Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Description of key information

Pivarose was found to be not irritating to the skin and eyes of rabbits following application of the neat material.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Skin irritation / corrosion

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
skin irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: see 'Remark'
Remarks:
Non-GLP study conducted similarly to OECD Guideline 404 with deviations: no data about purity and no certificate of analysis of the test substance; no details on environmental conditions; occlusive patches were applied for 24 h and skin reactions were scored at 24 and 72 h after application; observations not followed until the reversibility of the effects
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
non-GLP study; no data about purity, no certificate of analysis of test substance; no details on environmental conditions; occlusive patches applied for 24 h and scored at 24 and 72 h after application; observations not followed until the reversibility
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- Age at study initiation: Adult
Type of coverage:
occlusive
Preparation of test site:
other: intact or abraded
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period:
72 h
Number of animals:
12 rabbits (6 with intact skin and 6 with abraded skin)
Details on study design:
- Area of exposure: Back of the animals
- % coverage: Test substance (0.5 mL) was applied under a surgical patch (1 inch x 1 inch) to the intact or abraded skin site on each animal.
- Type of wrap used: The patches were fixed to the application site by means of adhesive tape and the entire trunk of the rabbits was wrapped with an impervious material to maintain the test patches in position and to retard evaporation of volatile substances.

REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- After an exposure period of 24 h, the patches and the applied material were removed.

SCORING SYSTEM:
- Skin reactions were scored at 24 and 72 h after application according to Draize scoring system (1944).
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 72 h
Score:
0.83
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 72 h
Score:
0.25
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: intact skin
Irritation parameter:
erythema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 5 animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 72 h
Score:
0.8
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: abraded skin
Irritation parameter:
edema score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 5 animals
Time point:
other: 24 and 72 h
Score:
0.3
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
no data
Remarks on result:
other: abraded skin
Irritant / corrosive response data:
- After 24 h, very slight erythema and very slight oedema was noted in animals.
- After 72 h, very slight or well-defined erythema, slight scaliness and very slight oedema were noted in 6/11 rabbits.
- No distinct differences were noted between the reactions on the intact skin and abraded skin.
Other effects:
Mortality: One rabbit died during the exposure period, probably because of a mechanical trauma.

Table 7.3.1/1: Skin irritation data for individual rabbits

Rabbit number

Irritation scores

24 h

72 h

Mean (24 and 72 h)

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

Erythema

Oedema

Intact skin

1

1

0

1

1

1

0.5

2

1

0

0

0

0.5

0

3

1

0

0

0

0.5

0

4

1

0

0

0

0.5

0

5

1

1

2

1

1.5

1

6

1

0

1

0

1

0

Mean (all 6 animals)

0.83

0.25

Abraded skin

7

1

1

1

0

1

0.5

8

1

1

1

0

1

0.5

9

1

1

0

0

0.5

0.5

10

1

0

1

0

1

0

11

1

0

0

0

0.5

0

12

Dead

 -

Mean (all 5 animals)

0.80

0.30

 

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under these test conditions, fenethylpivalinate is not classified as irritating to skin according to the Directive 67/548/EEC and the CLP Regulation.
Executive summary:

In a primary dermal irritation study performed similarly to OECD Guideline 404, 12 New Zealand White rabbits were dermally exposed to 0.5 mL of fenethylpivalinate, under an occlusive patch (1 inch X 1 inch) to intact or abraded skin of the dorsal region. After an exposure period of 24 h, the patches and the applied material were removed and skin reactions were scored by Draize method. A second reading was recorded 48 h later (72 h after application).

After 24 h, very slight erythema and very slight oedema was noted in animals. After 72 h, very slight or well-defined erythema, slight scaliness and very slight oedema were noted in 6/11 rabbits. No distinct differences were noted between the reactions on the intact skin and abraded skin.

The calculated mean scores for each individual lesion for all animals within two scoring times (24 and 72 h) were as follows: 0.83 for erythema score (intact skin), 0.25 for oedema score (intact skin); 0.80 for erythema score (abraded skin); 0.30 for oedema score (abraded skin).

Under these test conditions, fenethylpivalinate is not classified as irritating to skin according to the Directive 67/548/EEC and the CLP Regulation.

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Eye irritation

Link to relevant study records
Reference
Endpoint:
eye irritation: in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1981
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study conducted similarly to OECD Guideline 405 with deviations: no data about purity and no certificate of analysis of the test substance; no details on environmental conditions; age of animals at the start of study not reported
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to same study
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Qualifier:
equivalent or similar to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
Deviations:
yes
Remarks:
no data about purity and no certificate of analysis of the test substance; no details on environmental conditions; age of animals at the start of study not reported
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Not applicable
GLP compliance:
no
Remarks:
pre-GLP
Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- Housing: Animals were housed individually in cages.
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Controls:
not required
Amount / concentration applied:
TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL
- Concentration (if solution): Undiluted
Duration of treatment / exposure:
24 h
Observation period (in vivo):
72 h
Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
Six
Details on study design:
REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing: Eyes were not washed following instillation and the animals were released immediately.

SCORING SYSTEM: Ocular lesions were scored at 24, 48 and 72 h after instillation according to a scale comparable to the OECD Guideline 405.

TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: Ocular reactions were read using a binocular magnifying glass. The diagnosis of corneal damage was confirmed, if necessary, by staining the eyes of the animals with fluorescein-impregnated papers. After flushing the excess fluorescein solution, the eyes were examined in a dark room under UV illumination.
Irritation parameter:
cornea opacity score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: average of 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
iris score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: average of 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
2
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritation parameter:
conjunctivae score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: average of 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0.28
Max. score:
3
Reversibility:
fully reversible within: 3 days
Irritation parameter:
chemosis score
Basis:
mean
Remarks:
of 6 animals
Time point:
other: average of 24, 48 and 72 h
Score:
0
Max. score:
4
Reversibility:
other: not applicable
Irritant / corrosive response data:
- Slight redness of the conjunctivae was noted in 4/6 rabbits.
- After three days, these lesions had cleared up completely.
Other effects:
None

Table 7.3.2/1: Scores for ocular lesions

Animal no.

Cornea

Iris

Conjunctivae redness

Conjunctivae chemosis

24 h

48 h

72 h

Mean*

24 h

48 h

72 h

Mean*

24 h

48 h

72 h

Mean*

24 h

48 h

72 h

Mean*

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.00

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0.33

0

0

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0.33

0

0

0

0

4

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0.00

0

0

0

0

5

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0.67

0

0

0

0

6

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

1

0

0

0.33

0

0

0

0

Mean#

0

0

0.28

0

*mean of scores at 24, 48 and 72 h

#mean of scores of all 6 animals

Interpretation of results:
not irritating
Remarks:
Migrated information Criteria used for interpretation of results: EU
Conclusions:
Under the test conditions, fenethylpivalinate is not classified as irritating to eyes according to the Annex VI of the Directive 67/548/EEC and of the Regulation (EC) N° 1272-2008 (CLP).
Executive summary:

In an eye irritation study conducted similarly to the OECD Guideline 405, six rabbits of the New Zealand White strain were exposed to 0.1 mL of fenethylpivalinate in one eye, while the other eye remained untreated and served as control. The eyelids were then gently held together for 1 second to avoid any loss of the test material. Eyes were not washed and ocular reactions were read at 24, 48 and 72 h following instillation using a binocular magnifying glass. The diagnosis of corneal damage was confirmed, if necessary, by staining the eyes of the animals with fluorescein-impregnated papers. After flushing the excess fluorescein solution, the eyes were examined in a dark room under UV illumination. Ocular reactions were graded according to a scale comparable to the OECD Guideline 405.

Slight redness of the conjunctivae was noted in 4/6 rabbits. After three days, these lesions had cleared up completely. The calculated mean scores for each individual lesion for all animals within three scoring times (24, 48 and 72 h) were as follows: 0.00 for cornea score; 0.00 for iris score; 0.28 for conjunctivae score and 0.00 for chemosis score. In this study, fenethylpivalinate is not an eye irritant on rabbits.

Under the test conditions, fenethylpivalinate is not classified as irritating to eyes according to the Annex VI of the Directive 67/548/EEC and of the Regulation (EC) N° 1272-2008 (CLP).

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no adverse effect observed (not irritating)

Respiratory irritation

Endpoint conclusion
Endpoint conclusion:
no study available

Additional information

Based on the results of a reliable in vivo skin and eye irritation study, classification under the EU DSD or CLP regulations as a skin or eye irritant is not required.


Justification for selection of skin irritation / corrosion endpoint:
Reliable in vivo study

Justification for selection of eye irritation endpoint:
Reliable in vivo study

Justification for classification or non-classification