Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Administrative data

Endpoint:
appearance / physical state / colour
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
October 10, 2016 - October 31, 2017
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment
Cross-reference
Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
reference to other study
Reference
Endpoint:
particle size distribution (granulometry)
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
October 10, 2016 - October 31, 2017
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
test procedure in accordance with generally accepted scientific standards and described in sufficient detail
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
ISO 13320 (Particle size analysis - Laser diffraction methods)
Version / remarks:
2009
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
other: CIPAC MT 187 (Particle size analysis by laser diffraction)
Version / remarks:
version not specified in the study report
Principles of method if other than guideline:
According to REACH Article 13(3) tests on substances shall be conducted in accordance with the test methods laid down in a Commission Regulation or in accordance with other international test methods recognised by the Commission or the Agency as being appropriate. No particle size distribution test method is laid down in regulation (EC) No 440/2008. OECD 110 TG ‘Particle Size Distribution/FibreLength and Diameter Distributions’ dates from 1981 and describes two methods in detail; both methods have restrictions and are not applicable to the entire size range. ECHA’s Guidance on information requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment-Chapter R.7a stipulates that many methods are available for particle size measurements but none of them is applicable to the entire size range. The guidance mentions Laser scattering/diffraction as a method for particles of all kind and makes reference to ISO 13320:2009.
According to Guidance document EUR 20268 (2002), the laser diffraction technique is applicable to particles of respirable and inhalable size. The MMAD can be calculated.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)
Type of method:
Laser scattering/diffraction
Type of particle tested:
primary particle
Type of distribution:
volumetric distribution
Specific details on test material used for the study:
Relative density: 1.40
Mass median aerodynamic diameter:
19.554 µm
Geometric standard deviation:
>= 3.021 - <= 3.035
Remarks on result:
other: MMAD is the mean (n= 5) value. 'St.dev.' in table below is the population standard deviation [µm].
Key result
Percentile:
D10
Mean:
3.458 µm
St. dev.:
0.044
Key result
Percentile:
D50
Mean:
16.527 µm
St. dev.:
0.175
Key result
Percentile:
D90
Mean:
46.749 µm
St. dev.:
0.627
No.:
#1
Size:
< 10 µm
Distribution:
30.59 other: vol%
No.:
#2
Size:
< 100 µm
Distribution:
99.9 other: vol%

Coefficient of variation for D50 is < 3%; D10 and D90 are < 5%. These values are within the acceptable limits mentioned in the ISO 13320 standard.

VISUAL OBSERVATION

The substance was observed to be a medium to fine white powder with lumps and clusters. Using 3.2 objective lens under a microscope, the particles appeared to be crystalline needles and fibres. Using 40 objective lens under a microscope, the sample was observed to be made up of single crystalline particles.  

Conclusions:
Particle size distribution of the substance: D10= 3.458 µm, D50= 16.527 µm and D90= 46.749 µm. 30.59% by volume was determined to be smaller than 10 µm. The MMAD was determined to be 19.554 µm.

Executive summary:

The particle size distribution of the substance was determined using laser diffraction analysis (dry powder module) in a GLP study according to ISO 13320 and CIPAC MT 187. Each result is the average of five runs. D10= 3.458 µm, D50= 16.527 µm and D90= 46.749 µm. 30.59% by volume was determined to be smaller than 10 µm. The MMAD was determined to be 19.554 µm.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
2017
Report date:
2017

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Appearance was determined by visual observation.
GLP compliance:
yes (incl. QA statement)

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(6S)-6-(propylamino)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ol hydrobromide
EC Number:
605-420-3
Cas Number:
165950-84-5
Molecular formula:
C13H20BrNO
IUPAC Name:
(6S)-6-(propylamino)-5,6,7,8-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-ol hydrobromide
Test material form:
solid: particulate/powder
Details on test material:
- Appearance: White powder
- Storage condition of test material: At room temperature

Results and discussion

Physical state at 20°C and 1013 hPa:
solid
Form / colour / odour
Key result
Form:
solid: particulate/powder
Colour:
white
Odour:
other: not determined
Substance type:
organic

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The substance is a white powder.
Executive summary:

The substance is a solid. The substance was visually observed to be a medium to fine white powder with lumps and clusters.