Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Acute Toxicity: dermal

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
acute toxicity: dermal
Type of information:
migrated information: read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
2 (reliable with restrictions)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
other: Information from published industry source (USEPA), limitations in design and/or reporting but otherwise adequate for assessment

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
publication
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1965
Report date:
1965

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
no guideline followed
Principles of method if other than guideline:
Two New-Zealand White rabbits per sex per dose group were exposed by occlusive dermal application to the test substance for 24 hours. During the observation period of 14 days, animals were examined for mortality, local reactions, and behavioral abnormalties.
GLP compliance:
no
Test type:
standard acute method
Limit test:
no

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane
EC Number:
213-668-5
EC Name:
1,1,1,3,3,3-hexamethyldisilazane
Cas Number:
999-97-3
Molecular formula:
C6H19NSi2
IUPAC Name:
1,1,1-trimethyl-N-(trimethylsilyl)silanamine
Details on test material:
- Name of test material (as cited in study report): Hexamethyldisilazane
- Molecular formula (if other than submission substance): C6H19NSi2

Test animals

Species:
rabbit
Strain:
New Zealand White
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
TEST ANIMALS
- Weight at study initiation: 2.5 kg
- Housing: individual, stainless steel cages
- Diet: ad libitum Wayne Rabbit Ration, Allied Mills, Chicago, Illinois
- Water: ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 7 days

Administration / exposure

Type of coverage:
occlusive
Vehicle:
unchanged (no vehicle)
Details on dermal exposure:
TEST SITE
- Area of exposure: back, shaved with electric clippers
- % coverage: 10% of the total body
- Type of wrap if used: impervious plastic sheet, secured with taped
Duration of exposure:
24 hours
Doses:
900, 1350, 2025, 3038 mg/kg
No. of animals per sex per dose:
2
Control animals:
no
Details on study design:
- Duration of observation period following administration: 14 days
- Necropsy of survivors performed: no
- Other examinations performed: clinical signs
Statistics:
To calculate the LD50 of the test material the techniques of Weil (Weil, Carrol S.: Tables for Convenient Calculation of Median-Effective Dose (LD50 or ED50) and Instructions in Their Use. Biometrics, Sept. 1952), Thompson (Thompson, William R.: Use of Moving Averages and Interpolation to Estimate Median-Effective Dose. Bact. Rev., Nov. 1947.), and Thompson and Weil (Thompson, William R. and Weil, Carrol S.: On the Construction of Tables for Moving Average Interpolation. Biometrics, March, 1952.) were used

Results and discussion

Effect levels
Sex:
male/female
Dose descriptor:
LD50
Effect level:
1 350 mg/kg bw
Based on:
test mat.
Remarks on result:
other: Standard deviation is ±158 mg/kg
Mortality:
- No mortality observed in animals exposed to 900 mg/kg
- 2 out of 4 animals died exposed to 1350 mg/kg, which occured 8 to 16 hours after exposure
- All animals exposed to 2025 or 3038 mg/kg died, which occured 3 to 8 hours after exposure
Clinical signs:
other: - Severe tremors and salivation were exhibited by all animals exposed to 2025 or 3038 mg/kg, starting at 10 minutes after exposure and continued until death. In addition, extreme erythema and edema were noted at the 2 hour point. - Moderate tremors and sa

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Interpretation of results:
harmful
Remarks:
Migrated information