Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Ecotoxicological information

Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
supporting study
Reliability:
4 (not assignable)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: The study report has not been received and therefore cannot be reviewed and evaluated in full.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: OECD 202-II
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Acetic acid
EC Number:
200-580-7
EC Name:
Acetic acid
Cas Number:
64-19-7
Molecular formula:
C2H4O2
IUPAC Name:
acetic acid
Details on test material:
Acetic acid technical 60%. Lot/batch A07ET265, Purity not stated.
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Details on properties of test surrogate or analogue material (migrated information):
No further details

Sampling and analysis

Analytical monitoring:
yes
Details on sampling:
Counting of new-born living daphnia and living adults. Average oxygen content, aaerage pH, substnace concentration and temperature were checked at the beginning 3 time weekly after test initiation and 21 days after test initiation. Effects of test substnace observed daily.

Test solutions

Vehicle:
no
Details on test solutions:
Test solutionsrenewed 8 times in the exposure period.

Test organisms

Test organisms (species):
Daphnia magna
Details on test organisms:
2-24h old

Study design

Test type:
semi-static
Water media type:
freshwater
Limit test:
no
Total exposure duration:
21 d
Post exposure observation period:
Not applicable

Test conditions

Hardness:
Not reported
Test temperature:
20°C±1
pH:
7.52-7.98
Dissolved oxygen:
7.8-8.6mg/l
Salinity:
Not applicable
Nominal and measured concentrations:
Nominal concentrations: 0, 84, 88, 93, 97, 102, 107 mg/l. Measured concentrations (time-weighted mean): 0, 52.4, 47.9, 54.3, 65.5, 73.8, 59.7mg/l.
Details on test conditions:
Daphnia fed green algae ( Scenedesmus subspicatus).
Concentrations tested with 8 replicates.
40 animals divided into groups of 10 animals in each test concentration and control
Reference substance (positive control):
no

Results and discussion

Effect concentrationsopen allclose all
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
80 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (TWA)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Remarks on result:
other: 60% acetic acid
Duration:
21 d
Dose descriptor:
NOEC
Effect conc.:
31.4 mg/L
Nominal / measured:
meas. (not specified)
Conc. based on:
test mat.
Basis for effect:
reproduction
Remarks on result:
other: For 100% acetic acid
Details on results:
Recovery rates of acetic acid in the test medium were below 80% of nominal before water renewal. EC50 values calculated with nominal and with measured (TWM) concentrations.
Results with reference substance (positive control):
not reported
Reported statistics and error estimates:
Determination of EC50 was carried out by probit analysis.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Validity criteria fulfilled:
yes
Conclusions:
The NOEC for reproduction, based on mean measured concentrations, was reported to be 80mg/l for 60% acetic acid. The NOEC for reproduction, based on mean measured concentrations, was determined to be to be 31.4mg/l for 100% acetic acid.
Executive summary:

The NOEC for reproduction, based on mean measured concentrations, was determined to be to be 31.4mg/l for 100% acetic acid. This study is GLP compliant and follows a standard guideline. It is considered suitable for use as a key study.