Registration Dossier

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vivo

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vivo mammalian somatic cell study: cytogenicity / bone marrow chromosome aberration
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study
Justification for type of information:
Refer to the Category Approach Justification document provided in IUCLID6 Section 13.

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1995
Report date:
1995

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 475 (Mammalian Bone Marrow Chromosome Aberration Test)
Deviations:
no
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
chromosome aberration assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Reference substance name:
68891-38-3 (purity 27-29%)
IUPAC Name:
68891-38-3 (purity 27-29%)

Test animals

Species:
mouse
Strain:
CD-1
Sex:
male/female
Details on test animals or test system and environmental conditions:
According to Guideline.

Administration / exposure

Route of administration:
oral: gavage
Vehicle:
Distilled water
Duration of treatment / exposure:
n.a.
Frequency of treatment:
Once
Post exposure period:
test group: 10, 24 and 48 h
positive control: 26 h
Doses / concentrations
Remarks:
Doses / Concentrations:
0, 1000, 2000 mg/kg bw
Basis:
nominal conc.
No. of animals per sex per dose:
5
Control animals:
yes, concurrent vehicle
Positive control(s):
Cyclophosphamide (50 mg/kg bw)

Examinations

Tissues and cell types examined:
Femoral bone marrow cells
Details of tissue and slide preparation:
SAMPLING TIMES
test groups: 10, 24 and 48 h after treatment
positive control group: 26 h after treatment
Evaluation criteria:
According to Guideline.
Statistics:
Yes

Results and discussion

Test results
Sex:
male/female
Genotoxicity:
negative
Toxicity:
no effects
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Negative controls validity:
not examined
Positive controls validity:
valid

Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
negative