Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 208-419-2 | CAS number: 527-60-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 06 Apr - 27 Apr 2022
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study without detailed documentation
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 211 (Daphnia magna Reproduction Test)
- Version / remarks:
- adopted 02 Oct 2012
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Landesamt für Umwelt, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
- Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Details on sampling:
- - Concentrations: Fresh and aged samples of control and all treatment groups
- Sampling method: Content of the test item was measured weekly in the freshly prepared and in the used solutions in extra replicates without algae and daphnia. Samples were taken from the same batch of the solutions. - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: Preparation of a stock solution by weighing the test substance and sonication in a respective volume of test media until complete dissolution.
- Controls: Water
- Test concentration separation factor: 2.2
- Evidence of undissolved material: No - Test organisms (species):
- Daphnia magna
- Details on test organisms:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION
- Method: Preparation of a stock solution by weighing the test substance and sonication in a respective volume of test media until complete dissolution
- Controls: Water
- Test concentration separation factor: 2.2
- Evidence of undissolved material: No
TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: Water flea
- Age at study initiation (mean and range, SD): Between 0 and 24 hours
- Method of breeding: The holding is performed similar to the method described in the OECD guideline. They were cultured in groups of a maximum of 18 daphnia (in 2.5 L medium).
- Source: Umweltbundesamt (Berlin)
- Feeding during test: Yes
- Food type: Unicellular green alga Desmodesmus subspicatus
- Amount: 0.15 - 0.20 mg org. carbon/animal/day
- Frequency: On each working day. On Fridays, the double amount of alga suspension was added into the test vessels - Test type:
- semi-static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 21 d
- Hardness:
- 267 mg CaCO3/L
- Test temperature:
- 19.1 - 21.7 °C
- pH:
- 7.6 - 8.5
- Dissolved oxygen:
- 8.4 - 9.8 mg/L
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal: Control, 0.12, 0.27, 0.56, 1.22, 2.68, 5.61 mg/L
Time-weighted mean measured: Control, 0.10, 0.21, 0.45, 1.22, 2.67, 5.55 mg/L - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 10 glass beakers per treatment group
- Type (delete if not applicable): open, loosely covered with perforated transparent plastic wrap
- Material, size, fill volume: Glass, 100 mL, 80 ± 5 mL test solution
- Aeration: None
- Renewal rate of test solution: Three times per week
- No. of organisms per vessel: 1
- No. of vessels per concentration: 10
- No. of vessels per control: 10
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Preparation of dilution water: M4 Medium
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: 16 h daylight / 8 h darkness
- Light intensity: 1058 – 1111 lux
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED:
- Reproduction (at each medium renewal)
- Immobility (at each medium renewal)
- Abnormalities as ephippia, presence of males, presence of aborted eggs and dead offspring (at each medium renewal)
- Length (at the end of the study)
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 2.2
- Range finding study: Yes
- Test concentrations: Control, 0.1, 1.0 and 5.0 mg/L
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: The chosen test design based on the result of a non GLP pre-test (duration 21 days) under semi-static conditions and medium renewal on Monday, Wednesday and Friday using freshly prepared test solutions. Based on the stability results, the chosen semi-static test design can be considered suitable for determining a mean exposure concentration in the range of the nominal concentration. - Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- Acute toxicity studies were conducted twice a year wit the reference substance 3,5-Dichlorphenol
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 0.45 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: based on initially introduced parent animals
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 1.2 mg/L
- 95% CI:
- >= 0.95 - <= 1.41
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- reproduction
- Remarks on result:
- other: based on initially introduced parent animals
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC10
- Effect conc.:
- 2.09 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Duration:
- 21 d
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect conc.:
- 1.22 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- meas. (TWA)
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- immobilisation
- Details on results:
- - Behavioural abnormalities: No
- Observations on body length and weight: No difference between control and the treatment groups
- Mortality of control: No
- Abnormal responses: No
- Any observations that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: No
- Effect concentrations exceeding solubility of substance in test medium: No - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- The 48 h-EC50 against 3,5-Dichlorphenol was determined as 2.04 mg/L
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- For each endpoint, the NOEC, LOEC, and, if possible, the EC50 and EC10 was determined. The estimation of the biological results was accomplished using the software ToxRat® Professional, version 3.3.0. In the highest tested nominal concentration (5.61 mg/L), all daphnia were found dead on day 2. In the second highest nominal concentration (2.68 mg/L) only 3 daphnia survived until the end of the test. In the other treatments no significant immobility was observed.
In the third highest tested concentration of 1.22 mg/L (nominal), a slight, statistically significant decrease in the reproduction of the daphnia was observed. The decrease in the reproduction of the daphnia in the lower concentrations was not statistically significant compared to the control.
The slight immobility at the nominal concentrations 0.27 mg/L and 0.56 mg/L was not caused by toxicity of the test item because in the next higher concentration 1.22 mg/L no immobility was observed. A regression analysis with all tested concentrations would result in an implausible, much too low value for the EC10 for the endpoint immobility. Therefore, for the endpoint immobility, an additional statistical evaluation was performed only with the 3 highest nominal concentrations. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- For details please refer to field "any other information on results incl. tables"
- Conclusions:
- The 21 d NOEC (reproduciton) for 2,4,6-trimethylphenol was 0.45 mg/L based on time weighted average cocentration and under semi-static conditions.
Reference
Table 1: Calculated time weighted average (TWA) test concentrations for 2,4,6-trimethylphenol
Nominal concentration (mg/L) |
Sampling days |
Measured concentration (mg/L) |
Measured concentration (mg/L) |
Time Weighted Average (mg/L) |
0.12 |
0 and 2 (old) |
0.1 |
0.09 |
0.10 |
5 (new) and 7 (old) |
0.11 |
0.09 |
||
14 (new) and 16 (old) |
0.1 |
0.09 |
||
19 (new) and 21 (old) |
0.11 |
0.09 |
||
0.27 |
0 and 2 (old) |
0.22 |
0.2 |
0.21 |
5 (new) and 7 (old) |
0.25 |
0.22 |
||
14 (new) and 16 (old) |
0.22 |
0.17 |
||
19 (new) and 21 (old) |
0.24 |
0.2 |
||
0.56 |
0 and 2 (old) |
0.45 |
0.41 |
0.45 |
5 (new) and 7 (old) |
0.5 |
0.45 |
||
14 (new) and 16 (old) |
0.47 |
0.39 |
||
19 (new) and 21 (old) |
0.5 |
0.44 |
||
1.22 |
0 and 2 (old) |
1.24 |
1.13 |
1.22 |
5 (new) and 7 (old) |
1.38 |
1.18 |
||
14 (new) and 16 (old) |
1.28 |
1.08 |
||
19 (new) and 21 (old) |
1.34 |
1.17 |
||
2.68 |
0 and 2 (old) |
2.80 |
2.45 |
2.67 |
5 (new) and 7 (old) |
2.81 |
2.28 |
||
14 (new) and 16 (old) |
2.89 |
2.47 |
||
19 (new) and 21 (old) |
3.10 |
2.60 |
||
5.61 |
0 and 2 (old) |
5.83 |
5.28 |
5.55 |
5 (new) and 7 (old) |
NA |
NA |
||
14 (new) and 16 (old) |
NA |
NA |
||
19 (new) and 21 (old) |
NA |
NA |
||
NA: Not sampled since all testing organisms were immobile at that time |
Table 2 : Nominal and percent of nominal concentration for 2,4,6-trimethylphenol during the 21 d reproduction study
Nominal |
% of Nominal Concentration |
|||||||
(mg/L) |
0 d |
2 d |
5 d |
7 d |
14 d |
16 d |
19 d |
21 d |
Blank control |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
0.12 |
86 |
79 |
93 |
78 |
87 |
76 |
93 |
79 |
0.27 |
82 |
75 |
91 |
80 |
82 |
63 |
89 |
73 |
0.56 |
80 |
73 |
90 |
81 |
84 |
70 |
88 |
79 |
1.22 |
102 |
93 |
113 |
97 |
105 |
88 |
110 |
96 |
2.68 |
104 |
91 |
105 |
85 |
108 |
92 |
116 |
97 |
5.61 |
104 |
94 |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
-- |
Table 3: Test organism offspring after 21 d of exposure to 2,4,6-trimethylphenol
Nominal |
Blank |
0.12 |
0.27 |
0.56 |
1.22 |
2.67 |
5.61 |
Replicate |
|||||||
1 |
61 |
32 |
M |
59 |
44 |
M |
M |
2 |
69 |
35 |
M |
48 |
53 |
2 |
M |
3 |
48 |
49 |
56 |
53 |
54 |
M |
M |
4 |
46 |
56 |
62 |
53 |
45 |
M |
M |
5 |
59 |
37 |
55 |
M |
52 |
M |
M |
6 |
54 |
75 |
52 |
55 |
57 |
M |
M |
7 |
57 |
63 |
28 |
57 |
48 |
M |
M |
8 |
64 |
41 |
63 |
52 |
35 |
1 |
M |
9 |
57 |
61 |
87 |
59 |
49 |
M |
M |
10 |
92 |
52 |
71 |
64 |
46 |
1 |
M |
Mean |
61 |
50 |
59 |
56 |
48* |
1* |
-- |
SD |
13 |
14 |
17 |
5 |
6 |
1 |
-- |
RSD |
21.35 |
27.87 |
28.44 |
8.54 |
13.02 |
43.3 |
-- |
SD = standard deviation; |
|||||||
RSD = relative standard deviation = coefficient of variation |
|||||||
M = mortality of parent animal |
|||||||
* statistically significant |
Table 4: Test Organism fecundity based on the Surviving Parent Animals after 21d of exposure to 2,4,6-trimethylphenol
Nominal Con |
Total |
Surviving Pa |
Mean Offspring per |
Inhibition of |
|
Blank Control |
607 |
10 |
61 |
0 |
|
0.12 |
501 |
10 |
50 |
17## |
|
0.27 |
474 |
8 |
59 |
2 |
|
0.56 |
500 |
9 |
56 |
8 |
|
1.22 |
483 |
10 |
48 |
20* |
|
2.67 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
98* |
|
5.61 |
0 |
0 |
-- |
-- |
|
* statistically significant |
|||||
## not statistically significant, an inhibition of 17 % is within a normal range for this biological system and is within the range of dispersion in the blank (blank mean = 61, blank |
|||||
standard deviation 13, blank RSD = 21.35 %, see Table 3). |
Table 5: Test organisms' body length after 21 d exposure to
2,4,6-trimethylphenol
Nominal |
Blank |
0.12 |
0.27 |
0.56 |
1.22 |
2.68 |
5.61 |
Replicate No. |
Length in mm |
||||||
1 |
6 |
4 |
-- |
6 |
5 |
-- |
-- |
2 |
6 |
4 |
-- |
6 |
6 |
5 |
-- |
3 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
-- |
-- |
4 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
-- |
-- |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
-- |
6 |
-- |
-- |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
-- |
-- |
7 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
-- |
-- |
8 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
-- |
9 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
6 |
-- |
-- |
10 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
6 |
5 |
-- |
mean |
5.8 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
5.6 |
5.7 |
5.0 |
|
-- Dead adults |
Table 6: Validity criteria for OECD 211
Criterion from the guideline |
Outcome |
Validity criterion fulfilled |
The mortality of the parent animals in the control (female Daphnia) does not exceed 20% at the end of the test. |
0 % |
Yes |
The mean number of living offspring produced per parent animal surviving at the end of the test is ≥ 60 in the control. |
61 |
Yes |
Description of key information
NOEC (21 d): 0.45 mg/L (time weighted average, reproduction, Daphnia magna, OECD 211)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Fresh water invertebrates
Fresh water invertebrates
- Dose descriptor:
- NOEC
- Effect concentration:
- 0.45 mg/L
Additional information
One GLP study on the long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates is available for 2,4,6-trimethylphenol. The study was conducted according to OECD guideline 211 investigating the chronic toxicity of the test item to Daphnia magna under semi-static conditions. Daphnia were exposed to the nominal concentrations of 0.12, 0.27, 0.56, 1.22, 2.68, 5.61 mg/L and an untreated control for 21 days. The test item was dissolved in test water. Corresponding concentrations of the new and aged test solutions for the chosen exposure intervals ranged between 73 % and 116 % of nominal.
Therefore, the results were based on time weighted average concentrations. No mortality or abnormal behavior was observed in the control. However, for the treatments mortality occurred for the nominal concentrations 0.27 mg/L with 20%, for 0.56 mg/L with 10%, for 2.67 mg/L with 70% and for 5.61 mg/L wit 100%. The mean living offspring number per surviving adult daphnid was 61 for the control and 50, 59, 56, 48 and 1 for the tested concentrations. The study is valid according to OECD guideline 211. The 21-day NOEC for reproduction and survival of Daphnia magna was 0.45 mg/L (time weighted average, based on initially introduced parent animals) and 1.22 mg/L (time weighted average).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.