Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Additional toxicological data

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
additional toxicological information
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Study well documented, meets generally accepted scientific principles, acceptable for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Structure-toxicity relationship of acrylates and methacrylates.
Author:
Tanii H, Hashimoto K
Year:
1982
Bibliographic source:
Toxicol. Lett. 11: 125-129

Materials and methods

Type of study / information:
other: Structure-toxicity relationship
Principles of method if other than guideline:
The acute oral toxicity (LD50), the partition coefficient (P), and the second order rate constant (K) with reduced glutathione were measured experimentally.
GLP compliance:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
Butyl methacrylate
EC Number:
202-615-1
EC Name:
Butyl methacrylate
Cas Number:
97-88-1
Molecular formula:
C8H14O2
IUPAC Name:
butyl methacrylate
Details on test material:
Butyl methacrylate (Tokyo Kasei Inc.), purity not specified

Results and discussion

Any other information on results incl. tables

For butyl methacrylate the oral LD50 in mice was 142.70 mmol/kg (20.292 mg/kg), 

log  P was 2.88 and log K -0.655; the toxicities of acrylates and  methacrylates

were found to be dependent upon log P or log K; the  correlation coefficient 

between log (1/LD50) and log P was -0.9909 for  acrylates and -0.795 for 

methacrylates (both statistically significant);  the correlation coefficient 

between log P and log K was -0.935 for  acrylates and -0.744 for methacrylates.

----+-------+--------+--------+--------+-------+-------
    |  Oral LD50 (mmol/kg) a) | Log P  | Log K |   K
    | Range |  from  -  to    |   b)   |   c)  |   e)
----+-------+--------+--------+--------+-------+-------
MA     9.60     6.895   13.36    0.80    1.602   39.994
EA    17.97    12.27    26.35    1.33    1.428   26.792
nBA   58.98    46.62    74.44    2.36    1.000   25.177
iBA   47.63    47.63    d)       2.22    1.431   26.977
HEA    5.177    4.325    6.20   -0.21    1.919   82.985
HPA    8.112    6.623    9.932   0.35    1.758   57.280
MMA   51.97    39.03    69.22    1.38   -0.675    0.211
EMA   68.64    51.62    91.25    1.94   -0.403    0.395
iPMA  67.84    49.75    92.39    2.25   -0.876    0.133
nBMA 142.70   116.50   174.80    2.88   -0.655    0.221
iBMA  83.14    65.80   105.00    2.66   -0.769    0.170
tBMA  60.12    45.15    80.10    2.54   -0.632    0.233
HEMA  45.24    33.20    61.65    0.47   -0.273    0.533
HPMA  55.24    34.29    88.92    0.97   -0.273    0.533
----+-------+--------+--------+--------+-------+-------

a) Acute oral LD50 was determined according to Weil [12] and expressed as  the mean (95 % confidence interval)
b) Values are the mean of four determinations.
c) Values are the mean of four determinations.
d) s.dev. = 0.0000
e) Rem: K [liter mol-1 min-1] has been re-calculated from logK; test  conditions: 37 °C, 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.3, 150 µM KCN, ester and  GSH: 10 mM

MA = Methyl acrylate; EA = Ethyl acrylate; nBA = n-Butyl acrylate; iBA =  Isobutyl acrylate; HEA = 2-Hydroxylethyl acrylate; HPA = 2-Hydroxylpropyl  acrylate; MMA = Methyl methacrylate; EMA = Ethyl methacrylate; iPMA =  Isopropyl methacrylate; nBMA = n-Butyl methacrylate; iBMA = Isobutyl  methacrylate; tBMA = tert-Butyl methacrylate; HEMA = 2-Hydroxyethyl  methacrylate; HPMA = 2-Hydroxypropyl methacrylate

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
Using a valid scientific method, for butyl methacrylate the oral LD50 in mice was 142.70 mmol/kg (20.292 mg/kg), 
log  P was 2.88 and log K -0.655; the toxicities of acrylates and  methacrylates were found to be dependent upon log P or log K.
Executive summary:

Using a valid scientific method, for butyl methacrylate the oral LD50 in mice was 142.70 mmol/kg (20.292 mg/kg),  log  P was 2.88 and log K -0.655; the toxicities of acrylates and  methacrylates were found to be dependent upon log P or log K.