Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 248-451-4 | CAS number: 27425-55-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: gene mutation
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Data is from peer reviewed journal
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: as per mentioned below
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Method as described by Ames et al 1975
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Type of assay:
- bacterial gene mutation assay
- Target gene:
- Histidine
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium, other: Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1538, TA98 and TA100
- Details on mammalian cell type (if applicable):
- Not applicable
- Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
- not specified
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- no data
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.1 mg/plate and 1 mg/plate
- Vehicle / solvent:
- DMSO
- Untreated negative controls:
- not specified
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- not specified
- True negative controls:
- not specified
- Positive controls:
- not specified
- Positive control substance:
- not specified
- Remarks:
- no data
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- Details on test system and conditions
METHOD OF APPLICATION: in agar (plate incorporation)
DURATION
- Preincubation period:
- Exposure duration: 2 days
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): No data available
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): No data available
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): No data available
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): No data available
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): No data available
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: duplicate
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: No data available
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; cloning efficiency; relative total growth; other: No data available
OTHER EXAMINATIONS: No data available
- Determination of polyploidy: No data available
- Determination of endoreplication: No data available
- Other: No data available
OTHER: No data available - Evaluation criteria:
- A sample was judged mutagenic if it produced greater than twice the spontaneous background colonies at more than one dose or at the highest dose tested.
- Statistics:
- No data available
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1538, TA98 and TA100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not specified
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not specified
- Positive controls validity:
- not specified
- Additional information on results:
- Additional information on results
TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: No data available
- Effects of osmolality: No data available
- Evaporation from medium: No data available
- Water solubility: No data available
- Precipitation: No data available
- Other confounding effects: Less soluble in DMSO
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: Spot test was performed with and without activation using the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1538, TA98 and TA100. The spot test results were inconclusive. The dyes were than screened at 0.1 mg/plate and 1 mg/plate.
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: No data available
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: No data available - Remarks on result:
- other: all strains/cell types tested
- Remarks:
- Migrated from field 'Test system'.
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative with and without
The given test material does not induce gene toxicity in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1538, TA98 and TA100. Hence it is negative for gene mutation. - Executive summary:
Liquid-dye lasers are being used in a variety of applications because of their versatility. To date there is little information available on many such dyes since there has been minimal testing of their toxicity and mutagenicity. Because laser technology is an important part of a growing number of research and development procedures and the dyes are potentially genotoxic, special precautions and handling procedures may be required.
One of the families of dyes that are involved in the study is coumarins. Amongst the 12 coumarins studied, the test material Coumarin 7 is also studied for mutagenicity. Bacteria were grown overnight in Oxoid nutrient broth, then refrigerated at 4-5OC for a few hours before use. 0.1 ml of bacterial culture was added to 2 ml of 45°C molten top agar containing 0.01 mg histidine HCI and 0.012 mg biotin/ml, followed by the test sample in ≤0.2 ml DMSO. Finally, 0.5 ml of sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (no activation), or 0.5 ml of Aroclor-induced rat S9 mixture was added, and the mixture was poured on minimal glucose agar plates. Histidine revertant colonies were counted on a Biotran II automated colony counter after a 2-day incubation at 37°C. A sample was judged mutagenic if it produced greater than twice the spontaneous background colonies at more than one dose or at the highest dose tested. To estimate mutagenic potency (revertant/µg) from linear dose-response curves, we used the method of Moore and Felton. All compounds were tested to a level at which they were toxic or to the limits of solubility. Duplicate plates were run on all tests except high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractions. All results were verified in repeat experiments. In the above mentioned study, coumarin 7, the test material failed to induce gene mutation in theSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA1538, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation.
Reference
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
Gene mutation in vitro:
Data from peer reviewed publications for the target chemical and data from read across (RA CAS no 91 -44 -1) have been used to determine the mutagenic nature of the test chemical Coumarin 7 (CAS no 27425 -55 -4). The summary is mentioned below:
Liquid-dye lasers are being used in a variety of applications because of their versatility. To date there is little information available on many such dyes since there has been minimal testing of their toxicity and mutagenicity. Because laser technology is an important part of a growing number of research and development procedures and the dyes are potentially genotoxic, special precautions and handling procedures may be required.
One of the families of dyes that are involved in the study is coumarins. Amongst the 12 coumarins studied, the test material Coumarin 7 is also studied for mutagenicity (Weubbles et al, 1985). Bacteria were grown overnight in Oxoid nutrient broth, then refrigerated at 4-5OC for a few hours before use. 0.1 ml of bacterial culture was added to 2 ml of 45°C molten top agar containing 0.01 mg histidine HCI and 0.012 mg biotin/ml, followed by the test sample in ≤0.2 ml DMSO. Finally, 0.5 ml of sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (no activation), or 0.5 ml of Aroclor-induced rat S9 mixture was added, and the mixture was poured on minimal glucose agar plates. Histidine revertant colonies were counted on a Biotran II automated colony counter after a 2-day incubation at 37°C. A sample was judged mutagenic if it produced greater than twice the spontaneous background colonies at more than one dose or at the highest dose tested. To estimate mutagenic potency (revertant/µg) from linear dose-response curves, we used the method of Moore and Felton. All compounds were tested to a level at which they were toxic or to the limits of solubility. Duplicate plates were run on all tests except high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) fractions. All results were verified in repeat experiments. In the above mentioned study, coumarin 7, the test material failed to induce gene mutation in the Salmonella typhimurium strains TA1538, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation. Thus the given test material, Coumarin 7, is negative for gene mutation in vitro.
The Salmonella/mammalian microsome test was performed (Haworth et al, 1983) to determine the mutagenic nature of the test compound 7-Diethylamino-4-methyl coumarin in vitro. Preincubation assay was performed using Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA98 with and without S9 metabolic activation system.To select the dose range for the mutagenesis assay, the test chemicals were checked for toxicity to TA100 up to a concentration of 10 mg/plate or the limit of solubility, both in the presence and absence of S-9 mix. The doses thus selected were 0, 100, 333, 1000, 3333, 5450 µg/plate. Appropriate positive controls were also incorporated. The test compound 7-Diethylamino-4-methyl coumarin is not mutagenic to Salmonella typhimurium TA100, TA1535, TA1537, TA98 in the preincubation assay performed with and without S9 metabolic activation system.preincubation assay performed with and without S9 metabolic activation system.
Gene mutation study was performed by Wuebbles, 1985 to evaluate the mutagenic nature of the test compound Coumarin 30 (RA CAS no 41044 -12 -6) using Salmonella typhimurium strain TA1538, TA98 and TA100 with and without S9 metabolic activation system. Bacteria were grown overnight in Oxoid nutrient broth, then refrigerated at 4-5OC for a few hours before use. 0.1 ml of bacterial culture was added to 2 ml of 45°C molten top agar containing 0.01 mg histidine HCI and 0.012 mg biotin/ml, followed by the test sample in ≤0.2 ml DMSO. Finally, 0.5 ml of sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4 (no activation), or 0.5 ml of Aroclor-induced rat S9 mixture was added, and the mixture was poured on minimal glucose agar plates. Histidine revertant colonies were counted on a Biotran II automated colony counter after a 2-day incubation at 37°C. A sample was judged mutagenic if it produced greater than twice the spontaneous background colonies at more than one dose or at the highest dose tested. In the above mentioned study, coumarin 30, the test material failed to induce gene mutation in theSalmonella typhimuriumstrains TA1538, TA98 and TA100 with and without metabolic activation.
Hence the given test material, Coumarin 30, is not likely to be a gene mutant in vitro.
Based on the data presented, the test material Coumarin 7 (CAS no 27425 -55 -4) is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Justification for selection of genetic toxicity endpoint
Data is from K2 peer reviewed publication
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the key study and its supporting data presented, the test material Coumarin 7 (CAS no 27425 -55 -4) is not likely to be mutagenic in vitro.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
Deze website maakt gebruik van cookies om het surfen zo aangenaam mogelijk te maken.