Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 204-000-3 | CAS number: 112-72-1
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data

Toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Remarks:
- Study conducted according to a non Guideline protocol; not GLP; no analytical monitoring; moisture level low; reference substance results not as expected; no information on test item equilibration with the soil.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Donkin & Dusenberry (1993)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- method of test animals recovery from vials changes, lower soil moisture.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 207 (Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- as above
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test method was modified to improve the recovery rate of test animals. The amount of soil requiring extraction was reduced, worms were extracted by adding 5ml Ludox HS40 to each vial then shaking the vial vigorously on a 'whirlmixer'. The Ludox/soil suspension were centrifuged for longer and at a higher speed (7000 rpm and for 15 minutes) in order to improve the clarity of the supernatant, which was sieved and the organisms rinsed with M9 salt solution and counted under a high power microscope. The test also reduced moisture content of soil respect to the OECD guideline, 15-20% rather than 20-30%, but the authors of the report thought that this would make no difference to the survival of organisms due to the short duration of the test.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- - Method of mixing into soil: sand spike, using 10% of the total dry weight of soil. This involved adding an appropriate amount of compound to analar grade acetone to form a stock solution for the 1000 mg/kg dose. Aliquots of the stock solution were then diluted with acetone to prepare lower doses. Acetone solutions were added to silica sand in 500 ml amber glass jars. Mixtures were mixed thoroughly with a stainless steel spatula. The acetone was left to evaporate in a fume cupboard, leaving the test item coated onto the sand. Appropriate amount of moist soil was added to each of the glass jars. The dosed or undosed sand was incorporated into the bulk of the soil using a paletted knife. Jars were then sealed with screw top lids containing aluminium foil inserts and tumbled overnight (ca. 16 h) on a rotary soil tumbler 50 rpm.
- Controls: One aliquot of sand was dosed with acetone only to serve as solvent control. A jar with an aliquot of sand only served as untreated control - both with the appropriate amount of moist soil added thereafter.
- Chemical name of vehicle: acetone
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium: acetone solutions was added between 1-7 ml to 5-35g of silica sand. The sand was left to evaporate the acetone completely before initial exposure, so that the concentration of vehicle would be negligible.
- Evaporation of vehicle before use: yes - Test organisms (species):
- Caenorhabditis elegans
- Animal group:
- nematods
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: nematode
- Source: Sanger Centre, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge.
- Age at test initiation (mean and range, SD): adult nematodes, 2 days old.
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: none, organisms were removed from mixed age populations and juveniles allowed to mature within 2 days. - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- natural soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Post exposure observation period:
- none
- Test temperature:
- 20 +/- 2 degC
- pH:
- 5.4-5.5
- Moisture:
- 18% +/- 1%
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): 50 ml clear glass vials
- Amount of soil or substrate: 10 g wet weight of sterilised soil
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 3
- No. of replicates per control: 3
- No. of replicates per vehicle control: 3
The test was preformed with other species, all details of the test were similar, except for the exposure system in which the test were carried was different. See Table 2 for details.
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE
- Geographic location: Heath Farm, Leicester Lane, LandLook (Midlands), Leamington Spa, from Dr Graham Beard. OS map reference 32896926.
- Pesticide use history at the collection site: assumed to be pesticide free, as the field the soil was taken from land that had been set aside for 3-4 years.
- Collection procedures: the soil was sieved to 2 mm.
- Sampling depth (cm): 5-20cm to avoid surface root mat
- Soil texture
- % sand: 63.8%-64.8%
- Soil classification: sandy loam soil. The soil is described as soil series, Bomsgrove, standard soil number 33, variant.
- Organic carbon (%): 1.3%
- Maximum water holding capacity: ca. 40%
- Pretreatment of soil: the soil was treated with gamma radiation (27 KGy) in order to kill the indigenous nematodes and potential predators. However observation from extracted fresh soil indicated that interference from the indigenous population was likely to be insignificant. Consequently, the definitive test were carried out using unsterilised soil.
- Storage: stored in closed black plastic bags at 4 degC until required.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: vials were placed in the dark.
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: mortality (immobilisation) at the end of the test, i.e. after 72 h
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3
- Range finding study: not conducted - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimethoate
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: reproduction and survival
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period: at the end of the exposure (72 h) mortality at the highest conc. (300 mg/kg dw) was 100%. See table 1 for details. Mortality is actually immobility, measured through response to touch and missing individuals.
See table 2 for details on results with other species. - Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? no since there was no mortality observed. Organisms thought to be tolerant by the authors of the report.
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Probit analysis (Finney 1971) was used to determine EC50 values and their corresponding 95% intervals in definitive tests.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A 72 h EC50 value of >1000 mg/kg dw soil has been determined for the effects of the test substance on population numbers of the nematode C. elegans.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: short-term
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- supporting study
- Reliability:
- 4 (not assignable)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- documentation insufficient for assessment
- Remarks:
- Study conducted according to a modified Guideline protocol with several deviations; not GLP; no analytical monitoring; no information on test item equilibration with the soil.
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- other: Donkin & Dusenberry (1993)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- method of test animals recovery from vials changes, lower soil moisture.
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 207 (Earthworm, Acute Toxicity Tests)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- as above and juvenile worms instead of adults were used
- Principles of method if other than guideline:
- The test method was modified to improve the recovery rate of test animals. The amount of soil requiring extraction was reduced, worms were extracted by adding 5ml Ludox HS40 to each vial then shaking the vial vigorously on a 'whirlmixer'. The Ludox/soil suspension were centrifuged for longer and at a higher speed (7000 rpm and for 15 minutes) in order to improve the clarity of the supernatant, which was sieved and the organisms rinsed with M9 salt solution and counted under a high power microscope. The test also reduced moisture content of soil respect to the OECD guideline, 15-20% rather than 20-30%, but the authors of the report thought that this would make no difference to the survival of organisms due to the short duration of the test.
- GLP compliance:
- not specified
- Analytical monitoring:
- no
- Vehicle:
- yes
- Details on preparation and application of test substrate:
- - Method of mixing into soil: sand spike. This involved adding an appropriate amount of compound to analar grade acetone to form a stock solution for the 1000 mg/kg dose. Aliquots of the stock solution were then diluted with acetone to prepare lower doses. Acetone solutions were added to silica sand in glass jars. Mixtures were mixed thoroughly with a stainless steel spatula. The acetone was left to evaporate in a fume cupboard, leaving the test item coated onto the sand. Appropriate amount of moist soil was added to each of the glass jars. The dosed or undosed sand was incorporated into the bulk of the soil using a paletted knife. Jars were then sealed with screw top lids containing aluminium foil inserts and tumbled overnight (ca. 16 h) on a rotary soil tumbler 50 rpm.
- Controls: One aliquot of sand was dosed with acetone only to serve as solvent control. A jar with an aliquot of sand only served as untreated control - both with the appropriate amount of moist soil added thereafter.
- Chemical name of vehicle: acetone
- Concentration of vehicle in test medium: acetone solutions was added between 1-7 ml to 5-35g of silica sand. The sand was left to evaporate the acetone completely before initial exposure, so that the concentration of vehicle would be negligible.
- Evaporation of vehicle before use: yes - Test organisms (species):
- Eisenia fetida
- Animal group:
- annelids
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: earth worm
- Source: Blades Biological, Cowden, Edenbridge, Kent, UK.
- Age at test initiation: adults
- Weight at test initiation (mean and range, SD): 0.076 (s.d. +/- 0.034 d)
- Length at test initiation: 2-3 cm
ACCLIMATION
- Acclimation period: not specified.
- Acclimation conditions (same as test or not): similar to test - Study type:
- laboratory study
- Substrate type:
- natural soil
- Limit test:
- no
- Total exposure duration:
- 7 d
- Post exposure observation period:
- none
- Test temperature:
- 20 +/- 2 degC
- pH:
- range: 5.8-6.1
- Moisture:
- range: 17.6 to 19%
- Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test container (material, size): sealed jars (with screw cap top)
- Amount of soil or substrate: 10 g wet weight of sterilised soil
- No. of organisms per container (treatment): 10
- No. of replicates per treatment group: 3
- No. of replicates per control: 3
- No. of replicates per vehicle control: 3
SOURCE AND PROPERTIES OF SUBSTRATE
- Geographic location: Heath Farm, Leicester Lane, LandLook (Midlands), Leamington Spa, from Dr Graham Beard. OS map reference 32896926.
- Pesticide use history at the collection site: assumed to be pesticide free, as the field the soil was taken from land that had been set aside for 3-4 years.
- Collection procedures: the soil was sieved to 2 mm.
- Sampling depth (cm): 5-20cm to avoid surface root mat
- Soil texture
- % sand: 63.8%-64.8%
- Soil classification: sandy loam soil. The soil is described as soil series, Bomsgrove, standard soil number 33, variant.
- Organic carbon (%): 1.3%
- Maximum water holding capacity: ca. 40%
- Pretreatment of soil: the soil was treated with gamma radiation (27 KGy) in order to kill the indigenous nematodes and potential predators. However observation from extracted fresh soil indicated that interference from the indigenous population was likely to be insignificant. Consequently, the definitive test were carried out using unsterilised soil.
- Storage: stored in closed black plastic bags at 4 degC until required.
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Photoperiod: continuous light
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED: mortality (immobilisation) at the end of the test
VEHICLE CONTROL PERFORMED: yes
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: 3
- Range finding study
- Test concentrations: 10, 100, 100 mg/kg
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: 7d EC50 100-100 mg/kg - Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Nominal concentrations: 0, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1000 mg/kg
- Reference substance (positive control):
- yes
- Remarks:
- dimethoate
- Duration:
- 7 d
- Dose descriptor:
- EC50
- Effect conc.:
- > 1 000 mg/kg soil dw
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: survival
- Details on results:
- - Mortality at end of exposure period: 100% at 1000 mg/kg
- Results with reference substance (positive control):
- - Results with reference substance valid? yes, 98 mg/kg
- Reported statistics and error estimates:
- Probit analysis (Finney 1971) was used to determine EC50 values and their corresponding 95% intervals in definitive tests.
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Conclusions:
- A 7 d EC50 value of >1000 mg/kg dw soil has been determined for the effects of the test substance on population numbers of the earth worm E. fetida.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to soil macroorganisms except arthropods: long-term
- Data waiving:
- other justification
- Justification for data waiving:
- other:
Referenceopen allclose all
Table 1. Result of C. elegans exposure to decanol, number of surviving animals and offspring combined at 72 h.
Compound | Dose (mg/kg dw soil) | Number ofC. elegans found in extracts (average) |
Control | - | 36 |
Solvent control | - | 40 |
Dimethoate | 100 | 33 |
300 | 23 | |
1000 | 23 | |
C14 | ||
100 | 46 | |
300 | 49 | |
1000 | 73 |
Solvent control is acetone used (up to 7 ml of acetone was used to prepare stock solutions with sand, then added to soil, however the acetone was left to evaporate before exposure).
The EC value should be normalised to a soil with 2% organic matter according to the following equation.
NOEC or L(E)C50 (standard) = NOEC or L(E)C50 (exp) * [ Fom soil(standard)/ Fomsoil(exp)]
Where Fom soil = fraction organic matter in soil
So 72h EC50 >1000 mg/kg dw * [2%/1.3%] = >1000 * 1.5 = >1500 mg/kg dw
Table 2. Comparison of results of the tests conducted with species: Eisenia fetida, Folsomia candida, Heterocypris incongruens and Caenorhabditis elegans.
Species | Duration | EC50 (mg/kg dw) |
Eisenia fetida | 7 d | >1000 |
Heterocypris incongruens | 6 d | >1000 |
Folsomia candida | 6 d | 530 |
Caenorhabditis elegans | 72 h | >1000 |
Table 1: Result of E. fetida exposure to tetradecanol, results of definitive test
Compound | Dose (mg/kg dw soil) | Number of E. fetida: live (average) | Number of E. fetida (average): dead / missing (average) |
Control | - | 10 | 0 |
Acetone control | - | 10 | 0 |
Dimethoate | 10 | 10 | 0 |
30 | 6.33 | 3.67 | |
100 | 4.67 | 5.33 | |
300 | 1 | 9 | |
1000 | 0 | 10 | |
C14 | 300 | 10 | 0 |
1000 | 10 | 0 |
Solvent control is acetone (up to 7 ml of acetone was used to prepare stock solutions with sand, then added to soil, however the acetone was left to evaporate before exposure).
The EC value should be normalised to a soil with 2% organic carbon according to the following equation.
NOEC or L(E)C50 (standard) = NOEC or L(E)C50 (exp) * [Focsoil(standard)/ Focsoil(exp)]
Where Focsoil = fraction organic carbon in soil
So 7 d EC50 >1000 mg/kg dw * [2.0%/1.3%] = >1000 * 1.54 = >1540 mg/kg dw
Table 2. Comparison of results of the tests conducted with species: Eisenia fetida, Folsomia candida, Heterocypris incongruens and Caenorhabditis elegans.
Species | Duration | EC50 (mg/kg dw) |
Eisenia fetida | 7 d | >1000 |
Heterocypris incongruens | 6 d | >1000 |
Folsomia candida | 6 d | 530 |
Caenorhabditis elegans | 72 h | >1000 |
Description of key information
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Additional information
Short-term toxicity
A 72 h EC50 value of >1000 mg/kg dw soil (1.3% organic carbon) has been determined for the effects of the test substance on population numbers of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (Shell, 2004). The study reflects the lowest value that is available for this endpoint, though it is of non assignable reliability. Although a relatively short exposure duration, 72 h is sufficient to cover a full life cycle of this species. The normal duration for a mortality study with this species is 24 h.
A 7 d EC50 of >1000 mg/kg dw soil has been determine for the effects of the test substance on population numbers of the earth worm Eisenia fetida (Shell, 2004).
The study reflects the lowest value that is available for this endpoint, though it is of non assignable reliability. Although a relatively short exposure duration, 72 h is sufficient to cover a full life cycle of this species. The normal duration for a mortality study with this species is 24 h.
These data are considered to be indicative only (non assignable reliability) and not suitable for quantitative application as part of the chemical safety assessment.
Long-term toxicity
In accordance with Column 2 of REACH Annex X, further long-term toxicity testing with terrestrial invertebrates (required in Section 9.4.4) is not needed as the chemical safety assessment according to Annex I indicates that this is not necessary. Moreover, considerable technical difficulties would be expected in the conduct of such a test, due to the very rapid biotic removal of the substance from the test system. Please refer to discussion of the long-term aquatic invertebrate and fish studies, and evidence of rapid removal in non-sterilised soils during method development for the adsorption/desorption study with natural soils , carried out with the close structural analogue decan-1-ol, in the environmental fate section.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.

EU Privacy Disclaimer
Šajā tīmekļa vietnē tiek izmantoti sīkfaili, lai nodrošinātu Jums vislabāko lietojumu mūsu tīmekļa vietnēs.