Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
skin sensitisation
Remarks:
in vivo
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Well conducted study suitable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2009
Report date:
2009

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: Adjuvant and Patch test
Principles of method if other than guideline:
This maximisation test involves intradermal injection of FCA and abrasion of skin, application (topically) of the test material onto the abraded skin and then covering the test site with an occlusive patch. The topical challenge was made without a covering.
GLP compliance:
no
Type of study:
other: Adjuvant and Patch test

Test material

In vivo test system

Test animals

Species:
guinea pig
Strain:
Hartley
Sex:
female

Study design: in vivo (non-LLNA)

Inductionopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, occlusive
Vehicle:
other: assumed to be ethanol (challenge control treatment)
Concentration / amount:
1% S-DHMN used
Challengeopen allclose all
Route:
epicutaneous, open
Vehicle:
other: assumed to be ethanol (challenge control treatment)
Concentration / amount:
1% S-DHMN used
No. of animals per dose:
10 in test group
Challenge controls:
5
Positive control substance(s):
yes
Remarks:
0.1% 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)

Results and discussion

Positive control results:
Positive control results gave the expected results confirming that the conditions of this test were valid (see table 1 for positive control results).

In vivo (non-LLNA)

Resultsopen allclose all
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1% challenge
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1% challenge. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1% challenge
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1% challenge. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
other: 3rd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
test chemical
Dose level:
1% challenge
No. with + reactions:
0
Total no. in group:
10
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: test group. Dose level: 1% challenge. No with. + reactions: 0.0. Total no. in groups: 10.0.
Reading:
1st reading
Hours after challenge:
24
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1% challenge
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
Mean score 3.0
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 1st reading. . Hours after challenge: 24.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.1% challenge. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: Mean score 3.0.
Reading:
2nd reading
Hours after challenge:
48
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1% challenge
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
Mean score 2.8
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: 2nd reading. . Hours after challenge: 48.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.1% challenge. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: Mean score 2.8.
Reading:
other: 3rd reading
Hours after challenge:
72
Group:
positive control
Dose level:
0.1% challenge
No. with + reactions:
5
Total no. in group:
5
Clinical observations:
Mean score 2.6
Remarks on result:
other: Reading: other: 3rd reading. . Hours after challenge: 72.0. Group: positive control. Dose level: 0.1% challenge. No with. + reactions: 5.0. Total no. in groups: 5.0. Clinical observations: Mean score 2.6.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
not sensitising
Remarks:
Migrated information
Conclusions:
Under the conditions of this study, S-DHMN was not considered to be sensitising in female guinea pigs (Hartley strain).