8]phenanthroline-1,3,6(2H)-trione
Cas Number:
52673-15-1
Molecular formula:
C25H19N3O4
IUPAC Name:
17-(3-methoxypropyl)-6(or7)-methyl-3,10,17-triazahexacyclo[13.6.2.0²,¹.0,.0¹²,²².0¹,²³]tricosa-1(21),2,4(9),5,7,12(22),13,15(23),19-nonaene-11,16,18-trione
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Determination of the test item
The test concentration of Disperse Orange 32 was analytically
verified via HPLC-DAD in the saturated solution and the control at the start of the exposure (0 hours).
At the start of the exposure (0 hours), sampling was carried out after preparation of the loading levels.
The measured test item concentration was below the LCL in the saturated solution, the dilutions and the control.
At the end of the exposure (72 hours), no analytical monitoring was carried out, because a measured test item concentration below LCL was observed at the start of the exposure.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Test item
Disperse Orange 32

Preparation of the Saturated solution
A saturated solution with a nominal loading of 100 mg test item/L was prepared once 24 ± 1 hour prior to the start of the exposure. An appropriate amount of the test item was weighed out. The test item was applied onto a glass slide. The glass slide with the test item was inserted into a glass bottle with an appropriate amount of dilution water. The saturated solution was stirred for 24 hours (1100 rpm) with a magnetic stirrer. Undissolved particles were removed by membrane filtration (membrane filter 0.45 µm, RC, MACHEREY-NAGEL). The filter was saturated in order to avoid adsorption during the filtration. The first 25 mL of the filtrate will be discarded. The filtration was interrupted for 10 minutes to allow adsorption and saturation of the filter material with dissolved test item. Thereafter, the filtration was continued. The next 25 mL were discarded. During filtration, the filter will always be kept covered.
The solution was checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect), which was negative.

Test loading
All terms related to concentration level are given as loading level because partly dissolved compounds and mixtures cannot be related to concentrations. The saturated solution and four dilution levels out of the saturated solution were tested in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 2: 6.25 - 12.5 - 25.0 - 50.0 - 100% of the saturated solution.

Control
Six replicates (without test item) were incubated under the same conditions as the test loadings.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Raphidocelis subcapitata (previous names: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Selenastrum capricornutum)
Details on test organisms:
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata HINDÁK
- Strain: SAG 61.81
- Source (laboratory, culture collection): SAG, Pflanzenphysiologisches Institut der Universität Göttingen, Nikolausberger Weg 18, D-37073 Göttingen
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): 4 days
- Method of cultivation: Fresh stocks were prepared every month on Z-Agar. Light intensity amounted to 2567 – 5130 lux corresponding to 35 - 70 µE ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1 for 24 h per day.


Study design

Test type:
static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
72 h
Post exposure observation period:
No

Test conditions

Hardness:
Not specified
Test temperature:
min.: 22.0 max.: 24.0 mean value: 23.0
pH:
Nominal test item loading pH-values
[% of the saturated solution] Start; 0 hours End; 72 hours
100 7.92 8.03
50.0 7.89 8.24
25.0 7.90 8.70
12.5 7.93 9.16
6.25 7.96 9.28
Control 8.12 9.24
Dissolved oxygen:
Not measured
Salinity:
Not measured, freshwater conditions
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal: 6.25 - 12.5 - 25.0 - 50.0 - 100% of the saturated solution
Measured: < LOQ
Details on test conditions:
TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks
- Type (delete if not applicable): open, cotton wool plugs
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: sterile 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks, test volume 100 mL
- Aeration: Test containers were placed on a rotary shaker and oscillated at appr. 70 rpm
- Type of flow-through (e.g. peristaltic or proportional diluter): None
- Renewal rate of test solution (frequency/flow rate): One application at test start
- Initial cells density: Nominal: approximately 2 - 5 x 10^3 cells/mL, Actual: mean 6839 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: Mean 1416910 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 3
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6


GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes



TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water:
Composition of Dilution Water
according to the guideline
Component Concentration [mg/L]
NH4Cl 15
MgCl2 x 6 H2O 12
CaCl2 x 2 H2O 18
MgSO4 x 7 H2O 15
KH2PO4 1.6
FeCl3 x 6 H2O 0.064a2EDTA x 2 H2O 0.1
H3BO3 0.185
MnCl2 x 4 H2O 0.415
ZnCl2 3 x 10^-3
Na2MoO4 x 2 H2O 7 x 10^-3
CoCl2 x 6 H2O 1.5 x 10^-3
CuCl2 x 2 H2O 1 x 10^-5
NaHCO3 50
pH 8.1 ± 0.2



OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: 24 h
- Light intensity and quality: Approximately 4440 to 8880 lux, corresponding to 60 to 120
µE ∙ m-2 ∙ s-1, mean value: 5547 lux,



EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable) :
-Chlorophyll a-fluorescence
The cell density was measured daily via Chlorophyll a-fluorescence, excitation at 436 nm, emission at 685 nm. Dilution water was used as a background signal.Self-fluorescence was observed in the range finding test. A separate replicate for the loading levels were prepared without algae and treated the same as the other test replicates. The self-fluorescence of each measuring point was taken into account in the evaluation.

Reference substance (positive control):
yes
Remarks:
(Potassium dichromate)

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: NOEL
Effect conc.:
12.5 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: LOEL
Effect conc.:
25 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL10
Effect conc.:
27.6 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: CI: 20.1 - 34.8
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
65.6 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
growth rate
Remarks on result:
other: CI: 58.5 - 76.1
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: NOEL
Effect conc.:
12.5 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
other: LOEL
Effect conc.:
25 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL10
Effect conc.:
13.1 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Remarks on result:
other: CI: 8.31 - 17.2
Duration:
72 h
Dose descriptor:
EL50
Effect conc.:
30.7 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
nominal
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
other: yield
Remarks on result:
other: CI: 26.9 - 35.2
Details on results:
- Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
- Unusual cell shape: No
- Colour differences: No
- Flocculation: No
- Adherence to test vessels: No
- Aggregation of algal cells: No
- Other: The saturated solution was visually clear orange throughout the exposure period. The Tyndall effect negative at the saturated solution.
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: No
Results with reference substance (positive control):
The toxicity of potassium dichromate (SIGMA ALDRICH, batch number MKBV0900V, purity 99.0 %, CAS RN 7778-50-9) to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined over a period of 72 hours from 2016-10-11 to 2016-10-14. The reference item toxicity is in the valid range following test facility SOPS.

EC50-Values of the Reference Item based on nominal concentrations mg/L, (0-72 hours)
Current Study Valid Range (average ± 3 x SD)
Growth Rate inhibition
ErC50 0.435 0.763 ± 0.514
95% confidence interval 0.414 – 0.458
Yield inhibition
EyC50 0.230 0.402 ± 0.293
95% confidence interval 0.179 – 0.322
SD = Standard deviation
Reported statistics and error estimates:
EL-values and statistical analyses
EL-values of growth rate and yield inhibition after 72 hours were calculated by sigmoidal dose-response regression.

NOEL, LOEL and statistical analyses
The NOEL and LOEL were determined by calculation of statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield.
The following statistical tests were conducted:

Shapiro-Wilk’s test on normal distribution was done with a significance level 0.01.
Levene’s test on variance homogeneity was done with a significance level 0.01.
Multiple sequentially-rejective Welsh-t-test after Bonferroni-holm was done with a significance level 0.05.

Software
The data for the tables in this report were computer-generated and have been rounded for presentation from the full derived data. Consequently, if calculated manually based on the given data minor deviations may occur from these figures.
Calculations were carried out using software
•Excel, MICROSOFT CORPORATION
•SigmaPlot, SPSS INC.
•GraphPad Prism, GRAPHPAD SOFTWARE, INC.
•ToxRat Version 3.2.1, ToxRat Solutions GmbH

Any other information on results incl. tables

Cell Densities

Nominal test item loading

Replicate

Cell density [cells/mL]

[% of the saturated solution]

No.

0 hours

24 hours

48 hours

72 hours

100

1

6839

2819

LOQcell density

4615

2

6839

3021

2836

8337

3

6839

LOQcell density

3097

11600

Mean

6839

n.a.

n.a.

8184

 50.0

1

6839

8486

32992

230497

2

6839

9835

31321

231246

3

6839

10324

53912

383304

Mean

6839

9548

39408

281682

 25.0

1

6839

19084

151234

962286

2

6839

22458

153616

966090

3

6839

14970

129114

825642

Mean

6839

18837

144655

918006

 12.5

1

6839

26508

245033

1371490

2

6839

26692

230181

1346210

3

6839

19866

162192

1045124

Mean

6839

24355

212469

1254275

   6.25

1

6839

28199

262147

1515382

2

6839

22786

223149

1307461

3

6839

24846

275923

1467630

Mean

6839

25277

253740

1430158

Control

1

6839

24954

228823

1348568

2

6839

26964

264895

1423649

3

6839

22379

220583

1408024

4

6839

34671

297947

1483808

5

6839

28693

271894

1440561

6

6839

26683

255906

1396847

Mean

6839

27391

256675

1416910

LOQcell density= Limit of quantification of the cell density (2736 cells/mL).             n.a.       = not applicable

 

 


Evaluation after 72 hours

Statistically significant differences of growth rates and yield compared to control values are marked (+), not significant differences are marked (-).

 

Nominal test item loading

Replicate

Growth rate

Inhibition of growth rate

Yield

Inhibition of yield

[% of the saturated solution]

No.

[d-1]

[%]

[cells/mL]

[%]

100

1

 

-0.131

107

 

-2224

100

2

 

0.066

96

 

1498

100

3

 

0.176

90

 

4761

100

Mean

(+)

0.037

98

(+)

1345

100

 50.0

1

 

1.17

34

 

223658

84

2

 

1.17

34

 

224407

84

3

 

1.34

25

 

376465

73

Mean

(+)

1.23

31

(+)

274843

81

 25.0

1

 

1.65

7

 

955447

32

2

 

1.65

7

 

959251

32

3

 

1.60

10

 

818803

42

Mean

(+)

1.63

8

(+)

911167

35

 12.5

1

 

1.77

1

 

1364651

3

2

 

1.76

1

 

1339371

5

3

 

1.68

6

 

1038285

26

Mean

(-)

1.74

2

(-)

1247436

12

   6.25

1

 

1.80

-1

 

1508543

-7

2

 

1.75

2

 

1300622

8

3

 

1.79

-1

 

1460791

-4

Mean

(-)

1.78

0

(-)

1423319

-1

Control

1

 

1.76

 

 

1341729

 

2

 

1.78

 

 

1416810

 

3

 

1.78

 

 

1401185

 

4

 

1.79

 

 

1476969

 

5

 

1.78

 

 

1433722

 

6

 

1.77

 

 

1390008

 

Mean

 

1.78

 

 

1410071

 

 


Section-by-Section and Average Specific Growth Ratesof the Control Group (0 - 72 hours)

 

Replicate No.

Specific growth rate [d-1]

Mean

(0 - 72 hours)

SD

±

CV
[%]

Mean CV [%]

section-by-section

0 - 24 hours

24 - 48 hours

48 - 72 hours

Control

1

1.29

2.22

1.77

1.76

0.461

26.2

25.0

2

1.37

2.29

1.68

1.78

0.464

26.1

3

1.19

2.29

1.85

1.78

0.555

31.3

4

1.62

2.15

1.61

1.79

0.310

17.3

5

1.43

2.25

1.67

1.78

0.420

23.5

6

1.36

2.26

1.70

1.77

0.454

25.6

 

 

 

Mean

1.78

 

 

 

 

 

SD ±

0.01

 

 

 

 

CV [%]

0.60

 

 

SD = Standard deviation CV = Coefficient of variation

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
In this study, Disperse Orange 32 was found to inhibit the growth of the freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata after 72 hours with the following effect values (based on nominal test item loadings): The EL50-values with 95% confidence intervals for both inhibition of growth rate (ErL50) and yield (EyL50) after 72 hours were 65.6 (58.5 – 76.1)% and 30.7 (26.9 – 35.2)% of the saturated solution, respectively. The NOEL-values for both inhibition of growth rate and yield after 72 hours were 12.5% of the saturated solution, respectively.
Executive summary:

The toxicity of Disperse Orange 32 to the unicellular freshwater green alga Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata was determined according to the principles of OECD 201 and Council Regulation (EC) No. 761/2009 C.3 from 2017-03-27 to2017-03-31, with the definitive exposure phase from 2017-03-28 to 2017-03-31at the test facility. The aim of the study was the determination of NOEL, LOEL, EL10, EL20- and EL50-values of growth rate and yield over a period of 72 hours.

 

The study was conducted under static conditions with an initial cell density of 6839 cells/mL. A saturated solution with a nominal loading of 100 mg test item/L was prepared with dilution water 24±1 hour prior to the start of the exposure. An appropriate amount of the test item was weighed out. The saturated solution was stirred for 24 ±1hour (1100 rpm) with a magnetic stirrer. Undissolved particles were removed by membrane filtration. The following filtrate, i.e. the saturated solution was used in the test. The solution was checked via laser beam (Tyndall effect), which was negative.

The saturated solution and four dilution levels out of the saturated solution were tested in the definitive test in a geometrical series with a dilution factor of 2:6.25 - 12.5 - 25.0 - 50.0 - 100% of the saturated solution. Three replicates were tested for each test item concentration and six replicates for the control.The test media were clear throughout the test period with a concentration dependent orange color.The environmental conditionswere within the acceptable limits.

 

All effect values given are based on the nominal test item loadings ofDisperseOrange 32.

 

 NOEL, LOEL, ELx-values and 95 % Confidence Intervals ofDisperseOrange 32(0 - 72 hours)

                  based on the nominal test item loadings

 

Growth Rate Inhibition
nominal test item loadings [% saturated solution]

NOEL

12.5

LOEL

25.0

ErL10

27.6 (20.1 – 34.8)

ErL20

39.6 (33.0 – 44.6)

ErL50

65.6 (58.5 – 76.1)

 

Yield Inhibition

nominal test item loadings [% saturated solution]

NOEL

12.5

LOEL

25.0

EyL10

13.1 (8.31 – 17.2)

EyL20

17.9 (14.4 – 21.6)

EyL50

30.7 (26.9 – 35.2)