Registration Dossier
Registration Dossier
Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets
Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.
The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.
Diss Factsheets
Use of this information is subject to copyright laws and may require the permission of the owner of the information, as described in the ECHA Legal Notice.
EC number: 814-059-2 | CAS number: 68680-98-8
- Life Cycle description
- Uses advised against
- Endpoint summary
- Appearance / physical state / colour
- Melting point / freezing point
- Boiling point
- Density
- Particle size distribution (Granulometry)
- Vapour pressure
- Partition coefficient
- Water solubility
- Solubility in organic solvents / fat solubility
- Surface tension
- Flash point
- Auto flammability
- Flammability
- Explosiveness
- Oxidising properties
- Oxidation reduction potential
- Stability in organic solvents and identity of relevant degradation products
- Storage stability and reactivity towards container material
- Stability: thermal, sunlight, metals
- pH
- Dissociation constant
- Viscosity
- Additional physico-chemical information
- Additional physico-chemical properties of nanomaterials
- Nanomaterial agglomeration / aggregation
- Nanomaterial crystalline phase
- Nanomaterial crystallite and grain size
- Nanomaterial aspect ratio / shape
- Nanomaterial specific surface area
- Nanomaterial Zeta potential
- Nanomaterial surface chemistry
- Nanomaterial dustiness
- Nanomaterial porosity
- Nanomaterial pour density
- Nanomaterial photocatalytic activity
- Nanomaterial radical formation potential
- Nanomaterial catalytic activity
- Endpoint summary
- Stability
- Biodegradation
- Bioaccumulation
- Transport and distribution
- Environmental data
- Additional information on environmental fate and behaviour
- Ecotoxicological Summary
- Aquatic toxicity
- Endpoint summary
- Short-term toxicity to fish
- Long-term toxicity to fish
- Short-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Long-term toxicity to aquatic invertebrates
- Toxicity to aquatic algae and cyanobacteria
- Toxicity to aquatic plants other than algae
- Toxicity to microorganisms
- Endocrine disrupter testing in aquatic vertebrates – in vivo
- Toxicity to other aquatic organisms
- Sediment toxicity
- Terrestrial toxicity
- Biological effects monitoring
- Biotransformation and kinetics
- Additional ecotoxological information
- Toxicological Summary
- Toxicokinetics, metabolism and distribution
- Acute Toxicity
- Irritation / corrosion
- Sensitisation
- Repeated dose toxicity
- Genetic toxicity
- Carcinogenicity
- Toxicity to reproduction
- Specific investigations
- Exposure related observations in humans
- Toxic effects on livestock and pets
- Additional toxicological data
Skin sensitisation
Administrative data
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- experimental study
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: equivalent to current guidelines, according to GLP
Cross-reference
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- reference to same study
Reference
- Endpoint:
- skin sensitisation: in vivo (LLNA)
- Type of information:
- read-across from supporting substance (structural analogue or surrogate)
- Adequacy of study:
- key study
- Reliability:
- 1 (reliable without restriction)
- Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
- other: equivalent to current guidelines, according to GLP
- Justification for type of information:
- See read-across justification attached in section 13.2
- Reason / purpose for cross-reference:
- read-across source
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- alternative parameters used
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/JICO
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 19.5 g - 25.0 g
- Housing: single housed
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 15 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12 - Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration:
- 10, 30, and 60 %
- No. of animals per dose:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- - Criteria used to consider a positive response:
lf a test substance does not show a statistically significant increase in ceII count and/or lymph node weight as compared to the vehicle control in the presence of statistically significantly increased ear weights as indication of skin irritation, it is considered not to be a sensitizer.
lf at least one concentration tested causes a concentration dependent statistically significant increase in cell count and/or lymph node weight without being accompanied by a statistically significant increase in ear weight, the test substance is considered to be a sensitizer.
lf statistically significant increases in ear weights are running in parallel to the increase in ceII count and/or lymph node weight, it cannot be ruled out, that the lymph node response was caused by irritation and not by skin sensitization. Then, for identification of the relevance of the statistical evaluation, a comparison of the results of the present test to appropriate historical control values is performed. lt one or a combination of the measured parameters change statistical significance, evaluation on basis of the criteria described above may be possible. lf the statistical comparison with
the historical control does not yield results useful tor evaluation, further investigations may be necessary to differentiate between irritation and sensitization response.
lf a test substance does not elicit a statistical significant increase in lymph node weight and/or cell count but shows a clear concentration related increase in response, further investigating of the sensitization potential at higher concentrations would be considered. - Positive control substance(s):
- other: Historical control: Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
- Statistics:
- WILCOXON-test
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- untreated
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Lymphnode weight Index: untreated: 0.89 Cell count index: untreated: 0.89 Ear weight index: untreated: 0.97
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- vehicle
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: vehicle: 1 Cell count index: vehicle: 1 Ear weight index: vehicle: 1
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: 10% TS: 0.95 Cell count index: 10% TS: 1.05 Ear weight index: 10% TS: 1.06
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- 30 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: 30% TS: 0.87 Cell count index: 30% TS: 0.92 Ear weight index: 30% TS: 1.08* *for p<=0.05
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- 60 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: 60% TS: 0.76 Cell count index: 60% TS: 0.88 Ear weight index: 60% TS: 1.04
No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed.
Data source
Reference
- Reference Type:
- study report
- Title:
- Unnamed
- Report date:
- 2004
Materials and methods
Test guideline
- Qualifier:
- equivalent or similar to guideline
- Guideline:
- OECD Guideline 429 (Skin Sensitisation: Local Lymph Node Assay)
- Deviations:
- yes
- Remarks:
- alternative parameters used
- GLP compliance:
- yes (incl. QA statement)
- Type of study:
- mouse local lymph node assay (LLNA)
Test material
- Reference substance name:
- Nonane-1,9-diol
- EC Number:
- 223-517-5
- EC Name:
- Nonane-1,9-diol
- Cas Number:
- 3937-56-2
- Molecular formula:
- C9H20O2
- IUPAC Name:
- nonane-1,9-diol
- Details on test material:
- - Name of test material (as cited in study report): 1,9-Nonandiol
- Physical state: Crystalline / white at room temperature; Liquid / white after heating at about 80 - 100°C
- Analytical purity: 98.8 cor. area%
- Lot/batch No.: 42638
- Stability under test conditions: The stability under storage conditions was confirmed by reanalysis.
- Storage condition of test material: Room temperature, exclusion of oxygen (storage under nitrogen)
Constituent 1
In vivo test system
Test animals
- Species:
- mouse
- Strain:
- other: CBA/JICO
- Sex:
- female
- Details on test animals and environmental conditions:
- TEST ANIMALS
- Source: Charles River Deutschland GmbH
- Age at study initiation: 9 weeks
- Weight at study initiation: 19.5 g - 25.0 g
- Housing: single housed
- Diet (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Water (e.g. ad libitum): ad libitum
- Acclimation period: 15 days
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS
- Temperature (°C): 20-24 °C
- Humidity (%): 30-70 %
- Photoperiod (hrs dark / hrs light): 12/12
Study design: in vivo (LLNA)
- Vehicle:
- propylene glycol
- Concentration:
- 10, 30, and 60 %
- No. of animals per dose:
- 6
- Details on study design:
- - Criteria used to consider a positive response:
lf a test substance does not show a statistically significant increase in ceII count and/or lymph node weight as compared to the vehicle control in the presence of statistically significantly increased ear weights as indication of skin irritation, it is considered not to be a sensitizer.
lf at least one concentration tested causes a concentration dependent statistically significant increase in cell count and/or lymph node weight without being accompanied by a statistically significant increase in ear weight, the test substance is considered to be a sensitizer.
lf statistically significant increases in ear weights are running in parallel to the increase in ceII count and/or lymph node weight, it cannot be ruled out, that the lymph node response was caused by irritation and not by skin sensitization. Then, for identification of the relevance of the statistical evaluation, a comparison of the results of the present test to appropriate historical control values is performed. lt one or a combination of the measured parameters change statistical significance, evaluation on basis of the criteria described above may be possible. lf the statistical comparison with
the historical control does not yield results useful tor evaluation, further investigations may be necessary to differentiate between irritation and sensitization response.
lf a test substance does not elicit a statistical significant increase in lymph node weight and/or cell count but shows a clear concentration related increase in response, further investigating of the sensitization potential at higher concentrations would be considered. - Positive control substance(s):
- other: Historical control: Alpha-Hexylcinnamaldehyde
- Statistics:
- WILCOXON-test
Results and discussion
In vivo (LLNA)
Resultsopen allclose all
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- untreated
- Remarks on result:
- other: see Remark
- Remarks:
- Lymphnode weight Index: untreated: 0.89 Cell count index: untreated: 0.89 Ear weight index: untreated: 0.97 Lymphnode weight Index: untreated: 0.89 Cell count index: untreated: 0.89 Ear weight index: untreated: 0.97
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- vehicle
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: vehicle: 1 Cell count index: vehicle: 1 Ear weight index: vehicle: 1
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- 10 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: 10% TS: 0.95 Cell count index: 10% TS: 1.05 Ear weight index: 10% TS: 1.06
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- 30 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: 30% TS: 0.87 Cell count index: 30% TS: 0.92 Ear weight index: 30% TS: 1.08* *for p<=0.05
- Parameter:
- SI
- Test group / Remarks:
- 60 %
- Remarks on result:
- other: Lymphnode weight Index: 60% TS: 0.76 Cell count index: 60% TS: 0.88 Ear weight index: 60% TS: 1.04
Any other information on results incl. tables
No signs of systemic toxicity were noticed.
Applicant's summary and conclusion
Information on Registered Substances comes from registration dossiers which have been assigned a registration number. The assignment of a registration number does however not guarantee that the information in the dossier is correct or that the dossier is compliant with Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (the REACH Regulation). This information has not been reviewed or verified by the Agency or any other authority. The content is subject to change without prior notice.
Reproduction or further distribution of this information may be subject to copyright protection. Use of the information without obtaining the permission from the owner(s) of the respective information might violate the rights of the owner.