Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
viscosity
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
03 Sept 2010 - 29 Oct 2010
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Guideline study; non-GLP

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2011
Report date:
2011

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Test Guideline 114 (Viscosity of Liquids)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
no
Type of method:
capillary viscometer (static)

Test material

Constituent 1
Details on test material:
Name of test material (as cited in study report): TFEE-5
- Physical state: Colorless liquid
- Analytical purity: 97.21%
- Stability under test conditions: Test item stable
- Storage condition of test material: Ambient temperature, 10-30 °C

Results and discussion

Viscosity
Key result
Temp.:
20°C
Parameter:
kinematic viscosity (in mm²/s)
Value:
4.699 - 4.717
Remarks on result:
other: The kinematic viscosity at 20 °C is reported as 4.7 mm²/s

Any other information on results incl. tables

Dynamic viscosity calculated as kinematic viscosity x density:

4.7 * 1.80 = 8.46 Pa*s at 20 °C.

The kinematic and dynamic viscosities at 40 °C are 2.7 mm²/s and 4.77 Pa*s

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The kinematic viscosity of TFEE-5 at 20 °C is 4.7 mm²/s
Executive summary:

The kinematic viscosity of TFEE-5 was measured using capillary viscometry in Cannon-Fenske Routine Viscometers. The kinematic viscosity of TFEE-5 at 20 °C is 4.7 mm²/s.

The study was performed according to internationally accepted test guidelines but was not done under GLP or equivalent QA criteria. This study is classified as reliable with restrictions.