Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 701-299-7 | CAS number: -
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
Administrative data
Link to relevant study record(s)
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 Sep. - 09 Oct. 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Novares L 100; CAS-no. 71302-83-5 (Hydrocarbons, C9- unsaturated, polymerized)
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: see Section 1.2 Composition
- Lot/batch No.: 24106
- Stability under test conditions: no measured data; based on chemical structure assumed to be stable
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, exclusion of light - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
- Details on sampling:
- - Samples for TOC-analysis: at 0 h and 72 h
- Measurements of the cell concentrations per mL: at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) were prepared by stirring various amounts of the test item in Alga-medium for 24 h with magnetic stirrers (open conditions). The WAFs were prepared in 2-L glass beakers. The beakers were equipped with a glass tube that allowed the separation of the water phase by siphoning.
The test loading rate of Novares TL 10 was weighed in a weighing scoop, that afterwards was placed into the glass beaker. The beakers were then filled with Alga-medium. Mixing was carried out at a speed that was slow enough not to cause dispersion or emulsification of the undissolved fraction of the test item. To ensure this, the vortex developed at the surface by stirring was set at ~ 10 % of the water depth.
After stirring for 24 h, the WAFs were allowed to stand for 1 h before use to facilitate phase separation. The extracts gained with this method were clear.
- Pre-conditioning: The test vessels of the Definite Alga-Test were rinsed with control media and WAFs for ca. 0.5 h before the definite start of the tests to facilitate adsorption of the test item to the glass walls of the beakers. Control media and WAFs were then discarded, and the test vessels were refilled again with control media and WAFs, respectively.
- Controls: without test material (blank; Alga medium)
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): none
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): no - Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: unicellular green alga
- Strain: : SAG 86.81
- Source: Albrecht von Haller Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften der Universität Göttingen
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): ca. 72 h [pre-culture: Incubation in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks at ± 25 °C on a shaker (80 - 120 rpm), ca. 72 h, ca. 10000 lux (Gro-Lux fluorescent tubes), permanent illumination]
- Method of cultivation: sterile on agar tubes (OECD-Medium, 0.8 % Agar), transferred to a new agar tube every 2 months - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- no data specified: compositions of stock solutions are reported
- Test temperature:
- 23.7 - 24.8 °C (25 ± 2°C)
- pH:
- initial (with algae): 8.0
final (with algae): 10.6 (control); 10.8 (100 mg/L) - Salinity:
- no data specified: compositions of stock solutions are reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Pre-test:
Time [h] Control 100 mg/L loading
==========================================
24 (stirring) 0.1 1.0 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
48 (stirring) 0.4 1.2 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
==========================================
Main test:
Time [h] Control 100 mg/L loading
==========================================
0 (48 h stirring) 0.6 0.8 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
72 0.5 0.9 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
==========================================
The TS-related TOC was = < 0.5 mg C/L for 100 mg TS/L, 95%-C.I. = 0.3 mg/L. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL-Erlenmeyer
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: approx. 5000 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: approx. 452900 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: reconstituted from deionised water and mineral stock solutions
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: permanent
- Light intensity and quality: approx. 10000 Lux (Gro-Lux fluorescent tubes)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable)
- Determination of cell concentrations: densitometrically at 525 nm (turbidity)
- Chlorophyll measurement: no
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: not applicable (limit test)
- Range finding study
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: based on results from daphnia test - Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- other: biomass and growth rate
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: no
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
Observations by microscopy at the end of the testing period of 72 h:
- Control: appearance of alga cells was normal, cell proliferations could be observed regularly.
- 100 mg/L: comparable to control - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- standard deviations, coefficient of variance
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1) Biomass in controls increased 90.6x in 72 h (nom. >= 16x). 2) Mean var-coeff. for section-spec. growth rates: 8.3% (nom. ≤ 35%). 3) Var-coeff. of av. spec. growth rates for the whole period in replicate controls: 2.5% (nom. value ≤ 7%).
- Conclusions:
- Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) of NOVARES L 100 caused no toxic effects on Desmodesmus subspicatus. A 72-h ErL50 and EyL50 of > 100 mg/L and a NOELR of 100 mg/L have been determined.
- Endpoint:
- toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Study period:
- 26 Sep. - 09 Oct. 2008
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- guideline study
- Qualifier:
- according to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 201 (Alga, Growth Inhibition Test)
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Specific details on test material used for the study:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): Novares TL 10; CAS-no. 71302-83-5 (Hydrocarbons, C9- unsaturated, polymerized)
- Composition of test material, percentage of components: see Section 1.2 Composition
- Lot/batch No.: 26697
- Stability under test conditions: no measured data; based on chemical structure assumed to be stable
- Storage condition of test material: room temperature, exclusion of light - Analytical monitoring:
- yes
- Remarks:
- determination of Total Organic Carbon (TOC)
- Details on sampling:
- - Samples for TOC-analysis: at 0 h and 72 h
- Measurements of the cell concentrations per mL: at 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h - Vehicle:
- no
- Details on test solutions:
- PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF TEST SOLUTION (especially for difficult test substances)
- Method: Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) were prepared by stirring various amounts of the test item in Alga-medium for 24 h with magnetic stirrers (open conditions). The WAFs were prepared in 2-L glass beakers. The beakers were equipped with a glass tube that allowed the separation of the water phase by siphoning.
The test loading rate of Novares TL 10 was weighed in a weighing scoop, that afterwards was placed into the glass beaker. The beakers were then filled with Alga-medium. Mixing was carried out at a speed that was slow enough not to cause dispersion or emulsification of the undissolved fraction of the test item. To ensure this, the vortex developed at the surface by stirring was set at ~ 10 % of the water depth.
After stirring for 24 h, the WAFs were allowed to stand for 1 h before use to facilitate phase separation. The extracts gained with this method were clear.
- Pre-conditioning: The test vessels of the Definite Alga-Test were rinsed with control media and WAFs for ca. 0.5 h before the definite start of the tests to facilitate adsorption of the test item to the glass walls of the beakers. Control media and WAFs were then discarded, and the test vessels were refilled again with control media and WAFs, respectively.
- Controls: without test material (blank; Alga medium)
- Chemical name of vehicle (organic solvent, emulsifier or dispersant): none
- Evidence of undissolved material (e.g. precipitate, surface film, etc): no - Test organisms (species):
- Desmodesmus subspicatus (previous name: Scenedesmus subspicatus)
- Details on test organisms:
- TEST ORGANISM
- Common name: unicellular green alga
- Strain: : SAG 86.81
- Source: Albrecht von Haller Institut für Pflanzenwissenschaften der Universität Göttingen
- Age of inoculum (at test initiation): ca. 72 h [pre-culture: Incubation in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks at ± 25 °C on a shaker (80 - 120 rpm), ca. 72 h, ca. 10000 lux (Gro-Lux fluorescent tubes), permanent illumination]
- Method of cultivation: sterile on agar tubes (OECD-Medium, 0.8 % Agar), transferred to a new agar tube every 2 months - Test type:
- static
- Water media type:
- freshwater
- Limit test:
- yes
- Total exposure duration:
- 72 h
- Hardness:
- no data specified: compositions of stock solutions are reproted
- Test temperature:
- 23.7 - 24.8 °C (25 ± 2°C)
- pH:
- initial (with algae): 8.0
final (with algae): 10.6 (control); 10.7 (100 mg/L) - Salinity:
- no data specified: Compositions of stock solutions are reported
- Nominal and measured concentrations:
- Pre-test:
Time [h] Control 100 mg/L loading
==========================================
24 (stirring) 0.3 0.2 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
48 (stirring) 0.2 0.2 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
==========================================
Main test:
Time [h] Control 100 mg/L loading
==========================================
0 (24 h stirring) 0.6 0.2 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
72 0.5 0.5 mg C/mL (TOC of WAFs)
==========================================
The TS-related TOC was indistiguishable from the blank control. - Details on test conditions:
- TEST SYSTEM
- Test vessel: 250 mL-Erlenmeyer
- Type (delete if not applicable): open
- Material, size, headspace, fill volume: 100 mL
- Aeration: no
- Initial cells density: approx. 5000 cells/mL
- Control end cells density: approx. 448000 cells/mL
- No. of vessels per concentration (replicates): 6
- No. of vessels per control (replicates): 6
GROWTH MEDIUM
- Standard medium used: yes
TEST MEDIUM / WATER PARAMETERS
- Source/preparation of dilution water: reconstituted from deionised water and mineral stock solutions
OTHER TEST CONDITIONS
- Sterile test conditions: no
- Adjustment of pH: no
- Photoperiod: permanent
- Light intensity and quality: approx. 10000 Lux (Gro-Lux fluorescent tubes)
EFFECT PARAMETERS MEASURED (with observation intervals if applicable)
- Determination of cell concentrations: densitometrically at 525 nm (turbidity)
- Chlorophyll measurement: no
TEST CONCENTRATIONS
- Spacing factor for test concentrations: not applicable (limit test)
- Range finding study
- Results used to determine the conditions for the definitive study: based on results from daphnia test - Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- growth rate
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- EL50
- Effect conc.:
- > 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Basis for effect:
- biomass
- Key result
- Duration:
- 72 h
- Dose descriptor:
- NOELR
- Effect conc.:
- 100 mg/L
- Nominal / measured:
- nominal
- Conc. based on:
- test mat.
- Remarks:
- (highest concentration tested)
- Basis for effect:
- other: biomass and growth rate
- Details on results:
- - Exponential growth in the control (for algal test): yes
- Any stimulation of growth found in any treatment: slightly from 48 - 72 h
- Any observations (e.g. precipitation) that might cause a difference between measured and nominal values: no
- Observation of abnormalities (for algal test):
Observations by microscopy at the end of the testing period of 72 h:
- Control: appearance of alga cells was normal, cell proliferations could be observed regularly.
- 100 mg/L: comparable to control - Reported statistics and error estimates:
- standard deviations, coefficient of variance
- Validity criteria fulfilled:
- yes
- Remarks:
- 1) Biomass in controls increased 90.6x in 72 h (nom. >= 16x). 2) Mean var-coeff. for section-spec. growth rates: 8.3% (nom. ≤ 35%). 3) Var-coeff. of av. spec. growth rates for the whole period in replicate controls: 2.5% (nom. value ≤ 7%).
- Conclusions:
- Water Accommodated Fractions (WAFs) of NOVARES TL 10 caused no toxic effects on Desmodesmus subspicatus. A 72-h ErL50 and EyL50 of > 100 mg/L and a NOELR of 100 mg/L have been determined.
Referenceopen allclose all
Growth rates are listed below, from 0 - 24, 24 - 48, and 48 - 72 h (Table 1) and average from 0 - 72 h (Table 2):
Table 1: Loading rates of the Test item, cells/mL in the test flasks at 24, 48 and 72 h with mean value,
section-by-section average specific growth rate [μ] during observation times 0-24 h, 24-48 h and 48-72 h,
mean value of the average specific growth rate [μ], standard deviation and coefficient of variation Vc [%],
inhibition [%] and mean value of inhibition of the average specific growth rate [%] during observation times 0-24 h, 24-48 h and 48-72 h (Rep. Tab. 4)
[Note: Negative inhibition means increased growth, apparently stimulation]
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Cells / mL Mean value |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
24 h |
||||||||
Control 1 |
18746 |
20380 |
1.32 |
1.40 |
0.09 |
6.28 |
||
Control 2 |
22015 |
1.48 |
||||||
Control 3 |
18746 |
1.32 |
||||||
Control 4 |
22015 |
1.48 |
||||||
Control 5 |
22015 |
1.48 |
||||||
Control 6 |
18746 |
1.32 |
||||||
100 |
22015 |
18215 |
1.48 |
1.29 |
0.13 |
10.40 |
-5.73 |
8.31 |
100 |
18746 |
1.32 |
5.73 |
|||||
100 |
15518 |
1.13 |
19.21 |
|||||
100 |
15518 |
1.13 |
19.21 |
|||||
100 |
18746 |
1.32 |
5.73 |
|||||
100 |
18746 |
1.32 |
5.73 |
|||||
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Cells / mL Mean value |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
48 h |
||||||||
Control 1 |
104379 |
92715 |
1.72 |
1.52 |
0.12 |
7.60 |
||
Control 2 |
100201 |
1.52 |
||||||
Control 3 |
83905 |
1.50 |
||||||
Control 4 |
87917 |
1.38 |
||||||
Control 5 |
91970 |
1.43 |
||||||
Control 6 |
87917 |
1.55 |
||||||
100 |
104379 |
96196 |
1.56 |
1.67 |
0.13 |
7.92 |
-2.71 |
-9.93 |
100 |
108598 |
1.76 |
-15.94 |
|||||
100 |
87917 |
1.73 |
-14.47 |
|||||
100 |
91970 |
1.78 |
-17.44 |
|||||
100 |
79934 |
1.45 |
4.29 |
|||||
100 |
104379 |
1.72 |
-13.32 |
|||||
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Cells / mL Mean value |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
72 h |
||||||||
Control 1 |
492359 |
452938 |
1.55 |
1.58 |
0.06 |
3.91 |
||
Control 2 |
535389 |
1.68 |
||||||
Control 3 |
423947 |
1.52 |
||||||
Control 4 |
430603 |
1.59 |
||||||
Control 5 |
444037 |
1.57 |
||||||
Control 6 |
391290 |
1.49 |
||||||
100 |
610409 |
507575 |
1.77 |
1.65 |
0.15 |
9.03 |
-11.51 |
-4.38 |
100 |
665380 |
1.81 |
-14.45 |
|||||
100 |
457637 |
1.65 |
-4.16 |
|||||
100 |
444037 |
1.57 |
0.60 |
|||||
100 |
444037 |
1.71 |
-8.26 |
|||||
100 |
423947 |
1.40 |
11.51 |
Table 2: Loading rate of the Test item, cells/mL in the test flasks at 72 h, average specific growth rate [μ] over the whole testing period 0-72 h,
mean value of the average specific growth rate [μ], standard deviation and coefficient of variation Vc [%],
inhibition [%] and mean value of inhibition [%] of the average specific growth rate [μ] (Rep. Tab. 5)
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
72 h |
|||||||
Control 1 |
492359 |
1.53 |
1.50 |
0.04 |
2.50 |
||
Control 2 |
535389 |
1.56 |
|||||
Control 3 |
423947 |
1.48 |
|||||
Control 4 |
430603 |
1.49 |
|||||
Control 5 |
444037 |
1.50 |
|||||
Control 6 |
391290 |
1.45 |
|||||
100 |
610409 |
1.60 |
1.53 |
0.06 |
4.17 |
-6.75 |
-2.29 |
100 |
665380 |
1.63 |
-8.66 |
||||
100 |
457637 |
1.51 |
-0.35 |
||||
100 |
444037 |
1.50 |
0.32 |
||||
100 |
444037 |
1.50 |
0.32 |
||||
100 |
423947 |
1.48 |
1.35 |
Growth rates are listed below, from 0 - 24, 24 - 48, and 48 - 72 h (Table 1) and average from 0 - 72 h (Table 2):
Table 1: Loading rates of the Test item, cells/mL in the test flasks at 24, 48 and 72 h with mean value,
section-by-section average specific growth rate [μ] during observation times 0-24 h, 24-48 h, and 48-72 h,
mean value of the average specific growth rate [μ], standard deviation and coefficient of variation Vc [%],
inhibition [%] and mean value of inhibition of the average specific growth rate [%] during observation times 0-24 h, 24-48 h and 48-72 h (Rep. Tab. 4)
[Note: Negative inhibition means increased growth, apparently stimulation]
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Cells / mL Mean value |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
24 h |
||||||||
Control 1 |
18746 |
20380 |
1.32 |
1.40 |
0.09 |
6.28 |
||
Control 2 |
22015 |
1.48 |
||||||
Control 3 |
18746 |
1.32 |
||||||
Control 4 |
22015 |
1.48 |
||||||
Control 5 |
22015 |
1.48 |
||||||
Control 6 |
18746 |
1.32 |
||||||
100 |
18746 |
19836 |
1.32 |
1.38 |
0.08 |
6.04 |
5.73 |
1.91 |
100 |
22015 |
1.48 |
-5.73 |
|||||
100 |
18746 |
1.32 |
5.73 |
|||||
100 |
22015 |
1.48 |
-5.73 |
|||||
100 |
18746 |
1.32 |
5.73 |
|||||
100 |
18746 |
1.32 |
5.73 |
|||||
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Cells / mL Mean value |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
48 h |
||||||||
Control 1 |
104379 |
92715 |
1.72 |
1.52 |
0.12 |
7.60 |
||
Control 2 |
100201 |
1.52 |
||||||
Control 3 |
83905 |
1.50 |
||||||
Control 4 |
87917 |
1.38 |
||||||
Control 5 |
91970 |
1.43 |
||||||
Control 6 |
87917 |
1.55 |
||||||
100 |
91970 |
92005 |
1.59 |
1.54 |
0.09 |
5.78 |
-4.97 |
-1.35 |
100 |
96065 |
1.47 |
2.76 |
|||||
100 |
87917 |
1.55 |
-2.00 |
|||||
100 |
91970 |
1.43 |
5.64 |
|||||
100 |
100201 |
1.68 |
-10.63 |
|||||
100 |
83905 |
1.50 |
1.09 |
|||||
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Cells / mL Mean value |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
72 h |
||||||||
Control 1 |
492359 |
452938 |
1.55 |
1.58 |
0.06 |
3.91 |
||
Control 2 |
535389 |
1.68 |
||||||
Control 3 |
423947 |
1.52 |
||||||
Control 4 |
430603 |
1.59 |
||||||
Control 5 |
444037 |
1.57 |
||||||
Control 6 |
391290 |
1.49 |
||||||
100 |
492359 |
548340 |
1.68 |
1.78 |
0.08 |
4.29 |
-5.93 |
-12.60 |
100 |
550063 |
1.75 |
-10.17 |
|||||
100 |
499428 |
1.74 |
-9.67 |
|||||
100 |
595075 |
1.87 |
-17.89 |
|||||
100 |
610409 |
1.81 |
-14.08 |
|||||
100 |
542705 |
1.87 |
-17.87 |
Table 2: Loading rate of the Test item, cells/mL in the test flasks at 72 h, average specific growth rate [μ] over the whole testing period 0-72 h,
mean value of the average specific growth rate [μ], standard deviation and coefficient of variation Vc [%],
inhibition [%] and mean value of inhibition [%] of the average specific growth rate [μ] (Rep. Tab. 5)
Loading rate [mg/L] |
Cells / mL |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] |
Average Specific growth rate [µ] Mean value |
Standard deviation |
Coefficient of variation Vc [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate [%] |
Inhibition of Average Specific growth rate Mean value [%] |
72 h |
|||||||
Control 1 |
492359 |
1.53 |
1.50 |
0.04 |
2.50 |
||
Control 2 |
535389 |
1.56 |
|||||
Control 3 |
423947 |
1.48 |
|||||
Control 4 |
430603 |
1.49 |
|||||
Control 5 |
444037 |
1.50 |
|||||
Control 6 |
391290 |
1.45 |
|||||
100 |
492359 |
1.53 |
1.56 |
0.03 |
1.87 |
-1.97 |
-4.29 |
100 |
550063 |
1.57 |
-4.44 |
||||
100 |
499428 |
1.53 |
-2.29 |
||||
100 |
595075 |
1.59 |
-6.18 |
||||
100 |
610409 |
1.60 |
-6.75 |
||||
100 |
542705 |
1.56 |
-4.14 |
Description of key information
Toxicity to aquatic algae was investigated in two studies (limit tests) using two different types/technical products of NAF-AO. At the limit concentration of 100 mg/L, no inhibitory effects on algal growth could be observed in either test. No data is available for marine water invertebrates.
Key value for chemical safety assessment
- EC10 or NOEC for freshwater algae:
- 100 mg/L
Additional information
Based on differences in the technical production process, different types of NAF-AO can be obtained. Two of this technical products (Novares L 100 and TL 10) were tested in toxicity tests with algae according to OECD TG 202 performed under GLP conditions. Concentrations reported for the aqueous test media relate to loadings.
The aquatic toxicity of NAF-AO is known to be low as observed in aquatic toxicity studies with other organisms. Therefore, the toxicity tests to aquatic algae were performed as limit tests. Both test materials did not adversely affect the growth of algae at the limit test concentration of 100 mg/L (NOELR 100 mg/L).
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.