Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 253-523-3 | CAS number: 37482-11-4
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Endpoint summary
Administrative data
Key value for chemical safety assessment
Genetic toxicity in vitro
Description of key information
In vitro:
- Ames test (OECD 471): negative (CIT, 1993)
- Mammalian cell gene mutation test (similar to OECD 476): negative
(PPC/SIDS, 1982)
- Mammalian cytogenetic test (OECD 473): negative (CIT, 1996)
In vivo:
- Mammalian micronucleus test (OECD 474): negative (BASF/CIT, 2002)
Link to relevant study records
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 2 (reliable with restrictions)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study with acceptable restrictions
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
- Version / remarks:
- 26th of may 1983 and Draft Proposal of 1991
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of assay:
- bacterial reverse mutation assay
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of the test item (as cited by study report): 2-mercaptoethanol, sodium salt
- Purity: 45.21%
- Batch No.: 927056
- Appearance: Yellow, liquid - Target gene:
- his
- Species / strain / cell type:
- S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and TA 102
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Metabolic activation system:
- Aroclor 1254 induced rat liver S-9 mix
- Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
- 0, 125, 250, 1000, 2000 ug/plate. The highest concentration (2000 µg/plate) showing moderate toxicity: decreased by approximately 50% of the number of revertant.
- Vehicle / solvent:
- Distilled water
- Untreated negative controls:
- yes
- Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
- yes
- True negative controls:
- no
- Positive controls:
- yes
- Positive control substance:
- 9-aminoacridine
- 2-nitrofluorene
- sodium azide
- mitomycin C
- other: 2-anthramine (2AM) and danthron (DTH)
- Details on test system and experimental conditions:
- - Preincubation method : the test substance solution (maximum volume: 0.1 ml), 0.5 ml of S9 mix and 0.1 mL of the strain were incubated for 60 minutes at 37°C prior adding the overlay agar and pouring onto the surface of a minimum agar plate.
- Direct plate incorporation method: the test substance solution (maximum volume: 0.1 ml), 0.5 mL of S9 mix (when required) and 0 .1 mL of the strain were added to 2 mL molten agar containing traces of histidine and biotin and maintained at +45°C. After rapid homogenization, the mixture was spread out on a Petri plate containing minimum medium.
- The methods used were the direct plate incorporation method (both tests without S9 mix, first test with S9 mix) or the preincubation method (second test with S9 mix) described by Maron and Ames. - Evaluation criteria:
- The following criteria were used as an aid for determining a positive response: a reproducible and significant dose relationship using a linear regression analysis, considered as significant if p<0 .05 (for n = 18 values, the correlation coefficient must be r >0 .47) and/or a reproducible and significant increase (i.e. a doubling in the number of revertants for at least one of the tested strains when compared to that of the negative and/or solvent controls) for at least one of the tested concentrations.
A test substance is considered as non-mutagenic in this test system if the above two criteria are not fully met. Biological and statistical significances were considered during the evaluation. - Key result
- Species / strain:
- S. typhimurium, other: TA98, TA100, TA102, TA1535, TA1537
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- other: see additional information on results
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Additional information on results:
- CYTOTOXICITY IN PRELIMINARY TEST
- Without metabolic activation moderate effects on bacterial lawn at 2260 ug/plate, slight effects at 1130 ug/plate; number of revertants decreased to ca. 50% of solvent control at 1130 ug/plate and ca. 7% at 2260 ug/plate
- With metabolic activation no effects on bacterial lawn but decrease in the number of revertants at 452 and 1130 μg/plate (ca. 50% of solvent control), at 2260 μg/plate ca. 7%.
GENOTOXIC EFFECTS IN THE MAIN STUDY
- The test substance 2-Mercaptoethanol, sodium salt did not induce any significant increase in the number of revertants, with or without S9 mix, in any of the 5 strains tested.
- Negative and positive controls were valid.
- The high dose level decreased the number of revertants to ca. 50% of the solvent control in TA100 and TA102 (with and without MA), to ca. 70% in TA98 and TA1537 (with and without MA) in at least one out of 2 trials. - Endpoint:
- in vitro cytogenicity / chromosome aberration study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Additional information is available in the endpoint summaries and the read-across justification (see section 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- lymphocytes: human
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- not specified
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Result read-across source CAS No. 60-24-2
- Endpoint:
- in vitro gene mutation study in mammalian cells
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Justification for type of information:
- Additional information is available in the endpoint summaries and the read-across justification (see section 13).
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Key result
- Species / strain:
- mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells
- Metabolic activation:
- with and without
- Genotoxicity:
- negative
- Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
- no cytotoxicity
- Vehicle controls validity:
- valid
- Untreated negative controls validity:
- valid
- Positive controls validity:
- valid
- Remarks on result:
- other: Result read-across source CAS No. 60-24-2
Referenceopen allclose all
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Genetic toxicity in vivo
Endpoint conclusion
- Endpoint conclusion:
- no adverse effect observed (negative)
Additional information
In vitro:
In a study conducted according to the OECD TG 471 guidelines (SNEA, 1993) sodium 2-mercaptoethanolate did not induce reverse gene mutations in Salmonella typhimurium strains TA 98, TA 100, TA 102, TA 1535, and TA 1537 in the presence or absence of metabolic activation when tested up to cytotoxic concentrations (concentrations 125, 250, 1000, 2000 µg/plate).
Read across: 2 -Mercaptoethanol
No other studies regarding the genetic toxicity of sodium 2 -mercaptoethanolate were available. Therefore, data on the structural analogue 2 -mercaptoethanol (CAS: 60 -24 -2) has been used.
In vitro
Negative results with and without metabolic activation were also reported in mouse lymphoma L5178Y cells (similar to OECD 476) (Phillips Petroleum Company, 1982). In this test, concentrations used were 80, 120, 170, 240, 340, 500, 700 and 1000 µg/mL. In an in vitro chromosomal aberration test conducted according to the OECD TG 473 and following GLP, human lymphocytes were exposed to concentrations of 30, 100, 300, 1000, 3000 and 5000 µg/mL test substance. (CIT, 1996) Under the experimental conditions, 2-mercaptoethanol was negative with and without metabolic activation.
In vivo:
In a micronucleus assay according to the OECD TG 474 and following GLP, male and female mice were treated intraperitoneally with 50, 100, or 200 mg/kg bw 2-mercaptoethanol. Males of the high dose group showed a slight but statistically significant increase in the frequency of MPE; but data generated in the additional analysis (further 2000 polychromatic erythrocytes per animal evaluated) showed that there was no significant difference between males of the high dose group and the corresponding control. In none of the other treatment groups the number of micronucleated cells was significantly elevated. The high dose resulted in clinical signs of toxicity. In male mice of the mid and high dose group the ratio of polychromatic erythrocytes to normochromatic erythrocytes was significantly decreased indicating toxic effects in the bone marrow. Under the condition of this study the test substance did not induce damage to the chromosomes or the mitotic apparatus of mouse bone marrow cells (BASF, 2002).
Justification for classification or non-classification
Based on the available data, the substance is not classified for genetic toxicity according to the EU Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) Regulation (EC) No. 1272/2008.
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.