Registration Dossier

Data platform availability banner - registered substances factsheets

Please be aware that this old REACH registration data factsheet is no longer maintained; it remains frozen as of 19th May 2023.

The new ECHA CHEM database has been released by ECHA, and it now contains all REACH registration data. There are more details on the transition of ECHA's published data to ECHA CHEM here.

Diss Factsheets

Toxicological information

Genetic toxicity: in vitro

Currently viewing:

Administrative data

Endpoint:
in vitro gene mutation study in bacteria
Type of information:
experimental study
Adequacy of study:
key study
Study period:
1999
Reliability:
1 (reliable without restriction)
Rationale for reliability incl. deficiencies:
guideline study

Data source

Reference
Reference Type:
study report
Title:
Unnamed
Year:
1999
Report date:
1999

Materials and methods

Test guideline
Qualifier:
according to guideline
Guideline:
OECD Guideline 471 (Bacterial Reverse Mutation Assay)
Version / remarks:
adopted 21 July 1997
GLP compliance:
yes
Type of assay:
bacterial reverse mutation assay

Test material

Constituent 1
Chemical structure
Reference substance name:
(2-hydroxypropyl)trimethylammonium formate
EC Number:
263-503-6
EC Name:
(2-hydroxypropyl)trimethylammonium formate
Cas Number:
62314-25-4
Molecular formula:
C6H16NO.CHO2
IUPAC Name:
(2-hydroxypropyl)trimethylammonium formate
Test material form:
liquid: viscous
Specific details on test material used for the study:
SOURCE OF TEST MATERIAL
- Source and lot/batch number of test material: Air Product & Chemicals, Inc- Corporate Toxicology Dept. / EHS, Allentown/790K13950
- Purity: 100%

STABILITY AND STORAGE CONDITIONS OF TEST MATERIAL
- Storage condition of test material: Cool, Dry, Ventilated Storage
- Stability under storage conditions: Stable
- Stability under test conditions: Stable
TREATMENT OF TEST MATERIAL PRIOR TO TESTING
- Final dilution: All strains were treated with the test substance at a concentration of 10 mg/ plate, since the test substance, based upon the results of the Range Finding Study, did not show toxicity at this concentration.

Method

Target gene:
his-, trp-
Species / strain
Species / strain / cell type:
S. typhimurium TA 1535, TA 1537, TA 98, TA 100 and E. coli WP2
Additional strain / cell type characteristics:
other: Other phenotypic characteristics were verfied by using crystal violet sensitivity and resistance to ampicillin and tetracycline methods
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Metabolic activation system:
Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: post-mitochondrial S9 fraction of rat liver homogenate obtained from Aroclor 1254 treated Sprague Dawley rats
- method of preparation of S9 mix: the S9 activation system, prepared fresh on the day of the assay and kept refrigerated or on ice, contained the following per 10 mL:
0.4 M MgC12/1.65M KCL 0.20 mL
1 M glucose-6-phosphate 0.05 mL
0.1 M NADP 0.40 mL
0.2 M phosphate buffer Type and composition of metabolic activation system:
- source of S9: post-mitochondrial S9 fraction of rat liver homogenate obtained from Aroclor 1254 treated Sprague Dawley rats
- method of preparation of S9 mix: the S9 activation system, prepared fresh on the day of the assay and kept refrigerated or on ice, contained the following per 10 mL:
0.4 M MgC12/1.65M KCL 0.20 mL
1 M glucose-6-phosphate 0.05 mL
0.1 M NADP 0.40 mL
0.2 M phosphate buffer pH=7.4 5.00 mL
USP Water for Injection 3.35 mL
S9 Fraction 1.00 mL

Test concentrations with justification for top dose:
All strains were treated with the test substance at a concentration of 10 mg/plate, since the
test substance, based upon the results of the Range Finding Study, did not show toxicity at
this concentration.
Vehicle / solvent:
NaCl
Controlsopen allclose all
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
N-ethyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine
Remarks:
E.coli WP2 (20 Mg/mL) without metabolic activation
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
9-aminoacridine
Remarks:
Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 (800 µg/mL) without metabolic activation.
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
sodium azide
Remarks:
Salmonella typhimurium TA100 (100 µg/mL); Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 (5 µg/mL) without metabolic activation
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
2-nitrofluorene
Remarks:
Salmonella typhimurium TA98 (10 µg/mL), without metabolic activation
Negative solvent / vehicle controls:
yes
Positive controls:
yes
Positive control substance:
other: 2-Aminoanthracene
Remarks:
Salmonella typhimurium TA98 (5 µg/mL); Salmonella typhimurium TA100 (10 µg/mL); Salmonella typhimurium TA1535 (20 µg/mL); Salmonella typhimurium TA1537 (30 µg/mL); E. coli WP2 (200 µg/mL) with metabolic activation
Details on test system and experimental conditions:
NUMBER OF REPLICATIONS:
- Number of cultures per concentration: triplicate
- Number of independent experiments: two

METHOD OF TREATMENT/ EXPOSURE:
- Cell density at seeding (if applicable): Plates were incubated at 37±2°C for 72 or 48 hours, checked for uniform background lawns, and revertant colonies counted.
- Test substance was administered in agar (plate incorporation)

TREATMENT AND HARVEST SCHEDULE:
- Exposure duration/duration of treatment: Plates were incubated at 37±2°C for 72 or 48 hours, checked for uniform background lawns, and revertant colonies counted.

Evaluation criteria:
The test results were analyzed using a statistical program such as Tallarida, R. S. and R.B. Murray's Pharmacological Calculations Procedure, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Newman-Keuls Test for confirmation of pairwise comparisons. The statistical method was determined if there was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in the mutation frequency of the test substance compared to the negative control substance. The results obtained for the mutation frequency at the various dose levels (wherever applicable) were analyzed by the method of Linear Regression using a program such as "Linear Regression I" by R.J. Tallarida and R.B. Murray, (Manual of Pharmacologic Calculations with Computer Programs, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1986, pp 10-13). This determined if there was a positive dose response.
Statistics:
Statistical analysis performed are : analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Newman-Keuls Test for confirmation of pairwise comparisons.

Results and discussion

Test resultsopen allclose all
Key result
Species / strain:
E. coli WP2
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1537
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 1535
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 98
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Key result
Species / strain:
S. typhimurium TA 100
Metabolic activation:
with and without
Genotoxicity:
negative
Cytotoxicity / choice of top concentrations:
no cytotoxicity
Vehicle controls validity:
valid
Positive controls validity:
valid
Additional information on results:
RANGE-FINDING/SCREENING STUDIES (if applicable):
No toxicity was observed with the test article in the Range Finding Assay
STUDY RESULTS
- Concurrent vehicle negative and positive control data:
All positive controls exhibited a statistically significant increase in the number of mutants as
compared to the corresponding negative control, demonstrating that the test system was
functional with known mutagens.

Any other information on results incl. tables

Table 4. Confirmatory test Reverse Mutation Assay without Microsomal Activation














































Strain



Controls



Test Article



Positive Control



Negative Control



Dose Level 10 mg/plate



TA 98



135.3 ± 9.3



27.0 ± 7.0



25.7 ± 3.5



TA 100



502.0± 52.4



109.3 ± 17.4



109.0 ± 7.8



TA 1535



117.0 ± 30.1



24.7 ± 11.6



16.7 ± 2.3



TA 1537



146.3 ± 18.3



10.7 ± 2.5



7.7 ± 2.1



WP2



394.7 ± 10.3



130.7 ± 6.1



123.0 ± 4.4



Table 3. Confirmatory test Reverse Mutation Assay with Microsomal Activation














































Strain



Controls



Test Article



Positive Control



Negative Control



Dose Level



TA 98



137.3 ± 26.0



27.3 ± 9.1



33.3 ± 5.9



TA 100



440± 85.0



121.3 ± 10.5



107.3 ± 19.3



TA 1535



144 ± 9.9



18.3 ± 3.8



17.3 ± 5.1



TA 1537



152 ± 24.5



14.0 ± 4.6



9.7 ± 1.5



WP2



428.7 ± 2.9



129.3 ± 4.0



124.7 ± 5.7



 


 


Table 2. Reverse Mutation Assay without Microsomal Activation














































Strain



Controls



Test Article



Positive Control



Negative Control



Dose Level



TA 98



135.3 ± 9.3



27.0 ± 7.0



20.7 ± 2.5



TA 100



502.0± 52.4



109.3 ± 17.4



100.7 ± 11.09



TA 1535



117.0 ± 30.1



24.7 ± 11.6



20.3 ± 7.4



TA 1537



146.3 ± 18.3



10.7 ± 2.5



11.7 ± 3.5



WP2



394.7 ± 10.3



130.7 ± 6.1



133.0 ± 4.6



Table 1. Reverse Mutation Assay with Microsomal Activation














































Strain



Controls



Test Article



Positive Control



Negative Control



Dose Level



TA 98



137.3 ± 26.0



27.3 ± 9.1



31.7 ± 7.1



TA 100



440± 85.0



121.3 ± 10.5



122.3 ± 26.0



TA 1535



144 ± 9.9



18.3 ± 3.8



16.0 ± 4.6



TA 1537



152 ± 24.5



14.0 ± 4.6



10.3 ± 4.9



WP2



428.7 ± 2.9



129.3 ± 4.0



126.7 ± 3.5


Applicant's summary and conclusion

Conclusions:
The Salmonella typhimurium and Escherichia coli Reverse Mutation Assay (Ames Assay) evaluated the potential of the test substance, Hydroxypropyl, 2-, trimethylammonium formate, to induce histidine (his)reversion (his- to his+) and tryptophan (tryp) reversion (tryp- to tryp+) in the genomes of these respective organisms. This direct plate incorporation assay was conducted with four strains of Salmonella typhimurium (S. typhimurium) and one strain of Escherichia coli (E. coli) in the presence and absence of an exogenous mammalian activation system. A confirmatory assay was performed in order to verify the results of the Reverse Mutation Assay. Based on the criteria of the study protocol, the test substance is considered non-mutagenic