Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 229-856-5 | CAS number: 6789-88-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
![](https://echa.europa.eu/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/print_environmental-fate-and-pathways.png)
Biodegradation in water: screening tests
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- biodegradation in water: ready biodegradability
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 15 December 2011 to 6 January 2012
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 301 F (Ready Biodegradability: Manometric Respirometry Test)
- Version / remarks:
- 1992
- Deviations:
- no
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Remarks:
- Swiss Federal Office of Public Health. Consumer protection directorate. Notification authority of chemicals. CH-3003 Bern (d.d. 2011-02-08)
- Oxygen conditions:
- aerobic
- Inoculum or test system:
- activated sludge, domestic (adaptation not specified)
- Details on inoculum:
- - Source: Fresh activated sludge from a biological waste water treatment plant treating predominantly domestic sewage (Bois-de-Bay, Satigny, Switzerland) was used.
- Pre-treatment: The sludge is collected in the morning, washed three times in the mineral medium (by centrifuging at 1000 g for 10 minutes, discarding the supernatant and resuspending in mineral medium) and kept aerobic until being used on the same day.
- Dry weight of suspended solids: The dry weight of suspended solids was determined by taking two 50 mL samples of the homogenised sludge, evaporating water on a steam bath, drying in an oven at 105 - 110 °C for two hours and weighing the residue. The dry weight of suspended solids was determined at 6.41 g/L and further diluted to 1.53 g/L. To obtain a concentration of 30 mg/L (dry weight) in 103 mL total volume (reference test flasks), 2.00 mL of sludge was added (inoculum). To obtain a concentration of 30 mg/L (dry weight) in 255 mL total volume (blank control and test flasks), 5.00 mL of sludge was added (inoculum). - Duration of test (contact time):
- 32 d
- Initial conc.:
- 30 mg/L
- Based on:
- test mat.
- Initial conc.:
- 76.8 mg/L
- Based on:
- ThOD
- Parameter followed for biodegradation estimation:
- O2 consumption
- Details on study design:
- TEST CONDITIONS
- Composition of medium: The water used during this study is deionised water containing less than 10 mg/L dissolved organic carbon (DOC). The following stock solutions were prepared: Solution A: 8.5 g KH2PO4, 21.75 g K2HPO4, 33.4 g Na2HPO4·2H2O and 0.5 g NH4Cl dissolved in water and made up to 1 litre. Solution B: 27.5 g CaCl dissolved in water and made up to 1 litre. Solution C: 22.5 g MgSO4·7H2O dissolved in water and made up to 1 litre. Solution D: 0.25 g FeCl3·6H2O and one drop of concentrated HCl dissolved in water and made up to 1 litre. Mineral medium was then prepared by mixing 50 mL of solution A and 2000 mL deionised water, adding 5 mL of each of the solutions B, C and D and making up to 5 litres with deionised water. The pH was measured and if necessary adjusted to 7.4 ± 0.2 with phosphoric acid or potassium hydroxide.
- Test temperature: 22.1 °C to 22.9 °C.
- Preparation of test samples: Test substance samples (7.65 mg, corresponding to 30.0 mg/L in 255 mL of test medium) were weighed in small aluminium boats and added directly to the test flasks of the Oxitop, whereas reference the substance (sodium benzoate) was added as 1.00 mL of a 10.2 g/L solution in mineral medium, to give a total volume of 103 mL.
- Preparation of flasks: Flasks were filled with 250 mL of mineral medium (flasks containing reference substance: 100 mL). Samples of test or reference substance were added. Then suspended sludge diluted to a concentration of 1.53 g/L dry matter was added. Except when the test substance has an acid or alkaline character, the pH of each flask is not measured but assumed to be the same as the mineral medium, in order not to remove any floating undissolved test substance from the test medium by dipping a glass electrode in it. Neutral test substances, even sodium benzoate, were shown not to affect the pH of the medium by more than 0.1 pH unit. Two sodium hydroxide pellets were placed in the quivers on top of the bottle, and the flasks were closed tightly with the measuring heads. The flasks were allowed to equilibrate to the test temperature. The measurement was started by programming the measuring unit of the Oxitop test flasks, and the test flasks were placed in the temperature controlled cupboard of the Oxitop system. After temperature equilibration, the controller of the instrument started the data acquisition (time zero of the experiment).
PERFORMANCE OF THE TEST
Everyday the oxygen consumption of each flask was recorded and correct temperature and stirring were checked. At the end of the test period, the pH of each flask was measured again. - Reference substance:
- benzoic acid, sodium salt
- Remarks:
- 100 mg/L based on test. mat, 167 mg/L based on ThOD.
- Key result
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 61
- Sampling time:
- 28 d
- Parameter:
- % degradation (O2 consumption)
- Value:
- 63
- Sampling time:
- 32 d
- Details on results:
- - The 10-day window criterion is not fulfilled (11 % biodegradation on day 1 and 47 % on day 11).
- Hexyl Benzoate did not inhibit the intrinsic respiration of the inoculum at the test concentration and was therefore considered to be non-toxic to the inoculum at the test concentration. - Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- see 'Any other information on materials and methods incl. tables'.
- Interpretation of results:
- readily biodegradable
- Conclusions:
- The substance is readily biodegradable.
- Executive summary:
The biodegradation potential of the substance in water was determined in a screening study according to OECD TG 301F (Manometric Respirometry) and in compliance with GLP criteria. In this study, 30 mg/L test substance (76.8 mg/L based on ThOD) was inoculated with activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant for 32 days under aerobic conditions. During the incubation period the biological oxygen demand (BOD) was measured and biodegradation expressed as percentage of the theoretical uptake (ThOD). All validity criteria were met. No toxicity control was performed but as Hexyl benzoate did not inhibit the intrinsic respiration of the inoculum at the tested concentration, it was considered to be non-toxic to the inoculum at this concentration.
After 28 days incubation 61% of the substance was biodegraded. The 10-day window criterion was not fulfilled with observed biodegradation of 11% on day 1 and 47% on day 11. This is considered to be attributable to the fact that esters are usually not viewed as a single substance by microorganisms. Ester hydrolysis products are sequentially degraded, often by different microorganisms. The 10-day window criterion should therefore not be used as a pass/fail criterion and the substance should be regarded as readily biodegradable according to this test.
Reference
Table: Biodegradability of Test substance
O2 uptake |
Replicate |
Day |
||||||
1 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
32 |
||
Sludge (inoculum blank) |
1 |
10.8 |
25.6 |
29.6 |
32.3 |
36.3 |
39.0 |
40.4 |
2 |
8.1 |
24.2 |
28.3 |
32.3 |
36.3 |
39.0 |
41.7 |
|
Mean |
9.5 |
24.9 |
29.0 |
32.3 |
36.3 |
39.0 |
41.1 |
|
Test substance + sludge |
1 |
17.5 |
55.2 |
67.3 |
72.7 |
83.5 |
88.8 |
94.2 |
2 |
18.8 |
52.6 |
63.4 |
67.4 |
75.5 |
82.2 |
84.9 |
|
Test substance |
1 |
8.1 |
30.3 |
38.4 |
40.4 |
47.2 |
49.8 |
53.2 |
2 |
9.4 |
27.7 |
34.4 |
35.1 |
39.2 |
43.2 |
43.9 |
|
% Biodegradation |
Replicate |
Day |
||||||
1 |
7 |
11 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
32 |
||
% Biodegradation of test substance |
1 |
10.0 |
39.0 |
50.0 |
53.0 |
61.0 |
65.0 |
69.0 |
2 |
12.0 |
36.0 |
45.0 |
46.0 |
51.0 |
56.0 |
57.0 |
|
mean |
11.0 |
38.0 |
47.0 |
49.0 |
56.0 |
61.0 |
63.0 |
Table: Biodegradability of Reference substance
O2 uptake |
Replicate |
Day |
||||
5 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
||
Sludge (inoculum blank) |
1 |
22.9 |
25.6 |
32.3 |
36.3 |
39.0 |
2 |
21.5 |
24.2 |
32.3 |
36.3 |
39.0 |
|
Mean |
22.2 |
24.9 |
32.3 |
36.3 |
39.0 |
|
Reference substance + sludge |
1 |
141.2 |
152.2 |
172.4 |
178.4 |
188.5 |
2 |
146.2 |
152.2 |
178.4 |
188.5 |
193.5 |
|
Reference substance |
1 |
119.0 |
127.3 |
140.1 |
142.1 |
149.5 |
2 |
124.0 |
127.3 |
146.1 |
152.2 |
154.5 |
|
% Biodegradation |
Replicate |
Day |
||||
5 |
7 |
14 |
21 |
28 |
||
Reference substance |
1 |
71 |
76 |
84 |
85 |
90 |
2 |
74 |
76 |
88 |
91 |
93 |
|
mean |
73 |
76 |
86 |
88 |
91 |
Description of key information
The biodegradation potential of Hexyl benzoate in water was determined in a screening study according to OECD TG 301F (Manometric Respirometry) and in compliance with GLP criteria. In this study, 30 mg/L test substance (76.8 mg/L based on ThOD) was inoculated with activated sludge from a municipal wastewater treatment plant for 32 days under aerobic conditions. During the incubation period the biological oxygen demand (BOD) was measured and biodegradation expressed as percentage of the theoretical uptake (ThOD). All validity criteria were met. No toxicity control was performed but as Hexyl benzoate did not inhibit the intrinsic respiration of the inoculum at the tested concentration, it was considered to be non-toxic to the inoculum at this concentration.
After 28 days incubation, 61% of the substance was biodegraded. The 10-day window criterion was not fulfilled with observed biodegradation of 11% on day 1 and 47% on day 11. This is considered to be attributable to the fact that esters are usually not viewed as a single substance by microorganisms. Ester hydrolysis products are sequentially degraded, often by different microorganisms. The 10-day window criterion should therefore not be used as a pass/fail criterion and the substance should be regarded as readily biodegradable according to this test.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- Biodegradation in water:
- readily biodegradable
Additional information
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.
![ECHA](/o/diss-blank-theme/images/factsheets/A-REACH/factsheet/echa_logo.png)