Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 256-370-0 | CAS number: 49556-16-3
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Water solubility
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- water solubility
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- weight of evidence
- Study period:
- 12.2017 - 06.2018
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Year:
- 2 018
- Report date:
- 2018
Materials and methods
Test guidelineopen allclose all
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 105 (Water Solubility)
- Deviations:
- no
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- EU Method A.6 (Water Solubility)
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of method:
- flask method
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Tin(2+) neodecanoate
- EC Number:
- 256-370-0
- EC Name:
- Tin(2+) neodecanoate
- Cas Number:
- 49556-16-3
- Molecular formula:
- C20H38O4Sn
- IUPAC Name:
- λ²-tin(2+) bis(2,2-dimethyloctanoate)
- Test material form:
- liquid
Constituent 1
Results and discussion
Water solubilityopen allclose all
- Water solubility:
- 193.61 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Incubation duration:
- ca. 24 h
- Temp.:
- 30 °C
- pH:
- 5
- Water solubility:
- 192.81 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Incubation duration:
- ca. 24 h
- Temp.:
- 30 °C
- pH:
- 5
- Water solubility:
- 328.39 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Incubation duration:
- ca. 24 h
- Temp.:
- 30 °C
- pH:
- 5
- Water solubility:
- 314 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Incubation duration:
- ca. 24 h
- Temp.:
- 30 °C
- pH:
- 5
- Water solubility:
- 413.53 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Incubation duration:
- ca. 24 h
- Temp.:
- 30 °C
- pH:
- 5
- Water solubility:
- 385.04 mg/L
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Incubation duration:
- ca. 24 h
- Temp.:
- 30 °C
- pH:
- 5
Any other information on results incl. tables
Preliminary test
The test item was given by means of a 50µL-syringe to 1 L of purified water as presented in the following table.
|
Amount of test item [µL] |
Volume of water [ml] |
Concentration of test item [mg/l] |
Visual observations |
Pre-sample 1 |
10 |
1000 |
12 |
At first: droplet on the water surface; after shaking: droplet as a greasy film on the glass wall above the water level |
+ 10 (20 in sum) |
24 |
greasy film on the glass wall |
||
+ 10 (30 in sum) |
36 |
further 10 µL: fell down as droplet on the bottom of the test flask; at first droplet was clear, after some time it became milky |
||
Pre-sample 2 |
5 |
1000 |
6 |
After slight shaking the test itemadhered to the glass wall. |
Due to the strong affinity of the substance to glass surfaces no clear statement about the water solubility could be made. It was decided to proceed with the shake flask method.
To largely avoid glass adsorption during the main test, the test item was placed in the test vessel at first and then the water was added.
Main test and results
Six samples were prepared with three different test item concentrations in duplicate (see following table).
The samples were shaken at 30 °C (min: 23.05 °C; max: 30.17 °C; mean; 29.51 °C) for 24 h (250 rpm), then equilibrated at 20 ± 0.5 °C for 24 h (gentle shaking). The temperature was controlled at start and end of the equilibration phase (= 20.2 °C).
After this, the samples were taken out of the water bath. The substance adhered to the glass wall in the form of droplets.At the highest test concentration a significant amount of test item could also be seen on the bottom of the vessel.
The aqueous phase was withdrawn with a syringe. The concentration of the test item in the clear aqueous phase of the samples was determined by carbon analysis.
Sample no. |
Amount of test item [mg] |
Added volume of water [mL] |
Shaking time at 30°C [h] |
Analysed carbon concentration [mg TOC/L]3) |
Concentration of the test item [mg/L]1) |
pH value2) |
1 |
10.45 |
10 |
24 |
101.47 |
193.61 |
5 |
2 |
11.10 |
10 |
24 |
101.05 |
192.81 |
5 |
3 |
50.87 |
10 |
24 |
172.11 |
328.39 |
5 |
4 |
50.86 |
10 |
24 |
165.09 |
314.0 |
5 |
5 |
100.29 |
10 |
24 |
216.73 |
413.53 |
5 |
6 |
99.91 |
10 |
24 |
201.80 |
385.04 |
5 |
1)calculated from the carbon concentration of the sample solutions and the carbon content of the pure test item (52.41 %)
2)The purified water used for the tests had a pH value of 5.
3)Values could only serve as order of magnitude (for discussion see 9.6)
Discussion of the results
After the preliminary experiments, low water solubility and accordingly low TOC values had been assumed for the test item. The calibration for the TOC measurements had therefore been made in the low concentration range (up to 10 mg/L). However, after performing the measurements overnight, it had to be determined that the TOC values in the measurement solutions were significantly above the calibration range (up to factor 10).
In addition, it had to be noticed that the measurement results for a control solution with a defined TOC content, which was routinely measured before, between and after the test item solutions, were at the exact set point at the beginning of the measurements. In between and after the test item solutions, however, these were significantly above the nominal value and thus also outside the acceptance range of the method (up to 57 %).
As one probable cause of this clear excess carry-over effects from the test item solutions are possible, since the TOC levels in the test item solutions were by a factor in the double-digit range higher than in the control solution.
In addition, the sample injection was performed on the system, inter alia via a glass syringe. The test item had shown a clear affinity for adsorption on glass surfaces in the preliminary experiments.
Beside this, it could be observed that as the amount of the test item used increased, the measured TOC values also increased and did not remain constant as required. This may be due to better water-soluble impurities in the test item (e. g. neodecanoic acid) and / or possible hydrolysis effects.
Repeating of the examinations with the present method is not considered to be expedient, since no additional knowledge is to be expected therefrom.
Consequently, the results obtained in the context of the experiments reported here can only serve as an approximate order of magnitude, but not as exact values. The values do not necessarily represent the water solubility of the test item, but could be due to water-soluble impurities or hydrolysis effects.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
- Conclusions:
- After the preliminary experiments, low water solubility and accordingly low TOC values had been assumed for the test item. The calibration for the TOC measurements had therefore been made in the low concentration range (up to 10 mg/L). However, after performing the measurements overnight, it had to be determined that the TOC values in the measurement solutions were significantly above the calibration range (up to factor 10).
In addition, it had to be noticed that the measurement results for a control solution with a defined TOC content, which was routinely measured before, between and after the test item solutions, were at the exact set point at the beginning of the measurements. In between and after the test item solutions, however, these were significantly above the nominal value and thus also outside the acceptance range of the method (up to 57 %).
As one probable cause of this clear excess carry-over effects from the test item solutions are possible, since the TOC levels in the test item solutions were by a factor in the double-digit range higher than in the control solution.
In addition, the sample injection was performed on the system, inter alia via a glass syringe. The test item had shown a clear affinity for adsorption on glass surfaces in the preliminary experiments.
Beside this, it could be observed that as the amount of the test item used increased, the measured TOC values also increased and did not remain constant as required. This may be due to better water-soluble impurities in the test item (e. g. neodecanoic acid) and / or possible hydrolysis effects.
Repeating of the examinations with the present method is not considered to be expedient, since no additional knowledge is to be expected therefrom.
Consequently, the results obtained in the context of the experiments reported here can only serve as an approximate order of magnitude, but not as exact values. The values do not necessarily represent the water solubility of the test item, but could be due to water-soluble impurities or hydrolysis effects.
- Executive summary:
The water solubility of the test item was determined according to OECD Guideline 105 [adopted on 27 July 1995] and EU test method A.6 [Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008] with the flask method (modified method).
A defined water solubility of the test item could not be determined with the method used.
Due to the physico-chemical properties of the test item only an approximate magnitude can be given for the water solubility based on the results obtained during the experiments.The values do not necessarily represent the water solubility of the test item, but could also be due to water-soluble impurities or hydrolysis effects.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.