Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Historical testing suggests positive sensitisation by repeat epicutanous testing.

Insufficient data to sub-categorise the classification.

The review document also references ear-swelling test on vanadium sulphate as being positive

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin sensitisation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin sensitisation: in vivo (non-LLNA)
Remarks:
repeat insult test (Buehler)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
data from handbook or collection of data
Justification for type of information:
Source reference not found, but is cited in several handbooks
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
other: Buehler repeat exposure
Version / remarks:
Buehler repeat exposure
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Also references 'ear swelling' test, but no details of method in the review documents
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
Buehler test
Justification for non-LLNA method:
Historical study that provides a positive response
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Precise form of vanadium sulphate not specified
Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
not specified
Sex:
not specified
Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
Described as 'albino' guinea pigs
Positive control results:
Non specified
Reading:
other: Not specified
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
3% concentration
No. with + reactions:
80
Total no. in group:
80
Clinical observations:
Not specified
Remarks on result:
positive indication of skin sensitisation
Interpretation of results:
Category 1 (skin sensitising) based on GHS criteria
Conclusions:
Insufficient data to sub-categorise the classification.
The review document also references ear-swelling test on vanadium sulphate as being positive
Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
adverse effect observed (sensitising)

Justification for classification or non-classification