Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 482-020-3 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Genetic toxicity: in vivo
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / erythrocyte micronucleus
- Remarks:
- Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP/Guideline Study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 012
- Report date:
- 2012
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 474 (Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.12 (Mutagenicity - In Vivo Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EPA OPPTS 870.5395 (In Vivo Mammalian Cytogenetics Tests: Erythrocyte Micronucleus Assay)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- micronucleus assay
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- -
- EC Number:
- 482-020-3
- EC Name:
- -
- Molecular formula:
- C8H12O2
- IUPAC Name:
- cyclohexane-1,3-dicarbaldehyde; cyclohexane-1,4-dicarbaldehyde
- Test material form:
- other: liquid
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,3 and 1,4-Cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: A mixture of 1,3-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde and 1,4-cyclohexanedicarboxaldehyde
- Lot/batch No.: Lot# 201001644 2nd pass Bottle # 2
- Storage condition of test material: ambient
Constituent 1
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: Outbred Crl:CD1(ICR)
- Sex:
- male
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River (Kingston, New York)
- Age at study initiation: 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation:
- Assigned to test groups randomly: [no/yes, under following basis: ] animals were stratified by body weight and then randomly assigned to treatment groups using a computer program designed to increase the probability of uniform group mean weights and standard deviations at the start of the study.
- Housing: animals were housed one per cage in stainless steel cages
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): LabDiet Certified Rodent Diet #5002 (PMI Nutrition International, St. Louis, Missouri) in pelleted form ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): municipal water ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least one week prior to the start of the study.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 22°C with a tolerance of ± 1°C (and a maximum permissible excursion of ± 3°C)
- Humidity (%): 40-70%
- Air changes (per hr): 12-15 times/hour (average)
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12-hour light/dark (on at 6:00 a.m. and off at 6:00 p.m.)
Administration / exposure
- Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil, CAS number 8001-30-7, Sigma
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS:
The dosing solutions of the test material were prepared and used fresh on each of the two
consecutive days of administration. A frozen stock solution of CP dissolved in distilled
water (thawed and brought to room temperature prior to use) served as the positive
control. The vehicle used to mix the test material (corn oil, CAS number 8001-30-7,
Sigma) served as the negative control. - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Groups of male mice were administered test material on two consecutive days. Animals (six mice/dose) were
dosed on March 20-21, 2012. To the positive control group, CP was administered only
once. - Frequency of treatment:
- daily
- Post exposure period:
- 48 hours
Doses / concentrations
- Remarks:
- Doses / Concentrations:
0, 500, 1000, or 2000 mg/kg bw/day
Basis:
other: based on results of RFT
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 6
- Positive control(s):
- Cyclophosphamide monohydrate (CP) was administered only
once at a dose level of 40 mg/kg bw
Examinations
- Tissues and cell types examined:
- Approximately 5,000 RETs were analyzed per blood sample. The number of
normochromatic erythrocytes (NCE), MN-NCE, RET, and MN-RET were recorded for
each sample and the frequency of MN-RET was determined to provide an indication of
genotoxic potential. The frequency of RETs relative to total erythrocytes was determined
to provide an indication of perturbations in hematopoietic activity indicative of cell
toxicity. For each of the treatment groups, a mean and standard deviation was calculated
to describe the frequency of RET and MN-RET observed. The analyses were conducted
utilizing a Beckman Coulter Gallios™ flow cytometer. - Details of tissue and slide preparation:
- Duplicate cell smears were prepared and stored to serve as backups in the event that the
flow cytometric analysis was not possible. Blood was collected into a microtainer tube
coated with EDTA (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey). Wedge smears
were prepared, fixed in methanol, and stored at room temperature. - Evaluation criteria:
- A test was considered valid if all of the following conditions were met:
• The range of MN-RET values in the negative controls were within reasonable
limits of the recent laboratory background range.
• There was a significant increase in the incidence of MN-RET in the positive
control treatment as compared to the concurrent negative controls.
• The mean for percent RET value in one or more of the test material treated
groups was ≥ 20% of the control value indicating no undue effect on
erythropoiesis (toxicity).
A test material was considered positive in this assay if the following criterion was met:
• Statistically significant increase in MN-RET frequency at one or more dose
levels accompanied by a dose response.
A test material was considered negative in this assay if the following criterion was met:
• No statistically significant dose-related increase in MN-RET when compared to
the negative control.
A test result not meeting the criteria for either the positive or the negative response was
considered to be equivocal. - Statistics:
- MN-RET and percent RET was tested for equality of variance using Bartlett's test (alpha
= 0.01). If the results from Bartlett's test were significant, then the data for
the parameter may have been subjected to a transformation to obtain equality of the
variances. The transformations examined were the common log, the inverse, and the
square root in that order. The data was reviewed and an appropriate form of the data was
selected and subjected to the following analysis.
Based on the similarity of the response between sexes in the RFT, the MN-RET data and
the data on percent RET were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (where only
males were used). The alpha level at which tests were conducted was
0.05.
The MN-NCE was not analyzed statistically and was only used as an adjunct end point to
evaluate the biological significance of the MN-RET results.
The final interpretation of biological significance of the responses was based on both
statistical outcome and scientific judgment.
Results and discussion
Test results
- Sex:
- male
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Toxicity:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 2000 mg/kd/day
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- Interpretation of results (migrated information): negative
Treatment-related toxicity including a slight decrease in body temperature, a slight decrease in the percent RET value in the test material-treated animals, and clinical signs including decreased feces and perineal soiling were observed in male mice administered two consecutive daily doses of 1,3 and 1,4-cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde up to the limit dose of 2000 mg/kg bw/day. Based upon the results of the study reported herein, it was concluded that the test material, 1,3 and 1,4-cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde, did not induce a significant increase in the frequencies of micronucleated reticulocytes in the peripheral blood when given as a single oral dose on two consecutive days to male Crl:CD1(ICR) mice. Hence, 1,3 and 1,4-cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde is considered negative in this test system under the experimental conditions used. - Executive summary:
The in vivo genotoxic potential of 1,3 and 1,4-cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde was evaluated by
examining the incidence of micronucleated reticulocytes (MN-RET) in the peripheral blood.
The test material was administered to male Crl:CD1(ICR) mice by single oral gavage on two
consecutive days at dose levels of 0 (negative control), 500, 1000, and 2000 (limit dose)
mg/kg body weight (bw). The highest dose level of 2000 mg/kg bw/day was based upon the
results of a range-finding test where at this dose, no treatment-related deaths were observed
in male or female mice. The analytically determined concentrations of the test material in the
dosing solutions used for the first day of dosing in the micronucleus ranged from 86.3% to
93.8% of the targeted concentrations. All animals were observed for clinical signs prior to
dosing and at 2, 5, and 24 hours following each dosing. Groups of animals were euthanized
48 hours after the second treatment for the collection of peripheral blood and evaluation of
RET (approximately 5,000/animal) for MN by flow cytometry. The proportion of RET was
also determined based upon 5,000 RET per animal and the results expressed as a percentage.
Mice treated with 40 mg/kg bw cyclophosphamide monohydrate by a single gavage dose and
euthanized 48 hours later served as positive controls.
All animals survived to the end of the observation period. Treatment-related clinical signs
including decreased feces and perineal soiling were noted in the 2000 mg/kg bw/day
treatment group. There were no statistically significant increases in the frequencies of MNRET
or statistically significant effects on the percent RET in groups treated with the test
material as compared to the negative controls. There was a significant increase in the
frequency of MN-RET and a decrease in the percentage of RET in the positive control
chemical group as compared to the negative control group. Based upon the results of the study reported herein, it was concluded that the test material, 1,3 and 1,4-
cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde, did not induce a significant increase in the frequencies of
micronucleated reticulocytes in the peripheral blood when given by daily gavage on two
consecutive days to male Crl:CD1(ICR) mice. Therefore, 1,3 and 1,4-
cyclohexanecarboxaldehyde is considered negative in this test system under the experimental
conditions used.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.