Każijiet fejn l-ECHA hija l-imputat jew l-intervenjent

Każijiet fejn l-ECHA hija l-imputat jew l-intervenjent

Każijiet fejn l-ECHA hija l-imputat jew l-intervenjent

Din it-tabella tinkludi l-każijiet kollha tal-qorti li ngħalqu b'deċiżjoni li l-ECHA kienet tagħmel parti minnhom. Partijiet interessati jistgħu faċilment jirreferu għal deċiżjonijiet li jistgħu jkunu rilevanti għalihom fil-kamp ta' applikazzjoni tal-attivitajiet ewlenin tal-ECHA (fost l-oħrajn REACH u CLP). Għal xi wħud mill-każijiet, jista' jkun hemm appell pendenti jew renvoi, li huma elenkati wkoll fit-tabella. It-tabella ma turix każijiet ta' persunal jew akkwist.

Il-każijiet magħluqa tal-qorti ġew klassifikati fi tmien kategoriji:

  1. Lista ta' Kandidati REACH: każijiet relatati mal-identifikazzjoni ta' sustanza li hija ta’ tħassib serju ħafna;
  2. Reġistrazzjoni REACH: każijiet relatati mal-preżentazzjoni konġunta tal-obbligu tad-data;
  3. Awtorizzazzjoni REACH: każijiet relatati mal-inklużjoni ta' sustanza fil-Lista ta' Awtorizzazzjoni (Anness XIV) u applikazzjonijiet tal-awtorizzazzjoni;
  4. Valutazzjoni REACH: każijiet fejn l-ECHA talbet informazzjoni minn reġistrant skont il-proċedura ta' valutazzjoni (Artikoli 40, 41 jew 46 ta' REACH);
  5. CLH: każijiet li jikkonċernaw l-armonizzazzjoni ta' klassifikazzjoni ta' sustanza;
  6. Bijoċidi: każijiet li jikkonċernaw bijoċidi;
  7. ATD: każijiet relatati ma' talbiet għal aċċess għad-dokumenti;
  8. Daqs tal-kumpanija: każijiet relatati mal-verifikazzjoni tad-daqs tal-kumpanija u bidliet relatati. 

 

Case number Parties Keywords Main Legal Provisions Procedurally linked cases Date of the ruling
T-669/15 R Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU;
Art. 95 of BPR;
Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights

Initial Case:
T-669/15

Appeal on the Initial Case:
C-663/16 P

17/12/2015
T-543/15R Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA Application for interim measures — REACH — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance on the list referred to in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Application for suspension of operation — Lack of urgency Art. 278, 279, 256(1) of TFEU;
Art. 95 of BPR;
Art. 7 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights

Initial Case:
T-543/15

Appeal on the Initial Case:
C-666/16 P

17/12/2015
T-669/15 Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU
  1. Proceedings for interim measures
    T-669/15 R
  2. Appeal
    C-663/16 P
12/10/2016
T-543/15 Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Others v ECHA Actions for annulment — Inclusion as supplier of an active substance on the list provided for in Article 95 of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility Art. 95 of BPR; Art. 263 of TFEU
  1. Proceedings for interim measures
    T-543/15 R
  2. Appeal
    C-666/16 P
12/10/2016
C-663/16 P Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance Art. 130(1), 130(7) and 181 of the Rules of Procedure

Initial Case:
T-669/15

Proceedings for interim measures:
T-669/15 R

19/07/2017
C-666/16 P Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann and Ecolab Deutschland v ECHA Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice –– Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 — Making available on the market and use of biocidal products — Article 95 — European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) — Publication of a list of active substances — Inclusion of a company as a supplier of an active substance Art. 130(1) and 130(7) of the Rules of Procedure

Initial Case:
T-543/15

Proceedings for Interim Measures:
T-543/15 R

19/07/2017
T-243/17 Ecolab Deutschland and Lysoform Dr. Hans Rosemann v ECHA Removal from the register Art. 263 of TFEU 18/10/2017

T-347/18

Laboratoire Pareva and Biotech3D v Commission Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard

Regulation (EU) 528/2012,
Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014,
Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
 

15/09/2021

T-734/18

Sumitomo Chemical and Tenka Best v Commission Removal from the registrer 18/12/2019

T-337/18

Laboratoire Pareva v Commission Biocidal products – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval for product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Conditional approval for product-types 2 and 4 – Risks to human health and the environment – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Harmonised classification of the active substance under Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 – Prior consultation of the ECHA – Manifest error of assessment – Read-across – Right to be heard

Regulation (EU) 528/2012,
Article 6(7)(a) and (b) of the Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014,
Regulation (EC) 1272/2008
 

15/09/2021

T-199/21

EurO3zon v ECHA Suspension of evaluation active substance - BPR Regulation 08/04/2023

C-702/21 P

Laboratoire PAREVA S.A.S. v Commission Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment

Appeal – Biocidal products – Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1062/2014 – Active substance PHMB (1415; 4.7) – Refusal of approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 1, 5 and 6 – Approval as an existing active substance for use in biocidal products of product-types 2 and 4 – Teratogenic effect – Human health risk assessment

Appeal of the Cases  T-337/18 and T-347/18

10/11/2022

T-123/20

Sciessent LLC v Commission Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations

Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)

COM Decision 2019/1973

16/11/2022

T-122/20

Sciessent LLC v Commission Biocidal products – Active substances – Silver zeolite and silver copper zeolite – Refusal of approval for product-types 2 and 7 – Article 4 and Article 19(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 – Efficacy – Active substances for use in treated articles – Assessment of the efficacy of the treated articles themselves – Competence of the Commission – Principle of non-discrimination – Legal certainty – Legitimate expectations

Articles 3(1)(I), 4(1), 19(1), 19(2), Annex II, Annex VI of Regulation (No 528/2012)

COM Decision 2019/1960

16/11/2022