Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 915-673-4 | CAS number: 211519-85-6
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro genetic tioxicity studies have been conducted with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides (CAS No. 211519-85-6, EC No. 915-673-4) as follows:
Gene mutation (Bacterial reverse mutation assay / Ames test): negative with and without metabolic activation in S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA, (OECD Test Guideline 471) (Hita Laboratory, 2000b).
Cytogenicity in mammalian cells: negative with and without metabolic activation in CLU/IU cells (OECD Test Guideline 473) (Hita Laboratory, 2000c).
Mutagenicity in mammalian cells: negative with and without metabolic activation in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells (OECD Test Guideline 476) (Harlan, 2009).
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Japan ministry of labour notifications 67
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98 and TA 100
- Species / strain / cell type:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbitol and 5,6 benzoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 4.88-5000 µg/plate (range finding expt), 156-5000 µg/plate main tests (pre-incubation)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: test substance is insoluble in water - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2(2-furyl)-3-(5-mitro-2-furyl)acrylamide
- Remarks:
- TA 100, TA 98 and E coli WP2 uvrA without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- sodium azide
- Remarks:
- TA 1535 without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-methoxy-6-chloro-9-[3-(2-chloroethyl)-aminopropylamino] acridine
- Remarks:
- TA 1537 without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: 2-aminoacridine
- Remarks:
- all strains with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: preincubation
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 20 min
- Exposure duration: 48 h
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 48 h
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 48 h
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: test concentrations plated in triplicate, experiment repeated
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: other: inhibition of bacterial growth
ACTIVATION: 1 ML of S9 mix contained 8 µmol MgCL2, 33 µmol of KCl, 5 µmol of glucose-6-phosphate, 4 µmol of NADPH, 100 µmol of sodium phosphate buffer and 0.1 ml S9. 0.5 ml S9 was added to 0.1 ml test substance and 0.1 ml of bacterial culture medium was added to 2 ml of top agar, resulting in a final concentration of approximately 2% S9. - Evaluation criteria:
- An increase in the number of revertants above twice that of the negative (solvent) control was judged to be a positive result.
- Statistics:
- No statistical treatment was done.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 98
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium TA 100
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- E. coli WP2 uvr A pKM 101
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity nor precipitates, but tested up to recommended limit concentrations
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- True negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Effects of pH: hydrolyses in water
- Effects of osmolality: no information
- Evaporation from medium: no information
- Water solubility: hydrolyses in water
- Precipitation: observed at highest concentration
- Other confounding effects: none reported
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES: no cytotoxicity or genotoxicity observed
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: comparable with historical data
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON CYTOTOXICITY: no inhibition of bacterial growth was observed - Conclusions:
- Polysulfides (CAS 211519 -85 -9; EC 606-716-5) has been testing according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP. No increase in the number of reversions was observed in S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 or E. coli WP2 uvrA, with or without metabolic activation, when tested up to limit concentrations. The initial and the repeat study used the preincubation method and the results were in agreement. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2000-40-3 to 2000-07-13
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Kihatsu No 652 1997
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mammalian cell line, other: Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts CHL/IU clone no. 11
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Phenobarbital and 5,6-benzoflavone activated rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 50-200 µg/ml (main chromosome aberration test, 6 h exposure without activation); 50-150 µg/ml (main chromosome aberration test 6 h exposure with activation); 25-100 µg/ml (main chromosome aberration test, 24 h exposure without activation). Main cell growth inhibition tests conducted at: 50-800 µg/ml (6 h without activation), 50-400 µg/ml (6 h with activation), and 25-300 µg/ml (24 h without activation).
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: DMSO (dried)
- Justification for choice of solvent/vehicle: a stable suspension of test substance was obtained at 480 mg/ml. The test substance hydrolyses in water. - Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- mitomycin C
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- Remarks:
- DMSO
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- other: cyclophosphamide monohydrate
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium; preincubation;
DURATION
- Preincubation period: 6 hours
- Exposure duration: 6 hours short term tests, 24 hours continuous
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 18 hours
- Fixation time (start of exposure up to fixation or harvest of cells): 24 hours
SPINDLE INHIBITOR (cytogenetic assays): Colcemid added 2 h before completion of incubation
STAIN (for cytogenetic assays): 2% Giesma
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: Duplicate cultures at each dose
NUMBER OF CELLS EVALUATED: 200
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: mitotic index; inhibition of cell growth
OTHER EXAMINATIONS:
- Determination of polyploidy: yes
- Determination of endoreplication: not recorded
ACTIVATION: 1 ml of S9 mix contained 0.3 ml of S9, 5 µmol of MgCl2, 33 µmol of KCl, 5 µmol of glucose-6-phosphates, 4 µmol of NADP and 4 µmol of buffer. 0.5 ml of S9 mix was added to a total volume of 3 ml, resulting in a final concentration of approximately 1.7% S9. - Evaluation criteria:
- A results was judged positive when there is a 10% dose dependent increase in the frequency of cells with structural chromosomal aberration or 5% increase in the frequency of cells with polyploidy.
- Statistics:
- No statistical evaluation of results was carried out.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mammalian cell line, other: CHL/IU clone 11
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Remarks:
- at 200 µg/ml
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- at 4800 µg/ml with and without activation during 6 h cell growth inhibition test dose setting, and at 200 µg/ml during main 6 h tests without activation
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Conclusions:
- Polysulfides (CAS 211519 -85 -9; EC 606-716-5) has been tested in an in vitro chromosome aberration assay conducted in accordance with OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP. No substance-related increase in the number of aberrant cells was observed when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is not cytogenic to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 2009-08-11 to 2009-09-14
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 476 (In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method B.17 (Mutagenicity - In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 2008
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Type of assay:
- mammalian cell gene mutation assay
- Species / strain / cell type:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- phenobarbital/beta naphthoflavone induced rat liver S9
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0.31 to 20 μg/ml (4 and 24 h -S9); 5 to 60 μg/ml (4 h +S9)
- Vehicle / solvent:
- - Vehicle(s)/solvent(s) used: ethanol
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- ethylmethanesulphonate
- Remarks:
- without activation
- Untreated negative controls:
- no
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- cyclophosphamide
- Remarks:
- with activation
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- METHOD OF APPLICATION: in medium
DURATION
- Preincubation period: none
- Exposure duration: 4 h (with and without activation) 24 hours (without activation
- Expression time (cells in growth medium): 2 days
- Selection time (if incubation with a selection agent): 10-14 days
SELECTION AGENT (mutation assays): 5-trifluorothymidine
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS: cell cultures treated in duplicate
DETERMINATION OF CYTOTOXICITY
- Method: relative total growth; other: relative suspension growth; 2 day viability
OTHER: microwells used
ACTIVATION: 20% S9 mix contained S9, 8 mM of MgCl2, 33 mM of KCl, 5 mM of glucose-6-phosphate and 5 mM of NADP. The final concentration of S9 was 25 throughout the study. - Evaluation criteria:
- A substance is judged to be positive if it produces a reproducible, dose-dependent, statistically significant increase in the mutant frequency relative to the vehicle control, by a factor that equals or exceeds the global evaluation value for the microwell method of 126 E-06.
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- cytotoxicity
- Remarks:
- 25 µg/ml (4 and 24 h without activation)
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- not applicable
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- TEST-SPECIFIC CONFOUNDING FACTORS
- Precipitation: at or above 194.19 µg/ml in all exposure groups
COMPARISON WITH HISTORICAL CONTROL DATA: control values were within historical control data - Conclusions:
- Polysulfides (CAS 211519 -85 -9; EC 606-716-5) has been tested for mutagenicity to mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells in a study according to OECD Test Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP. No increase in the number of revertants was observed. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the mutagenicity in mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 2: Dose range-finding study. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA100 |
TA1535 |
E coli WP2 uvrA |
||||||
Conc. |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
110 |
119 |
no |
8 |
11 |
no |
22 |
25 |
no |
4.88 |
111 |
112 |
no |
10 |
11 |
no |
20 |
24 |
no |
19.5 |
111 |
104 |
no |
8 |
11 |
no |
19 |
25 |
no |
78.1 |
100 |
120 |
no |
12 |
8 |
no |
21 |
30 |
no |
313 |
114 |
126 |
no |
13 |
9 |
no |
19 |
27 |
no |
1250 |
116 |
114 |
no |
10 |
14 |
no |
23 |
31 |
no |
+5000 |
117 |
122 |
no |
9 |
7 |
no |
24 |
29 |
no |
Positive control |
329 |
992 |
- |
349 |
153 |
- |
111 |
692 |
- |
*solvent control with DMSO
Table 3: Dose range-finding study. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA 98 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
19 |
32 |
no |
8 |
16 |
no |
4.88 |
18 |
29 |
no |
9 |
19 |
no |
19.5 |
18 |
34 |
no |
8 |
20 |
no |
78.1 |
21 |
26 |
no |
9 |
20 |
no |
313 |
24 |
27 |
no |
10 |
17 |
no |
1250 |
16 |
31 |
no |
12 |
19 |
no |
+5000 |
24 |
29 |
no |
12 |
15 |
no |
Positive control |
398 |
264 |
- |
22296 |
198 |
- |
*solvent control with DMSO
Table 4: Experiment 1 Preincubation. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
|
TA100 |
TA1535 |
E coli WP2 uvrA |
||||||
Conc. |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
110 |
124 |
no |
15 |
12 |
no |
17 |
28 |
no |
156 |
109 |
101 |
no |
17 |
11 |
no |
19 |
23 |
no |
313 |
102 |
95 |
no |
18 |
13 |
no |
22 |
29 |
no |
625 |
118 |
104 |
no |
18 |
14 |
no |
19 |
28 |
no |
1250 |
104 |
91 |
no |
13 |
12 |
no |
21 |
24 |
no |
+2500 |
134 |
132 |
no |
19 |
16 |
no |
23 |
30 |
no |
+5000 |
114 |
131 |
no |
16 |
17 |
no |
26 |
32 |
no |
Positive control |
422 |
912 |
- |
447 |
115 |
- |
121 |
887 |
- |
*solvent control with DMSO
Table 5: Experiment 1 Preincubation. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
- |
TA 98 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
15 |
29 |
no |
9 |
15 |
no |
156 |
18 |
34 |
no |
5 |
16 |
no |
313 |
21 |
34 |
no |
6 |
17 |
no |
625 |
19 |
30 |
no |
8 |
10 |
no |
1250 |
20 |
32 |
no |
7 |
15 |
no |
+2500 |
16 |
35 |
no |
8 |
15 |
no |
+5000 |
22 |
35 |
no |
15 |
16 |
no |
Positive control |
384 |
273 |
- |
2814 |
173 |
- |
*solvent control with DMSO
Table 6: Experiment 2 Preincubation. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
- |
TA100 |
TA1535 |
E coli WP2 uvrA |
||||||
Conc. |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
112 |
108 |
no |
8 |
6 |
no |
17 |
23 |
no |
156 |
102 |
111 |
no |
11 |
7 |
no |
18 |
21 |
no |
313 |
108 |
101 |
no |
7 |
8 |
no |
18 |
21 |
no |
625 |
100 |
105 |
no |
10 |
8 |
no |
17 |
25 |
no |
1250 |
110 |
114 |
no |
7 |
11 |
no |
14 |
18 |
no |
+2500 |
100 |
110 |
no |
8 |
7 |
no |
18 |
23 |
no |
+5000 |
105 |
109 |
no |
7 |
9 |
no |
23 |
26 |
no |
Positive control |
360 |
908 |
- |
200 |
125 |
- |
111 |
570 |
- |
*solvent control with DMSO
Table 7: Experiment 2 Preincubation. Number of revertants per plate (mean of 3 plates)
- |
TA 98 |
TA1537 |
||||
Conc. |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
-MA |
+ MA |
Cytotoxic |
0* |
15 |
22 |
no |
4 |
12 |
no |
156 |
15 |
21 |
no |
5 |
11 |
no |
313 |
13 |
28 |
no |
6 |
10 |
no |
625 |
15 |
23 |
no |
5 |
10 |
no |
1250 |
17 |
20 |
no |
4 |
11 |
no |
+2500 |
17 |
23 |
no |
6 |
13 |
no |
+5000 |
18 |
24 |
no |
7 |
12 |
no |
Positive control |
354 |
249 |
- |
2665 |
173 |
- |
*solvent control with DMSO
Numbers in tables indicate the average number of aberrant cells per 100 cells, unless otherwise indicated
Table 2: Results of chromosome analysis: 6h exposure, 18 h recovery, without activation
- |
Solvent Control |
Positive Control |
Low dose 50 µg/ml |
Mid dose 100 µg/ml |
High dose 200 µg/ml |
|
Cytotoxicity |
- |
yes/no |
no |
no |
yes |
|
Precipitation |
- |
- |
no |
yes |
yes |
|
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
0 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
breaks |
0 |
23 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
42.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Isochromatid aberrations |
gaps |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
breaks |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
|
interchanges |
0 |
1.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Cell growth index |
100% |
NR |
107.6% |
67.9% |
53.7% |
|
Polyploidy |
1% |
0 |
2% |
0 |
0 |
|
Endo reduplication |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR: Not reported
Table 3: Results of chromosome analysis: 6h exposure, 18 h recovery, with activation
- |
Solvent Control |
Positive Control |
Low dose 50 µg/ml |
Mid dose 100 µg/ml |
High dose 150 µg/ml |
|
Cytotoxicity |
- |
yes/no |
no |
no |
yes |
|
Precipitation |
- |
- |
no |
yes |
yes |
|
Chromatid aberrations |
gaps |
1.5 |
1.5 |
0 |
0.5 |
1.0 |
breaks |
0 |
15 |
0 |
0.5 |
3.0 |
|
interchanges |
0.5 |
22.5 |
0 |
2.0 |
2.5 |
|
Isochromatid aberrations |
gaps |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
breaks |
0 |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
interchanges |
0.5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Cell growth index |
100% |
NR |
98.6% |
73.4% |
44.2% |
|
Polyploidy |
0.5% |
0 |
2% |
0 |
0 |
|
Endo reduplication |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR: Not reported
Table 4: Results of chromosome analysis: continuous exposure
- |
Solvent Control |
Low dose 50 µg/ml |
Mid dose 1 50 µg/ml |
Mid dose 2 75 µg/ml |
High dose 100 µg/ml |
Cytotoxicity |
- |
no |
no |
yes |
yes |
Precipitation |
- |
no |
no |
yes |
yes |
Frequency of aberrant cells - structural |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Cell growth index |
100% |
97.1% |
72.3% |
51.8% |
38% |
Polyploidy |
4% |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Endo reduplication |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR |
NR: Not reported
Table 1 Preliminary toxicity test
Dose (μg/ml) |
% RSG (-S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (+S9) 4-Hour Exposure |
% RSG (-S9) 24-Hour Exposure |
0* |
100 |
100 |
100 |
12.4 |
74 |
96 |
72 |
24.27 |
90 |
96 |
26 |
48.55 |
83 |
84 |
0 |
97.09 |
100 |
68 |
0 |
194.49 |
95 |
82 |
1 |
388.38 |
94 |
102 |
1 |
776.75 |
108 |
98 |
1 |
1553.5 |
100 |
102 |
4 |
3107 |
97 |
82 |
39 |
* solvent control with ethanol
Table 2 Main experiment Relative suspension growth, relative total growth and mutant frequency
Treatment µg/ml |
4 hours - S9 |
Treatment µg/ml |
4 hours + S9 |
||||
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
||
0* |
100 |
1.00 |
89.99 |
0* |
100 |
1.00 |
114.53 |
12.5 |
112 |
1.29 |
89.46 |
12.5 |
113 |
1.04 |
91.57 |
25 |
111 |
1.28 |
82.23 |
25 |
106 |
1.20 |
95.58 |
50 |
121 |
1.42 |
89.78 |
50 |
102 |
1.05 |
101.72 |
100** |
110 |
1.28 |
79.77 |
100 |
105 |
1.09 |
93.79 |
150** |
109 |
1.28 |
86.92 |
150** |
104 |
1.10 |
88.74 |
200** |
122 |
1.38 |
86.12 |
200** |
106 |
1.17 |
98.22 |
Positive control |
94 |
0.81 |
710.52 |
Positive control |
65 |
0.29 |
935.61 |
RSG: Relative suspension growth,
RTG: relative total growth and mutant frequency
MF: mutant frequency
*Solvent control with ethanol
**Precipitate observed
Table 3 Main experiment Relative suspension growth, relative total growth and mutant frequency
Treatment µg/ml |
24 hours - S9 |
||
% RSG |
RTG |
MF |
|
0* |
100 |
1.00 |
96.68 |
1.56 |
109 |
NC |
NC |
3.13 |
102 |
0.95 |
108.38 |
6.25 |
101 |
1.29 |
76.85 |
12.5 |
104 |
1.21 |
113.47 |
18.75 |
89 |
1.02 |
93.93 |
25 |
59 |
0.69 |
89.8 |
37.5 |
16 |
0.14 |
141.03 |
50 |
9 |
NC |
NC |
Positive control |
9 |
0.69 |
992.94 |
RSG: Relative suspension growth,
RTG: relative total growth and mutant frequency
MF: mutant frequency
NC not counted
*Solvent control with ethanol
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
The key bacterial mutagenicity study with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides was conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 471 and in compliance with GLP (Hita Laboratory, 2000b). No increase in the number of reversions was observed in S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 or E. coli WP2 uvrA, with or without metabolic activation, when tested up to limit concentration. The initial and the repeat study used the preincubation method and the results were in agreement. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is not mutagenic to bacteria under the conditions of the test.
This key result is supported by an older study of similar reliability (Microbiological Associates, 1996) which tested S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2 uvrA using the plate incorporation method. A further study of lower reliability used S. typhimurium strains TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 1538 (TNO, 1988). Both the supporting studies gave negative results with and without metabolic activation.
In the key in vitro chromosome aberration assay with bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]polysulfides conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 473 and in compliance with GLP (Hita Laboratory, 2000c), no substance-related increase in the number of aberrant cells was observed when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations with and without metabolic activation in Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is not cytogenic to mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
The key mammalian cell mutagenicity test was conducted according to OECD Test Guideline 476 and in compliance with GLP (Harlan, 2009). Mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells were used in the study. No increase in the number of revertants was observed with and without metabolic activation when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations. Appropriate solvent and positive controls were included and gave expected results. It is concluded that the test substance is negative for the mutagenicity in mammalian cells under the conditions of the test.
No evidence genetic toxicity potential was observed in the in vitro studies, so in vivo testing is not required.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available in vitro genotoxicity data, polysulfides, bis[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl] does not require classification for mutagenicity according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.