Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
Remarks:
Type of genotoxicity: chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Klimisch criteria

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2013
Report date:
2013

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 473 (In Vitro Mammalian Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of assay:
in vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test

Test material

Method

Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
S9
Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
Exp I:
4h, without S9: 9.4, 18.8, 37.5, 75, 150, 300 microg/L
4 h, with S9: 37.5, 75, 150, 300, 600, 1200 microg/L
Exp II:
24 h, without S9: 7, 14.1, 28.1, 56.3, 112.5, 225 microg/L
4 h, with S9: 112.5, 225, 450, 900 microg/L
Vehicle / solvent:
water
Controls
Untreated negative controls:
no
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
True negative controls:
no
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
cyclophosphamide
ethylmethanesulphonate
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
according to guideline
Evaluation criteria:
according to guideline
Statistics:
according to guideline

Results and discussion

Test results
Species / strain:
Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79)
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Untreated negative controls validity:
not applicable
Positive controls validity:
valid
Remarks on result:
other: all strains/cell types tested
Remarks:
Migrated from field 'Test system'.

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Interpretation of results (migrated information):
negative

Under the experimental conditions described, D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, C10-16-alkyl glycosides, carboxymethyl ethers, sodium salts is considered not to be a chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) substance or to induce numerical chromosomal aberrations (aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in V79 cells.
Executive summary:

D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, C10-16-alkyl glycosides, carboxymethyl ethers, sodium salts were investigated for clastogenic activity or for the induction of chromosome aberrations accoring to OECD guideline 476 under GLP conditions. Two indpendant experiments were performed. The individual test concentrations with and without metabolic activation are described above.

Cytotoxicity indicated by clearly reduced relative increase in cell count (RICC) proliferation index and/or low quality of the slides was observed in all experimental parts either in the absence or in the presence of S9 mix. No statistically significant increase in the number of micronucleated cells was observed compared to the concurrent negative controls. All values were close to the concurrent negative controls and within our historical negative control data range. Thus, under the experimental conditions described, D-Glucopyranose, oligomeric, C10-16-alkyl glycosides, carboxymethyl ethers, sodium salts is considered not to be a chromosome-damaging (clastogenic) substance or to induce numerical chromosomal aberrations (aneugenic activity) under in vitro conditions in V79 cells.