Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Physical & Chemical properties

Vapour pressure

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Link to relevant study record(s)

Description of key information

Dreisch S & Franke J (2013), OECD 113, EU Method A.4, OECD 104, EPA OPPTS 830.7950, the vapour pressure of the test material was determined to be 0.0015, 0.0022 and 0.011 Pa at temperatures of 20, 25 and 50 °C, respectively.

Key value for chemical safety assessment

Vapour pressure:
0.002 Pa
at the temperature of:
25 °C

Additional information

In the key study (Dreisch & Franke, 2013), the thermal stability of the test material was determined in accordance with the standardised guideline OECD 113. Following investigation by Differential Scanning Calorimetry, an exothermic event was observed at temperatures between 160 and 220 °C with an energy of -50 J/g. Subsequently, the vapour pressure of the test material was determined in accordance with standardised guidelines EU Method A.4, OECD 104 and EPA OPPTS 830.7950 using the effusion (vapour pressure balance) method. Under the conditions of the study, the vapour pressure of the test material at temperatures of 20, 25 and 50 °C were determined to be 0.0015, 0.0022 and 0.011 Pa, respectively. A reliability score of 1 was assigned, in accordance with the criteria for assigning data quality in line with the principles described by Klimisch (1997).

 

Supporting information is available from Guide Chem (2012) which recorded the vapour pressure of the test material as 1.18E-16 mm Hg at 25°C. The method used has not been recorded. Since the data is taken from an abstract of an internet source with no reported methodology; it is not possible to assess the accuracy of the information. A reliability score of 4 was therefore assigned, in accordance with the criteria for assigning data quality in line with the principles described by Klimisch (1997).