Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 225-806-1 | CAS number: 5089-72-5
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Effects on fertility
Description of key information
Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD 422), rat: NOAEL (parental/reproductive) ≥500 mg/kg bw/day (RA from CAS 1760-24-3)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24.09.2001 to 06.09.2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to a test protocol that is similar to the appropriate OECD test guideline, and in compliance with GLP.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Modified OECD 422 and USEPA Health Effects test guideline OPPTS 870.3650 (2000)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Sex:
- male/female
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Portage, MI, USA
- Age at study initiation: At least 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 253-301 g; Females: 181-229 g
- Fasting period before study: None
- Housing: Iindividually in suspended wire-mesh cages elevated over Bed-O'Cobs bedding; during cohabitation the females were pared 1 to 1 with a male in a suspended wire-mesh cage; pregnant females were moved into shoebox cages containing Enviro-dri and Bed-O'Cobs combination bedding (no later than three days prior to their expected delivery date until remainder of the study)
- Diet: PMI Certified Rodent Chow #5002 (PMI Nutritional International, St. Louis, MO, USA), ad libitum
- Water: Municipal water, further purified by reverse osmosis, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 01.10.2001 To: 11.04.2002 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The dosing formulations were prepared daily by adding an appropriate amount of test substance to a measured amount of vehicle (dried and de-acidified) under nitrogen atmosphere.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil was dried and de-acidified to removal residual water before use as test substance hydrolyses in contact with moisture.
- Lot/batch no: 070K0127
- Purity: 100% - Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: Until evidence of copulation occurred or up to 2 weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Concentration, homogeneity and stability of the test substance in the vehicle were verified by gas chromatopgraphy with a flame ionisation detection (FID). Concentration verification was conducted on a weekly basis.
- Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: 28 days (beginning 2 weeks prior to mating)
Toxicity phase female: 29 days (beginning 2 week prior to mating)
Reproductive phase females: 39-44 days (2 weeks prior to mating, throughout mating and pregnancy until day 3 postpartum - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily (seven days/week)
- Details on study schedule:
- Not applicable to this screening study.
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10/sex/dose (with females only used for of toxicity and reproductive phase groups)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose selection was based on a 7-day range finding study where 3 Sprague-Dawlex rats per sex were dosed per gavage with 125, 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. As a result one high dose female was found dead on study day 4. One high dose male was found moribund on study day 6 and was humanely sacrificed. All other animals survived until scheduled necropsy. Slight effects on body weight and food consumption have been observed in the treatment groups. Increased breathing sounds recorded as rales and soiling and wetness around the muzzle were the most common clinical findings related to treatment. Both findings were most common and most persistent in the 1000 mg/kg bw/day group. Some animals in the lower dose groups exhibited rales or wetness around the nose and/or mouth or soiling of the muzzle. However, these clinical findings were detectable for only one or two days of the study. At the highest dose, the majority of the clinical signs were associated with the two mortalities. However, one of the surviving females from the high dose group exhibited rales, hunched posture and muzzle soiling. Both of the animals that died before scheduled sacrifice had gaseous distension of the gastrointestinal tract and small dark livers. There were no adverse findings in the necropsy examination of the surviving animals.
- Parental animals: Observations and examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice daily for morbidity, moribundity and mortality. General clinical observations were made at least once per day, approximately one hour after dosing.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Once before the first dosing and weekly thereafter.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights were recorded weekly beginning approximately one week prior to test substance administration, on the first day of dosing and just prior to scheduled necropsy.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Individual food consumption was recorded weekly for female animals in the toxicity group for four weeks. Individual food consumption for the male animals and the reproductive group females were recorded during the first two weeks of treatment. Food consumption was not measured during the cohabitation period. Food consumption was measured for the reproductive group females throughout gestation until terminal sacrifice.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On the day of scheduled sacrifice
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes, ketamine HCl/Xylazine
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- How many animals: All male and toxicity group females
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On the day of scheduled sacrifice
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: All male and toxicity group females
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY (FOB): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Prior to the start of dosing and during the fourth week of the treatment. The assessments were conducted following the daily dose administration.
- Dose groups that were examined: All male and toxicity group females.
- Battery of functions tested: cageside observations, hand-held observations, open field observations, categorical observations, measurements/counts, motor activity. - Oestrous cyclicity (parental animals):
- Apparently not investigated.
- Sperm parameters (parental animals):
- Parameters examined in male parental generation: testes weight, epididymis weight
- Litter observations:
- STANDARDISATION OF LITTERS
- Performed on day 3 postpartum: No, all animals sacrificed on day 3 postpartum.
PARAMETERS EXAMINED
The following parameters were examined in offspring: number and sex of pups, stillbirths, live births, runts, presence of gross anomalies, weight gain, physical or behavioural abnormalities.
GROSS EXAMINATION OF DEAD PUPS: yes, for external and internal abnormalities; possible cause of death was not determined for pups born or found dead. - Postmortem examinations (parental animals):
- SACRIFICE
- Male animals: All surviving animals after 28 days of dosing.
- Maternal animals: All surviving animals on day 3 postpartum.
- Toxicity group females: All surviving animals after 29 days of dosing.
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
The tissues indicated in Table 1 were prepared for microscopic examination and weighed, respectively. - Postmortem examinations (offspring):
- SACRIFICE
- Postpartum day 3
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Not conducted. - Statistics:
- All data analysis was carried out using SAS. In all comparisons, the family wise error rate was held at 5% (alpha=0.05). Prior to this analysis, an exploratory analysis was carried out on all variables tested. Bartlett's test was used to check for heterogeneity of variances and a Kolmogorov-smirnov test was used to test normality of the data. Parametric data was then tested using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's Test (if significant). Non-parametric data were tested by Kruskal Wallis Test followed by Wilcoxon (if significant). For variables that had multiple measurements across time Repeated Measurement ANOVA was used to analyse the data. Categorical data were tested for equal proportions using the Fisher's Exact Test.
Statistically significant probabilities are reported at either the p≤0.05 or p≤0.01 levels. - Reproductive indices:
- Fertility
- Offspring viability indices:
- Survival
- Clinical signs:
- effects observed, treatment-related
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality:
- mortality observed, non-treatment-related
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- no effects observed
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Immunological findings:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- effects observed, non-treatment-related
- Histopathological findings: non-neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings: neoplastic:
- no effects observed
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: oestrous cycle:
- not examined
- Reproductive function: sperm measures:
- no effects observed
- Reproductive performance:
- no effects observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- parental
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No significant adverse effects on parent animals.
- Clinical signs:
- no effects observed
- Dermal irritation (if dermal study):
- not examined
- Mortality / viability:
- no mortality observed
- Body weight and weight changes:
- no effects observed
- Food consumption and compound intake (if feeding study):
- not examined
- Food efficiency:
- not examined
- Water consumption and compound intake (if drinking water study):
- not examined
- Ophthalmological findings:
- not examined
- Haematological findings:
- not examined
- Clinical biochemistry findings:
- not examined
- Urinalysis findings:
- not examined
- Sexual maturation:
- not examined
- Organ weight findings including organ / body weight ratios:
- not examined
- Gross pathological findings:
- no effects observed
- Histopathological findings:
- not examined
- Other effects:
- not examined
- Behaviour (functional findings):
- not examined
- Developmental immunotoxicity:
- not examined
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- reproductive
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects on offspring were observed.
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In an oral gavage study conducted to OECD 422 and to GLP (reliability score 1) the NOAEL for the test material relating to repeated dose (parental systemic) effects and to reproductive toxicity was at least 500 mg/kg bw/day, as no significant adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose of 500 mg/kg bw/day tested in rats.
- Endpoint:
- screening for reproductive / developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to the Additional Information field in the endpoint study summary.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- parental
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No significant adverse effects on parent animals.
- Remarks on result:
- other: DCC, 2002
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- reproductive
- Generation:
- F1
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No adverse effects on offspring were observed
- Remarks on result:
- other: DCC, 2002
- Reproductive effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In an oral gavage study conducted to OECD 422 and to GLP (reliability score 1) the NOAEL for the test material relating to repeated dose (parental systemic) effects and to reproductive toxicity was at least 500 mg/kg bw/day, as no significant adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose of 500 mg/kg bw/ day tested in rats.
Referenceopen allclose all
BODY WEIGHT AND WEIGHT GAIN: Mean body weights in males and females in the 25, 125 and 500 mg/kg bw/day groups were comparable to the control group values throughout the study; no statistically significant differences were noted. Reductions (not statistically significant) in weekly body weight gain were observed in the 25 and 125 mg/kg bw/day group males during week 4. These reductions were not considered to be test substance-related since the difference did not occur in a dose-dependent manner and no reductions were noted in female body weight gains during this time period.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: There were no statistically significant differences in food consumption in any group.
HAEMATOLOGY: There were no treatment-related effects on haematology parameters. However, in the toxicity group females there was a statistically-significant increase in platelet counts compared to controls. The counts for the treated groups were within published historical control ranges, whereas controls in the present study were somewhat below those ranges. No biological/toxicological significance is attributed to treatment.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: There were no treatment-related effects on clinical chemistry. However, in females, there was a statistically significant decrease in the chloride value (1.9%) in the high dose group, and a slight decrease (1.4%) in sodium in the middle and high dose groups. There was no dose-response. Sodium values for all female groups, including controls, were within or slightly below published historical control ranges. Chloride values for all groups were slightly above published control ranges. There were no associated clinical or morphological findings, so the findings were not thought to be biologically or toxicologically significant.
FOB: Cage side observations: There were no treatment-related changes noted in unusual body movements, abnormal behaviour, posture or resistance to removal.
Handling observations: Palpebral closure, lacrimation, pupil size and reactivity, salivation, muscle tone, extensor thrust response and reactivity to handling were not affected by the treatment.
Open Field Observations: No differences were apparent between the control and treated groups in the open field observations.
Categorical Observations: No differences between control and treated groups when skin or hair coat, behaviour, respiration, muscle movements, eyes, urine or faeces, soiling, posture or general abnormalities were evaluated.
Measurements/counts: There was no effect on rectal temperature, hindlimb grip strength or landing foot splay assessments.
Motor activity: There were no effects on motor activity.
ORGAN WEIGHTS: There were no treatment-related effects on organ weights. There was no dose-response associated with a statistically-significant small increase in relative prostate weight in the 25 mg/kg bw/day group.
GROSS PATHOLOGY: There were no findings attributable to the test substance.
HISTOPATHOLOGY: There were no treatment-related findings.
REPRODUCTIVE FUNCTION: SPERM MEASURES (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No adverse effects.
REPRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE (PARENTAL ANIMALS): No adverse effects.
CLINICAL SIGNS (OFFSPRING): No adverse findings.
BODY WEIGHT (OFFSPRING): No adverse findings.
GROSS PATHOLOGY (OFFSPRING): No adverse findings.
Effect on fertility: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study (Klimisch score 2 due to read-across) from a reference substance with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common functional group and similarities in physico-chemical and toxicological properties (refer to endpoint discussion for further details). The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.7, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Effect on fertility: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on fertility: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Additional information
Read-across justification
Effects on toxicity to reproduction
There are no developmental toxicity data for N-[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine(CAS 5089-72-5) or its hydrolysis product N-[3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine, so good quality data for the related substance N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS 1760-24-3) has been used to assess the reproductive toxicity of N-[3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine. Both substances hydrolyse within 165 min and 1.5 min at 25°C and pH 7 to the common hydrolysis productN-[3-(trihydroxysilyl)propyl]ethylenediamine. In addition, methanol and ethanol are generated. Hydrolysis will be faster at lower or higher pH values (5 s at pH 2, conditions after oral exposure).
Ethanol
Rats and mice maintained on liquid diets containing 5 – 10% ethanol for 5 weeks or longer showed some adverse physical and functional effects on the testes. Some indications of toxicity to the foetus, including deaths, growth retardation and increased malformations have been noted in rats and mice given diets in which 15-35% of the calories were derived from ethanol. However in other studies, no effect on the foetuses were seen in mice and rabbits given drinking water containing up to 15% ethanol, or inhaling up to 20 000 ppm ethanol, during pregnancy.
Methanol
Information about the effects of methanol on fertility is limited. Slight increases in sperm abnormalities were noted in a study in mice (1000 mg/kg/day) although the effect on fertility was not investigated. In a rat 2-generation study there were no effects on fertility. In a cynomolgus monkey study no effects were noted. Where effects are noted they occur only at high doses.
Conclusion
The common silicon-containing hydrolysis product of these substances, ethanol and methanol, would not contribute to any reproductive toxicity (fertility) effects at the dose levels tested.
Further information on read-across is given in chapter "Repeated dose toxicity"
Discussion
A combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test according to OECD guideline 422 and in compliance with GLP was performed with N-(3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS 1760-24-3) in rats Sprague-Dawley rats (DCC, 2002). Ten male and 20 female rats (10 per reproductive and toxicity group each) were administered 25, 125 and 500 mg/kg bw/day of the test substance in corn oil by gavage, for up to 29 (males and toxicity group females) or 39-44 (reproductive group females) consecutive days. Control animals received the concurrent vehicle. The dose selection was based on a 7-day range finding study where 3 Sprague-Dawlex rats per sex were dosed per gavage with 125, 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. Based on mortality observed in the high dose group (1 male and 1 female) and no further effects observed in all other dose groups a NOAEL of 500 mg/kg bw/day was derived and 500 mg/kg bw/day was chosen as the high dose in the main study. In the main study no treatment-related deaths were observed and no other treatment-related adverse effects were observed. Functional observational battery revealed no treatment-related effects. There were no pathology or histopathology findings attributable to the test substance throughout the study period and no treatment-related effects on organ weights were observed. Furthermore, no effects attributable to the test substance for any of the reproductive parameters examined were observed. Litter size, sex ratio, pup survival and weight, total implant sites and corpora lutea were not affected by the administration of the test item. No incidence of abnormal behavior was recorded for any of the pups. At 500 mg/kg bw/day six of the eight surviving dams became pregnant and delivered litters that were not different from control litters in any parameters. Three rats were not found pregnant, two in the 500 mg/kg bw/day and one in the 25 mg/kg bw/day dose group, whereby all had evidence of copulation.
In conclusion, a NOAEL of ≥500 mg/kg bw/day for fertility and systemic toxicity was derived for the analogue substance N-(3-(triethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS 1760-24-3).
Effects on developmental toxicity
Description of key information
Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD 422), rat: NOAEL (maternal/developmental) ≥500 mg/kg bw/day (RA from CAS 1760-24-3)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 24.09.2001 to 06.09.2002
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: The study was conducted according to a test protocol that is similar to the appropriate OECD test guideline, and in compliance with GLP.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: OECD Guideline 422 (Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction / Developmental Toxicity Screening Test)
- Deviations:
- no
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- Modified OECD 422 and USEPA Health Effects test guideline OPPTS 870.3650 (2000)
- GLP compliance:
- yes
- Limit test:
- no
- Species:
- rat
- Strain:
- Sprague-Dawley
- Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Laboratories, Inc., Portage, MI, USA
- Age at study initiation: At least 8 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: Males: 253-301 g; Females: 181-229 g
- Fasting period before study: None
- Housing: Iindividually in suspended wire-mesh cages elevated over Bed-O'Cobs bedding; during cohabitation the females were pared 1 to 1 with a male in a suspended wire-mesh cage; pregnant females were moved into shoebox cages containing Enviro-dri and Bed-O'Cobs combination bedding (no later than three days prior to their expected delivery date until remainder of the study)
- Diet: PMI Certified Rodent Chow #5002 (PMI Nutritional International, St. Louis, MO, USA), ad libitum
- Water: Municipal water, further purified by reverse osmosis, ad libitum
- Acclimation period: Five days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 19-25
- Humidity (%): 30-70
- Air changes (per hr): 10-15
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
IN-LIFE DATES: From: 01.10.2001 To: 11.04.2002 - Route of administration:
- oral: gavage
- Vehicle:
- corn oil
- Details on exposure:
- PREPARATION OF DOSING SOLUTIONS: The dosing formulations were prepared daily by adding an appropriate amount of test substance to a measured amount of vehicle (dried and de-acidified) under nitrogen atmosphere.
VEHICLE
- Justification for use and choice of vehicle (if other than water): Corn oil was dried and de-acidified to removal residual water before use as test substance hydrolyses in contact with moisture.
- Lot/batch no. (if required): 070K0127
- Purity: 100 % - Analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- yes
- Details on analytical verification of doses or concentrations:
- Concentration, homogeneity and stability of the test substance in the vehicle were verified by gas chromatopgraphy with a flame ionisation detection (FID). Concentration verification was conducted on a weekly basis.
- Details on mating procedure:
- - Impregnation procedure: cohoused
- If cohoused:
- M/F ratio per cage: 1:1
- Length of cohabitation: Until evidence of copulation occurred or up to 2 weeks
- Proof of pregnancy: vaginal plug or sperm in vaginal smear referred to as day 0 of pregnancy - Duration of treatment / exposure:
- Males: 28 days (beginning 2 weeks prior to mating)
Toxicity phase female: 29 days (beginning 2 week prior to mating)
Reproductive phase females: 39-44 days (2 weeks prior to mating, throughout mating and pregnancy until day 3 postpartum - Frequency of treatment:
- Daily (seven days/week)
- Duration of test:
- Up to 44 days
- Dose / conc.:
- 25 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 125 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Dose / conc.:
- 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- No. of animals per sex per dose:
- 10/sex/dose (with females only used for toxicity and reproductive phase groups)
- Control animals:
- yes, concurrent vehicle
- Details on study design:
- - Dose selection rationale: The dose selection was based on a 7-day range finding study where 3 Sprague-Dawlex rats per sex were dosed per gavage with 125, 250, 500 or 1000 mg/kg bw/day. As a result one high dose female was found dead on study day 4. One high dose male was found moribund on study day 6 and was humanely sacrificed. All other animals survived until scheduled necropsy. Slight effects on body weight and food consumption have been observed in the treatment groups. Increased breathing sounds recorded as rales and soiling and wetness around the muzzle were the most common clinical findings related to treatment. Both findings were most common and most persistent in the 1000 mg/kg bw/day group. Some animals in the lower dose groups exhibited rales or wetness around the nose and/or mouth or soiling of the muzzle. However, these clinical findings were detectable for only one or two days of the study. At the highest dose, the majority of the clinical signs were associated with the two mortalities. However, one of the surviving females from the high dose group exhibited rales, hunched posture and muzzle soiling. Both of the animals that died before scheduled sacrifice had gaseous distension of the gastrointestinal tract and small dark livers. There were no adverse findings in the necropsy examination of the surviving animals.
- Maternal examinations:
- CAGE SIDE OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Twice daily for morbidity, moribundity and mortality. General clinical observations were made at least once per day, approximately one hour after dosing.
DETAILED CLINICAL OBSERVATIONS: Yes
- Time schedule: Once before the first dosing and weekly thereafter.
BODY WEIGHT: Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Individual body weights were recorded weekly beginning approximately one week prior to test substance administration, on the first day of dosing and just prior to scheduled necropsy.
FOOD CONSUMPTION: Individual food consumption was recorded weekly for female animals in the toxicity group for four weeks. Individual food consumption for the male animals and the reproductive group females were recorded during the first two weeks of treatment. Food consumption was not measured during the cohabitation period. Food consumption was measured for the reproductive group females throughout gestation until terminal sacrifice.
HAEMATOLOGY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On the day of scheduled sacrifice
- Anaesthetic used for blood collection: Yes, ketamine HCl/Xylazine
- Animals fasted: Yes, overnight
- How many animals: All male and toxicity group females
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY: Yes
- Time schedule for collection of blood: On the day of scheduled sacrifice
- Animals fasted: Yes
- How many animals: All male and toxicity group females
- Parameters checked in table 1 were examined.
FUNCTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL BATTERY (FOB): Yes
- Time schedule for examinations: Prior to the start of dosing and during the fourth week of the treatment. The assessments were conducted following the daily dose administration.
- Dose groups that were examined: All male and toxicity group females.
- Battery of functions tested: cageside observations, hand-held observations, open field observations, categorical observations, measurements/counts, motor activity. - Ovaries and uterine content:
- The ovaries and uterine content was examined after termination: Yes
Examinations included:
- Gravid uterus weight: No
- Number of corpora lutea: Yes
- Number of implantations: Yes
- Number of early resorptions: No
- Number of late resorptions: No - Fetal examinations:
- SACRIFICE
- Postpartum day 3
GROSS NECROPSY
- Gross necropsy consisted of external and internal examinations including the cervical, thoracic, and abdominal viscera.
HISTOPATHOLOGY / ORGAN WEIGHTS
Not conducted. - Statistics:
- All data analysis was carried out using SAS. In all comparisons, the family wise error rate was held at 5% (alpha=0.05). Prior to this analysis, an exploratory analysis was carried out on all variables tested. Bartlett's test was used to check for heterogeneity of variances and a Kolmogorov-smirnov test was used to test normality of the data. Parametric data was then tested using one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's Test (if significant). Non-parametric data were tested by Kruskal Wallis Test followed by Wilcoxon (if significant). For variables that had multiple measurements across time Repeated Measurement ANOVA was used to analyse the data. Categorical data were tested for equal proportions using the Fisher's Exact Test.
Statistically significant probabilities are reported at either the p≤0.05 or p≤0.01 levels. - Indices:
- Viability and fertility
- Details on maternal toxic effects:
- Maternal toxic effects:no effects
Details on maternal toxic effects:
No significant adverse systemic effects in maternal animals. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No significant adverse systemic effects in maternal animals.
- Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
- Embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:no effects
Details on embryotoxic / teratogenic effects:
No abnormal behaviour or effects, including teratogenic, were observed in offspring. - Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No abnormal behaviour or effects, including teratogenic, were observed in offspring.
- Abnormalities:
- not specified
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In an oral gavage study conducted to OECD 422 and to GLP (reliability score 1) the NOAEL for the test material relating to repeated dose (systemic) effects and to developmental toxicity was at least 500 mg/kg bw/day, as no significant adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose of 500 mg/kg bw/day tested in rats.
- Endpoint:
- developmental toxicity
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Please refer to the Additional Information field in the endpoint study summary.
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- maternal
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No significant adverse systemic effects in maternal animals.
- Remarks on result:
- other: DCC, 2002
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- Remarks:
- developmental
- Effect level:
- >= 500 mg/kg bw/day (actual dose received)
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Sex:
- male/female
- Basis for effect level:
- other: No abnormal behaviour or effects, including teratogenic, were observed in offspring.
- Remarks on result:
- other: DCC, 2002
- Developmental effects observed:
- not specified
- Conclusions:
- In an oral gavage study conducted to OECD 422 and to GLP (reliability score 1) the NOAEL for the test material relating to repeated dose (systemic) effects and to developmental toxicity was at least 500 mg/kg bw/day, as no significant adverse effects were observed up to the highest dose of 500 mg/kg bw/day tested in rats.
Referenceopen allclose all
Effect on developmental toxicity: via oral route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed
- Dose descriptor:
- NOAEL
- 500 mg/kg bw/day
- Study duration:
- subacute
- Species:
- rat
- Quality of whole database:
- The available information comprises an adequate and reliable study (Klimisch score 2 due to read-across) from a reference substance with similar structure and intrinsic properties. Read-across is justified based on common functional group and similarities in physico-chemical and toxicological properties (refer to endpoint discussion for further details). The selected study is thus sufficient to fulfil the standard information requirements set out in Annex VIII, 8.7, in accordance with Annex XI, 1.5, of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006.
Effect on developmental toxicity: via inhalation route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Effect on developmental toxicity: via dermal route
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no study available
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on reliable data from the analogue substance N-(3 -(trimethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS 1760-24-3), the registered substance N-(3 -(triethoxysilyl)propyl)ethylenediamine (CAS 5089-72-5) does not meet the criteria to be classified for toxicity to reproduction according to Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.