Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: - | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Description of key information
Skin irritation (OECD 404): not irritating
Read across from source substances 1,2,3-Propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) and glycerides, C14-18 and C16-22-unsatd. mono- and di- (CAS 91744-13-7)
Eye irritation (OECD 405) not irritating
Read across from source substances 1,2,3-propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) and 9-octadecenoic acid (Z), diester with oxybis[propanediol]) (CAS 67965-56-4)
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Skin irritation / corrosion
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro skin irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo skin irritation study are available
- Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Lack of data on test substance. Lack of data on test material. Occlusive conditions.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Lack of data on test material. Occlusive conditions.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Kleinrusse, Chbb:HM
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Age at study initiation: adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2.3 kg
- Housing: The animals were single housed in rabbit cages.
- Diet: 20 ZH 5, Nohrlin GmbH
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 21
- Humidity (%): 45 - 50
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Type of coverage:
- occlusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: Not required, untreated sites of the same animal served as control.
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 7 d
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 7 d - Number of animals:
- 4 males
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6.25 cm² on the dorsal area of the trunk
- Type of wrap if used: The treated skin was covered with a plastic film, held in place with adhesive plasters and acrylastic tape.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 d
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The dermal application of the test substance did not result in edema in any of the animals tested at any observation time point. Very slight to slight erythema formation was observed in 3/4 animals at the 24 and 48 h reading time points. At the 72 h reading time point, slight and moderate erythema formation was observed in 2/4 animals. The effects were reversible in all animals within 7 d after the application of the test substance.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified - Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Study period:
- 9 Apr -17 Apr 1990
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: GLP - Guideline study. Lack of test material details.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 404 (Acute Dermal Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- lack of test material details
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Kleinrussen, Chbb:HM
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Age at study initiation: 19-20 months
- Weight at study initiation: 2770 g
- Housing: animals were housed individually in cages (Heinkel, Kuchen, Germany)
- Diet: Altromin Haltungsdiät 2023 (Altromin GmbH, Lage, Germany), ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 1 week
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-25
- Humidity (%): 45-70
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light):12/12 - Type of coverage:
- semiocclusive
- Preparation of test site:
- shaved
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: not required, untreated sites of the same animal served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied: 0.5 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 4 h
- Observation period:
- 7 days
Reading time points: 1, 24, 48 and 72 h and 7 days - Number of animals:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: 6 cm² on the dorsal area of the trunk
- Type of wrap if used: The treated skin was covered with gauze, held in place with an adhesive hypoallergenic tape.
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system - Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- After 1h 2/3 animals showed slight erythema being reversible within 24h and 7 days, respectively. After 48 h 1/3 animals showed slight erythema being reversible after 72 h. Edema formation was apparent in 1/3 animals at the 48 and 72 h reading time point and was reversible within 7 days.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified - Endpoint:
- skin irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Remarks:
- Summary of available data used for the endpoint assesssment of the target substance
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- refer to the analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- other: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 1
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 d
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 63705-03-3
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- other: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 63705-03-3
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 72 h
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 91744-13-7
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 91744-13-7
- Irritation parameter:
- erythema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 1.3
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 91744-13-7
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #1
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 91744-13-7
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #2
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 91744-13-7
- Irritation parameter:
- edema score
- Basis:
- animal #3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.7
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 7 days
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- reversibility: not applicable
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- As detailed in the analogue justification, it is considered that the target and the source substances are unlikely to lead to differences in skin irritation potential. The available data on suitable source substances did not show any skin irritation effects. Therefore, the target substance is not predicted to be a skin irritant.
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Results of skin irritation study
Observation time |
Rabbit no. |
||||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
||||||
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
||
1 h |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
24 h |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
48 h |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
|
72 h |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
|
7 d |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h |
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.67 |
0.00 |
1.00 |
0.00 |
2.33 |
0.00 |
|
Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h all animals |
1.00 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 1. Results of skin irritation study.
Observation time |
Rabbit no. |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
Erythema |
Edema |
|
1 h |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
24 h |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
48 h |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
72 h |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
7 days |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Mean value 24 + 48 + 72 h |
0.3 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
1.3 |
0.7 |
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Eye irritation
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Data waiving:
- study scientifically not necessary / other information available
- Justification for data waiving:
- an in vitro eye irritation study does not need to be conducted because adequate data from an in vivo eye irritation study are available
- Justification for type of information:
- To cover eye irritation for the substance, read-across is performed with Triglycerindiisostearat and with 9-Octadecanoic acid (Z), diester with oxybis[propanediol]. For Triglycerindiisostearat, an in vivo study was performed in 1988. For 9-Octadecanoic acid (Z), diester with oxybis[propanediol], Scheel et al published in 2011 a study comparing results of the in vivo eye irritation study with the HET-CAM method. This publicly available information was included in IUCLID.
- Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Guideline study with acceptable restrictions. Lack of data on test substance.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- Lack of data on test substance.
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- other: Kleinrusse, Chbb:HM
- Details on test animals or tissues and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Thomae, Biberach, Germany
- Age at study initiation: adult
- Weight at study initiation: 2.5 kg
- Housing: The animals were single housed in rabbit cages.
- Diet: Altromin 2023, ad libitum
- Water: tap water, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: at least 7 d
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20 - 21
- Humidity (%): 45 - 55
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: the untreated eye served as control
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 0.1 mL - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- single application without washing
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 3 d
Reading time points: 1, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h - Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 4 males
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM: Draize scoring system
TOOL USED TO ASSESS SCORE: fluorescein - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- animal: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- animal: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- animal: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0.08
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- animal: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- The application of the test substance to one eye of each animal did not result in corneal opacity, iritis or swelling of the conjunctivae at any observation time point. Very slight redness of the conjunctivae was observed in 1/4 animals at the 24 h reading time point. The effect was reversible within 48 h after the application of the test substance.
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- CLP: not classified
DSD: not classified - Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vitro / ex vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well documented publication which meets basic scientific principles.
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The HET-CAM was used to measure irritation potential of chemicals following the protocol published in the 1990s by the cosmetic industry (Brantom et al., 1997, Toxicology In Vitro, 11, 141-179; Steiling et al., 1999, Toxicology In Vitro, 13, 375-384; Sterzel et al., 1990, Toxicology In Vitro, 4, 698-701) and was evaluated in a number of studies including the European COLIPA validation study (Brantom et al., 1997, Toxicology In Vitro, 11, 141-179). The results were obtained either using the Reaction Time Method (RT) (Steiling et al., 1999, Toxicology In vitro, 13, 375-384).
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- other: in vitro
- Strain:
- other: chicken eggs
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: internal standard (5% aqueous solution of sodium magnesium lauryl-myristyl-6-ethoxysulfate) with well-known irritating potential was used as benchmark for categorization of irritation potential
- Amount / concentration applied:
- TEST MATERIAL
- Amount(s) applied (volume or weight with unit): 300 µL or sufficient amount to cover at least 25% of the CAM
- Concentration (if solution): 100% - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 300 seconds
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 300 seconds
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 2 eggs in pretest and 6 eggs in main test
- Details on study design:
- SCORING SYSTEM:
Effects: occurrence of specific effects on the CAM and/or its blood vessels, H - Hemorrhage, L - Lysis, C - intravasal and/or extravasal coaggulation
RT scores - individual time of occurrence of effects were recorded during a maximum observation period of 300 seconds, a test item specific irritation score was determined by equal valuation of individual effects without using ranking factors. The benchmark chemical was tested in parallel and both irritation scores (mean over all eggs) were used to calculate the Q-value (quotient of both scores). This Q-value is the relevant parameter for prediction of irritancy classes (see table 1 under "Any other information on material and methods including tables"). - Irritation parameter:
- other: Q-score
- Run / experiment:
- mean of all 6 eggs
- Value:
- 1.2
- Vehicle controls validity:
- not valid
- Negative controls validity:
- not valid
- Positive controls validity:
- not valid
- Remarks on result:
- no indication of irritation
- Other effects / acceptance of results:
- no details given
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- DSD: not classified
CLP: not classified - Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: Acceptable, well documented publication which meets basic scientific principles.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 405 (Acute Eye Irritation / Corrosion)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Species:
- rabbit
- Strain:
- not specified
- Vehicle:
- unchanged (no vehicle)
- Controls:
- other: not required: the untreated eye of the same animal served as control
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- 24 hours
- Observation period (in vivo):
- 72 hours
- Number of animals or in vitro replicates:
- 3
- Details on study design:
- REMOVAL OF TEST SUBSTANCE
- Washing (if done): not specified
SCORING SYSTEM: Draize Scoring System - Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal#1 - animal#3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal#1 - animal#3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal#1 - animal#3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- animal#1 - animal#3
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Irritant / corrosive response data:
- no effects were observed in all animals tested
- Other effects:
- no other effects observed
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- DSD: not classified
CLP: not classified - Endpoint:
- eye irritation: in vivo
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- refer to analogue justification provided in IUCLID section 13
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- other: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 63705-03-3
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- other: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 63705-03-3
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- other: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0.08
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- fully reversible within: 48 h
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 63705-03-3
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- other: mean out of all 4 animals
- Time point:
- other: mean over 24, 48 and 72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 63705-03-3
- Irritation parameter:
- cornea opacity score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean out of all 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 67965-56-4
- Irritation parameter:
- iris score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean out of all 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 2
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 67965-56-4
- Irritation parameter:
- conjunctivae score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean out of all 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 3
- Reversibility:
- other: reversibility: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 67965-56-4
- Irritation parameter:
- chemosis score
- Basis:
- mean
- Remarks:
- mean out of all 3 animals
- Time point:
- 24/48/72 h
- Score:
- 0
- Max. score:
- 4
- Reversibility:
- other: not applicable
- Remarks on result:
- other:
- Remarks:
- CAS 67965-56-4
- Interpretation of results:
- not irritating
- Conclusions:
- As detailed in the analogue justification, it is considered that the target and the source substances are unlikely to lead to differences in eye irritation potential. The available data on suitable source substances did not show any eye irritation effects. Therefore, the target substance is not predicted to be an eye irritant.
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (not irritating)
Respiratory irritation
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
There are no skin and eye irritation/corrosion data available on Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered), esters with glycerol oligomers. Skin and eye irritation studies with the registered substance have been commissioned at a CRO. Therefore, as an interim measure, the skin and eye irritation potential of the registered substance was assessed based on the available data from the source substances 1,2,3 -propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) glycerides, C14-18 and C16-22-unsatd. mono- and di- (CAS 91744-13-7) and 9-octadecenoic acid (Z), diester with oxybis[propanediol]) (CAS 67965-56-4). In accordance with Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 Annex XI, 1.5 “Grouping of substances and read across” and following the Read across assessment framework (RAAF, ECHA 2017) read across from analogue substances have been applied to support the human health hazard assessment of Fatty acids, C16-18 (even numbered), esters with glycerol oligomers.
Skin irritation
CAS 63705-03-3
The skin irritation potential of 1,2,3-propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) was investigated according to OECD Guideline 404 and GLP (Kaestner, 1998). The shaved dorsal area of the trunk of three male Kleinrussen rabbits was exposed to unchanged test material for 4 hours. Skin reactions were assessed using the Draize scheme approx. 1, 24, 48, 72 hours and 7 days after removal of the test substance. The dermal application of the test substance did not result in edema in any of the animals tested at any observation time point. Very slight to slight erythema was observed in 3/3 animals at the 24 and 48 h reading time points. At the 72 h reading time point, slight and moderate erythema was observed in 2/3 animals. The effects were reversible in all animals within 7 days after the application of the test substance. The slight irritating effects seen in skin are below the hazard classification limit and therefore the substance is assumed as not irritating to skin.
CAS 91744-13-7
The skin irritation potential of glycerides, C14-18 and C16-22-unsatd. mono- and di- was investigated in a GLP-conform study performed according to OECD guideline 404 (Steiling, 1990). 0.5 mL of the test substance was applied for 4 h to the shaved skin of 3 Kleinrussen, Chbb:HM rabbits under semiocclusive conditions. The untreated site of the animals served as control. The scoring of skin reactions (erythema and edema) was performed according to Draize at 1, 24, 48, 72 h as well as 7 days after removal of the dressing. In one animal, slight erythema persisted up to the 72 h, but was fully reversible within the 7-day observation period. In the two other animals, slight erythema was either seen at the 1 or 48 h reading, but was fully reversible 24 h or 72 h after patch removal. Slight edema was only noted in one animal at both the 48 and 72 h reading time points, but fully reversed during the 7-day observation period. No signs of systemic toxicity were seen during the study. The mean erythema and edema scores over the 24, 48 and 72 h reading time points were 0.3/0/1.3 and 0/0/0.7 for the 3 animals. Thus, the test substance is considered to be non-irritating to the skin.
Eye irritation
CAS 63705 -03 -3
An acute eye irritation study was performed with 1,2,3-propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) according to OECD Guideline 405 and GLP (Kaestner, 1988).
0.1 mL of test substance was instilled in the conjuctival sac of one eye of each of 3 Kleinrussen rabbits. The animals were observed over 3 days. Eye irritation was scored by mean of the Draize scoring system at the following reading time points: 1, 6, 24, 48 and 72 h. The application of the test substance to one eye of each animal did not result in corneal opacity, iritis or swelling of the conjunctivae at any observation time point. Very slight redness of the conjunctivae was observed in 1/3 animals at the 24 h reading time point. The effect was reversible within 48 h after the application of the test substance. As the slight irritating effects are below the hazard classification limit, the substance is assumed as not irritating to the eye.
Under the experimental conditions described, it was concluded, that no evidence of eye irritation properties was seen in rabbit after treatment with 1,2,3 -propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CA 63705-03-3).
CAS 67965-56-4
For this source substance, in vitro and in vivo data are available with respect to eye irritation.
The HET-CAM was used to measure irritation potential of chemicals following the protocol published in the 1990s by the cosmetic industry (Brantom et al., 1997, Toxicology In Vitro, 11, 141-179; Steiling et al., 1999, Toxicology In Vitro, 13, 375-384; Sterzel et al., 1990, Toxicology In Vitro, 4, 698-701) and was evaluated in a number of studies including the European COLIPA validation study (Brantom et al., 1997, Toxicology In Vitro, 11, 141-179). The results were obtained using the Reaction Time Method (RT) (Steiling et al., 1999, Toxicology In vitro, 13, 375-384). 9-octadecenoic acid (Z), diester with oxybis[propanediol]) (CAS 67965-56-4) was found to be not irritating in both in vitro (HET-CAM) and in vivo studies (Scheel, J et, al., 2011).
Conclusions
Based on the available data, none of the two source substances considered - 1,2,3 -propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) and glycerides, C14-18 and C16-22-unsatd. mono- and di- (CAS 91744-13-7) - was found to be a skin irritant. Thus and based on read-across, it can be concluded that the registration substance is not a skin irritant.
Results of an eye irritation study conducted with both source substances 1, 2,3-propanetriol, homopolymer, diisooctadecanoate (CAS 63705-03-3) and 9-octadecenoic acid (Z), diester with oxybis[propanediol]) (CAS 67965-56-4) did not provide any evidence of eye irritation properties. Thus and based on read-across, it can be concluded that the registration substance is not an eye irritant.
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on read-across from structurally similar substances, the available data on skin and eye irritation/corrosion do not meet the classification criteria according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008 (CLP), and are therefore conclusive but not sufficient for classification.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.